The promoters of this evil pegeant are saddists just like Hitler himself who caused world wars 1 and 2 that made people to loose their loved ones,millions died as a result of one man and yet people with questionable characters were there promoting his evil ideologies.

Erm... what?

Islam horror ] [ SHAKIL AFRIDI! FREE FREE
Dr. Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani physician who helped the U.S. locate Osama bin Laden,
has been in jail in Pakistan since he was arrested days after the raid on bin Laden's compound in 2011.
In 2013, he was granted a retrial,
with a new charge that appears politically motivated: charged with murder in regard to the death, eight years earlier, of a patient he had treated. Afridi has gone on a hunger strike protest his unspeakable prison conditions -- including torture. His former lawyer,
Samiullah Khan Afridi, was murdered by the Taliban in March 2015.
The Obama Administration appears to have abandoned him.

Socialism of ALL flavors need to be wiped out.

no one should forget that besides the covenant of Moses
where access to Rothschild's demonic Talmud was not lost
there has also been a new alliance
against which all those predestined to hell (the Cain men) did not want to enter!
The Holy Bible - Luke 22.20. In the same way after having dinner, he took the cup saying: "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."

Luke 22:36 comes to mind as well.........
Bring it.

One wonders who was behind this disgusting contest?

The Aryan Airheads of the world are hidden most of the time. If you block them, you are admitting your argument is weak, therefore theirs must be suppressed.

They say it is better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak up and remove all doubt. You are killing their revelation of their brutal ignorance. They should be held up to ridicule for their racism and abandon our own.

There is one race. It is the human race. All other distinctions are arbitrary and capricious. I consider it like asking what color unicorn is. DNA tests show have West African, West Asian, and West European ancestry, but the percentages are useless. A group in India has much in common with my DNA. I suspect my Indian heritage is low. They could not identify 0.1%, so am I Ancient Alien?

My color is a shade of orange. Obama is dark orange and Trump is light orange. It comes from our red blood, brown pigment, and beta carotene.

I refused to answer the question of race. I have refused for the Census twice. I volunteered to have my serum checked for Covid-19 antibodies, but refused it when they demanded to know my "race." Other and orange were not on their list.

It is time to give up classifying humans by anything but their intelligence and character.

Congratulations JLS...you seem to be trying to bring the art of b*llsh*t to a whole new level! It's almost as if you have some idea what you're talking about! You must have a lot of spare time on your hands, but instead of using it to make yourself sound intelligent, you should consider napping.

https://www gatestoneinstitute org/topics/40/persecution-of-minorities

A goat 4 U , Sir ?

BAD Dush 666 4 u criminal?

Yup.
Beware ! I am looking through you ...

Character & integrity matter most. The book I read tells me to Condescend to men of low estate.

I agree with you totally about how many races we are, and I also refuse to designate my race as anything other than human. I think I am more pink than orange, but good minds can have different opinions.

That said, we have every right to refuse to give a PLATFORM to those who spew hate. GoDaddy was within their rights to take down the web site. Unfortunately, far too many people will be persuaded by the purveyors of hate. We have as much right to influence our culture and society as anyone else does, and it is not a sign of weakness to do so, but rather strength of character.

Surely this is a joke? I find Nazism to be abhorrent but don't you think they should be able to exercise their stupid contest? I mean, if we are to be consistent about our 1st A?

A person's right to freedom of speech has a couple of limitations. You don't shout "fire" in a crowded theater if there is no fire. You don't aid and abet the commission of felonies. Hitler committed crimes against humanity and murdered millions. Freedom of speech does not extend to being an accessory after the fact to his atrocities.

Hitler killed six million innocent people LEGALLY. Don't confuse legal and moral. Our legal system is based on Judeo-Christian morality. When we diverge it is with great suffering. Crying 200 million people will die if you don't give up all your freedoms except the ones I grant you today, is a form of crying fire in a theater.

If you have the power, you can always pass a law making your atrocities legal, but there is a higher law, which is both a legal entity, and a moral law. This is why the participants were tried for crimes against humanity. Our legal system WAS based on Judeo-Christian morality, but it is diverging even now. I totally agree with your last statement. But just because one thing is an atrocity, that does not mean that advocating another atrocity is moral.

I agree. I don't think I advocated for any atrocity. Hitler was an avid eugenicist (like Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood) and was very excited about the application of Darwin. His work scheme for Jews and others was that the strongest would survive the work camps and they would be the ones to kill before they procreated. It is pretty easy if all it takes is for one "expert" or "official" to decide who is essential and who is not, who is a valued life and who is not. This is an appropriate subject to discuss today of all days, actually, as we should note and celebrate the 75 anniversary of the end of WWII. The 19th Century was truly the "Bloody Century" mainly because of Atheism, Socialism and Communism. A terrible legacy. Hard to believe that it still holds so much allure to people.

