We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
Funnily enough .. If the queen does not have the royal perogative to dissolve parliament neither does the Governor General of NZ so if the Moari tribes have not been consulted The Treaty of Waitangi has no legal status which means the New Zealand government is illigitimate and the Moaris are no longer British subjects and at this stage after 4 years of Jacinda Ardern most kiwis would be happy for Winston Peters to grab the keys head up to Waitangi (by the pole) find a Cheif or local BHlack Power President and give the country back...if we ever locate the NZ AIRFORCE ...bro thats about as likely as finding John Major at a Hangi ..thats why we love you Winston despite the suits and free taxis...at least your a realist...so democracy is restored smoking is allowed in pubs and Moaris get two votes each..sweet but the Queen says if any Moari votes for the horse...smokers will be back in the beer garden...fair enough..hey bro..whose taxi vouchers are these ? this is historic moment brother...theres one left
We should wait at least nine months before even considering jabbing adolescents.
That is to say, we need to wait for birth defects, developmental defects.
We really should not be injecting adolescents until there is more data. Some data, even.
But maybe that is why 'they' are rushing it along with indecent haste.
The vaccines have been in use for 10 months now.
15 if you count the start of trials
Why not post the following on the mRNA vaccines?
Toxicology studies?
Pharmacokinetics studies?
Pharmacodynamics studies?
I'll wait............
Don't look to see Merck "The Emperor" Stevens' new clothes unless you have a freight car full of eye bleach ready.
Awesome. The smartest "doctor" in the world can't produce toxicology, pharmacokinetics, or pharmacodynamics studies, but still claims they are proven safe. LOL!!! Can't produce package inserts either.
But ze can produce a fake Fauci Flu vaccine photo, so there's that. Ze also produces massive quantities of male bovine manure.
For pregnant women, the "ten months" from 21 Apr 2021 to 7th May 2021 , you mean?
We need to be realistic about this; both the virus and the vaccine are novel. We don't have enough information on either to know long term impact for ourselves and our children as a result of the vaccine nor as a result of the virus.
As the mother of a 9.5 year old with a complex heart defect, I do not have the luxury of being so cavalier about whether or not the virus will be an issue for my son.
I am exercising my privilege (and I know it is that) to continue staying in our tight bubble, working and doing school from home.
This article would have been better (as would vaccine conversations) if we are talking about all of the unknowns and all of the options. Masking does work (N95). Staying isolated with one's family does work (and is just fine for mental health for some - I don't know why we have a-historic nostalgia associated with a completely full calendar and always on the go).
there are 12000 dead on the European database alone, and over a million side effects, of which 50% are serious and affect normal daily life. There's really no known reason why some people die from the vaccines and others are badly injured, and there's still a risk of ADE. Everyone has to make a choice based on their own personal circumstances.
The European database only records events within 3 days of vaccination, and only medical professionals are able to raise a record. So the likelihood of incidents included unrelated to vaccine is very low. It's been found from a Japanese study, that spike proteins in vaccine can travel in the blood supply, beyond the site of injection to other organs, whereas a natural infection would normally be limited to nose and lungs. What's important really is a strong immune system, and there's a lot we can do to bolster it.
Vitamin D as many people have too little, and elderberry is a natural antiviral, although there are others ginger, garlic.
Children's Health Defence are very into vaccine injuries and risks, I wrote to them about vitamin D research last year, you might find a consultation along with one with a private MD and medical herbalist helpful. You'll find the private MDs on the internet, but I wouldn't bother with anyone who doesn't know about widespread vaccine injuries or the UK yellow card system. Armstrong Economics carries a recent video by Nuns in a London convent, who acknowledge 50 vaccine deaths alone, none of which are making mainstream news.
Let's do some basic math...
"there are 12000 dead on the European database alone... The European database only records events within 3 days of vaccination"
If you were to select a random person out of a population with a life expectancy of 82 years old, there is about a 1-in-30,000 chance that they'll die within the next 24 hours, or a 1-in-10,000 chance of dying within the next three days.
There have been more than 250,000,000 vaccine doses given in the European Union. By chance alone, 25,000 of those getting vaccinated would be expected to die within the next three days, and it would still mean not a single death caused by any vaccines!
If you were to select a random person out of a population with a life expectancy of 82 years old, there is about a 1-in-30,000 chance that they'll die within the next 24 hours, or a 1-in-10,000 chance of dying within the next three days.
'Basic maths' you say???? You clearly missed the stats classes. Your figures are fake start to finish. Let me elucidate for the benefit of the more numerate contributors/readers.
