Political or not, this is blatant anti-Semitism.

Good morning Harold,

Correct - but more than that it is also an attempt to change History - and even worse, it is an attempt to shake their fist in the face of God and remove His words and replace them with "man's words".

How stupid of them.

Shalom.

They are no difference than the rest of Europe who helped the Nazis murder six million Jews.

Good morning Jongnagy,

Jews (Children of Israel) have suffered persecution ever since Egypt and that is because God (who is Sovereign) separated them from all other peoples (tribes) and chose them to be His "special chosen" people. Naturally, other nations have been ENVIOUS because THEY would like to be God's chosen people.

Down through history ENVIOUS nations have tried to eliminate the Jew - but God has preserved His people - and WILL continue to preserve His people.

Other ancient civilisations have come and gone - but the Jew continues - because Jews are kept by a Divine Hand.

Lift your eyes and heart to the God who loves you and preserves you - and don't worry about those foolish "puny" nations who are shaking their fist in the face of a MIGHTY GOD.

Shalom.

Is it called "The Dhimmi Bible?"

Danish translation of New Testament eliminates references to Israel
ANSWER
the Danes should not be surprised if Muslims rape all women!

Big Deal!
This is nothing new,Europe has shown over & over their hatred of Jews.
One of the main things that the Jew hating Europeans can't handle is the fact that the Jews were never disowned & cast out,...they were just exiled & now they are back home in Israel after 2000 years.
This makes a mockery of Christian Europe's Replacement Theology!

Europe and it's Christian replacement theology will go down the sewer of history as the seed of Satan in Genesis 3:15.

It's written cursed be upon them that add or subtract from the Holy scriptures

If Christianity subtracted the New Covenant for Israel after Paul's death, does that mean that Christianity is cursed? Please be careful of what proceeds from your keyboard.

to me there is nothing ''christian'' about hating Jews. ''by their fruits ye shall know them'' is what Y'shua said. anyone can call themselves a christian, but it doesn't mean they are. people who persecute jews are false christians. tragically they are many, but they do not represent the millions of us.

In the entire chapter of Romans 11 Paul warned the Romans against replacement theology which all Christians practice today. He also warned against calling them enemies using their own words against them in verse 28. As concerning the gospel, enemies for your sakes: but they (Israel) are the elect for the Patriarch's (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) sakes, because the gifts and calling of Yehovah CANNOT be changed. Did you gentiles listen to Paul? The answer is NO YOU DIDN'T! If you did, you would not have rejected the New Covenant as written in Jeremiah 31:31-34, Hebrews 8:8-12, and Romans 11:26. You see folks, there are no IFs in the New Covenant.

most christians have not rejected st paul sir.

the man makes no sense

To the contrary. The whole chapter of Romans 11 was a warning and a threat to the Romans as they were already rejecting his words back then! They obviously weren't listening to Paul because if they were, Paul wouldn't have had to write Romans 11 to begin with!

Paul said these words in 2 Timothy 1:15 As you know, EVERYONE FROM THE PROVINCE OF ASIA has deserted me—even Phygelus and Hermogenes. Stephanie Wilson, I regret to inform you that ALL of Christianity has rejected the words of Paul in Romans 11.

some. not all. to say all is total bull sir!

Really? Total bull you say? Ok, then see if you can explain the following statement that Paul made to the Romans. Every Christian when confronted with these words will attempt to undermine what Paul said. NOW PROVE ME WRONG!!! Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is MY COVENANT unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the gospel, they might be enemies for your sakes: but as concerning the election, they are BELOVED for the PATRIARCHS' sakes. 29 For the gifts and calling of Yehovah are without repentance.

On what basis? If you would have bothered to actually read Romans 11, you would not have asked the question.

You didn't even bother to read Romans 11 did you? Ok, Here it is in black and white. Now you have a choice, believe the words of Paul or not. See if you can explain the following statement that Paul made to the Romans. Every Christian when confronted with these words will attempt to undermine what Paul said every single time! NOW PROVE ME WRONG!!! Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is MY COVENANT unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the gospel, they might be enemies for your sakes: but as concerning the election, they are BELOVED for the PATRIARCHS' sakes. 29 For the gifts and calling of Yehovah are without repentance.

i don't practice it i embrace all that he said. most of us do. you have misjudged me. shame on you.

That vast majority of Christianity reject Romans 11, and the New Covenant and that is a fact. Once again, Can you show me the scripture (There are two of them) that describes the terms of the New Covenant?

I don't know who Christos is but I know that Yehoshua Ha Moshiach is the testator aka facilitator of the New Covenant. Read Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Hebrews 8;8-12 for the terms of the New Covenant. Christianity has rejected those terms because they believe that the Gentile church is the "NEW" Israel.

By the way, isn't replacing the name Yehoshua with Jesus an act of replacement theology?

It is impossible to call Yehoshua to Jesus a transliteration. That leap is not transliteration but a replacement of the name Therefore it is replacement theology. Transliteration is the process of transferring a word from the alphabet of one language to another. Transliteration helps people pronounce words and names in foreign languages. ... It changes the letters from the word's original alphabet to similar-sounding letters in a different one. Jesus is actually the false god of the Druids Aesus/Hesus. The Pagan Romans adopted this false god from the English as the name sounded like the Greek false god Iesous. Jesus is a compound word and here is the definition. "Je" in Latin means "I am". Sus in Latin means "Swine". Therefore Christians call their false god a swine.
sus, suis
Definitions:
hog, pig, sow
swine

So when I say that Christianity has rejected the terms of the New Covenant, they did so by claiming they the Christians are the "New Israel" thereby rejecting the terms of the New Covenant. The only way the Gentiles can be saved is by being grafted in among the twelve Branches as Paul plainly said in Romans 11. He warned the Romans that if the Romans boasted against the Branches, they were boasting against Moshiach. Not only did the Roman Christians boast against the branches, they blood libeled, raped, pillaged, and murdered the Branches for nearly 2000 years in the name of Jesus. You Christians will do just like your forefathers did and murder the Two Witnesses thereby bringing judgement down on Western Civilization with a crushing blow. that will send western civilization back to the Stone Age where it belongs.

