We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

mutthead52 • 5 years ago

I always absolutely trust revisionist anti-Russian history sourced from an ex-Russian self-exile living in the UK. Absolutely. It's vogue to be anti-Russian, you see--even if it sneaks in thru the back door cloaked as conservative anti-Stalinist anti-Communism--since most gringos think still Putin is a commie, it has the same effect as the rest of the current Russkie-bashing. And validates all that NATO on the Russkie borders stuff--just Western prudence, since the stalinist Russkie mindset never really changes, and a Ramstein/Polish invasion might really just be pre-emptive wisdom and save Europe.

chris chuba • 5 years ago

The Russian BT70 even had secret compartments that used English instead of the Metric system that would be only be useful after their wonderful Amphibian tanks crossed the English Channel :-)

I thought it was funny. Most of the Russian army wasn't even on the frontier at the time they were invaded.

eddie • 5 years ago

Indeed, and much of that army's elite officer corp had been liquidated due to Stalin's paranoia, forcing Russia to settle for quantity over quality. He shot himself in the foot before the war even began.

NATOcracy • 5 years ago

That's a myth. Some 40,000 were arrested, most of them returned on their posts.
There is a precise data about numbers of convicted or fired, year by year.
The Red army had 1.7 million soldiers in 1938 and more than a 5 million in 1941, that's why they were lacking a good officer cadre.

VeeNarian (Yerevan) • 5 years ago

Yes, and it was such a master-stroke for Stalin to have all those Nazi forces cornered at Stalingrad. Not very credible, is it?
Stalin has to be credited for not leaving Moscow in 1941 as the Nazis hordes arrived at the suburbs. That must have had a huge moral impact on the successful defence of Moscow. However, this heroic defence would not have been needed if Stalin hadn't done away with most of his Army commanders in the first place.
I couldn't believe how he had to rescue Rokkosovsky from his own GuLag to lead the successful and long counter-attack from Stalingrad to Berlin.

Brian Niziol • 5 years ago

It matters little who your generals are if the supreme leader does not listen to them. Stalin wanted his army lined up against the border. Not good. It rejects successful doctrine that has served them well over the years. Zhukov did what he could removing some but not all of his important equipment from the border under a excuse he called practice maneuvers but not enough. It was not until the summer offensive of 42 that failed with dire consequences that Stalin started to let his generals control the battlefield. Stalingrad was another failure of German intelligence. They were reporting the Russians were on their last legs west of the Volga. The real situation was much different as the Nazi horde was to find out in the Don bend. The Red Army had 10 reserve armies comprising of around 1 million men. As early as 42 the Russians were out producing the Germans in almost everything including tanks of a higher quality than the Germans could bring on the battlefield. Of course the German high command had just fired the intelligence officer who told them what was close to the real situation but even he was well short of the mark. Replaced him with someone who told them what they wanted to hear who was a complete fool totally out of his league who had in the past kissed ass to get where he was. Later he went on to become the head of intelligence for NATO where he was still a fool. Rokkosovsky was put on ice Stalin viewed him as a troublemaker but most likely had a ideal he may need him in the future. Stalin can rightfully be called a lot of things but a fool is not one of them. He outmaneuvered Churchill and got all of what he wanted at Yalta. In Moscow he played Churchill knowing he had a weakness for booze. That was a gong show with poor Winston demanding to have is chief of staff see the Red Army order of battle which Stalin refused to show him. That was a reasonable request but Stalin did not trust him so uncle Joe started prodding Churchill with statements like get in the fight it is not so bad but you have to fight. One can only imagine Churchill's reaction he was outraged but that is what Stalin wanted. So Churchill stormed out of the supper and Stalin followed him and the 2 got down to some serious talk. Churchill was assured Russia would not fall and new armies were already taking up position that was good news but I doubt Churchill completely believed him. It was then Stalin was promised a second front on 43 at the latest. Churchill lied but his feet were put to the fire for the next 3 years by Uncle Joe. This constant sparing between Stalin and Churchill was quite interesting but make no doubt Stalin got the best of him.

Douglas • 5 years ago

One of the fears that Churchill had was that Stalin would make peace with the Germans (call that paranoia but after the French it is understandable). Russia would then likely go back to supplying Germany with material and equipment, just as it had even in the week before Germany declared war.

I do not disagree that Stalin bested Churchill in negotiation. The captures in Africa (more than at Stalingrad) should have been enough to show that the British Empire was doing its bit but there was no way Britain could back out of the war, whereas Russia might have done, at least from a UK perspective. This affected the balance of power in negotiations.

Haut • 5 years ago

Stalin was a psychopathic JEW Idiota Period,!

Brad Golding • 5 years ago

Stalin's mother was Jewish, but Stalin was raised a Christian. I know this because I am pretty sure they don't have Jews in Christian seminaries and Stalin went to a seminary..

zeb • 3 years ago

Sure, just like Marx whose "parents were Jewish, and descended from a long line of rabbis" was a Lutheran. Jews really are not the problem, it's the dumb goyim...trick me once, shame on me, trick me 6 million times....

https://www.history.com/top...

