We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

raymond e charette • 3 years ago

go trump he will win because he is a man of god i only bow and kneel to god but i love TRUMP

Martin Brown • 3 years ago

But, A divided house can't stand. Two Jews will never agree on one unity. Gantz and Bibi.

Tuvi Todd • 3 years ago

Please remember the events of 1948, & that mutual threats unite us, where
the Irgun, Lehi, Stern Gang, Haganah, etc. all put aside their differences, to
fight together as the IDF, and defend the new Jewish state from Muslim Invaders.

sidney weiner • 3 years ago

Perhaps,
But these different groups all worked for the Jewish People in their own way.

In Israel & America,we have those we call the 'Left' that are working for outside vested interests.
This is not about different opinions about the same agenda.
This is about completely different agenda's

Steven Thompson • 3 years ago

Gantz likes to say he is for something (for instance, sovereignty of Judea and Samaria), but then puts all these unreasonable obstacles in the way that can never be resolved, so in effect, things just would not really get done under Gantz. How do you do a careful analysis of all the ramifications??? My question to Gantz is, "Can you identify all the ramifications that you want to analyze? And isn't any analysis merely speculation? I say to Gantz, "Just do the right thing, and stop being so wisy washy."

sidney weiner • 3 years ago

Ganz is owned,like the rest of the left,by the NWO.
The NWO financial elites that own The EU,The UN & the Democrats in America.
They are the hidden vested interests who he speaks for.
There is no real reason for any political group,if they are working for the benefit of the nation,to object to the plan out of hand
The only people who would have a reason to object would be hidden vested interests that I mentioned.
The Democrats in America who are doing the same thing in America working for the same vested interests.
vested interests who want to keep the borders open for illegal entry into the country.

Apache12 • 3 years ago

It is called 'Extending sovereignty' over the territory already owned by the Jewish People as defined in the Mandate for Palestine 1922. . Or does everybody insist on calling it "annexation" with the intention of stirring up antisemitism by giving the false impression that Israel is trying to steal land belonging to the Palestinians? In 1967 Israel recovered Judea & Samaria from JORDAN who invaded and conquered it in 1948/49 -- Israel recovered zilch from the Palestinian People who were not invented until 1964.

Guest • 3 years ago
Apache12 • 3 years ago

Stirring up antisemitism is the only reason I can think of for using the term "annexation of the West Bank" but please feel free to enlighten me, Norm.

Marjorie Rosenfeld • 3 years ago

Yes. Thanks.

AJL • 3 years ago

This has to be thought out carefully and I'm sure the Israelis have done that. The ramifications must be looked at from all sides.

Hector Zuniga • 3 years ago

Hashem give instruction to Ysrael, to keep the timid ones, out of the important duties that Ysrael must take for the take of The land at the other side of The Jordan River. So Gantz must be keep outside of any opinion in the retake of the Land that belong to Ysrael since the Yosua Times. Please Gantz take yourself out of the Righful take of the land belonging to Ysrael; and go to study That Biblical portion.

John Conrad • 3 years ago

Gantz is again showing his inability to make difficult decisions. He took the position of Minister of defense. Bennet did the job very well but this man is weak minded and inept. Tall and good looking... that is why he was trusted... People dont understand that brains and courage do not always fit the looks.

AlfaBravo • 3 years ago

I am for “Right of return” (Annexation) but No to Palestinian state.

Dano_FL • 3 years ago

That's a great biblical encouragement for my President. Thank you Generals!

arigatoo • 3 years ago

Annexation is good, but, unfortunately, it is only partial. If the price for it is giving away all the remaining Jewish land to the enemies, then perhaps this annexation should not be done.
Anyhow, this annexation is not the solution. The only way to a real peace is expelling all the Arab enemy invaders from the whole Jewish Land of Israel. Why doesn't Israel do it?

alpcns . • 3 years ago

For once, finally, Israel - thanks to Trump and Trump only - has a historic opportunity. An opportunity, if wasted, most likely never will be repeated. Not applying sovereignty to ALL of Israel's land is a wasted historic opportunity - but applying it little by little to carefully selected (or avoided, for the EU) little plots left and right is the very definition of complete and utter insanity.

It is also asking - no, literally begging - for constant trouble and Islamofascists attacks. Besides, it clearly projects weakness and insecurity; which will be used against Israel immediately as "proof" of "insecure landgrab", as good Arab custom and modern-day "progressive" insanity demands.

Arabs - and Islamofascists in general - like all savages and primitives understand only one language. Strength. Utter, complete, overwhelming and decisive strength.

You want eternal war? Do weak, stupid appeasement stuff. Like Gaza, just to name one example of many... how well did that work out?

Madeleine Donaldson • 3 years ago

is Gantz under the Globalists?

Guest • 3 years ago
pilgrimson • 3 years ago

You know the saying "If it acts like a duck, sounds like a duck and looks like a duck:..Quack!

Susana C. Tompson • 3 years ago

I will call recovering Judea and Samaria. PA Arabs agree to stay there in peace with our Jews People or, if they do not like, they can sell their property, and finally move on to their own Country (Jordan, Egypt, Syria, etc.etc.ete.. Just like other Arab's Countries did to our Jews People. Jews must leave the Arab Country. Did you remember that?