there is no monetary sovereignty of ours
then
there is no political sovereignty of ours
then how could a judiciary be ours
all Masons and their Islamic LGBTQ traitors?
must be sentenced to death!
Prosecutor of the Fatou Bensouda world court

Prime Minister Netanyahu launched the ICC's December 20 decision to open an investigation for war crimes, saying: "They want to turn the fact that Jews live in the Land of Israel, in their homeland, into a war crime. Is absurd. "
answer
war crime is the genocide of Islamic sharia
from 1400 years ago
as still today
therefore all agents who sit in the UN must all be sentenced to death!

Fatou Bensouda, a Muslim from Gambia, gave an interview with Al Arabiya before taking up the post of ICC prosecutor in June 2012.
Asked if her religion has a role in helping her with her new position, she said: "Absolutely, definitely. Islam, as you know, is a religion of peace, and it gives you this inner strength, this inner ability and a sense of justice. Together with my experience, this will help a lot. "
answer
Fatou Bensouda, a Muslim from Gambia,
Allah uuh akbar
death to all kafir infidels
Shiite apostates Takfiri
dhimmis slaves
for Murtidi death penalty for blasphemy and apostasy
until the ARAB LEAGUE condemns sharia?
Muslims must be inhibited from public offices and political parties!

Regardless of Bensouda's religious affiliation, I would assume that the ICC would regard any accused person or entity as being innocent until conclusively proven guilty. So let her and the ICC do their worst.

who does not see the sharia elephant of 1400 years of continuous sharia Islamic genocides
on what, he believes himself suitable
to present his judgment?

There will be no justice coming from the ICC when it is run by people that hold to an evil ideology. Their idea of justice is perverted from what true justice is.

Yer assumption makes an a.. of you😉

you can answer me
not condemning the universal crime of sharia law,
then, FED Russia IMF China ECB India UN EU, B'nai B'rith OCI, Riyadh, Erdogan
they all together condemned the theology of substitution to Islamic genocide UMMA: all Christians and all Israelis

Does not apply in tribunals such as the ICC. Here we have a situation where the prosecutor BenSouda is also the judge and jury. So I believe that your assumption is incorrect. Bensouda is the ICC prosecutor agreed. Who is the judge? Who is the Jury? In criminal cases here in Canada, all trials have a jury. ICC I remind you stands for the International CRIMINAL court.

Fat pig!!!

Irrelevant!

Wow, so she can simultaneously slam opponents of her misguided propaganda campaign against Israel for "misinformation" to change facts, while maintaining the objectively demonstrable lie that Islam is a "religion of peace!" How can any Muslim be impartial in matters concerning Israel? She should never have been assigned and an honorable jurist would recuse herself from such an obvious conflict of interest.

It doesn't matter what she says, Israel nor the USA are signatory s to the fraud they call the ICC!

Fatou Bensouda is a war criminal, one of the worst, her being part of the ICC proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the ICC is a corrupt, criminal organisation without any legitimacy whatsoever.

Quoting Wikipedia:

Functions under the regimes of Sir Dawda Jawara and Yahya Jammeh

Fatou Bensouda was appointed as state counsel in 1987 and deputy director of public prosecutions in February 1994 for Sir Dawda Jawara's government.[3] She played a central role in the early years of Gambian president Yahya Jammeh's regime, being chosen as his solicitor general and legal adviser after his 1994 putsch in 1996,[3] before becoming his Minister of Justice in August 1998 and being dismissed in March 2000.[4]

Jammeh's rule had been recurrently denounced for its disrespect of human rights, being considered as one of the "worst dictatorships in the world".[5]

Kangaroo courts do not have honorable jurists.

Where is this Palestine? I am not aware of any country going by this name.

as is the fertile crescent : an imaginary concept that never existed but that they can use to make the so called palestinian refugees hait Jewish Israel, Christians of Lebanon, Armenians of Turkey, Kurds of Syria, Coptes of Egypt, Other Moslem around the worldand and...western civilisation!

Ben Souda, she must be Moslem. She must take herself off the case against Israel because she is going to be biased.

NOT going to be biased, she IS BIASED!

You are absolutely right. She is already biased.

SHE IS a MOSLEM ! She said so in the interview. SO NO WONDER SHE IS BIASED . SHE WAS THEREFORE THE WRONG PERSON TO JUDGE THIS CASE. SO THE CASE SHOULD BE RE - SUBMITTTED FOR JUDGEMENT - WITH AN, OBJECTIVE, WELL INFORMED JUDGE. - NOT ONE COLLUDINMG WITH PALESTINIANS ! SHE SHOULD BE DISSMSSSED FROM THE POST !

