We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Harry Stottle • 5 years ago

Amongst everything else, what about the UN’s climate policies? An extra 3.5 billion people in Europe alone would destroy so many nature reserves. The impact would be enormous. I guess the environment can go to hell when white extinction is the goal.

Scott Davis • 5 years ago

But wait... the Global Warming Nuts said that Europe will be uninhabitable in 20 years due to Climate Change... How are you going to put 3.5 billion people somewhere they can't live?

Hey!

Maybe they're really on our side, and that's the long game - get all 3.5Bn to Europe before it becomes unlivable, then watch them die. . .

Paolo Pagliaro • 5 years ago

What about family-friendly policies, instead of promotion of all kinds of sexual perversion? It's clear that the political maneuver is twofold: destroy the traditional family and import working slaves. In other words, our "betters" envision a society where a mass of divided workers are not able unite on the basis of common values, cultural or familiar, to protest their conditions; if they protest, in fact, they are immediately labeled as fascists by the media, one of the fundamental constituents of the new class in power.

jillhare • 5 years ago

Women in the western world have been brainwashed over 40 years to have less children "for the sake of the planet", cajoled into full time employment instead of starting families in their younger decades, given the Pill. Our birth rate has plummeted. Now they cry they have too few population, not enough workers to pay tax and service their elite lifestyles.

I don't buy it. This reconfiguration of the human population of the planet has been on the table for many decades. running parallel with their cries for less population in the West.. This UN Global Migrant Pact is, in fact, an extension of the 1973 EEC/Arab Global Migration Compact, with exactly the same content (+ some more nasties".

Whites have always been the minority race, on a global scale.

It's nothing more than that the ignorant and superstitious fear and hate that which they can never understand - much easier to kill it and remain ignorant and superstitious.

For example, the Abrahamic religions were all created by the same group of non-whites, for the purpose of spreading ignorance and superstition.

Just_Sayin' • 5 years ago

+1. ReverendDraco, you said: "...the Abrahamic religions were all created by the same group of
non-whites, for the purpose of spreading ignorance and superstition." MY research indicates that you are most likely 100% correct on that point. It appears that the so-called "Jews" (10% Berber-ARAB, 90% Slavo-TURK) are behind the "Abrahamic" religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam). The so-called "Jews" are mostly ARAB. Therefore, NON-White.

aliswell • 5 years ago

"The Abrahamic religions were all created by the same group of non-whites, for the purpose of spreading ignorance and superstition."

What rubbish! You are lost.

Facts don't give a fuck about your feelings.
Neither do I.

Just_Sayin' • 5 years ago

+1. "Facts don't give a fuck about your feelings."

100% correct, again.

aliswell • 5 years ago

Can you godless regressives ever come up with anything original?

Couldn't say - when I meet one, I'll ask.

Now, if you'll excuse me, it's time for me to go to church. I have a great sermon prepared, and I don't want to waste it.

Guest • 5 years ago

Wait til you see my dark side. . .

aliswell • 5 years ago

100+ votes.

jillhare • 5 years ago

Thanks allswell. The reason I made my point, is that it illustrates the manipulation of us as a tax paying workforce, to work instead of increasing the population, especially after WWII. On that occasion the influx of islamic migrants was to "replace our war dead".

Now, its because we didn't have enough children, and they need either more tax payers (fat chance), or super cheap labour for jobs "we won't do". All lies. hen we look a the screw of islamic mass migration "Pacts" over this last generation, iI's all one long range plan, now culminating in the UN's legalisation of mass migration, which is now awarded a "human right". They have completely abandoned their rhetoric of "the poor refugees) while blatantly ignoring the actual refugees in camps for years..

There is an absence of rationale within modern western politics on enabling mass migration (as it has done since 1945 up to the appalling current UN Global Migrant Compact, it's previous first cousin the EES/Arab Global Migrant Compact of 1973, and the EU's Pact with signatory islamic countries around the Mediterranean to form the EuroMed, which has been going on since 1995.

What our governments say and what they do are contradictory, absurd and criminal as our infrastructure can't deal with the sudden rise in population and the high birth rate of the incomers. At the same time, funding has been withdrawn from all of the UK's infrastructure (defence, police, health education) on purpose.

The UN now moves to enact laws to counter those in place that protect Our rights. If Our rights are cancelled (which is pretty obvious right now), then we have no obligation to hold up our end of the contract with our governments: pay our taxes, maintain law and order or indeed register the birth of the children we Do have so they belong to the State.

The profession of investigative journalism has been demolished and what remains is seriously harried. There are very few people out there explaining things to the people. Now the UN have actually introduced a new law, banning any debate in the media on this new UN Global Migrant Pact, all of which is to to be ratified in Marrakesh on 10/11th December.

josephswysocki@msn.com • 5 years ago

It seems if the UN would ban abortions it would help more than importing caveman like creatures that are beyond ignorant to rebuilt their countries. This could eliminate 90 percent of rape and crime that these muslims bring in. These progressive judges claim that Muslims just are doing what muslims do so they have right over your rights. This shows the true intention of world order they leave out that in 40 years it will be over run with animals in high places ant they themselves will be toppled.

jillhare • 5 years ago

The text of the 1973 EEC/Arab Global Migrant Compact explains exactly what rights, exemptions and special privileges islamic migrants will be (and now have been) given over the decades when they came to the West. The 1973 Copact forms a large pat of the new UN document + of course the legalisation of said migration and the addition of the human right to do so. The Marrakesh Pact also includes the criminalisation of debate on migration.
I have a chunk of the 1973 Compact. If you're interested, I can copy it into another comment. (I'm aware it's easy to hog the comments with long boring text, but we've been oblivious to a lot of this stuff and now it's become vitally important. The MSM is silent. There is some discussion on Breitbart London.

ohio granny • 5 years ago

What is glaringly obvious is this is aimed directly at majority white countries with the only exceptions being Japan and South Korea. The other obvious thing is it takes direct aim at the west and developed countries. Why should third world, dysfunctional countries and dictatorships change their ways if they can foist their problems on other countries? For any western country to go along with this is treasonous.