1. If you embraced the New Covenant you would never ask that question.
2. The Two Witnesses will bring a plague 1260 days of no rain upon the Gentiles for what they did to Jerusalem. Revelation 11.
3. Christians are cross worshiping children of the Crusaders who raped pillaged and murdered the Jews for nearly 2000 years in the name of Jesus the swine. Je means "I am" and Sus means "swine". Jews know this and will never ever convert to a religion that decalres the swine as their savior.
4. I will tell you what it means when you acknowledge that the New Covenant is for the House of Israel and the House of Judah exactly as written in Jeremiah 31: 31 Behold, the days come, says Yehovah, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah.

Now if you cannot unequivocally confess that the New Covenant is for the House of Israel and the house of Judah, then you and I have nothing further to discuss.

What you are looking for is the word "IF". There are no "IFs" in the New Covenant. There for the terms for the New Covenant "that the Gentiles have rejected" the forgiveness of Israel's (all 12 tribes) sins and forgetting Israel's iniquity forever, those terms are final. You O fake branch will have to answer to Yehoshua Ha Moshiach for labeling the terms of the New Covenant as spew. Paul made it abundantly clear in Hebrews 10:26 that there is no forgiveness for such an act.

Be careful and do not in any way be disrespectful in your remarks concerning the New Covenant. The terms of the New Covenant are as follows. Jeremiah 31;31 Behold, the days come, saith Yehovah, that I will make a NEW covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not like the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith Yehovah: 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL; After those days, saith Yehovah, I will put my TORAH in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their Elohim, and they ISRAEL shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know Yehovah: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith Yehovah: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Whose sins? ISRAEL SINS WILL BE FORGOTTEN FOREVER!

The disrespect for the New Covenant I am speaking of is the Christian false narrative that "The Church" is the new Israel. All Christian denominations use that false narrative and it is highly disrespectful to the New Covenant and its testator.

AGAIN. I HAVE READ & AGREE W/ PAUL. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WANT. seems to me you're playing stupid games w/ me. it is really annoying. go away

Can you show me the scripture (There are two of them) that describes the terms of the New Covenant?

"Replacement Theology" is a Roman Catholic teaching - personally, I do not know of ANY Evangelical Christian who believes that "error".

If "Replacement Theology" were true Israel as a Nation would not exist.

Paul said: "Hath God cast away His people? God forbid"......."God hath not cast away His people which He foreknew". (Romans 11:1 & 2)

Yes Israel and the Jew still has a place in God's plans.

Shalom.

Apparently, there are Christians from no matter what denominations (Caths, Prots, quasi-Evangelicals, and Orientals) who believe they were more "chosen" than the Jews, and that the Jews rewrote their books just for being a Joooish pain in Christian ar$es, and that the Jews generally had no place in the world because of Jesus or something. Look down this thread, there is someone "Natural Branch" who fulfills all these criteria, and she appears to be an Evangelical.

Good morning Aristobulus,

You may be right - my answer to those people would be "please prove your teaching from Scripture".

Scripture and its accuracy is really the only way we can divide between "heresy" and TRUTH.

Unfortunately there are some people who will hold onto "what they have been taught" or "what some scholars think" rather than what the Scripture actually says - those people I can only refer them to what it says in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 which says:

"......because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believe not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness"

If they REFUSE to believe Scripture "GOD SHALL SEND THEM A LIE" and they will believe the LIE rather than Scripture.

Regarding "Natural Branch" - I do not know her or him very well but I think that she/he is a "Messianic Jew" and desires to see all Jews becoming "Messianic Jews" - I do not know where she/he stands on Replacement Theology.

Shalom.

... "God shall send them a lie" is impossible in every aspect. Because but humans invent and spread lies.

Good evening Aristobulus,

1 Kings 22:21-23 King James Version (KJV)

21 And there came forth a spirit, and stood before the Lord, and said, I will persuade him.

22 And the Lord said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, Thou shalt
persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so.

23 Now therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the Lord hath spoken evil concerning thee.

This Text does not mean that God tells lies - but it shows the Sovereignty of God over ALL SPIRITS and also that God is able to use, even satan and his demons to accomplish His Divine Will.

You have probable noticed in your lifetime how quick people are to REJECT the TRUTH and deceive themselves with falsehoods.

Shalom.

There's no need to quote random sentences from the Bible taken out of their context...

Humans have liberty, they are no one's puppets, and of course no one is God's puppet. To claim humans were puppets of "the divine will" rejects the concept of individual liberty, Noel. While the Bible is ALL about this concept.

Which is why but humans reject reason, not exactly truth which mostly lies in the eyes of the beholder. They reject facts, reason, and analysis. And they do this solely by themselves. Even the most evangelical of all Christians see it like this, don't they?
Only Mohammedans cling to the koranic belief that Allah were the best deceiver.

As far as I know, most Christians are sure that God talked to the devil while harrassing Job. Which is bizarre because in the original text, it's "one accuser" (Satan isn't a Jewish concept, this dramatic figure doesn't appear in the Torah, or in Judaism). This "accuser" could be anyone; a jealous neighbour; or the prosecutor just like in a court room who does what he can to damage the defendant. Which Job's "accuser" does.