Sorry, the browser you are using is not currently supported. Disqus actively supports the following browsers:

This page is forcing your browser to use legacy mode, which is not compatible with Disqus. Please see our troubleshooting guide to get more information about this error.

We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Xee • 1 year ago

Solzhenitsyn
Jewish people were, in part, responsible for mass genocide in the Ukraine during the 1930s; moreover, this atrocity has been downplayed – and often ignored – by the international community.
Not only ignored but ascribed to the ethnic Russians.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

Really the J*w Kaganovich was the primary architect of the Holodomor, so I would say they are more than just partially responsible.

Haut • 1 year ago

Yes, exactly "WHOLLY" Responsible !

Paschn • 2 weeks ago

Hello fellow lucids! David Duke showed me a great way to speak out. SImply do the research and QUOTE the Synagogue's own words..

The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people. Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919

There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism. Jewish Chronicle London, April 4, 1919

The Bolshevist officials of Russia are Jews. The Russian Revolution with all its ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement. The Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 22, 1922
And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by constant campaigns about the terrors of society, by pretence as to your effectiveness, make the capitalist himself, by his own appropriation, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of that nation. Address of the Jew Laventria Beria, The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics, p. 8

Kjell Hasthi • 1 year ago

Kaganovich was not official leader, more like deep state.
No one can be deep state without performing rituals (blood sacrifice) vs. the masters

Styx • 1 year ago

one.
Kaganovich was a faithless bolshevik first and foremost.
Bolsheviks were a very small extreme left wing fraction within the communist party.

two.
Holodomor was a nazzi Germany construct invented by one of the joseph goebbels's comrades in arms. It goes without saying that goebbels was a virulent antisemite.

three.
Your theory "J*w Kaganovich was the primary architect of the Holodomor, so I would say they are more than just partially responsible" falls apart in the most spectacular manner imaginable.

Hope that helps.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

Ah, same old defense by the same old (((people))). The J*w wasn't really a J*w...especially if he's done something reprehensible! No, in that case, he's an "atheist" or an "agnostic" or a "faithless bolshevik".

One-
Nice try, but it's all according to the DNA...or, you could say, according to your own J*wish tradition, which says that if Mommy ain't a shiksa, that boy Kaganovich is a J*w.

Two-
The Holodomor is far more real than the Holohoax (TM), which has been proven to be a fraudulent construct designed to milk money out of the gullible goy.

Three-Not an argument.

Don't really care if that helps, because I know you're just a Zio-troll. Sorry, Schlomo.

Ryan Hall • 1 year ago

RIGHT ON!!!!!!

Styx • 1 year ago

"One-
Nice try, but it's all in the DNA...or, you could say, according to you J*ws' own tradition, which says if Mommy ain't a shiksa, that boy Kaganovich is a J*w."

Being a parrot and not a particularly bright one is not helping you.

Holodomor as such is Nazzi Germany construct. Period.

The bottom line is: You are in exactly the same boat as Joseph Goebbels and there is absolutely nothing that can change that.

"Three-Not an argument."

What made you think that I would ever lower myself to arguing with you?

Where are you from, anyway?

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

Hi Hasbarah-
How's the weather in Tel Aviv?

Styx • 1 year ago

"Hi Hasbarah-
How's the weather in Tel Aviv?"

Hi, mariupol "hero".

It's a VERY beautiful day today in Monaco.

I am going out for a stroll to take some pictures

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

Weather's nice in Monaco? In March? Really, Schlomo? :)

Styx • 1 year ago

It was a very nice day today in Monaco, cool but sunny, bandera-bot.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

"Cool"? It was ZERO when you posted how nice it was outside, numbnuts. :))

Styx • 1 year ago

It was nice and warm in the sun, but it's none of your business anyway.

Once again:

The question is, why a professional troll like you based in US of A with clear connections to Western Ukraine is posting antisemitic garbage on a site which is sympathetic to Russia.

Styx • 1 year ago

No marching of any kind, hapless "hero".

I dislike demonstrations, not to mention revolutions very intensely.

Unless it is Pink Ribbon or No finish line

http://www.monacolife.net/g...

https://www.monaco.edu/news...

Mind you, I would support https://www.vox.com/2018/3/... unconditionally if I was in US.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

It's zero degrees in Monaco right now. You really need to reassess your standards, Schlomo.

Styx • 1 year ago

Checking weather forecast for Monaco is not going to help you bandera-bot.

