We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Leonie Pipe • 5 years ago

The New York Times typifies the blatant propaganda and biased opinionated reporting filtered through the left-wing lens that is trussed up as "news" in MSM all over the world. This is why so many of us turn to alternative news sources. It also explains why the powers-that-be want to curtail our external news sources so that we are fed only the rubbish diet of the MSM. They want us to believe that only muzzies are good, everyone else is bad, and the Jews deserve to be wiped off the face of the Earth. Well done CAMERA!

NutalieDumsom • 5 years ago

Amen

Nart • 5 years ago

We need another one of these for the BBC and the Guardian in the UK.

Peter Cohen • 5 years ago

I will say this. The Guardian's film reviews are some of the best in the World. Won't read any other part of the paper.

Dave Kaplan • 5 years ago

The same odd situation prevails in all the leftist-rag-newspapers of the world. Great food and culture articles, rabid anti-Western "news articles". Go figure. Somebody should do their PHD thesis on this one.

George Parker • 4 years ago

The leftist corruption starts in the schools and universities. Then infests all influential strata of our societies.

Eliyahu100 • 5 years ago

What you should do is learn Italian and read LaStampa, LaRepubblica, Il Corriere della Sera or Il Foglio. But of course the powers that be in the USA do not want people to learn foreign languages.

Paul • 5 years ago

To read their reviews would you have to subscribe? And if you do, you are helping them!

jegwe • 5 years ago

However, in the UK, such signs would probably fall foul of tort laws.

mikeatkron • 5 years ago

However in the U.S., under N.Y. Times v. Sullivan, the truth of the matter is a defense to charges of defamation. The N.Y. Times must be choking on its 1964 precedent! It has no defense to fomenting antisemitism!

Chervin Daniel • 5 years ago

waste of ink...

ALWK • 5 years ago

Bless you CAMERA! I hope New Yorkers take the time to get the full meaning of the billboard. NYT never had much of a moral compass. Sadly, I don’t hold much hope its staff will grow a conscience and become responsible journalists.

Selma Prager • 5 years ago

That kind of biased reporting is why I gave up my subscription to the NY Times after many years.

Normando782 • 5 years ago

I understand that CNN has banned Alan Dershowitz for 6 months because he is telling it how it is rather than spewing CNN political propoganda. Not only is there fake news , now there is banning news that they do not wnt us to know about.

Peter Cohen • 5 years ago

Instead they feed us Christiane Amanpour who looks likes a camel and who recycles the boring boutique Leftism that is total BS. Amanpour fashions herself 'a woman of the world' when she is
a biased ignoramus. Having a faux Jewish husband sadly helps her cause.

Maurice H • 5 years ago

She is an Iranian no less. For years under the Shah the populace was pro-Jewish and Israel. This is the result of the Mullahs gaining power. Thank you all you Liberals!

Guest • 5 years ago
Michael Woland • 5 years ago

For the American Jews like this one Mr. Prager and Rabbi Telushkin have developed the perfect term - "not Jewish Jews". Unfortunately those erev rav sick people brought a lot of terrible antisemitit's acts that are killing the "tikun ha olam" commandment.

Maurice H • 5 years ago

He is on FOX. He is not doing so bad!

Eliyahu100 • 5 years ago

Yes, what is omitted or not reported by the NYT and other press outlets may be worse than their explicit lies and distortions. But the phenomenon of leaving out what is important goes way back. It is not new.

BonniePrinceCharlie • 5 years ago

NYT along with CNN, WaPo, NBC, ABC and other members of the Alt-Left/Alt-Lib MSM have become simply the mouthpieces for the Democrats, the anti-Trumpers, Israel-haters and assorted antisemites.

Are their 'journalists' not aware that the clearly stated objectives of the 'Palestinian' leadership - represented largely by Hamas and the PA and supported by Iran - is the total obliteration of the State of Israel and the extermination of Jews worldwide? Do they understand what the mantra 'Palestine from the river to the sea' really means for the State of Israel?

Do they support these objectives but lack the guts to come out and say so? Or do they prefer to provide their support through simply ignoring the atrocities that the 'Palestinian' leadership perpetrates on its own citizens and the citizens of Israel?

Do they support the PA's policy of encouraging terrorism by providing stipends for terrorists and their families from international aid funds whilst whining and moaning that their people are starving and lack medical facilities? Do they support the assumed right of the 'Palestinian' leadership to steal funds for their own personal use, to live in luxury and then complain about the conditions under which their citizens have to live?

If not, why do they stay silent on these matters? Perhaps it's because it's easier to simply parrot 'Palestinian' propaganda and produce Fake News? Or perhaps they really do hate Israel and Jews for one reason or another? Or perhaps they're just too ignorant? Who knows?

So well done, CAMERA. I hope you have access to the funding that will allow you to sustain and expand your campaign against NYT and its Alt-Left/Alt-Lib fellow-travellers.

