We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Cassandra of Troy • 8 years ago

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Nick Naylor • 8 years ago

No wonder Scott Walker is one of David Koch's favorite "investments".

http://www.nytimes.com/poli...

ohpaleasegivemeabreak • 8 years ago

That corrupt judge - the one who once ordered all evidence that had been gathered to be DESTROYED - will be certain that Scooty slides on this one.

The corruption runs deep in Wisconsin.

They are doomed if they do not put Walker in Prison.

ProgressiveOldMan • 8 years ago

We are doomed if this corrupt clown is elected President!

CoolCMo • 8 years ago

Rick Santorum has approximately the same odds of being elected Pope as Scott Walker has of being elected President of the United States.

Michael Valentine • 8 years ago

Googling Santorum now .....

Matt Trudgeon • 8 years ago

I might advise against that....at least check out the urban dictionary definition first.

Michael Valentine • 8 years ago

Too late!

Irishfive • 8 years ago

Judge Randa, who ordered those documents destroyed, is married to a woman who donated to Scott Walker. His judical assistant is married to a lawyer who is key to Walker's campaign. Plus Randa has enjoyed the largese of the Kochs. But hey, nothing snarky going on here.

Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago
Union Lacktivist • 8 years ago

Of course not. But conservatives do not abuse the courts and legal system like liberals have chosen to do.

Guest • 8 years ago
Kyle • 8 years ago

OMG you are delusional, all studies of this election point to W. as the justifiable winner; if only the same could be said of Al Franken

Color me Covfefe • 8 years ago

'All studies'? Pray tell, which studies are those?

Do you mean the one by the consortium of ten? That found:

...a statewide tally would have resulted in Gore emerging as the victor by 60 to 171 votes, if the official vote-counting standards had not rejected ballots containing overvotes (where a voter marks a candidate's name and also writes it in).

so people wanting to make sure that their vote was unequivocal, ended up having their vote discarded, even though their meaning was absolutely clear.

Supreme court justice Scalia eventually ruled the election complete because "counting every legally cast vote can constitute irreparable harm." to GW Bush.

The counting of votes that are of questionable legality does, in my view, threaten irreparable harm to petitioner Bush, and to the country, by casting a cloud upon what he claims to be the legitimacy of his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires.
NikZak • 8 years ago

Ha!! That's the funniest thing I've seen in weeks! Let's see, Bush hasn't been in office for 6-7 years, yet here's the OBAMA administration, finally prosecuting the architects of the greatest financial scheme and devastation that this country has seen in past 50 years!

jacobjg • 8 years ago

Get competent professional help. Really.

Guest • 8 years ago
jacobjg • 8 years ago

Walker 2016 in prison?

wifather2000 • 8 years ago

Half witt bootlickers=non union

Connie Freise • 8 years ago

thats laughable!

MantisDragon91 • 8 years ago

Remind us how Bush became president in 2000 despite losing both the popular vote and the recount in Florida?

Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago

God hates us all.

Budjob • 8 years ago

Lacktivist,It is apparent that the intelligence part of your gray matter ran down your Momma's leg!

Paylo • 8 years ago

HAhahahahahahahahah! Wow. Proof, please.

Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago
Raven • 8 years ago

How much is the Fox Network paying you per comment?

Just asking.

Guest • 8 years ago
Raven • 8 years ago

"Sorry but I don't watch Fox ."

I didn't ask whether you watched it.

I asked what it paid you.

And I notice that you've avoided answering. So.....

Guest • 8 years ago
Raven • 8 years ago

No, I think the Fox Network (and/or other rightwing blogtroll funders) might conceivably pay me NOT to post my opinions, but on the other side there just isn't any bankrolling of astroturf commenters. Why? Perhaps because there are so many real grassroots commenters, no fakes are needed; perhaps just because rightwing moguls outnumber (and outwealth) leftwing moguls.

Guest • 8 years ago
Raven • 8 years ago

Walker2016: "you mean your lies"

Nah, lies they could simply rebut and that would be a triumph for them.

The real irritant to them is the plain obvious truth, because that can't be rebutted, refuted, disproved, or even hidden forever if people keep talking about it — witness their continually failed attempt to conceal the climatic effects of pollution, even forbidding government employees to speak or write the term "climate change", and now defunding NASA's budget to so much as look at the Earth from space.

So you see, their tactic is to stop people from talking about the truth.

Guest • 8 years ago
Raven • 8 years ago

Walker2016: "you are joking I see."

No joke, follow the links to Newsweek: Scott Walker's own Wisconsin government has forbidden its employees from using the term "climate change", following Rick Scott's Florida government in that policy.

Is it just something about people named "Scott"?

boomergran • 8 years ago

Funny, I have a good friend who is a lifelong resident of WI and she has also followed the "Walker issue" since the beginning. She's appalled at how he's ruined a once-great state. You should be, too. You'll soon be right down there with FL and TX.

Guest • 8 years ago
Guest • 8 years ago

BS!

You'd love to see the economy tank under president Obama.

Guest • 8 years ago
boomergran • 8 years ago

You're hilarious. The unions have lost nearly all their power and you still drink Walker's kool-aid. You need to study your history.

Connie Freise • 8 years ago

Seems to be REALLY big problem for the "right"!

Guest • 8 years ago
Joseph • 8 years ago

Don't takeit hard. YOUR State elet4ed him and then voted down his recall. I just backed out of dealtob y some acreage on a nice lake becasueof the uncertainty taht the stae will be ableto keep it nice lake once they allow unregulated mining. No thanks. I'm putting my money in a state with some brains. Minnesota comes to mind but I'm thinking more about Canada.

wifather2000 • 8 years ago

Name your "facts" that would defend Scatt Wanker and the Madison Tea BaKKKer's Wisconsin destroying actions.

Guest • 8 years ago