<" a new form of election fraud had emerged that was not about hundreds of dead people voting in acity but was about the possibility of several hundreds of thousands of votes being injected into each of several locations. "

This is the statement that shows he has nothing on alleged voter fraud. With the exception of Maricopa County (Phoenix), and it would be nearly impossible even there, you couldn't inject several hundred thousand fraudulent ballots into any of the six cities without it being completely obvious. The vote totals in those cities don't show the presence of fraudulent votes or voters. There is no there there.

Search for it on Amazon. No love.

I bought it two days ago and already a search of Amazon's main page does not find it. B&N has a version for the Nook and there is an app that allows Nook files to play on Amazon's Kindle Fire. FWIW.

I just attempted to download to my Kindle. It was available on Amazon yesterday. Not today.

Could not find on AmazonSmile. Cancel culture gnomes never sleep.

Correction - I found it.

FWIW, I was just able to buy off of Amazon.

I have now read through the first three chapters, and they are entirely factual and well documented. I am well into the part where he discusses "How the crisis could have been ended" and the personalities involved, and although this is more of a fun read and the author's opinions intrude he has already established that the election was stolen without any doubt. President Nixon discovered that the cover-up is worse than the crime. What happened the night of the election cries out to be examined in broad daylight. Lacking Court scrutiny of any of what he charges the conviction that is held by at least 90 million voters that the election was stolen exists. This is a fact, independent of the facts of the case, and those who are in denial are in denial.

I'm surprised Scott didn't spike this column. Questioning the Narrative is Unacceptable!

Has the policy changed? Can we read the missing AmmoGrrl column, now?

President Nixon discovered that the cover-up is worse than the crime. What happened the night of the election cries out to be examined in broad daylight. Dominion may sue for defamation but I assume that after all the publicity this will not go to Discovery. They may possibly get a Judge Sullivan to rule in their favor, but it was demonstrated in Pennsylvania thst the machines could be remotely hacked in a matter of minutes. The paper-overed windows, the distancing of poll observers, the early morning ballot drops and the unprecedented halt in counting together with numerous affadavits indicate to any fair observer that there are matters which require clarification. Lacking Court scrutiny of any or all of these in detail the conviction that is held by at least 90 million voters that the election was stolen exists. This is a fact, independant of the facts of the case, and those who are in denial are in denial.

<"“Because instead of widespread election fraud, it only takes deep election fraud in six cities to flip the swing states they are in, to thereby flip the electoral college, and to thereby steal the election nationally. Those cities are Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, Phoenix, and Las Vegas.”"

This is from the introduction of the book.

Having actually looked at the votes totals in those counties I can say with complete certainty he is wrong about Detroit and Philadelphia, and with near certainty he is wrong about the other four counties.

Detroit and Philadelphia had no role in the defeat of Trump in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

There are districts in Philadelphia with greater that 100% voter participation - more votes than registered voters.

Unless there are a great number of motivated, model citizens living there, I suspect voter fraud occurred.

That is not true. Where did you hear that lie.

Nope. Not true. This is false. There's no valid source for this.

A Biden voter, I see.
"Orange Man is, in fact, very bad. The evidence is staring us all in the face." At least you are not anonymous.

Barbara Streisand

I'm going to make a guess here. You have never looked at the results from Detroit and Philadelphia County, nor have you compared them to 2016 results. Am I correct?

Of course you are correct. Buy hey, Barbra Streisand.

The gaslighter is here......Jeffy's spinning like a top. Must be part of the "cabal."

Why not? According to this information 43 states did not require a witness signature. Many of those states went for Trump. Has anyone, anywhere, expressed any concern about what happened in those states? Is there any evidence of fraud in those states? No. Nobody cares.

The fact that 43 states do not require witness signatures and yet there are no allegations or cases of fraud and that election officials in those states and the legislatures in those states approved the results is strong evidence that yes, we can believe the results in those states. There's no reason to believe that widespread vote fraud exists because of the absence of a witness signature.

More gaslighting.
"Orange Man is, in fact, very bad. The evidence is staring us all in the face."

He and Jeffy have spun this for all they can, but they rely on a site put together by the same people who perpetuated the fraud. The "cabal" is alive and well and trying to cover their tracks.

PA did not include any ballots that arrived after 8PM election night to be counted.

Wow. We're adults here. Stop lying.

You may be an adult, but you are misinformed.

https://www.electionreturns...

Wherever you "learned" this has been lying to you.

Jeff forgets that it was this issue that was at the heart of Justice Alito's concern. They counted them for a week afterward.

David. It's not true. Please rely on real information.

https://www.electionreturns...