Believe me, I well know about the connection between Sanger and Hitler. I have been active in the pro-life movement for a half century. And right now we have a handful of "experts" who are intent on destroying most of the world's population. And they're doing a very good job starting with destroying the world's economy. Without a robust economy, millions will starve.

Evil holds much allure for many. They have chosen it. We can take a lesson from Che Guevara. He, like other such people, were/are cowards. He was perfectly willing to murder many innocent people, but when it came to facing justice, he cowered like a baby. These people think they will be among the favored few, when in fact they are totally expendable, and the more they are in the forefront, the sooner they will be eliminated.

You and I are definitely on the same page.

Well hey I’m sure flakebook or uselesstube will be happy to pick that up, sounds exactly like what they would want to promote!

Yup. But they would not dare to name the beauty pageant "Miss Hitler". They will name it "Miss Guevara".

Human idiocy has no limits. In Poland, where I live, there are also many morons praising Hitler.

Shalom, get the book, A Man Called INTREPID by William Stevenson. Intrepid, won World War Two for us. In the second part of his book he is fighting the American left that supported Hitler. It is the same battle we are fighting today.
Robin

Good news but a small victory. Anti-Semitism is like the game in which players pound a figure on its head with a hammer, the figure retreats into its hole, and another figure pops up from another hole and gets bopped on the head, and so on. Jew hatred manifests itself in many ways. But I'll never do business with Go Daddy. Its administrators took WAY too long to de-platform the "contest."

You mean whack-a-mole?

Yep. Thanks. I totally blanked on the name of the game.

Hate sites have no place on ANY social media and a contest to see who is the most beautiful Hitler supporter is certainly a hate site. That goes beyond freedom of speech.

Not IMO. Nothing goes beyond freedom of speech. I "get" where you're coming from, but I respectfully suggest that you reacquaint yourself with our awesome Constitution.

Our awesome Constitution DOES NOT REQUIRE A PRIVATE PLATFORM to permit hate speech. The American Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment gives a person a right to REFUSE to host speech he disagrees with. Limits on suppressing speech apply ONLY to GOVERNMENT. It is always wise to FAMILIARIZE oneself with our awesome Constitution, and if you ARE familiar, you will know about this.

Our Founding Fathers did not anticipate the internet and its offspring — among them Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc., which (as an aggregate) function as public utilities in the highly profitable business of communications — a reality whose implications Congress should address, sooner rather than later. The "hosts" to which your post refers are a small group of billionaire techie entrepreneurs who claim their platforms provide a public service with regard to the exchange of facts, opinions and ideas. This oligarchy (largely leftwing) deploys censorship to suppress those facts, opinions and ideas that don't accord with their political agenda. That is NOT what the Constitution and its Framers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution, a foundational document upon which so much of the good that defines America rests. And it all begins with Freedom of Speech.

It is true our Founders did not envision the internet. It is also true they never envisioned tech giants. (From what I know of it, GoDaddy is not one of the really big players.) Regardless, the internet is supposed to be a place that is free. And that means not only for free speech we agree with, but for the freedom to deny someone else a platform if we disagree. If you say GoDaddy has no right to deny its platform to those it disagrees with, particularly those who clearly violate the terms of service they agreed to abide by, YOUR right to provide a platform for people who agree with YOU is also in jeopardy. We do not need to suppress the rights of GoDaddy. The federal government can address the real monopolies like Facebook, YouTube, etc. They can do so on the basis of anti-trust laws, and on this additional basis: a platform is either a common carrier or it is a private entity. If a common carrier, then it must permit ALL speech. If a private entity, then it will be held responsible for allowing things like child porm. And prosecuted. And if GoDaddy chooses to be a private entity, it has every right to take down that site, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution. Now, GoDaddy can be held responsible for letting its servers be used as relays for child porm.

Probably the biggest mistake in understanding the Constitution, is the failure to realize and acknowledge that it binds GOVERNMENT, not the individual and not groups of individuals who are not government. GoDaddy is private. It is not bound by the First Amendment. If you truly believe in free speech as you present it, then participate in a site like Brighteon. This is a private entity that allows dissent. But I would be very much surprised if even Brighteon would permit terrorists to come and plan attacks there. What we have lost is DISCERNMENT. In the age where there are no absolute standards and everyone does what he pleases, this is what happens. No discernment. And that is why people like this Hitler contest even dare to show their faces, because in a culture that has moral principles, they would scurry back under the rocks like the cockroaches they are. In the meantime, we must do what we can to show them our contempt and slather them with disgrace. It is the only way we can begin to turn society back toward sanity, because it is those who abuse our liberties and engage in licentiousness who destroy our way of life. And the last thing they need is people promoting their right to freedom of speech, when their speech kills. Ideas have consequences.