Styx • 1 year ago

The question is, why a professional troll based in US of A with clear connections to Western Ukraine is posting antisemitic garbage on a site which is sympathetic to Russia.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

LOL! Anti-Semite! I thank you for the compliment. Come back when you bring your big boy game with you.

Styx • 1 year ago

Antisemitic garbage is all you do on this site, bandera-bot.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

As opposed to semitic garbage? :)

Styx • 1 year ago

Once again:

The question is, why a professional troll like you based in US of A with clear connections to Western Ukraine is posting antisemitic garbage on a site which is sympathetic to Russia.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

No, the question is, why do hasbarah always provide such low quality trolling?

Styx • 1 year ago

No.

The question is, why a professional troll like you based in US of A with clear connections to Western Ukraine is posting antisemitic garbage on a site which is sympathetic to Russia.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

No, the question is, why do hasbarah always provide such low quality trolling?

Styx • 1 year ago

The question remains to be the same, why a professional troll like you based in US of A with clear connections to Western Ukraine is posting antisemitic garbage on a site which is sympathetic to Russia.

Truthsayer • 1 year ago

^^^Hasbarah troll^^^

franz kafka • 1 year ago

Convenient rubbish.

Paschn • 1 year ago

Isn't it "fortuitous" that the lesbian "Kagan" has been "appointed" to this sty's SCOTUS?

The enemy isn't AT the gate - no, the enemy SOLD us the gate AT INTEREST!!

Haut • 2 weeks ago
Freespirit • 1 year ago

I get a sense from the Author of this article, Jan, a certain ADMIRATION for the "Intelligence" of the Jew.

Not-with-standing" a Jew is not a race or nationality, it is a RELIGION, adopted by PAGAN Khazarian converts and IF they were so intelligent how does one account for their, in the majority not only an acceptance of Communism but an OBSESSION for that COLLECTIVE Ideology. It is an ideology which not only DESTROYS the INDIVIDUAL but, as a result, makes true PROGRESS impossible. TRUE Progress requires INDIVIDUAL thinking and doing.

MY analysis of COLLECTIVISM in any form is that it is an ideology for and even CREATES, Mentally and Physically LAZY INCOMPETENTS, more than it requires INTELLIGENCE

Then there is my 78 years of PERSONAL experience with Jews.

I would classify them as SLY, not Intelligent. They are successful because they use LIES,THEFT and FORCE, ( force by Proxies), to take advantage of Naivete and the innate and somewhat natural innocent Honesty, and caring of and by others, to make themselves successful, in Wealth and Power.

Their TALMUD verifies what I say and MORE

They are ruthless "Carpet Baggers" or"Scalawags", without the slightest hint of Integrity, Empathy or Humanity, at least towards non-Jews. PRACTICE, makes PERFECT, not Intelligence makes perfect. They tend towards being, if not actually are, PSYCHOPATHS. They find great pleasure in using, abusing and exploiting non-Jews to reinforce their own FALSE sense of Superiority. I say "FALSE" because their cowardly, PRIMITIVE tactics to achieve Wealth and Power, prove them INFERIOR

Do people NOT NOTICE that when communists are seeking and more so, when they OBTAIN POWER that they immediately start to "weed out " the Intellectuals, the Intelligent, the Creative, the most productive businesses and farmers and the PROFESSIONALS ? Those people they "weed-out" are INCORRUPTIBLE and KNOW that the Khazarian Ashkenazi are the Inferior ones, war mongers and are the TRUE ENEMY of mankind who use BARBARISM, in one form or many, to RULE so THEY, who truly know and cannot be corrupted, must therefore be eliminated.

THAT is what is coming again only to a much greater degree, IF they win

They are the BEASTS of Humanity and will create a "BEASTLY planet" ruled by themselves.

A true RATIONAL Humanitarian Civilization is impossible with or by them

Umberto Indicci • 1 year ago

I agree with your analysis except that, because it accepts and fully appreciates its atheists, Judaism is not a religion.

Jews are a multinational, multiracial, multi-generational Crime Syndicate Cult.

Problem One is the Jew.
Enemy One is the Collaborator.

First Things First : Eliminate Jew Influence

FTF:EJI

Styx • 1 year ago

"Jews are a multinational, multiracial, multi-generational Crime Syndicate Cult."

Does that "Crime Syndicate Cult" apply to Italy?