So, per the article,

"The court would rest its war crimes charge on
Article 8(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, which classifies as a war crime
“the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts
of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”"

However, the territory Israel has populated is not "occupied" territory, as it is part of the original Israel, as of the 1947 map, before the Arab nations occupied some of its territory in the war they started. Israel won it back in 1967, but it is not occupied as it was theirs by law.....

And let us not forget the international treaties that empowered the 1920 San Remo agreements, which granted to Jews all of the western Palestine region, west of the Jordan river, for settlement and ultimate political self-determination, which means independent statehood as in the State of Israel, just as the eastern four-fifths of Palestine was granted to Arabs for the same purpose, which became the Arab Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Hence Israel is not an "Occupying Power" in the framework of the Rome Statute. Israel is a reclaimant of its own territory, which it has indeed administered in accordance with the San Remo stipulation about the rights of indigenous non-Jews. These include human rights, civil rights, private property rights, and local political rights. They do not include national rights to supersede those of Jews by taking any portion of their allotted territory to form an additional Arab Muslim state.

The illegal and inimical occupiers of Israel have no rights to protect, those are wrongs!!!

Now there, Daj, I must disagree with you. Human beings have natural rights and responsibilities. They do not cease to be human even when they fail to behave in accordance with those responsibilities. If we neglect that, we diminish our own humanity. On the other hand, Jews are enjoined to pursue Justice, as it is written: (Deuteronomy 16:20) “Justice, and only justice, you shall pursue, that you may live and possess the land which the Lord your God is giving you." In the case of the Canaanites, HaShem had already declared their iniquities to be sufficiently "full" that they were to be destroyed utterly. We can't make the same claim about all moslems or other arabs who reside in legitimately-Israeli territory nowadays. We can and must, however, prosecute terrorists for their murders and other crimes. We can likewise insist that other just laws be enforced, including those which examine and adjudicate disputes over property lines and ownership. When Israel does this, it is protecting its own soul as well as the rights of others. Determining just what those rights may or may not include is, nonetheless, one area where errors are sometimes made.

Justice is rendering to every man his just due without distinction. Rights are given by God, natural rights.

Rights impose corollary obligations. The right to life imposes an obligation to refrain from murder.

Muslims assert a right to attack, kill, plunder, rape and enslave.
Those are all wrongs, not rights.

Allah commands them to do those things. Islamic law licenses them to do those things and they claim individual and collective impunity.

There is no right to knife or shoot yer neighbor. There is no right to heave a rock or a fire bomb at him. There is no right to burn or cut down his olive trees.

Muslims know that Allah will damn them if they get a single drop of piss on their garments. They know they will burn for a multitude of sins. And they know that being killed in the act of attacking Jews is their get outta Hell free card.

That alienates any natural rights they are born with.

Live and let live and to Hell with those who will not let live!!!

If there is any justice, Israel can not be obligated to host existential enemies within its borders.

Retaliating against unprovoked attacks is not unjust. Incarceration of attackers is not unjust. Taking hostages to exchange for them is unjust.

Using human shields is not just.

Everything Falestinians kvetch about is a consequence of their own actions. If they were not threatening and attacking, Israel would not take security measures.

War is the crime: jihad! Muslims are the criminals. By engaging in that crime they alienate their human rights because they will not live and let live.

Is there a right to be a made Mafiosa or can governments prosecute mobsters? How then can there be a right to be Muslim?

U nailed it, I tweeted it.

This is in no way relevant to the settlement issue. Jews are not being "transferred" to the West Bank. They're voluntarily moving back to places where they, or their ancestors, once lived before being expelled by others.

In addition, those territories never legally belonged to either Jordan or Egypt, and certainly not to the Palestinians, who were never the sovereign authority in any part of Palestine.

The same person who aided the genocicide in Gambia. Witch.

That fat blob of evilness herself is the very embodiment of all smear campaigns. Her 'facts' are the essence of terrorism. Herself has been the willing right hand of 2 bloody handed mass murderer african dictators so after that her being elected into any legal body shows its absolute forked tongued hypocrisy and its intent opposing its alleged purpose. Her next post will surely be the secretary general of Useless Nitwits if that mean, biased institution stll exists.

Appointing a Muslim to decide between Jews and Muslims is a denial of natural justice and Ms. Bensouda as a devout Muslim who abides by Sharia Law that states that Muslim Land must always be Muslim should have recused herself long ago. Ms. Bensouda as a devout Muslim that follows the teachings of the Quran that states and I paraphrase " If you find a Jew hiding behind a tree, you must kill him". How can anyone believe that this one individual can be impartial ?

