A ruling party politician in India, Nand Kishore Gurjar, said that people who want to offer to make animal sacrifices during Id al-adha should sacrifice their children as the meat of innocent animals can spread the coronavirus.
ANSWER
these fanatical Hindus are another pathology apart.
but everything they do with the Qur'an sharia, and with the Talmud SpA Coorportion: FED shareholders lgbtq: the antichrist ..
a threat can be interpreted by the other slave peoples of the planet such as: Chinese, dalit dhimmis and goyims, which have an apparent human form, but which are actually animals of Rothschild and Erdogan

Obama, "Trump feeds nativism, racism and sexism"
AND WHAT DOES A TRAITOR OF THE HOMELAND MUST SAY / slander as is the Democratic Party to legitimize itself?

Obama, "Trump alimenta nativismo, razzismo e sessismo"
E COSA DEVE DIRE/ calunniare un TRADITORE DELLA PATRIA come è il Partito Democratico per legittimare se stesso?

Ol brainfart is getting lots of press with his ignorant/evil idiocy!!!!!!

Anybody, Jewish or not, who denies the legitimacy of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, is a racist. The fact that the NYT did not bring somebody who strongly disagrees with Beinart on this subject clearly demonstrates its enormous anti-Israel bias.

Bingo! Only real racists keep screaming about the perceived racism they see everywhere.

Beinart sounds like he would be buddies with hitler.

those like Mr. Beinart who argue in softer terms, framing their position in terms of human rights.

It has always been the practice of antisemites to frame their hatred in terms of whatever was the highest court-of-appeal of the time. When "racial theory" was considered "science", Jew-hatred was based on notions of racial superiority/inferiority. Today, concern with human rights is on the ascendant — and, for the most part, rightly so — so this is what the scoundrels leap to wrap themselves up in.

But let's be clear: calling for the destruction of a people, to push them into the sea, is not a "human right", nor is thwarting efforts in that direction a violation of human rights.

The Arabs who were abandoned by their brethren, and left in a territory without a country (calling themselves "Palestinians" is also, please remember, a lie), under the administration of the country who won that territory after defending themselves against their neighbors' aggression, actually have things pretty good and would be far better off if they were not so hell-bent on murder.

Just imagine how well they could live if they turned their undisputed cleverness to productive goals and made peace with Israel. ... Instead of being a pawn, they could be the envy of the Arab world.

The NYT no longer slinks around its' support for genocide as in WWII, but now openly calls for it. This is an act of outright war.

How can you say that the NYT supported the genocide, the holocaust of WWII? Can you support your statement with facts?

Asks a downvote orgy-ist who pretends not to have the slightest clue.

Where is the proof of your slanderous statements?

The downvote orgies are obvious; as well as the complete cluelessness.

Again, where are the facts behind your slanderous statement? You know, I assume, that you could be sued for slander!

"Sued", lol. Such a narcissist thou art, confusing a factual critique with lèse-majesté.
Flagged for threat.

The NY Slimes never wanted Jew's to have a State of their own. Jew's have more historical rights to Israel, than the owners of the Times, have to New York. Not only did the NY Slimes oppose the rebirth of Israel, but it refused to report the murder of the European Jew's. The NY Slimes is an antisemitic rag.

...and run by self-hating "progressive" imbeciles so monumentally blind to facts that they have become, in fact, closet fascists themselves. Remember, for the true "progressives" ideology comes first and foremost. Facts and history - or even people - don't matter.

The quasi silence of "the new pravda times" and WaPo makes them both complicit of the Holocaust (Hitler) and Holodomor (Stalin). Add C. Lindbergh, Ford, Ed Kennedy (asking for the help of the KGB to defeat R. Reagan) etc..... and now supporting the CCP against Trump and the American people!
Beinart is promoting the "dhimmization" of the Jew!

Eugenics is not a religion. Ethnic Separatism is not religion. Religious Exclusion is Religious Isolation. Cultural differences create diversity. God is not exclusive or malign.

Israel excludes no religion and has a great deal of racial, ethnic and religious diversity, perhaps more than anywhere else in the mideast. What in the world are you on about?

