I had a go at Web2.0-ifying my site. I reckon it looks better than it did in version 1.0(?) but I reckon most visitors will have to wait until 2.1 until it's adopted as a model in its own right.

please go to http:/www.guineapiggrandpri... or throwkiaseyes.com
thanks

I was amazed at the quality of web2.0 logos

I am really satisfied with my web2.0 logos

Thank you, voodoo :)
I&#39m not a native speaker, so it&#39s not the easiest thing for me to write this hole thing down. The best I can do is to check the text above in MS WORD and see where are the "red waves" under the misspelled words. ( if firefox has missed something ).
I&#39ll try to improve myself. Thank you for giving me this tip.

Interesting article but you might want to proof-read and spellcheck it.

having logo for your product is quite necessary for your company to have it&#39s own trademark and emblem. Great article here.

Very good analysis. Printing is often less (or un-)important for Web2.0 businesses so gradients etc are less of an issue.

Im fan of two colors logos. Nice observation on "15 - rectangular backgrounds are the safety belt for bad designed word mark."

saludos.

You may find useful this article:
Digg, Wikipedia and the myth of Web 2.0 democracy
in order to understand the web 2.0 idea