Haut • 5 years ago

What a Stirling Christian he was huh ? BS, he was a Jew nuff said !

Brad Golding • 5 years ago

Well, you believe what you want! I ain't going to argue with you!

Stephan Williams • 4 years ago

You know as well as any of us that jews themselves consider the children of a jewish mother to be jews. Stalin was a jew. FULL STOP!

Cyndy T • 3 years ago

Stalin was a crypto-Jew. Hews were forced to convert to
" Christianity" or face being forced to leave the countries or other punishment.
They may have claimed to have converted, but still practiced their Talmudic faith. Many entered seminaries, which enabled them to corrupt the " Christian" faith into the corrupt Talmudic church it is today.

Laszlo Tamas • 3 years ago

sorry ,but you wrong Brad...

Le Rusé • 4 years ago

Stalin a jew ??
Humm..
As it was quoted by a famous French writer.
"Today the question is Not who's a Jew, but who's Not a Jew"?

Laszlo Tamas • 3 years ago

good comments ... so why and how Stalin ''got the tron'' if he was not a jew.. The big Satan worshipper bankers who run the show put Stalin in his position ...one can wondering why?

OckovonDornum • 3 years ago

Levashov said something like that the Jews in Britain/USA were Levites , which among the Jews is the elite.
These elite Jews financed Trotsky to take over Russia and hand it over to Rothschild.

Then in 1925 Stalin, a black Jew, meaning race mixed, thought that it doesn't make sense to do all the work and then hand over Russia to the Levites. So Stalin took Russia for himself. Kicking Rothschild and his agents out or plainly killing them.
He also had to kill 60 million (there is that number again) white Russians to keep control over Russia. (That's according to Solzhenitzin.) Then Stalin got the idea that he can control the world instead of the Levites and built a powerful army.

Meanwhile the Levites propped up the half/quarter Jew Adolf Hitler. Investing billions to prop up Germans so they can take over Russia.

Finally when they figured that Stalin was ready for attack, they stopped the war between England and Germany (Hitler did that non-sensical Dunkirk thing) so Adolf was in a position to attack and destroy Russia.

We all know it didn't work out. With Stalin's advancing toward Europe, propably targeting England too, the Levites made a deal with Stalin, giving him half of Europe if he stops at the defined border.

Later in order to control that border they attacked Germany from the back to be at the border first, to stop the Russian there.

That worked out, Stalin adhered to the plan.

Then Stalin closed the borders so he could control the territory he now owned without interference by the Levites.

The goal of the Jews was always to cull the number of goyim to keep control of them. That plan worked out.

In the 90s the Levites got into Russia, and destroyed it.

That was obviously countered by the KGB (the Patriot part, propably not the Jew part) and their agent Putin. Now the Jew Putin, a black Jew controls Russia, using Christianity which he built up again. That's an old tactic from early medieval times when (((they))) concocted the Bible.

But time is over for the Jews they are exposed in a rapidly growing truth wave, to which most of the Jews will succumb.

BLM and anifa plus their money will not safe them. You can't beat the truth.

OckovonDornum • 3 years ago

As Adolf wasn't really kosher to the Levites, he liked his position as the leader of Germany and most likely had his own plans.....and secret deals with the Levites.

But the Levites made a better deal with Stalin and abondened Adolf (that's why Hess flew to England to figure out what was going on)

It obviously was all a Jew melee and deals between the mishpoke.

Millions of whites were killed.

An aim of Jews.

Cyndy T • 3 years ago

Hitler's unforgivable crime was shutting down all Freemason Halls , Rothschild banks and imprisoning a Rothchild.

Le Rusé • 3 years ago

Maybe, because he was more cunning ??
But training for priesthood, in a seminary to be an Georgian Orthodox make me doubt greatly that he was a Jew ?? Married Jewish woman , yupp ..

Haut • 4 years ago

A French "Idiot" by the sounds of it maybe a fan of Macron !

Le Rusé • 4 years ago

There's as many idiots in France as there's in England ? But the French idiot is a thinking idiot !

arras • 5 years ago

Except it's not true.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Baron • 5 years ago

The guy in the clip is rather disingenuous in comparing the purges in the Red Army with those in other countries, (say) the dismissals in the US were because of age, the inability of many officers to switch to modern warfare, in the USSR these purges were for purely for political reasons, the impact on the moral of the officer corps was unimaginably negative, their freedom of action was self-curtailed, everyone was scared to death of being accused of treachery, often shot.

Also, what nobody mentions is that many of the top officers (including Tuchachevsky) did train in Germany (as did many German officers in Russia) before Hitler gained power. It was this in addition to the faked documents furnished by the the Heydrich's staff via the Czechs that led to the bloodbath of the top military.

1RW • 5 years ago

Tuchachevsky was a psychopath that used poison gas against Russian peasants. He was talented and ambitious, and had no morals. A prime candidate for getting purged.