I most certainly don't deny the legitimacy of Israel as a home of the Jewish people. Peter Beinart didn't do it either. One may agree or disagree with Peter Beinart's views, but it is absolutely wrong to maintain that Peter is preaching for the elimination of Israel. Whatever you consider Judea and Samaria, as an occupied or disputed territories, it is obviously wrong to have millions of people without any civil rights under the control of Israel. There must be a solution to this wrong situation, and although I am not saying that Peter's solution is, or is not the right one, I think that he should be lauded for encouraging a discussion about a solution. Please treat the word "solution" in a positive manner.

Abe, the Arabs whom you envision as lacking civil rights are not under Israel's control, and have not been so for decades. They have been under the civil administration of the Palestinian Authority ever since the Oslo accords. Israel's IDF administration in the disputed territories only controls security and the passage between these disputed territories and the internationally-recognized sector of Israel. If these Arabs are lacking in civil rights it is not because Israel has denied them anything -- unless, perhaps, you would prefer that they be under full Israeli sovereignty which provides by law equal rights for *all* its citizens (that includes Arab citizens) and almost as many rights even for non-citizen residents. I would agree that this sovereign "solution" would be much better for the Arab residents within an undisputed cisjordanian Israel that could normalize its jurisdiction. Nonetheless, meanwhile it is the PA that controls them and fails to provide the civil rights you advocate.

What Beinart seems to be denying is the legitimacy of Jewish sovereignty over our own affairs, in the cisjordanian sector of the Palestine region that was allotted to us in 1920 at the San Remo conference, at the same time that the transjordanian sector (4x larger) was allotted to the Arabs of the region. Jews are not allowed to settle in Arab Jordan; and it is not Israel's fault that some Arabs chose to remain (and were allowed to remain) in the cisjordanian Jewish sector, but the consequence of that choice should not be for anyone to try to justify diminishing the Jewish allotment or to deny the legitimacy of a characteristically-Jewish state.

It is incorrect to state that the Palestinians in the occupied or disputed territories are not under the control of the Israeli army. Area C, is under a total Israeli control and the PA has a so called autonomous control in area A and a more limited Control in area B. To say that the Palestinians are not controlled by Israel, but by the PA, is like saying that the residents of NY City are not controlled by either the State on NY and/or the Federal government. Referring to the Balfour declaration, or the San Remo agreements both referred to a „Jewish Home“. Again I am not quarreling with the right of Israel to exist, but I am of the view that the question, or problem, of millions Palestinians having hardly any basic civil rights has to be solved. If I understand you correctly you are indirectly supporting Peter Beinart‘s solution, in as much as if The disputed or occupied territories are annexed, which you seem to favor, and as you rightly state, its residents will be treated as equal citizens, Israel will be a bi national state. Again, I an not saying that Peter‘s suggested solution is, or is not, the right one. I am only of the view that the existing problem must be solved and the solutions to this problem must be discussed.

Abe, you overestimate the amount of control that Israel -- or more specifically, the IDF -- currently exercises, even in Area C; and you likewise underestimate the PA's actions or inaction as determinative of Arab rights, privileges, and wellbeing.

However, the kind of resolution I envision does not create a bi-national state at all. Israel would remain a characteristically Jewish nation-state, defined by principles enshrined in a constitution yet to be formulated, and none of the ordinary democratic processes in which citizens may participate would diminish or change those characteristics. MKs would likewise be required to defend that constitution, and could not propose legislation contrary to it. Democratic rights, even in the USA, do not entitle anyone to overturn the Constitution. So it would be in Israel as well, and perhaps even more adamantly. Further, no current Arab resident would be compelled to become an Israeli citizen, nor would citizenship be granted automatically. Some may prefer to remain officially-recognized non-citizen residents, despite the limitation of not participating in national elections but only in regional or municipal ones. Such a status may be preferred in order not to compromise citizenship or potential citizenship in another (presumably Arab-Muslim) nation. Those who do apply for Israeli citizenship would become like the 20% of Arabs who currently are Israeli citizens. But their additional contribution potentially to increase that percentage would not be any more a bi-national influence than at present, and would not influence the Jewish constitution.