Not true. I am a Jew in the US who supports Trump and credits him being the best US president ever for Israel.

so am I but unfortunately we're the exception.

We may be the exception, but I see a few liberal Jews starting to reject the democrat party, primarily based on democrat support for mostly not peaceful protests.

The Tide, she's a-changin.'

Better happen real fast! I hope I hope!

Amen!

Times - the Bob Dylan song, "The times, they are a-changin"

I didn't want to plagiarize. We already have that choice in the upcoming election cycle. ;<}

It's not
plagiarizing if you put quotes around it.

"Seems like deja vu all over again."

If you put it inside quotes, it's not plagiarizing.

YES, "A FEW". A VERY, VERY FEW FEW.

...burning bibles and removing Ten Commandments from public spaces.

I may be wrong,but isn't the display of the Ten COMMANDMENTS required by the Constitution?

You are wrong.

IT'S NOT REQUIRED. NOR IS IT PROHIBITED.

Somehow it takes Jews way too long to figure political things out. They are faster in science and arts. Politics is their Achilles heel!! They are always on the Radical Left

That is not true. Most are moderate.

We will see in November who is right!! 75% is far from "most". So, 75% vote Democrat, i. e. are Left-wing and now this is not moderate. Now this is Radical Left!! We will see what happens this year, Arlene.

If you the the Dems are left wing you need to travel more. Most Dem policies are to the right of the vast majority of other countries - they just have a few hard left idiots like Sanders to mix things up.

If this was true, Sanders would have won the nomination. He lost TWICE.

IMHO the fix was put in both in 2016 and 2020 just so it would appear to be very moderate.

You are VERY STUPID!! And it does not make any sense to talk to stupid people.
We just block them, not to waste precious time. Sanders was NEVER MEANT to be president by fascist D-RATS anti-Semites!!! If you do not understand that, quite commenting

Most are moderate, but most vote Democrat, which is today very arguably, on the far left.

MOST JEWS ARE INDEED PRO ISRAEL, BUT EVEN AMONG THOSE WHO ARE PRO ISRAEL, NOWADAYS OTHER ISSUES "TRUMP" THEIR LOVE FOR ISRAEL.

The other issue is their love for America.

YOU ARE CORRECT TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE JEWISH/MY LOVE OF AMERICA YET I TAKE ISSUE WITH YOUR CALLING IT AN "other issue" [much as I fear being anti-Semantic].
LOVE FOR ISRAEL AND LOVE FOR AMERICA TO ME ARE FAR FROM CONFLICTING, THEY ARE CONFLUENT. I ALMOST THINK ONE CAN'T REALLY HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER. IDENTICAL IDEALS, LOVE OF OUR HISTORIES, AND A DESIRE FOR A FAIR, FREE, OPEN, DYNAMICS DESTINY.
ONE NEED NOT BE SCHIZOPHRENIC TO LOVE BOTH, BUT IT MAY BE A REQUIREMENT TO LOVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER.

You are right but I take issue with American Jews who support a fascist who destroys America while throwing a few crumbs to Israel. He purposely for his own benefit takes advantage of naive American Jews. I also suspect he wants us all to make aliyah in order to make America totally Xian and/or to hasten what they call a rapture.

YOUR FALLACY, ARLENE, IS THAT YOU DEPICT HIM AS BEING STUPIDER THAN HE ACTUALLY IS [and that would be impossible]. NOBODY [not even he] THINKs HE WILL GET ONE VOTE MORE FROM JEWS THAN 30% [surely not
from me; nor shall I be voting for Biden, and not because of his Alzheimerz; that and being my age bring me to identify with him, but I beat him out having become feeble minded before he had/has].
THE FACT REMAINS THAT JEWS [by and large] ARE GENETICALLY UNABLE TO PRESS ANY LEVER THAT DOES NOT RECITE "DEMOCRAT". I, BEING IN AN UNDEFINED CATEGORY [something akin to being "off the wall"] CAME CLOSE TO SPLITTING, SINCE COLLEGE, 50-50 [and once for "independent" Ralph Nader, knowing Clinton would wiin but wanting to be one of the initial #METOOs as a protest].
AT ANY RATE, HAVE NO FEAR. SUCCESSFUL FASCISTS, ALAS, HAVE NOT BEEN IGNORAMUSI; HE WILL GET SO CREAMED IN NOVEMBER THAT IT WILL MAKE GEORGE McGOVERN AND WALTER MONDALE LOOK LIKE VICTORS.

FROM MY LIPS TO THE LIBS, NORM?

I DON'T [necessarily] DISAGREE BUT AM NOT SURE IF YOU'RE IMIPLYING THAT THE LIBS HAVE G-D's EARS?

NORM, THERE WILL BE AN embarrassing loss BUT IT WON'T BE BIDEN'S [for whom I do not plan to vote - nor for the other mis-fit, just as I "recused" myself in 2016]. 2016 WAS CLOSE, PERHAPS AS CLOSE AS THEY COULD COME. BUT 2020, NO WAY! FIRST, TAKE THE [and it may sound small] 3- 4% WHO VOTED TRUMP IN 2016 AND NOW WILL VOTE BIDEN. SUBTRACT THE 1/10 OF 1% [if that; I've yet to find one] WHO ARE SWITCHING FROM CLINTON THEN TO TRUMP NOW. SUBTRACT FROM BOTH THOSE WHO DIED, 2/3 HAVING VOTED TRUMP, 1/3 FOR CLINTON. ADD IMMIGRANTS WHO LEGALLY BECAME SINCE 2016 VOTERS. [I'd speculate 90% for Biden, 10% Trump]. FELONS WHO SINCE 2016 BECAME ENFRANCHISED, ANOTHER 90%. PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN 14 THRU 17 AND NOW ELIGIBLE TO VOTE? ONE MAY SPECULATE BUT ANYONE WHO THINKS IT WOULD BE 50-50 WANTS TO MAKE HIMSELF/HERSELF HAPPY TODAY AND PAY IN SPADES "TOMORROW". ADD THE INCREASE AGAINST TRUMP WHOSE FAMILIES A] HAD SOMEONE BECOME UNEMPLOYED AND/OR B] HAD SOMEONE DIE FROM THE VIRUS, BOOM! HE'S OUT OF THE BOX. "OH, BUT IT AIN'T HIS FAULT". WELL, FRIEND, GUESS WHERE THE BUCK STOPS!.
YOUR A GOOD PERSON SO I'D LIKE TO SEE YOUR [inevitable] NOVEMBER 4TH DISAPPOINTMENT MITIGATED.