Because to try and change the ways of dysfunctional countries is colonialism, and that's a bad word to leftists. No, better to just allow third-world degenerates into successful cultures so they can deteriorate those, as well.

jillhare • 5 years ago

Japan is a member of the UN and so would be affected by the UN Global Migrant Pact. Japan has refused to sign it. This UN Pact is global, not just for western countries. However we all know that the newly legalised islamic mass migration will not be going to Africa or Mexico, they will be heading to western countries, although both the US and Australia will not be signing this Pact. Currently New Zealand will be signing, but I understand the counter debate has begun.

Guest • 5 years ago
jillhare • 5 years ago

The UN is global. If Japan had agreed to sign the UN Global Migrant Pact, they would have been embraced in it terms. Japan has refused to sign it.

Basically, once mass migration is legally ratified and holds itself as a human right, then it will begin. But we know they will head to stable western countries who have benefit systems. They're not going to go to Africa, India or Mexico, are they.

The US and Australia will not be signing this Pact, and neither will most of Eastern Europe so that rules them out. Netherlands is wavering, France has announced it won't sign. Russia is still thinking about it. New Zealand?

What we can expect, is chaos. One suspects that is precisely the whole point of this debacle.

Smedley • 5 years ago

How about encouraging procreation in the EU?

Do these morons even think WHY there are less babies being born?
DO YOU THINK IT COULD POSSIBLY BE FROM THE HIGH COST OF LIVING DUE TO HIGHER TAXES?

perhaps that is their idea. Bring in migrants, allow them to leech of the citizens of the invaded country, create violence and unrest, have babies which become citizens.

Undecider • 5 years ago

It was the U.N. crowd that got the depopulation going, with their vaccines and all. Then they foist upon us a bunch damned migrants.

Michael Brian Smallwood • 5 years ago

They want to destroy white people, as they are the only thing standing in the way of complete world government.

𝕭𝖗𝖊𝖜 • 5 years ago

In the meantime

France seems to be preparing their own Tiananmen Square protest with thousands of troops

Hass • 5 years ago

These are some dumb mother fuckers if they think replacing the population is the solution. Arbitrary skin color aside, if you take a population with and average IQ of 100, and import a replacement population with an average IQ of 80, depending on how many and how long of a time frame, you end up with a population with an average IQ of 90. If you've ever been to Mexico, you will easily see how just 10 points in IQ makes a huge difference (usa avg 98 IQ, mexico 88)

They are attempting a very stupid and seemingly easy solution to a population decline...and for what? What does a decline in population actually do? Why not try to incentivize the current population to have more kids by giving more tax breaks, or day care, or healthcare...but no, the dipshit millennials get to worry about their own selfish personal experiences over having a family..."I felt like putting a bullet between the eyes of every panda, or millennial that wouldn't screw to save its species" -Tyler Durden

jillhare • 5 years ago

Check out the Third Industrial Revolution, an economic theory by Jeremy Rifkin (economic and social theorist. A communist and fan of Friederich Engels). It requires a vast number of cheap labour to demolish and rebuild global infrastructure over the next 2 generations.
Rifkin is an advisor to the EU Commission (since 2003) and the current and previous Presidents of the EU Commission and a personal advisor to Angela Merkel. This economic theory seems to answer many of the seemingly irrational political decisions of the current age.

A couple of days after Australia announced it would not sign the UN Global Migrant Pact, it televised (prime time) a 2 hr lecture by Rifkin on the Third Industrial Revolution. It's chilling. The first 2 questions after the lecture were: 1) isn't this just another unattainable utopia?
2) What about corruption? Rifkin did not answer either of them. He's on UTube. He's deemed by academics as "controversial" and we now find this man is a long term advisor to the EU inner circle for 15 years.

Hass • 5 years ago

Interesting...too bad the political dinosaurs don't see the AI revolution coming to see that human labor will very rapidly become a thing of the past. Then what? How do they plan on demolishing labor if it wasn't even done by a human? What would be the purpose then? We're in for some interesting times in the next few decades.

A decline in population is a decline in tax chattel & other useful idiots. Gotta keep those numbers up, donchaknow. . .

Stefan Molyneux has been lighting twitter the fuck up over IQ differences for the last week or so. . .

Turns out, no society with an average IQ of 90 or lower has ever created or maintained a democracy.

Hass • 5 years ago

Interesting. Coincidence? I think not. IQ does nothing in the hands of nobodies, but with the right will, IQ is like a limitless pill except its endowed at birth and never wears off.

I high IQ person can decide not to be a brain surgeon.

A low IQ person cannot decide to be a brain surgeon.

Hass • 5 years ago

Society has looked at people marrying and having families based on IQ as a bad thing. Why? This could be just the thing the world needs to advance past our little rock in the universe. Too bad most people are so dumb.

John Steel • 5 years ago

Oy vey, rejection of this is antisemitic.

MAGA GRIZZ • 5 years ago

Self loathing euroweenies.
Please send in the blue helmets to enforce your white hate madness.

Pro Tip: Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets.

Jas • 5 years ago

What about artillery?

I only know about arms, not ordnance.

Guest • 5 years ago
Just_Sayin' • 5 years ago

"They" (the "elites") certainly must think so ~ as do their SAYANIM ("HELPERS") ~ like Macron and Merkel, and Hitlary.