Some reading for you:

https://i5.walmartimages.co...

Freespirit • 1 year ago

ALL Religions are CULTS

Umberto Indicci • 1 year ago

Yes. I call it mythtardation, but not all cults are religions.

Freespirit • 1 year ago

I never said "all cults are religions" but thanks for your response

Styx • 1 year ago

Not all religions are cults.

Rosicrucianism isn't.

True spirituality is above any religion.

Omega • 1 year ago
Not-with-standing" a Jew is not a race or nationality, it is a RELIGION, adopted by PAGAN Khazarian converts

Pharisaim - later known as Talmudism, Medieval Rabbinism, Modern Rabbinism to finally being renamed as “Judaism” - was the creation of the ruling class of Persia (as an accentuated version of Zoroastrianism) aimed at destroying the pagan, polytheistic beliefs in Canaan-Phoenicia.

The first “Juddins” (converts to Pharisaism) were the Canaanite captives in Babylon (who were converted by Persia after making Babylon the capitol of its empire).

Everywhere the Persian Empire spread, you had Juddins: Canaan-Phoenicia, Turkey, Greece, Italy, India, Pakistan, today’s “-stan” countries, etc.

The Khazars were the second major group of mixed people to have converted to Judaism in history.

art • 1 year ago

I wonder if I can coin the term "Chomskyism" here, the core idea that anything Jews can ever do wrong must be somebody else's fault. Like, if Israel does some thing wrong, its America's fault because Israel is America's "client state". Of course we know that the opposite is true. The professor is playing dumb for us. "Persia created Judaism" seems to be another Chomskyist feature idea I first read about through Dr. M.D. Magee's long treatise: How Persia Created Judaism.

After carefully reading the treatise, my take away was that the "Persia created Judaism" gave birth to the treatise, and not the other way around, that logically is supposed to be. In other words, it is the corroboration that gives birth to a conclusion, not the other way around. This idea might only appeal to people who have a Hollywoodic understanding of the Persians and their belief system.

-Talmud was written a thousand years after Babylon conquered, A THOUSAND YEARS: you can't connect them by just a stroke of pen.
-"Persian Empire" was created in the last 100 years by those historians who think any thing big must be bad. And anything big-and-bad must be an "Empire"! Persia was never an "Empire". The same way that we know now that there were no Pharaohs in Egypt. All constructs of historians hired by Hollywood.
-Persians were spiritual, not religious. They believed in Artaic Spiritual Value System, a belief in natural order of cosmos. That's why they never bothered with anybody's religion, much-the-less creating one for them.
-Zoroastrianism was never monotheistic until third century ad.
-"Persian Empire" stretched from Egypt to China. And they needed to go thru creating a new religion only in a hand palm size Canaan to collect taxes?! Give me a break.
-Turkey and Pakistan did not exist during "Persian Empire". "Persian Empire" never took over Greece or Italy.

Drop Chomskyism!

Omega • 1 year ago

Wonder no more and feel free to call it whatever "ism" you want. I don't know too much about Chomsky aside from some of his books and the fact that was associated with the RAND Corporation as a linguist - but if he's known to divert and shift the wrongs Jews do on others, then it may very well be suited to call it that generally and not directed at me (shifting blame is not what my comment was about).

America is not Israel's client nor is Israel, America's. Both are the colonies of the British Empire. While the symbiosis between the two may seem organic, it's very well orchastrated that way.

I don't know why you think Magee was/is the source of my information. I first came across the revelation that Pharisaim was the creation of the ruling class of Persia in a text from the late 1970s. Your interpretation of Magee's work remains your personal opinion.

The Talmud could have been written much later. It changes nothing to the fact that Pharisaism is of Persian origin. Cults and their texts evolve.

I agree that Western modern court-historians are famous for distorting past history to suit the narrative of certain people today but I don't understand why/how the usage of the term "Empire" is pejorative. I am also not aware that the Persian "Empire" was/is protrayed negatively today. I"ll add that no "Empire" became vast diplomatically.

You say "we" know that there were no Pharaohs but who is "we"? Most people people don't know that. You're the first people I hear it from.

I am aware that the Persians were spiritual and of their beliefs system. While it wasn't exclusively monotheistic, it was the first attempt at unifying under the worship of one Almigthy God and that from the beginning.

I don't know where you read me write that Pharisam was created to collect taxes in Canaan.It was destined at destroying the beliefs in Canaan-Phoenicia.