Why is there an assumption that the purges were purely political? It sounds nice, because it is a smear against the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets did win the war, and then carried out an absolutely brilliant campaign in Manchuria against imperial Japan. So the competence of the Red Army at the end of the war is without doubt. To achieve this, they must have promoted successful officers and gotten rid of incompetent ones, like any other successful organization.

The Soviets also had a policy of utilizing talented individuals even if they were politically unreliable. Marshal Rossokovskii was unpurged for example - pulled out of prison and sent to fight. He finished the war near Berlin. Engineers kept working in prison, including the God father of Soviet Aviation, Andrey Tupolev.

Le Rusé • 4 years ago

Quite agree with you 1RW, the mantra is , that all the enemies that Stalin had shot, were little innocent choir boys ?? e.g. Trotsky, such a nice philanthropic man, concerned & caring human being ??

Baron • 5 years ago

You've obviously never lived in the USSR, 1RW, Baron did, in part inside as a political.

Btw, what kept you? This blog ran close to a year ago.

1RW • 5 years ago

I did live in the USSR. But the USSR of the ‘80s was way different than the USSR of the ‘30s.

kadosh • 5 years ago

Not exactly paranoia! Hitler's obsession w. ability of German farmers to feed
the nation was well known, therefore his ultimate attack on USSR (esp.fields
of Ukraine) was known to his General Staff, which expected such action to
begin in 1938, with the help of Ukra nationalists (now glorified by Kiev, Banderists lead by Suchachev) but still afraid of Soviet Army. So Himmler
(w. Hitler's approval) delegated task of decimating that Soviet Army, before
the actual shooting to his most able and indeed the smartest Nazi SD general
Reinhard Heydrich. So in 1937 his dept. prepared perfect 37pages document
"proving" secret cooperation of Marshall Tuchachevskij (Chief of Staff) and
numerous Soviet officers w. German military, including photos, signatures, agreements etc. Subsequently such document was "discovered" by the
Czechoslovak milit. inteligence. Cs president Benes conveyed promptly
such "document" to Stalin - and who was shot = 3 of 5 marshals!, 14 out of
16 Armies commanders. 8 Admirals, 60 out of 67Generals, 136 of 199
commanders of Divisions, etc. altogether over 35000 officers of Soviet
Army was eliminated !! Well - Soviets had NO army commanders and
some silly double Soviet agent in UK, parroted by the author of this non-sense think that Stalin was ready to "attack" Europe? How?? They didn't
even have trucks to move army - thanks to L&L they've bought about 18000
US trucks from USA - oh, so much b.s. presented in one article is sad.

John Joseph Sinclair • 5 years ago

US trucks from USA - 0h, so much b.s. Read Major Jordans Diary, it will dispel any notions of b.s.

Ivan Grozny • 5 years ago

According to (Soviet Hero) Marshall Zhukov, the 'western' allies supplied 18.700 airplanes, 10.800 aurmored vehicles (which the soviets didn¨t like), and 9.800 cannons - respectively, 12, 10.4, and 2 % of the Soviet material, an important but not deceicive contribution. In other words, the Soviets would have defeated the Nazi without the 'western contributuion'.
No matter what people say - the Soviett Union fought and defeated the Nazis!
The Hollywood story of the D-Day and so on, is just that - a Hollywood story!

John Joseph Sinclair • 5 years ago

Ivan Grozny, are you a Russian?
By 1942 the Soviet Union was on its knees, and if it had not been for Soviet Britain and Soviet America supplying the Soviet Union with war material, Russia would have been defeated. The French General de Gaulle stated some time after the Second World War that the Waffen SS (European Army) saved much of Europe from the Bolshevik communists.
No matter what people say - Germany and her allies, and this includes Japan,( signatory to The Anti-Comintern Pact) saved much of Europe and much of the world from Jewish Bolshevism.
The Russians and their Soviet allies continue to foster the childish belief that Adolf Hitler wanted to exterminate the Slavic peoples of Russia. Nothing could be further from the truth.
It is my belief that one of Adolf Hitler's war aims was to liberate Russia from the yoke of Jewish Bolshevism. Most of what you are taught about the history of the Second World War is a Hollywood story and the Great Patriotic War is just a myth. In truth it was Germany and Europe that were fighting for their very existence against Soviet Jewish Bolshevism and as Viktor Surovov said in his book:"Icebreaker," if the Jewish Bolshevik Communists had invaded Europe, the consequences for Europe would have been unimaginable.
Germany was fighting a war on two fronts and I read that 120 countries declared war and or fought against Germany and this ultimately led to Germanys defeat.
The Jews declared war on Germany on the 24th March 1933
(JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY) Google search. It was the Jews and their Shabez Goy
allies that ultimately destroyed National Socialist Germany.

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

This is surreal Nazi crap.