Asking her to recuse herself is like asking hitler to step down from power because he was evil. Evil seeks power in order to force their evil upon others.

" If you find a Jew hiding behind a tree, you must kill him". is not an exact quote and is drawn from a sahih hadith in the collection of Imam Bukhari, it is not Quranic.

Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177 is the infamous genocide hadith to which you allude, wrongly attributing it to the Koran.

Thank you for the correction. is not the hadith the teachings or words of The Prophet Mohammed that must be followed? If not who wrote these words and what impact does it have for Muslims.

Y.W. Hadith are Islamic oral tradition, lit. sayings. They record what the salaf sawand heard Moe do and say. Bukhari supposedly winnowed down half a million sayings to 4700, all authentic.

In the genocide hadith, Moe is making a prediction, not an imperative. The imperatives are in 8:39, 57, 67 and 9.5, 29 & 123.

Moe raided the local Jewish settlements around Yathrib.That is sunnah, to be emulated as per 33.21.

When asked where he wanted his successors to invade first, Yemen or Syria, he chose Syria, saying that Allah had, on his account, taken a special interest in the people of Syria.

Turkey threatens Haftar forces: "legitimate targets if attacks on our interests"
The Libyan National Army (LNA) shot down 2 Turkish drones as they attempted to target their al-Watiya airbase in the southeastern part of Tripoli, Al Arabiya reported on May 8.
ANSWER
the devil Allah made them
and the devil Allah must swallow them!

When you give monkeys equal powers (giving them leading positions in all International organizations) with lions, what would monkeys do? Correct, put the lions in the cages. Israel was correct to not join the ICC in the first place, and the ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel. Let that Muslim monkey do what she wont to do (and we know perfectly well what she will try to do - building the cage for Israel). Meanwhile, Israel should head the US Peace Plan of the Century and return official status of Judea & Samaria back under the Israeli sovereignty.

The woman is pure evil. But to refer to black people as monkeys is also wrong. There are good and bad people in all nations and all races. I've known some very good God fearing black people in my days as well as some evil ones.

Since when has the icc been given the mandate to determine that "palestine" is a "state".

It hasn't!

"Islam, as you know, is a religion of peace,"

If she believes that, then she is not fit to be a para-legal's dogsbody, let alone a Chief Prosecutor in any form of international court. Has she ever mentioned it to rape victims, just before they are stoned to death, in any shariah-observant country? Has she thought to share her amazing claim with Christians in Nigeria, etc, as they are being butchered, and raped, by Muslim terrorist, and having their homes and crops destroyed? Has she made the point to homosexuals being hanged because of their sexuality, in Iran?

Islam is a satanic ideology. It is a cult of warmongering paedophiles, founded by the false prophet Mu Ham Mad, whose goal is the subjection, or death, of all non-Muslims - but especially Christians and Jews - as they establish their "world-wide caliphate"!

Porky can stick it in her nose!
As President Andrew Jackson said back 190 years ago replying to a Supreme Court ruling he disagreed with,
"John Marshall has made his Decision;
now let him enforce it''.

The article states: the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” For the life of me I can't understand how a state can "occupy" its own land and that that is considered illegal. Judea and Samaria were and are part of the Land of Israel. It's the Jordanians and the Palestinians that were/are occupying it illegally.
The International Court is totally impotent.

The International Court is totally Irrelevant.

Fact: No such thing as palestine exists and you are nothing but WRONG, period. No smear, just your ignorance.

.

You are quite right.

Much is made of the fact that Palestine did once exist. It was a country administered by the UK and could best be described as multi - cultural definitely with Christians, Jews and Muslims, and probably people of other faiths and no faith.

Palestine ceased to exist when Israel was formed by the UN in 1948. No internationally respected action has been taken over the past 72 years to re-start it. If anyone were to re-start Palestine as a country, rights would undoubtedly rest with the UK, and that's simply not going to happen!

.

Another corrupt international organization that needs to be ended.

“Absolutely, definitely. Islam, as you know,
is a religion of peace, and it gives you this inner strength, this inner
ability and a sense of justice. Together with my experience, this will
help a lot.”

HAHAHHA Religion of terrorism, is what it is. You are qualified to judge Jews or anyone else.

Fact: she is following the evil statues provided by evil people who want evil to rule in a very utmost and professional way. So what, its still wrong, its still evil, and she is blind to the truth. Doesn't matter that she follows evil in a professional manner.

Looks Like Obama sister.