We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
sloppy journalism again - come on TW -the 2 paragraphs are brilliantly contradictory -----However, accommodation-only bookings with Shearings Hotels brands, self-drive holidays, and activity-only bookings are not financially protected.
When approached by Travel Weekly, a spokesman for EY confirmed that bookings cancelled by Shearings had the same protection as the bookings they had replaced, meaning all packages – whether or not they include a flight – are financially protected.
Award for worst article of the day, goes to this one. How in any journalistic universe can the Administrator confirm that RCN notes are protected. If you have a direct quote from Administrators e.g. "We have spoken to CAA and they have confirmed RCN are protected" - I could see the point of this article. It is complete and utter speculation!
Dominic Cummings confirms Refund Credit Notes protected.
For the billionth time we need the CAA to answer and confirm ATOL protection on RCNs.
All the rest just adds to the middle.