There has never been anybody who has slaughtered more Europeans and nobody who has damaged Germany more but scum Hitler. Nazis have never been anything but illiterate complex- and hate-driven cowardly massmurderers, who started their first systematic destructive course after the 28th February 1933: the destruction of Germany: burning her literature - in a country that had regarded their book fairs for centuries as proud substitute for a capital, shred her legal tradition into bits, chased her brightest intellectuals out of the country and killed and tortured her best sons and daughters.

Nor has anybody ever intended to eliminate Germany and Germans than exactly that scum Hitler. Ever heard of the Nero Decree? Ever heard that this scum dared to say that he would not spread a single tear, if the German people were eliminated, as they had not met his lunatic goals?

Nobody who ever praises Hitler scum is a friend of Germans, on the contrary, who whitewashes that scum is an enemy of humanity!

And you, moron, have the cheek here to deny that Hitler aimed at extinguishing the Russian nation and the Russian people? You deny the aggressive plans that started with the Professoreneingabe in 1915? You deny plans to colonize the west of Russia gained ground in nationalistic wings of German high military already during the British hunger blockade? You deny that Hitler expressively wrote down his genocidal goals in "Mein Kampf" as early as 1925? (2nd book, chapter 14) You deny that Hitler excempted Soviet civilians expressively from the protection of the convention of The Hague and allowed in his decrees every crime, including murder, to Wehrmacht officers? You deny the plan to starve up to 30 million Soviet civilians according to the Hunger- and Backe plan? You deny the authenticity of Halder's protocol of Hitler's speech to 250 highest German Wehrmacht officers on the 31st of March 1941? You deny the existence of the seven genocidal decretes and memos for the "Unternehmen Barbarossa"? You deny the deliberate starvation of 3,5 million Soviet POWs, at a time Nazis had no difficulties to nourish the German population? You deny the systematic starvation of the population of Leningrad? You deny the systematic murder of Soviets of all ranks?

Faksimiles of original documents have been provided by a German-Russian initiative, consisting of the Universities of Erlangen and Moscow and the Bavarian State Library.
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.ifz-muenchen.de/...
https://www.ns-archiv.de/kr...

Then you ignorant moron claim that Anglosaxon war deliveries were of any relevance for the Red Army's victory? In 1942 Soviet war production outstripped the German by far; only German production of war ships exceeded that of the SU, while the first "Land and Lease"-delivery worth mentioning (though not even of use, as deliveries did not meet the Russians conditions, for example when sent tanks simply did not work at given temperatures) only arrived after the Battle of Kursk. That means: after the war had been decided.

The Red Army had to fight their war single-handedly. There was no help. Hypocritical putting off of a second front was accompanied by continuous negotiations between Brits, the US and the Goerdeler-Circle in Germany, which were about a changing allies, if they only got rid of Hitler. They only ended such tactical plans in January 1945.

And all the while the Soviet Union had 30 000 casualties a day!

I hope if you ever dare to spread the despicable Nazi crap on Russian territory, that they'll beat up anti-human garbage like you as hell, and I hope, for our own honor, you would receive the same treatment if saying such dirt aloud in Germany.

Being western German with many contacts to eastern Germans, I can tell you: I would have preferred a Soviet Invasion a hundred times more than having only one day to live under the thump of anti-human garbage like you.

Seing now that USAmericans consist of two groups of brainless massmurderous ideologues, genocidal neocons and altrightist nazis, I can see that it would have been a blessing, if the Red Army had indeed invaded the whole continent: This would have prevented any bloody further influence of the worst group of humankind has ever bred: White Anglosaxon Protestant: With 100 million murdered Africans, 40 million murdered Asians and millions murdered Europeans by the British Empire and the more than 30 million the US has murdered since 1949 alone, you have managed the highest massmurder toll of all peoples on this planet. And no, you did not need any Jewish help for that: Anglosaxon exceptionalism managed that all alone.

MJM • 5 years ago

You are FREAKIN' Insane and peddling some stinky bull manure there. But, then again, most Zionist jackals do!

John Brown • 5 years ago

A BLACK SLAVE TAKES OVER HIS JEWISH MASTERS HOUSE
MARCH 16, 2017 NOI RESEARCH ARTICLES 0
HTTP://NOIRG.ORG/ARTICLES/A-BLACK-SLAVE-TAKES-OVER-HIS-JEWISH-MASTERS-HOUSE/

“Cyrus” & the Mordecais: The Essence of the Relationship Between Blacks and Jews

Anja protested that “Anja's slaves” John brown and other Goyims were “All doing as they please and no one was asserting any racist supremacist Jewish slave master authority over them.”
Emma Mordecai, Richmond, VA (State Archives of North Carolina)
One day in 1865, at their plantation in Richmond, Virginia, members of the most distinguished Jewish family in America were stunned to learn that the Africans they held against their will were openly rejecting their enslavement. The family’s matriarch, Rose Mordecai, complained that her African slave was becoming “increasingly impudent” and resentful of being overworked. Mrs. Mordecai enlisted the services of a Black overseer to coerce her slave’s obedience, but his efforts were futile. The Mordecais then appealed to the woman’s husband, “Cyrus,” but to their astonishment “Cyrus” proved to be in complete and total agreement with his wife and refused to intervene. “Cyrus,” it turns out, had also had enough of this injustice and joined forces with his Black woman, waging a full-scale rebellion. Sister-in-law described the scene:
“Cyrus refuses either to leave the place or to do anything on it, unless sure of high wages and an increased allowance of meat.…He feels as if the whole place belongs to him.”
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

Another Anglosaxon scum, that wants me to prove in the public that you garbage are not only obnoxious, but as bleeding stupid that a person with an IQ of 50 would seem a genius in comparison.