I'm not sure Go Daddy's size is germane to the issue here. Facebook (as you acknowledge) is "a player" and censors at will. As for agreeing to abide by Go Daddy's terms of service, you have a point. But how many of us read ALL of the small print that characterizes such agreements? Moreover, our Constitution binds governors and protects the governed. The two are inextricably linked. Still, I'm in sympathy with your views on discernment, the absence of standards and moral compasses, all of which inform the behavior of many today. I submit that in addition to "slathering with contempt" those whose actions are offensive, we may also want to consider voting some of them out of public office.

What is germane is the amount of INFLUENCE GoDaddy has. Compared to Facebook, not much as far as I can tell. As for terms of service, it is our duty to read them before we agree, and I do read them. The Constitution does not bind the GOVERNED with respect to limiting speech on our private platform. It only binds the GOVERNMENT. It's not even censorship when a private platform refuses certain expressions of speech or ideas. Only the government can censor. A person who doesn't like Facebook's actions is free to promote his viewpoint someplace else. As for voting them out of office, I consistently vote to do so, but unless a majority of those who vote agree with me, it doesn't cause them to be removed.

You are wrong on one part. GoDaddy is and has been the top registar of domains for over two decades. There are not many registars, last i checked about 10 years ago there was only 5. They are kinda a big deal and there actions affect the other registars.

Otherwise I mostly agree with you

I am not wrong on what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about registrars. I was talking about social media like Facebook and sites like YouTube. This is where the censorship of conservative and alternative medical views views is taking place. I am well aware that GoDaddy is a major registrar. They have far less control simply because you can always move your domain registration elsewhere very quickly. They don't control what you put on your site like Facebook and YouTube do.

First, I am no fan of any form of democratic socialism, under any guise! But i am a very large fan of freedom. Freedom of speech. Further, I am a very large fan of grown-up people being adults; if you do not like a site, why go there? If you disagree, then disengage from that which you disagree with; my point is, it is up to us as individuals to be Adults! It is up to adults, with children to monitor and prevent their children from accessing disagreeable materials. I detest all that Hitler stood for, lived in his capital; I likewise detest democratic socialism, communism, and islamism- for that matter- ANY form of supremacist thinking! Yet, I do not concur preventing these idiots with their devilish thoughts from expressing them; let them be the fools they wish and let me, as well as everyone else, be able to choose to be foolish or not!

islam.

The American Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech INCLUDES the RIGHT to refuse a FORUM to someone you disagree with. GoDaddy is perfectly within its rights to take down the web site. The First Amendment protects our right to freedom of speech, to be protected from GOVERNMENT action, not private action. And nobody has a right to promote mass murder or mass murderers. At the very least, this makes them accessories after the fact, and you can be PROSECUTED for that.

Yes sir, they did indeed have the right to take the site off their servers. But had they left it up, that would not have made them an accessory; their bylines in their disclaimer paragraphs I am certain give them legal leeway.

Leaving the site in place would have made them ETHICALLY an accessory. The mere fact they give themselves wiggle room does not absolve them of the ethical burden.

Its amazing we have been hearing this for a long long time 'freedom of speech', 'freedom to do what I want', be tolerant - that is why the world is in a complete mess, spiritually, financially, morally and ethically bankrupt - take a look, a lot of people have bought into this and their lives are not pretty. Be respectful of others who were persecuted by a maniac. So do you agree Hitler was a maniac? Take off your rose coloured glasses and see it for what it is - anti-semetic. God has warned us that whatever country touches my people (the apple of his eye) - jewish and real believing gentiles - well His word says they will pay. Look back in history. Where is Spain now financially, Germany, Russia, England. The USA stands for Israel and so does Aus. Are the jews perfect, no, but He will deal with them, like He will deal with us.

It kills me to post this, but I agree with Terry. Many of the Lithuanian relations on my father's side of the family didn't survive the Holocaust. But the only way to deal with "hate speech" is to counter it with MORE speech — speech that confronts the hatred and exposes its inherent evil. That said, I STILL won't engage in any way with Go Daddy.

Do not let it kill you .
Be smart instead of being a clueless .
There is GOOD and there is EVIL . Choosing the evil side is not an option for a moral person.

It must be great to live in a world that is black and white. Most of us live in a world dominated by shades of gray. Allow me to explain this in terms you can, perhaps, more readily comprehend. In the real world, a complex one, people are far more often obliged to choose NOT between good and evil but rather between the lesser of two (or more) evils.

Is it your opinion , my good woman , that being a Nazi is somewhat falling in a gray area ?

Nope. Nor do I state that in my post. You need to reread it a tad more carefully. But you're right about one thing. I AM a good woman. Also humble.

Of course there is good and evil in the world. But the world is complex. Fair-minded people are sometimes called upon to decide for themselves what the greater and lesser evils are in a given scenario.