Extrapolating your fallacious argument would mean the chances of a 'random person' (your term) dying during the next year for anyone under 82 would be 1:82, which is clearly nonsense for anyone under 60. If your argument was logically carried through the average life expectancy of the UK population would be back in the dark ages. In fact the chance of dying in the 'next year '/ 'next 24 hours' by age group is as follows:
(https://www.statista.com/st...
20+: 1 in 2000 (m) / 1 in 5000 (f) [within next 24 hours = 1 in 730,000 (m) / 1 in 1.8m (f)]
30+: 1 in 1250 (m) / 1 in 2500 (f) [24 hrs = 1 in 1 in 465,000 (m) / 1 in 913,000 (f)]
40+: 1 in 555 (m) / 1 in 1000 (f) [24 hrs = 1 in 1 in 203,000 (m) / 1 in 365,000 (f)]
50+: 1 in 256 (m) / 1 in 417 (f) [24 hrs = 1 in 1 in 93,000 (m) / 1 in 152,000 (f)]
60+: 1 in 110 (m) / 1 in 166 (f) [24 hrs = 1 in 1 in 40,000 (m) / 1 in 60,000 (f)]
70+: 1 in 44 (m) / 1 in 66 (f) [24 hrs = 1 in 1 in 16,000 (m) / 1 in 24,000 (f)]
Currently (using MHRA Yellow Card statistics) the chances of dying from a Cov19 vaccine overall is between 1:40,000 to 1:4,000 (depending on the accuracy of MHRA reporting - these btw are government figures).
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn...
Using a similar approach even Tim Specter (Zoe App) concluded it was statistical nonsense for anyone under 65 to risk the experimental vaxx.
https://www.conservativewom...
Well, that's an obvious lie. Maybe you should come to my math class.
Please point out any 'obvious lie', and perhaps you can then explain why using the knowledge gained at your 'math class'. I have referenced all the info given to available ONS statistics.
The obvious lie was "the chances of dying from a Cov19 vaccine overall is between 1:40,000 to 1:4,000"
Your own source reported 1253 reported deaths occurring after over 60,000,000 vaccines being administered. Considering this is below the background rate, and includes vaccine recipients of all ages, there's no evidence these deaths are caused by vaccines.
In fact, your own source states "There are currently no indications of specific patterns or rates of reporting that would suggest the vaccine has played a role."
OK, so government stats have been reported as Spam and deleted!!! Panic, eh? A sense of being on the wrong side of history, perhaps? Or maybe it's the post-covid trials that are beginning to worry the government and its advisers, when the full death figures from the experimental vaxx will be fully available (including children). So, once again.....
https://coronavirus.data.go...
There have been 40,460,576 UK people vaccinated up to 6th June 2021.
Of these 1253 have been reported as deaths up to 26th May. The chances of death from a vaccine is therefore 1 in 32,290. If one sensibly extrapolates the MHRA death figures by 11 days to 6th June 2021 (using a VERY conservative estimate, as vaxx deaths rose by 40 in the last week's figures) gives an extra 60 deaths, making 1313 total. So the chances of dying from a vaccine becomes1 in 31k. This figure is significantlymore serious than the 1 in 40k figure you choose to call a 'lie'.
The government’s own advice is that ‘It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported’, and while this has a recent caveat added regarding a possible rise with Covid19 reporting, it still remains current government advice.
If this 10% figure is applied the chances of dying from a Covid 19 vaccination could be as high as 1 in 3,229. And even if MHRA Yellow Card reporting covers every single adverse reaction, which we know is NOT credible, the chances of dying from the vaxx remains 1 in 31k.
Two examples (using my previously cited sources):
1) A healthy woman in her 20s has a 1 in 730,000 chance of dying from any cause (and a chance of over 1 in 576,000 from Covid19). The vaxx increases that chance of dying by a factor of between 24x and 240x.
2) The chance of a 10-19 year old dying from C19 is 1 in 2.5m (ie near statistical ZERO). The taking of the vaccine entails a near 100x increase in the chances of dying compared to C19 based on the very lowest MHRA estimate. This figure would be a THOUSAND fold increase if the 90% Yellow under-reporting estimate remains accurate.
These official figures, even the conservative ones, show absolutely NO benefit in taking a C19 vaccine. The very act of vaccination exposes young people to an unnecessary existential risk out of all proportion to the seriousness /morbidity of the virus in their respective age groups. Vaccinating schoolchildren should be immediately suspended before small bedecked coffins and grieving parents start dominating even the most reluctant pro-Big Pharma MSM news outlets. And this is BEFORE considering the tens of thousands of non-fatal serious adverse reactions being reported to MHRA; and totally excludes the as yet unknown long term and inter-generational impacts.