I quote now the answer I have given another obnoxious pal of yours':

Listen, Anglosaxon vegetable: I have grown up in the late 60s and 70s
in an extended very very very active family in a country in which about
50 million witnesses of Nazism were still alive. My home region was the
core of the German war industry. People I grew up with were part of
active resistance, not communist as you garbage assume, but members of
Christian unionis and social democrats, dito neighbours, dito friends of
family members. The active parts, though Nazi opponents, did not need
to go to war, as they were specialised workfore in the steel industry.
Hundredthousands slave workers from Soviet ground are buried around:
They worked with relatives and neighbours of mine. Soviet slave workers
and German Hitler opponents had to rely on each other in work. First
they had starved all Soviet POWs to death: 3,5 million people,
deliberabtely. Then they needed qualified workers and noticed that
considerable were qualified. If two endangered people were pressed to
work together in Hitler's war industry, they needed to communicate.
Being obviously under-achieving would have been deadly for both, as the
German would have been sent to war, the Russian to extermination camps.
Open sabotage was suicid mostly. It was threatening for the German too,
if the Russian was over-achieving: As then he would have been
superfluous and could be sent to war. So they were silent arrangements,
and very clear communication, when the situation was not dangerous.

Ever
heard that apart from the "Secret Affair of the Reich" (Reports of the
SS), the socialdemocratic "SoPaDe-Reports", records of hundredthousands
social democrats within Germany, is the largest collection of sources
from within? I talk about people who contributed to it.

I can show
you in my city were which slave workers were: Three streets further
were Ukrainians, there they had whole families, with terribly emaciated
kids. Neighbours told me how they stuffed breads through the fence when
guards did not look. I know as well were Russians were, Poles, other
eastern Europeans, and German convicts.

I know in which villages
Jewish slave workers built streets. I know too on which graveyards these
people are buried around. People here, ordinary people, found various
written testimonies they left.

In the early 90s every single town
at the Ruhr and Rhine invited survivors of former slave workers around,
who visited us and told their expiriences. I was present at one of those
events in my city, and was befriended with people who had organized
them. They had been dozens of times in their home regions and received
records from them in their own home. And that had never been on public
state in the SU before. These people had hid their experiences as they
were considered a national shame in the SU. They only coul, without
losing their faces speak up about that horror in the context of Germans
who bade them for forgiveness. Thinking of their stories (and none of
these people felt hate for us), I could plunge my fist in your garbage
nose.

The other half of my family, males that is, were sent as
ordinary solidiers without any rank to the east and worked after war
years as POWs on SU terrritory. My grandfather built four and a half
years streets in Russian villages. He talked with people there, could
speak Russian fluently in the end and was told by them what they had
been through.

At my university we had at our history department
the "Institute of the German Working Class Movement", equipped with life
documents of hundrethousands aktive working class activists of the
Ruhr- and Rhine area. Old folks were still around and talked a lot with
us youngsters: They were communists, socialists, social democrats and
Christian workers' officials. I could compare archived material to
family documents and family testimony, neighbours' testimony, befriended
families' testimony. In the course of my own studies I have not only
worked in archives myself, but have made friends with people whose books
fill, among many others, my bookshelves. My husband, who worked for one
of the most prominent historians on Nazism, Hans Mommsen, offspring of a
German dynasty of historians, worked himself on the extermination
system, which was part of the war economy: On slave work for Volkswagen.
He has digged himself four full years through archives in Germany, east
and west (before the wall fell) and Poland. Results are part of a 1000
pages thick monography.

And you brain-amputated moron believe you
can impress me with your sick narrative that is as pathological and
crappy as Nazi garbage was more than 70 years ago? You think you can
come along here with made-up nonsense and opinion peaces in the
internet? Your research tool: Google - what a laughing stock!

Where
I have demographical figures on the SU from? From the same source as
the UN: You know, although you are an Anglosaxon Nazi dimwit, you might
know that governments, especially in a socialist state, need some dates
from time to time, to plan housing, health system, schools,
infrastructure... For that person they take down numbers of their
population. Educated people call it CENSUS. This, vegetable, are
official Soviet Census numbers, taken down in republic for republic and
then added up. Soviet archives have been opened completely in the early
90s. People who have digged themselves through them, having the
linguistic capacities to deal with sources and having learned
methodologically how solid source critique works, base reconstruction of
past empirical reality on it.