NORMSKI,
THROUGHOUT 2018 I RANTED AND RAVED AS TO HOW TRUMP WAS MAKING PELOSI HOUSE SPEAKER. I WAS POO POOED AND CONSTANTLY TOLD THEY'D LET ME HAVE IT "THE DAY AFTER" [the election]. YET THEY ALL DISAPPEARED, NARY A SOLE WITH A SOULFUL ["We should have taken your warmig"] REFRAIN.
THE DAY AFTER WILL BE NO MORE FUN THAN I EXPERIENCED IN 2016. I SAID TO ONE AND ALL "IRRESPECTIVE OF THE OUTCOME, MY ONLY PLEASURE WILL BE THE LOSER'S CONCESSION SPEECH".] AND AS YOU MAY RECALL, EVEN AS TO THIS "SHE" DEPRIVED ME [perhaps justifiably; as I'm depraved, I ought to be deprived, no?].
SO, AS WE SAY IN THE OLD COUNTRY:
SINBAAT SALAAM

NOT MUCH OF A CHANCE. RUTH BADER G. IS A BETTER BED [but to aggravate me, she won't].

Do you have something against RBG? If so, that would confirm your Alz diagnosis.

I FIND IT UPSETTING [very upsetting] WHEN ANY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE PLACES HIS/HER IDEOLOGICAL BIASES AHEAD OF THAT WHICH SUCH A JUSTICE IS SWORN TO FURTHER, TO WIT, FOLLOWING THE LAW AS ESTABLISHED, STARE DESISIS, RES JUDICATA, ETC. YES, I AM ABOUT AS SENILE AS ANYONE YOU'VE EVER COME CLOSE TO MEETING, BUT I SUGGEST YOU AVOID USING THE YARDSTICK YOU'VE HERETOFORE DEMONSTRATED WHICH IS TO APPLY MALADIES SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF A PERSON HAVING, FROM TIME TO TIME [or even always], OPINIONS WITH WHICH YOU MAY DISAGREE [or, more severe, that which you don't disagree but would like to for whatever reason, being cool, fitting in, conformity with a group, etc.]. A WORD TO THE WISE IS SUFFICIENT; ERGO, A VOLUME CONFERRED ON ME WOULD BE USELESS!.

My apologies for the Alz reference. It was yourself who identified with it awhile back. It is not something to joke about. I had to look up the Latin words, as I am not a lawyer. From what I can gather, you must have the same upset about virtually all Supreme Court justices, who have been chosen by whomever the sitting president is according to their ideological biases.

AM NOT SURE I CAN RATE ALL OF THE CURRENT 9 AS TO EACH'S DEGREE OF BIAS/NON-BIAS [in their holdings, everyone has biases a/k/a opiions]. BUT I VERY MUCH BELIEVE THAT CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS FOLLOWS AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE THE STRICTURES TO WHICH THEY ALL VERBALIZE [albeit as to some, they demonstrate that it be but lip service, and I've found that to be "quite the case" with Ruthie]. AS FOR MY SENILITY, NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE; THAT'S MY [only?] GOOD CHARACTERISTIC. HAVE A GOOD EVERYTHING. markie di parkie

Mark, whether or not you have Alzheimers, you make more sense than most on this thread. We should all be so feebleminded. I consider myself left of center and vote independently depending on the candidates and current events. I actually voted for Anderson when I couldn't stomach either Reagan or Carter. This election demands that the Trump administration be abolished. I watched the Netflix documentary on H...ler and was chilled at the writing so clearly on the wall.

THE WALL???? WAIT TIL YOU HEAR REPORTERS QUESTION STEVE BANNON ABOUT THAT WALL!!

The only ones he stole from were Republicans, so...

ARLENE,
YOU ARE A GOOD PERSON AND I HOPE [and pray] YOU FIND THE FOLLOWING NOT OFFENSIVE [or, at least not overly so].
MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMANDMENT "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL" DOES NOT DELINEATE FROM WHOM ONE MAY NOT [and/or ergo from whom one may?]. YES, I AM A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, EVEN THOUGH I LIKE TO THINK OF MYSELF AS INCLINED TO BE INDEPENDENT. BUT I SO REGISTERED BECAUSE ONLY AS A DEMOCRAT CAN ONE HAVE A "VOICE" IN THE GOVERNANCE OF NEW YORK. IF I LIVED WHERE REPUBLICANS HAVE AUTOMATIC [monkey fashion VICTORIES, AND THEREFORE THE REAL CONTEST WOULD BE IN A REPULBICAN PRIMARY, I'D REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN.
ALL THAT SAID, AND NOT WANTING TO BE TOO JUDGMENTAL, TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE WHO HAVE THE IMAGE [forget reality, one way or the other] OF A STEVE BANNON IS, TO SAY THE LEAST, QUITE BAFFLING.

Not offensive at all. You are right about the Commandment. Having said that, I don't feel sorry for his stupid victims.