PS: Yellow Card deaths are not 'below the background rate'. Your understanding of the background rate, as I have shown, is seriously awry.
"Of these 1253 have been reported as deaths up to 26th May. The chances of death from a vaccine is therefore 1 in 32,290."
No! No! No!
This is the chance of having a death, regardless of cause, reported to the yellow card system. Why can't you even get the basics right?
https://coronavirus.data.go...
There have been 40,460,576 UK people vaccinated up to 6th June 2021.
Of these 1253 have been reported as deaths up to 26th May. The chances of death from a vaccine is therefore 1 in 32,290. If one sensibly extrapolates the MHRA death figures by 11 days to 6th June 2021 (using a VERY conservative estimate, as vaxx deaths rose by 40 in the last week's figures) gives an extra 60 deaths, making 1313 total. So the chances of dying from a vaccine becomes1 in 31k. This figure is significantlymore serious than the 1 in 40k figure you choose to call a 'lie'.
The government’s own advice is that ‘It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported’, and while this has a recent caveat added regarding a possible rise with Covid19 reporting, it still remains current government advice.
If this 10% figure is applied the chances of dying from a Covid 19 vaccination could be as high as 1 in 3,229. And even if MHRA Yellow Card reporting covers every single adverse reaction, which we know is NOT credible, the chances of dying from the vaxx remains 1 in 31k.
Two examples (using my previously cited sources):
1) A healthy woman in her 20s has a 1 in 730,000 chance of dying from any cause (and a chance of over 1 in 576,000 from Covid19). The vaxx increases that chance of dying by a factor of between 24x and 240x.
2) The chance of a 10-19 year old dying from C19 is 1 in 2.5m (ie near statistical ZERO). The taking of the vaccine entails a near 100x increase in the chances of dying compared to C19 based on the very lowest MHRA estimate. This figure would be a THOUSAND fold increase if the 90% Yellow under-reporting estimate remains accurate.
These official figures, even the conservative ones, show absolutely NO benefit in taking a C19 vaccine. The very act of vaccination exposes young people to an unnecessary existential risk out of all proportion to the seriousness /morbidity of the virus in their respective age groups. Vaccinating schoolchildren should be immediately suspended before small bedecked coffins and grieving parents start dominating even the most reluctant pro-Big Pharma MSM news outlets. And this is BEFORE considering the tens of thousands of non-fatal serious adverse reactions being reported to MHRA; and totally excludes the as yet unknown long term and inter-generational impacts.
PS: Yellow Card deaths are not 'below the background rate'. Your understanding of the background rate, as I have shown, is seriously awry.
Still lying, I see.
Of the 1253 reported deaths, what is the age distribution?
If I am lying, then so is the government, as I am using its info. My figures are irrefutable, whereas a repeated pithy comment and the priceless comedy stat regarding a random UK person member having a 1 in 82 chance of dying in the next year is all you can manage.
As for age distribution, it's not available but one can surmise. Vaxx death is now impacting on the 30s and 40s, as the Yellow Card death figures still keep on going up week on week as the age groups being vaxxed get lower. A 43 year old BBC reporter died recently from the vaxx, so there's a clue that the young are not invulnerable.
Perhaps ask the gov, as it is withholding this info (just as it did on the sudden spike in C19 deaths following vaccine roll-out in December, due to the 10 day post vaxx immunity drop).
While you are on ask about C19 vaccine deaths within 30 days of the jab, as confirmed by a doctor, which should be a key standard measurement in experimental vaxx trials (as the UK is supposedly undertaking). You'll have to get in the queue, as there are already two outstanding ministerial questions on this very issue that this government refuses to respond to.
Horse, water, whatever.....
Not very good at math, I see.
You previously gave the mortality rates based on age groups, but conveniently left out death rates for anyone over age 74. Over 2,500,000 people in the UK over age 80 have been vaccinated, many with two doses. They have, on average, about a 1-in-10 chance of dying within any given year, or 1-in-250 chance of dying within a week of one of their two doses. This group alone could result in 10,000 death reports to the yellow card system, and it would still mean not a single death was caused by vaccines.