Arowolo Seyi • 5 years ago

I wish they can read this post and probably get their eyes open to the bias they perpetuate. Seems some of them do it ignorantly.

Ezratei • 5 years ago

They are not ignorant. They know exactly what they're doing. During the holocaust. they did not even report about the death of the Jews in Europe except on page 20 with a small article. Nor did they report about the extermination of the Ukrainian people by the Russian monster Communists under the regime of Stalin. The paper is owned by Jews who have an agenda and the agenda is to placate the Gentile by not being too Jewish or promoting things that are antiJewish. May Salzburger rot in hell. Many Jews could have been saved were it not for newspapers like The New York Times.

Eliyahu100 • 5 years ago

the present generation of Sulzbergers are not Jewish AFAIK

Paul • 5 years ago

Owned by Irish too and mtfg muslime scum.

Michael Woland • 5 years ago

Again, those are "not Jewish Jews" as it was defined by Mr. Prager and Rabbi Telushkin in their excellent book "Why the Jews? The reason for Antisemitizm".

Barry • 5 years ago

How is this any different than yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre?

Peter Cohen • 5 years ago

Because sometimes there really is a fire and no one realizes it.

Paul • 5 years ago

Well said!

ProclaimLiberty • 5 years ago

Where's the theater; and where's the fire, Barry? Do you think this billboard will influence Hamas to be any worse than it is already? Do you think it might inspire NY-ers to make incendiaries out of the newspaper?

mikeatkron • 5 years ago

The phrase is "FALSELY" shouting fire in a crowded theater. If the theater was actually on fire, somebody should definitely shout fire!

herbcaen • 5 years ago

New York Times is the paper of record of Amalek

Michael Woland • 5 years ago

Amen

lesrun5k • 5 years ago

Nicely done,how about several mounted around the Useless Nations ?

skier69 • 5 years ago

Awesome Billboard. I am thrilled somebody out there would post this to let people know about the bigotry of the New York Times and the heinous crimes that are happening against Israel . Hamas must be defeated

Daniel Indyk • 5 years ago

By having lower expectations for Arabs, the NYT is being explicitly racist against Arabs. Shame on you.

Ernst Goldman • 5 years ago

bigotry of lower expectations. So typical of the left.

Albert Ezekiel • 5 years ago

The best thing to do after the next rocket from GAZA lands in Israel is to take fight to them and obliterate once and for all times. So no more rockets from there and no more false reports from the NEW YORK TIMES and their acolytes. We need to remind them that we are at WAR and this is WAR.

Fred • 5 years ago

I always maintained the Idea that New York Sturmer is a true follower of Hitlers DER Sturmer virulent anti Jewish /anti Israel paper with hateful biased coverage that would make Julius Streicher & Hitler jump for joy in the fire of hell. Why do they hate Israel & Jews is a mystery ???

Maurice H • 5 years ago

Didn't that ex employee who was Jewish condemn the editor for being anti-semetic and anti-Israel? Jews have made it while Blacks have for the most part not. They can't deal with it.

Fred • 5 years ago

I have been trough the gruesome time of 1939-45 ,thought of it an aberration of history never thought after millions have been murdered in a gruesome way that some would like the periods of hate back again. How perverse can human kind be....

Diamondgirl • 5 years ago

I'm so glad that NYT and others are being called out for their biased behavior towards Israel and that many Jews aren't standing for this non-sense anymore. If only the Liberal ones would wake up and realize who
are the true enemies of the Jews and stop voting and behaving as they have been for far too long.

18_18 • 5 years ago

Thank you Andrea and the Camera organization for your efforts.

Harold Taback • 5 years ago

And there are even some Jews working for the New York Slimes ! Quislings.

Peter Cohen • 5 years ago

Roger Cohen, Paul Krugman, Thomas Friedman, yadda, yadda, yadda, yadda...………..the ONLY NYT writer of great merit is David Brooks.

Sam Cohen • 5 years ago

and jews still buy this anti semitic leftist newspaper called the new york times.why? self hate?

Paul • 5 years ago

I don't!

Selma Prager • 5 years ago

Not me any more I gave up my subscription after many years. I sent them a very strong email telling them why.

Ernst Goldman • 5 years ago

The New York Times does the same what John Heinz Kerry did. They and their likes basically goad palestinians to riotting and violence by responding to every Israel policy course with phony concern that pals would reject and riot in response to it. I recall in the beginning of Oslo process when buses in Tel Aviv were blown up on regular basis, an article in New York Times was suggesting that Israel should quickly offer even bigger concessions and they should not force aRAfaT to fight their terrorism and appear to be collaborationist in the eyes of arab street. That's the moral compass of New York Times.

Maurice H • 5 years ago

Kerry was Obama's Sec of State. The apple does not fall from the tree!