That is stuff my husband has contributed to, I have contributed to and people I know from joined work have contributed to.

Garbage, like you, that have equipped their lunatic brains with other garbage from biassed internet surfing know NOTHING.

You are spreading NOTHING here but sick DIRT, vegetable.

And
once again: What I link here is not opinion garbage of sick brains, but
faksimiles of primary documents, decrees and memos, of Nazi elites and
Hitler, protocols and publications of the German agrarian ministery and
the German Auswärtiges Amt, and historiography based on it, which all
give full testimony of the Nazis' genocidal plans. Material has been
provided by the University of Erlangen, University of Moscow and the
Bavarian State Library, the IfZ Munich and Wolfgang Benz, a NS historian
I have met.
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
https://www.ifz-muenchen.de...
https://www.ns-archiv.de/kr...
https://wigbertbenz.wordpre...
http://www.spiegel.de/eines...
https://books.google.de/boo...

And
now bugger off, scum, and never ever dare to open up your filthy mouth
for spreading rubbish about matters you have not the slightest knowledge
about.

MJM • 5 years ago

Marxist-Liberalism and its daddy –Communism- are Dead!!! We will bury you! On your Zionist backs will be tank tracks and you will be flattened out on the highway to our Populist/Alt-Rightist, futuristic, destiny. As Enrico Corradini so well pointed out, the cyclical cycle is closing on you idiots … and opening up for the New Era of proactive politics. The Zionist, dialectical materialist, jackals will be nothing more than carrion bodies in the hot sun... cyclical closure of a useless and evil villain of Folk and Culture. Good Riddance! # Figuratively speaking … of course…

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

That scum like you embraces the idea of burying millions, is exactly what I have laid down in empirical evidence more than once. However, illiterate garbage dreaming of triumphing in "cyclical circles" are only the cannon-fodder of the same cynic elites you believe you fight. Morons foolish enough to blow up themselves, that is all you are. You clowns will have no chance to "triumph".

You are too ridiculous in your foul obnoxciousness, a caricature of humanity.

MJM • 5 years ago

your dogmatic declamation is amusing... "too ridiculous" - indeed - is that you do not even foresee the expiry of your own socio-political, parasitic, philosophy. We all know that the bayonet of truth is making your lot scream louder, as the set expired time is drawing nearer.

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

You garbage have not even the slightest idea about the difference in meaning of "dogmatic" and "empirical".

I have stated empirical truth. I have not made a single "dogmatic" statement.

I state that the genocidal war against the Soviet Union, the expulsion of her civil population and the settling of Germans on Russian territory up to the Ural was at the core of Nazism, and prove it with a source, to check for everybody:

Mein Kampf, 2nd book, chapter 14, published in 1925.

I further state that the pursuit of these settlement plans and the plans of expulsion of Soviet citizens was continued allthrough the time of Hitler's taking up office as till he attacked the Soviet Union in German ministeries and the Reichskanzlei and prove it with primary documents, that is texts written by Hitler and other Nazi politicians.
https://www.ifz-muenchen.de...

I have further stated the systematic procedure of war plans and planned genocide in faksimiles of primary documents, decrees and memos signed by Hitler, publications of the German agrarian ministery and the German Auswärtiges Amt, Halder's protocol of the speech Hitler gave in preparation of that war to the 250 highest Wehrmachtsofficials on the 31st of March 1941 and historiography based on primary sources and archive studies, which all give full testimony of the Nazis' genocidal plans. Material has been provided by the University of Erlangen, University of Moscow and the Bavarian State Library, the IfZ Munich and Wolfgang Benz, a prominent NS historian.
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
https://www.ifz-muenchen.de...
https://www.ns-archiv.de/kr...
https://wigbertbenz.wordpre...
http://www.spiegel.de/eines...
https://books.google.de/boo...

This is EMPIRICAL evidence, and additionally I have outlined how many witnesses of Nazi crimes I have met personally in my live.

That is my record of EMPIRICAL TRUTH.

Now you, garbage: You claim you know about Stalin's allegedly likewise sinister plans against Germany?

Give me comparable proof, moron. I know you can't. You claim you can. Then DO IT.

MJM • 5 years ago

Ahh.. now we are getting somewhere. The geopolitical goals of the German National Socialists were, indeed, real..e.g. Ukraine was to be the breadbasket. But you also have some garbage in there too. Not sure why Russians volunteered in the Nazi 29th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS RONA and the Nazi 30th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, if indeed, Herr Hitler was going to start "genocidal war" against Russians. Sorta blows holes in your narrative … .357 magnum, jacketed hollow point, holes. War against Communism... yes.

Oh and I am not anglo-saxon..

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

Garbage, (of which national background) somehow you are very very sick, aren't you?

We are not "getting anywhere", when I link sources I have been linking here several times - and which you have obviously missed to check.