Just got the Kindle edition, have yet to read it, but I have heard that he criticizes various actors in this drama and maybe even President Trump for the way this was handled. My own feelings are that this is not over yet, there are many things we are not aware of, and I will read those passages with a critical eye. My take is that President Trump always acted in the best interests of the Nation and likely made the best decisions under the circumstances for the good of America. The role others played in this not clear and may never be known in its entirety.

It continues to astonish me that any thinking American who has been paying attention for a long time (for me, I've known about Donald Trump since the 1980s, when he rose to national prominence) can believe that Donald Trump acted in any interests other than his own. He has always acted in his own interests, since he was young, and he continued to do so as President. No respect for conflicts for interest or the avoidance of self-dealing. His own well-qualified underlings, which he hired, who had an opportunity to observe him, have said this. Why would anyone believe that Donald Trump had America's interest at heart? How is it rational to believe that?

Just lame. You don't have ANY information about President Trump that anyone else doesn't have. All you have is your opinion, and you know what they say about those....

And even more gaslighting.

"Orange Man is, in fact, very bad. The evidence is staring us all in the face."

Cato. He even acted in your interest even though you are a deranged Leftie. Pretty altruistic wouldn't you say?

No. I'd say it's pretty clear from Trump's experience of being in the public eye for over 40 years -- including his own statements -- that he's concerned with three things, none of which are my interest: 1) making as much money as possible, 2) getting as much praise and attention as possible, and 3) having sex with as many women as possible, whether or not they are his wife.

Poor troll.

What an evasive non-response from a non-serious person. Typical Leftie.

Evasive? I'd say it's as non-evasive as possible. My evaluation of Trump is based upon his own words. His own books, Tweets, and interviews show him to be exactly the person I say he is. There's nothing altruistic or honorable about Donald Trump.

But aren't you in the least bit curious why all your comments imply that Mr. Trump is bad therefore it isn't possible that he won the election no matter how much voter fraud is uncovered?

In all my years I have never see people in such a state of psychosis (mental depravity) over a single human being that it simply cannot be explained; and if the psychiatric professionals and researchers weren't so affected themselves with TDS, they might have started months ago to start the diagnosis of this debilitating mental disorder.

My 14 year old pomeranian has more sense than you.

I’ve read quite a bit and am not impressed. He repeats the canard that officials in Maricopa County made people use Sharpies that wouldn’t register in the tabulator. This is not accurate - they DO register. He repeats the story about the votes that “miraculously” appeared at the Civil Arena in Atlanta. That video has been analyzed repeatedly and the claim that workers pulled out suitcases full of ballots debunked. Aside from the raft of typos, inserted documents that are impossible to follow, lack of organization or coherence, I am so far not persuaded by the book.

They did NOT register, they leaked through to the other side which rendered the ballot unreadable. There was testimony by one person after another that when their ballots weren't read by the machines, the poll watcher forced them to deposit their ballots in a machine which then permanently discarded them.

And either way, I would venture to bet that we'll find out in a matter of time since the AZ legislature is going to analyze ALL 2.1 million ballots from Maricopa County.

Apparently they found some shredded ones in the dumpster, so maybe not.

Just admit you're a Leftie troll. The Atlanta video has been debunked? What a laugh that is.

OMG! I comment on here all the time and I'm anything but a leftie. I'm as conservative as you can get but I also have to be honest. The book is a mess - full of typos, hard to follow, charts too small to read and incoherent. I really want to believe the Democrats stole the election because I think they tried, I think there was voter fraud and we now have a senile old fool in the WH. I'm just not, so far as I have read, convinced by the author. If the Atlants video truly showed vote fraud, I think it would have been revealed.

You're being exposed to what Trumpism is all about. You cannot say anything, no matter how well founded in the law, or morality, or evidence, that crosses Donald Trump and his hold on power. If you do, you're a RINO, no matter what your credentials or loyalty to the Republican Party.

I get called a leftie for the things I say about Trump, who I think is awful because he's corrupt and stupid, despite the fact I don't vote left and don't support leftie causes. I think the left is completely nuts. But in today's GOP if you criticize Donald Trump you're called a leftie. The GOP is in the grip of a bizarre cult of Trump right now.

What do you mean "should be revealed"? You didn't see it?

He wrote 40,000 words to get the truth out in a matter of days. If your more intersted in spelling and formatting than content then you need to choose. The MSM flat out lies. He made some errors in haste. Chose your preference wisely.

There is a video of the Georgia incident and a bogus water main break and a resumption of counting after poll watchers had been sent home. The problems with Maricopa County are more serious than Sharpies, and ongoing. I did not state I expected to find the thrust of the book invalid. I intended to suggest that the author had his opinion on how to handle the situation as did other actors. My take is to trust President Trump in these matters.

Why would anyone trust Donald Trump? I don't get that.

I don't either. It is totally bizarre that people are unable to see how.much of a liar he is.