So before you have any validity to claims about deaths from the vaccines, you must provide the age distribution and number of days since vaccination, to see if it is any different than the background rate.
but conveniently left out death rates for anyone over age 74
Not conveniently, as I'm not avoiding anything. We are talking about the efficacy vs risk of vaccinating the younger age groups. Most of the over 80s have been vaccinated, so it was pointless including these figures out of space considerations, I gave the link to the figures it's no big deal, and doesn't alter the argument - although I agree age indexed figures should be provided by the government. Also, as I stated, even Tim Specter is on record disputing the efficacy of any person under 65 being vaccinated for C19. Crucially the week on week vaxx death figures continue to rise at a similar steady rate, despite the age groups being vaccinated getting lower - and this needs fleshing out with more info.
The chance of death in a female 80 - 84 in a given year in 2018 was 1 in 20. So a 1 in 500 chance of dying within any given week. I accept that, but (crucially) you make a preposterous claim by presuming the doctors (who issue death certificates and file the YC reports) are incapable of pinpointing the cause of death! Exactly what evidence do you have that states 100% of non-vaxx deaths could end up on a death certificate and YC report as vaxx deaths, as you speculate? Why would any doctor do this, as it would be 100% against the received wisdom of vaccines being the solution to the problem? This is pure fantasy.
A far more likely scenario in older age groups is that a possible vaxx death would NOT be reported as such because of another underlying health problem (or simply old age, as local authorities have claimed), and this sleight of hand would drastically reduce the actual reported YC death figures. This suspicion also seems to be confirmed by reports from NHS whistleblowers featured on UK Column confirming widespread failures to fill out Yellow Cards by doctors following possible vaxx deaths - despite this supposedly being a monitored trial.
For the record, the chances of death in any given year for the over 70s begins to increase (ever more) exponentially - a point you completely failed to understand in your made up 'random person out of a population' stat claiming 'there is about a 1-in-30,000 chance that they'll die within the next 24 hours'. Given your abject innumeracy evidenced here I take your intended insult (above) as a complement.
Finally, while age might give rise to an underlying frailty, the subsequent December/Jan death spike in the over 80s following vaccine roll out was NOT recorded as YC vaccine deaths but rather C19 deaths (this is available via the ONS). The surge in deaths occurred due to the sudden post-vaxx drop in natural immunity that left these people suddenly vulnerable to a flu like virus in the depths of winter (go figure) - all this is documented. This points to a significant under-reporting of vaxx deaths in this age group.
Conspiracies! Conspiracies!
The whole point of systems like VAERS and Yellow Card is to look for patterns. It's normal to make reports that aren't suspected of being vaccine related. Your own source says this. VAERS reports often even detail the cause of death that have nothing to do with vaccination.
So seeing your fatal flaw, you pivot to trying to blame covid deaths on vaccines. That hoax was refuted long ago. (Hint: you can't prevent covid19 deaths by vaccinating people that are already infected).
Conspiracies! Conspiracies!
Facts! Facts!
trying to blame covid deaths on vaccines.
Pointing out well documented cause and effect. Look at ONS!
The whole point of systems like VAERS and Yellow Card is to look for patterns.
Really? Perhaps you would be better telling Ms June Raine before scores, perhaps hundreds, of kids' coffins are ordered to cope with the unnecessary vaxx deaths? The pattern and numbers are becoming clear, see above, any corresponding MHRA algorithmic analysis and precautionary advice has not been so obviously forthcoming.
you can't prevent covid19 deaths by vaccinating people that are already infected
So why jab them at all? Doctors knew the vaxx lowered immunity for 7-10 days, so are you saying these excess deaths were therefore avoidable?
Cuckoo.
You were already disproven by your own source.
Are you conducting a Q and A then, because there are 12000 dead on the European database alone, and over a million side effects, of which 50% are serious and affect normal daily life. There's really no known reason why some people die from the vaccines and others are badly injured, and there's still a risk of ADE. Everyone has to make a choice based on their own personal circumstances.
The European database only records events within 3 days of vaccination, and only medical professionals are able to raise a record. So the likelihood of incidents included unrelated to vaccine is very low. It's been found from a Japanese study, that spike proteins in vaccine can travel in the blood supply, beyond the site of injection to other organs, whereas a natural infection would normally be limited to nose and lungs.
I see you are still failing to understand the basics of the basics regarding "adverse events".
A report does not, in any way, indicate it was caused by vaccination. Your own source proves you wrong.
And your utter failure (deliberate or otherwise) to grasp age dependent mortality rates deliberately downplays the horrendous deaths and life changing conditions that have been caused by an statistically unnecessary experimental vaxx. And these are only the short term adverse reactions, as recorded by MHRA, the long term and intergenerational impact is still to be assessed and understood.
The Johnson administration has been bought by Gates.
The UK health regulator has taken over $7,000,000 from the Gates Foundation over the last 10 years and the previous health regulator CEO now works for Gates in Seattle !