Have you ever heard what EMPIRICAL SCIENCE is? HISTORY is an EMPIRICAL SCIENCE. It is about WHAT HAS REALLY HAPPENED, and not about making up crap narratives that please the sick mind of idiots and fit in their intellectually limited plausibility frames.

Once again: I have linked documents, i.e. PRIMARY SOURCES, consisting of Hitler's authorized delination of intentions and racist ideological aberrations, of Nazi ministeries' authentic plans, of speeches he held in front of 250 German leading militaries in preparation the "Unternehmen Barbarossa", of decrees and memos signed by him, giving unmistaking evidence of Hitlers genocidal intentions and plans to eliminate the vast bulk of the Soviet Union's Slavic population.

So again: Apart from source number one, which is: Hitler: Mein Kampf, 2nd book, chapter 14,
https://agiw.fak1.tu-berlin...
https://disq.us/url?url=htt...

I have linked the following:

https://disq.us/url?url=htt...

http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
http://www.1000dokumente.de...
https://www.ifz-muenchen.de...
https://www.ns-archiv.de/kr...
https://wigbertbenz.wordpre...
http://www.spiegel.de/eines...
https://books.google.de/boo...

So, once again (I know I write to a complete idiot, so I have to repeat myself):

This is clear evidence.

Have you any likewise authentic DOCUMENTS and PRIMARY SOURCES of GOVERNMENTAL RANK to quote for the ficticious dirt narratives you spread?

I am waiting.

And your irrelevant suggestions of trivial stuff have no significance for the implied question: Nazis used members of all racially targetted peoples for eliminating their lot. They pressed, too, German Sintis and Jews in Wehrmacht uniforms, up to the moment they sent them into gas chambers.

I am not interested in you sick spinning activities, but in HISTORICAL EVIDENCE. Have you any to quote?

John Brown • 5 years ago

Part 2 http://noirg.org/wp-content...
Black-Slaveholding Jewish patriarch Jacob Mordecai.
When confronted, “Cyrus” declared that “There was to be no more master and mistress now, all was equal.” Now fully exasperated, the Mordecais demanded to know if their now ex-slave would have the chutzpah to continue to live at the Mordecais’ without working for them. Said the Black man:
“Yes, until I see how things are going to work. All the land belongs to the Yankees now and they are going to divide it among the coloured people.”
The Black man told the Jews that he had a right to stay, to bring in whom he pleased, and to keep his family on the land. He was entitled to a part of the plantation, he declared, because its success depended on his labor. Furthermore, in his opinion, the kitchen belonged to him because he cut the timber to build it! Emma protested that “her slaves” were “All doing as they please and no one asserting any authority over them.”
“Cyrus” and his Jewish oppressors were surely unaware of it, but contained in this episode is a profound truth about the relationship between Blacks and Jews. Indeed, the conflict on the Mordecais’ plantation leads Blacks and Jews to some fateful questions: Was “Cyrus” a noble freedom fighter asserting his God-given right to be free, or was he a raging “anti-Semite” disrespecting the “divine rights” of God’s Chosen People? Were the Mordecais engaging in a lawful and righteous societal practice, or were they unscrupulously exploiting the labor of an African family for their own profit?
Jews and Blacks may hold entirely different answers to these questions. For most Blacks, “Cyrus” is absolutely and unquestionably justified as he throws off the chains of enslavement and demands reparations for his family’s long, undeserved suffering. He is as justified to leave his enslavement as the Jews (of Biblical prophecy) were to leave Pharaoh’s Egypt and the concentration camps of the Nazi regime. On the other hand, Jews might claim that American slavery was in fact the “law of the land,” that their plantations and slaves were legally obtained, and that they were coincidental participants in a long-established slave-based economic system. And thus they had a right to the lifel http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c... labor of “Cyrus” and his family https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

MJM • 5 years ago

Oh, hades, I don't have time for all that. I've got a job. Moreover, Common sense can just eliminate most of that. +" Nazis used members of all racially targeted[sic] peoples for eliminating their lot. They pressed, too, German Sintis and Jews in Wehrmacht uniforms, up to the moment they sent them into gas chambers." = OH REALLY!!! Interesting …. hhmmm, 2/3's were VOLUNTEERS (waffen SS) and 1/3 were conscripts. As for the last Jewish comment.... Zionists, but not all Jews, are honorless…. they would sell their souls, without hesitation … or a blink of an eye, to stay alive... killing other Jews is nothing for them. E.G. SOROS!!!!!!

Yeah, your links are in other languages, etc. ..ain't got the time, right now... anyway. Plus, I HAD AGREED WITH YOU... on part of your comment ...so...

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

Garbage, either you have someting serious to contribute in form of valid historical documents, or you should mind to keep your foul mouth shut.

Everyone who has experienced Nazism or grown up with relatives who experienced it knows that you Nazi-garbage are only the rotten tools for a lousy attempt to serve exactly the very massmurderous escalation for saving the very Anglosaxon capitalism you pretend to fight.