I know how far the Persian "Empire" stretched. No clue why I wrote Italy when I had Crete in mind - honest mistake.

art • 1 year ago

Thanks for the thorough response. Unfortunately none of your rebuttals appeals to me. We seem to need considerable debates to narrow the gap. But I can refer you to Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, an Egyptian physician enthusiast regarding the Pharaohs: google "Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites". He has website, books, video clips to help you get out of the clutches of the fixed perceptions most Western nations have been under for too long. He will help you understand that what we know as Judaic people and their history were actually a group of Yemenite migrants who created the bogus Torah and their heritage as natives.

ExposingTheEnemy • 1 year ago

I have read through the comments of Freespiritart and Omega . There is much more i agree with on Freespirit's replies and Omega's then Art's. The replies are interesting for folks as myself who are long time historians of ancient, classical Holy Bible history and what is outside of the text in parallel chronological history among being a political scientist and an investigator/researcher of history and many other things. I may not be as diplomatic or eloquent in digital text dialogue, but i take issue with something "Art" claimed;

"I can refer you to Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, an Egyptian physician enthusiast regarding the Pharaohs: google "Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites"."

Mizraim, the dual form of "matzor", meaning a "mound" or "fortress," are in the Old Covenant, a people descended from Ham (Genesis 10:6, 10:13, 1Chronicles 1:8:1, 1:11). It was the name generally given by the Hebrews (a geographical term not a genetic one) to the land of Egypt and may denote the two Egypts, the Upper and Lower. The modern Arabic name for Egypt is Muzr. Now, the claim "Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites" is greatly untenable seeing as how archaeological evidence in stone proves the error of such a claim;

http://www.bible-history.co...

The above link provides irrefutable evidence counter to your claim "Art";

"The writing on the stele is in hieroglyphs and very clearly mentions the name of Israel on it. Israel was considered by the Pharaoh of Egypt important enough to mention as a significant victory. The Hebrews had conquered the land of Canaan around 1400 B.C. .... The discovery of the Israel Stela is very important in the study of Biblical Archaeology. It is the oldest evidence for the existence of Israel in the land of Canaan in ancient times outside of the Bible. The text on the stone reads:

"Canaan is plundered with every evil way. Ashkelon is conquered and brought away captive, Gezer seized, Yanoam made nonexistent; Israel is wasted, bare of seed." - Merneptah Stele"

And also nearing the end of the article;

"...Te name Israel i included among the list of defeated people's, hence the name Israel stela, referring not ot a country but to a tribe of the same name."

I would encourage you to read the link Art since there are other archaeology websites that provide further comprehensive evidence of this important finding.

As for myself, i don't believe there are 'physical israelites' today since Jesus' prophecy in Matthew 23:38-39 and Luke 13:35 came true which is that the House of Judah bloodlines would be left desolate, meaning dissolved, no more, finished, ended, done, which occurred somewhere in the range of after 70 A.D. to late 2nd century, and thus it is an genealogical impossibility for there to be 'true physical israelites' today those who claim they are, are either Khazarian converts to "Judaism" or if not Khazarian, the dissolved Judahite/Gentile mixed bloodlines since the Judahites of the first and second century as Jesus' prophecy bears out, their bloodlines would be dissolved and thus it came to be so by the remnant of Judahites left after 70 A.D. 2nd temple destruction ending up mixing with Gentiles, as the House of Israel did long ago before 70 A.D. with the Assyrians which is where you get "Samaritans".

And for further insight, here some other information below;

The modern word "Jew" is an apocopated corruption of "Judean" _(term of nationality of the province of Judea in Roman times)_ not "Judahite" _(tribe of Judah)_ . The "Jews" admit that they are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites in their writings. Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jew'ish Almanac is the following;

*'Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew."* (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

So ask yourself, if the ones claiming to be "Jews" are *not* physical israelites _(which to claim to be one is indisputable genealogical impossibility)_ , then who are they since there's no way physical israelites exist today?

"We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism (or later rabbinic Judaism) as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumptions of one Mishnah-tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code... and generally contradict it!" --Jacob Neusner A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities (Brill Academic, 1974), p. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: “The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature ...and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." - Vol. VIII, p. 474 (1942).