See links below.
Gates approves his own vaccines through his takeover of the UK regulator.
And Universities which put forward our Sage fools. Also the Vaccine passport as detailed further in ID 2020 - will use all of our health data in 1 huge database - who are the main sponsors of ID2020 - Gavi (includes the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation + all main vaccine manufacturers, Microsoft (oh ?) and Accenture.
An interview with Talk Radio JHB and freedom campaigner a couple of weeks ago, the internal passport would have a direct link to all medical records, the ethnicity of the person and relatives, and also a genetic factor. It isn't at all clear how the latter would become available. So far according to a comment in Conhome the internal passport has been dropped. Watch for the external ones contents though. China wants to be top dog of all held data , DNA medical records are a potential control mechanism over all politicians as well as everyone else
FORGET CHINA from any equation you think is there; this is our governments and elites.
Amusing that in the UK, Bill Gates, in effect, approves his own vaccines through his influence and funding ($7,000,000 over 10 years) of the UK health regulator, ''Medicines and Heathcare Regulatory Agency''.............
https://www.gov.uk/governme...
https://architectsforsocial...
UK administrations really have been bought by Big Money.
You are forgetting the terrifying effects of Long Covid
Tens of thousands of children have been affected
Everyone should read https://www.longcovidkids.org/
Read about the devastating effects of Long Covid on children
Just because the mortality rate has been low in children, doesn't mean it is harmless
Many of these poor children have suffered from symptoms of Long Covid for months on end
But what about Long Flu - Wah!
We all know Flu is much more dangerous to children than Covid and there are the known risks of Long Flu.
What steps are being taken against Long Flu?
There is one very good & documented method of preventin Long Flu & Covid, treat with Invermectin!
"The authors of an earlier study Trusted Source suggest that the symptom of fatigue after a viral infection is due to inflammation in the brain.
Viruses cause the immune system to respond and attack them. This response causes stress and inflammation in the body. The effects of this response often leave people feeling down, fatigued, and sometimes depressed.
Almost any viral infection can trigger post-viral syndrome, including:
common cold
flu
pneumonia
Epstein-Barr virus
herpes
HIV
Post-viral syndrome may be more prevalent or apparent in people with weakened immune systems"
https://www.medicalnewstoda...
And it has zero to do with covid - read Artur Firstenberg's book A History of Electricity and Life -
I wonder why MP's, newspapers and TV stations are so interested in 'Long Covid in Kids', yet not a peep out if any of them re deaths and adverse reactions from ther jabs? Or any questions about the abuse of the 'PCR Test' to create a 'Casedemic'? Could they perhaps have a pro-govt./pro Big Pharma agenda?
It seems that any severe vaccine reaction or potential death gets dedicated news articles, because they're so rare.
Propaganda.
I had covid and it was nothing. All gone is four days.
I got in a car accident and walked away with no injuries.
That doesn't mean nobody gets hurt or killed in car accidents.
Good point!
Good for you. But an estimated 1.1 million people are living with long Covid
Following any infection there's a reduction in white blood cells, so if someone became infected again shortly after, they'd feel tired . The same applies to the flu.
Long Covid is also long flu, and the symptoms are the same as Beriberi which is dietary.
Long Bovid ? Sounds like bull to me.
. Maori subjects of our Queen in London I invite join me on our hiku to Number 10 . I seem to remember The Maori Chiefs of New Zealand in 1848 signed The Treaty of Waitangi with the Crown Queen Victoria. They placed the soverignty of New Zealand in her hands and in return became British subjects () Their decendants will not be happy when I tell them that a conservative PM APPARENTLY took away their Queens legal perogative to dismiss such scruffs who loll about on her green benches doing very little.definately not `honouring the treaty` At this stage Jacinda Ardern will ASKING THE NZ Airforce ( two Pakeha fullas with keys to the helicoptor) to head offshore as far as one tank will take them The Maori elders will have a laugh when they realise some Major? gave them New Zealand back um..Major whoi?
The Haka will be of such intensity outside No 10 (definately no clapping?) it might make even Kea blink
Once both Houses are clear I will leave it to the Queens Maori Subjects of London at Westminster (by the statue of Oliver Cromwell might be an honourable spot to retrurn Her Majestys legal perogative to officially disolve this crowd inside as we all a bit sick off.... Im sure Westminster can accomadate as many Moari subjects as mattresses will allow.
Im sure they wont come back Maam
So G...where does this John Major live anyway? I dont know Brother but Queen Elizabeth just told me he definately will not be there .
and Princess Anne asked who voted for the horse?