However, I promise you: Everybody of you who does not return to your ratholes of oblivion in time again won't survive the next dirty attempt. Majorities here know what scum Nazis were and will, if you ever raise up your shabby heads in public again, cut every single throat of yours. This time USAmerican elites won't achieve to save you from justice.

MJM • 5 years ago

Garbage, how come you never say anything about Stalin and USSR communism, he butchered 6 times more innocent people than the National Socialists? Why no mention of Mao Zedong and the Chinese communists... who killed 49 million people. Or even USA, and the slaughter in the middle east? WHY DO YOU ONLY ATTACK THE NATIONAL SOCIALISTS!!!???? Because, to the Zionist, this is the worst form of government that will Wipe out the Destroyers of Cultures and Civilizations; the Zionists, globalist jackals that want and thrive on uniting all to the "chain-gang" of slavery and to an inglorious destiny, life unsuitable for even rats that live in the sewers.

Anja Boettcher • 5 years ago

Scum, if you think you have anything to say about China, go to China and tell people. I am not interested in China.

But it was Nazi-dirt that devastated my country and was responsible for the death of millions of us, Nazis who murderd and tortured people I grew up with, and it is Nazis whose rotten existence I smell whenever they appear remotely in my vicinity.

In the Soviet Union they murdered twenty times more people than Stalin, as all documents prove. I have given all related documents several times, and open Russian archives have proved that everthing else is a blatant Nazi lie.

Therefore, if ever any Nazi scum dares to open his rotten mouth on my country's territory again, me and hundredthousands like myself will finish off their unworthy existence. Not metaphorically, but physically. This is no empty threat, but determination.

And if rotten garbage like you like to spread your despicable foul zombi-minds, you'd better do so on websites called "Anglosaxon Insider", just invent other ficticious garbage stories about about ficitious countries, as otherwise you have rightly reason to fear for your lousy life.

I would not do any of you Nazi scum the honor to regard you as enemies, who are still human beings. As you have chosen to dehumanize yourself, you are only vermin, and to extinguish the likes of you is a human duty.

And now bugger off. Unworthy scum like you only makes me vomit.

John Brown • 5 years ago

Part 3 Despite “Cyrus” and his wife’s clear declaration of their own life’s direction, the Mordecais felt personally betrayed that “their” Black slaves had chosen freedom over permanent unpaid service to their family. “If they felt as I do,” Rose Mordecai tearfully exclaimed, “they could not possibly leave me.” Another wondered how “her slaves” could “feel so little remorse at abandoning [us].” And therein lies a troubling reality: the joyously celebrated emancipation of the Black slaves was, at the very same time, seen—by a people presumed to be the Chosen of God—as an aggressive act of betrayal.
Historically, Blacks and Jews continued down these distinctly separate tracks in almost every arena where they encountered each other. The secret of their relationship—and its moral, legal, social, political, and economic nuances—is unlocked by that poignant and contentious encounter in that Richmond, Virginia, kitchen. Does that kosher kitchen belong to “Cyrus” and his family, or Rose Mordecai and hers? Each felt entitled and both felt they had the moral authority—each unmoved by the other’s position. And now, at the dawn of the twenty-first century, Blacks and Jews find themselves at a similar historic crossroad.
http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
http://www.jewishvirtuallib...
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

John Brown • 5 years ago

Here is some empirical data for you from 100% Jewish sources Anaj, you racist supremacist slaver!
A BLACK SLAVE TAKES OVER HIS JEWISH MASTERS HOUSE
MARCH 16, 2017 NOI RESEARCH ARTICLES 0
HTTP://NOIRG.ORG/ARTICLES/A-BLACK-SLAVE-TAKES-OVER-HIS-JEWISH-MASTERS-HOUSE/

“Cyrus” & the Mordecais: The Essence of the Relationship Between Blacks and Jews
Anja protested that “Anja's slaves” John brown and other Goyims were “All doing as they please and no one was asserting any racist supremacist Jewish slave master authority over them.”
Emma Mordecai, Richmond, VA (State Archives of North Carolina)
One day in 1865, at their plantation in Richmond, Virginia, members of the most distinguished Jewish family in America were stunned to learn that the Africans they held against their will were openly rejecting their enslavement. The family’s matriarch, Rose Mordecai, complained that her African slave was becoming “increasingly impudent” and resentful of being overworked. Mrs. Mordecai enlisted the services of a Black overseer to coerce her slave’s obedience, but his efforts were futile. The Mordecais then appealed to the woman’s husband, “Cyrus,” but to their astonishment “Cyrus” proved to be in complete and total agreement with his wife and refused to intervene. “Cyrus,” it turns out, had also had enough of this injustice and joined forces with his Black woman, waging a full-scale rebellion. Sister-in-law described the scene:
“Cyrus refuses either to leave the place or to do anything on it, unless sure of high wages and an increased allowance of meat.…He feels as if the whole place belongs to him.”
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...https://uploads.disquscdn.c...