Freespirit • 1 year ago

Check my REBUTTAL to "Omega", today with 2 VERY interesting Videos from Brendon O'Connell

art • 1 year ago

ETE, I am pleased to know someone interested in the topic and perused through comments and took time to respond in detail. To get involved in a pitch debate in this type of topics, I lack a "conflict of interest" factor and cannot place much value on religious texts as historical references, unless of course parts of interests are corroborated by archaeological artefacts.

I did go through your link and had sour feelings from the beginning. The author calls Egypt of 1215bc "ancient Egypt", while in historical chronological nomenclature "ancient" refers to the period of 500bc-500ad. He calls Merneptah "Pharaoh", while the Stela text itself calls him "King". Reading the translation, I was irritated by all the 'punctuations'. I am certain the concept of punctuation did not exist at the time of this Stela writing. Adding punctuation based on the translator's understanding is an obvious interfering to me. It also took me less than ten minutes to find archaelogists who claim the carving has been tampered with and the text purposely mistranslated. The word "Israel" is mistranslated. The correct pronunciation is "iisii-r-iar" which in fact is an Egyptian sentence meaning: "those exiled because of their sin." It was not a reference to a geographical location. There was no attack on Canaan. Here is a link:
https://www.davidovits.info...
You need also to understand that I was not debating with Omega on what Judaism is or where exactly it came from or who created it. I only argued that it could have not been coming from Persians who were spiritual and had no commonality in perception with Judaism.

I also remind you that the letter "J" in Roman letters has a history of about three hundred years. The pronunciation "j" never existed around the time and place we are debating. The word "Jew" did not exist even in the first English dictionary which was published around 225 years ago. In fact there is no authentic documents beyond around 130 years ago that has the word "Jew" in it. Its a man-made word.

I was also curious that the Stela was discovered in 1896, and the fact that the meeting of Elders of Zion took place in Europe in 1897, where they decided to create Israel! Interesting, isn't it.

Omega • 1 year ago

I am aware of Ezzat (bought his ebook on Amazon) and read all his articles. There is a lot of precious information( but after cross examination, his theory is flawed as it omits the Canaanites-Phoenicians completely.

Freespirit • 1 year ago

From you: "America is not Israel's client nor is Israel,
America's. Both are the colonies of the British Empire."

You and I part company with that statement

Britain is also controlled by Zionist Jews, since the WAR against France and the takeover of the Bank of England, by the House of Rothschild

There are over 200 Ashkenazi Jews in Congress.They control the Media, Hollywood and the "non-education" system,

You may find this interesting :

How ISRAELI ZIONISTS do and WILL TARGET freedom
Advocates and Fighters by Brendon O’Connell : https://youtu.be/3kpJLCm-Y30

Check out other Videos of his which follow that one, on youtube He is one of a VERY FEW with the “guts” to speak the TRUTH, and even paid for it with Prison.That is REAL COURAGE.

The biggest mistake ALT-SITE hosts and commenters
make is USING their OWN NAME.They believe making a name for themselves is more impotant than SPREADING the TRUTH

TRUTH is what TRULY matters- NOT your name. THAT is WHY I have NEVER used my REAL NAME and never will. I will live to FIGHT another day and that allows me to say what is truly factual and true, ugly as it is.

If you think by talking and complaining about Zionists, that you will achieve something, think about WHO you think owns the Media you talk to and the Alternitive Media is too COWARDLY to say it, like Brendon O’Connell does! You problably think TRUMP will destroy the Zionist/Freemason POWER over mankind - “TRUMP is NOT draining the Swamp, he is the SWAMP”, as I said from the day he announced he was going to run for the Presidency and from
Brendon: https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Only ACTION can WIN for our Lives and Freedom, otherwise prepare for your continuing and worsening SLAVERY

Jews control America and,in effect, this planet mainly because of COWARDS and SECONDLY because of those who LACK Integrity

Ryan Hall • 1 year ago

that was 1 of the best responses I have ever read!

Styx • 1 year ago

All in all, your post comes straight out of Joseph Goebbels playbook.

Are you directly related or consider him to be your "spiritual" leader?

Paschn • 1 year ago

Wow. Thanks for that "nail on the head" explanation!! Wise, you bet! Wise in the ways of Satan, whom they and their Synagogue represent;

Revelation 3:9
Look! I will make those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews yet are not, but are lying—look! I will make them come and bow before your feet and make them know that I have loved you.

Quote from “You Gentiles” by Maurice Samuel;

“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. (Pg 155)