I've been following Mr. Rossi's struggle to get his ECAT technology recognised for many years. I am a scientist, a marine biologist, and recent had my first novel Pelagia: Between the Stars and the Abyss (pelagia.net) published by Lion Fiction. It is a thriller set against the human drama of settling the open seas and establishing Pelagic nation states.

In the novel, I envision a near future where energy is essentially free through the use of Alchemist LENR reactors, inspired by Mr. Rossi's ECAT. I explore the implications of a world where there is easy access to energy and what it might look like. There are many things that change, but of course some things that don't.

Mr. Rossi, I would be honoured to send you a signed copy of the book if you are interested. Thanks.

Steve Holloway

ARA Acquires (2018) License for BLP tech use in Defense Industry

ARA= Applied Research Associates, Inc.

This is found on You Tube:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Which I found as part of the last comment entry, before the thread was locked by mods, on :

https://forum.nasaspaceflig...

Seems the USA's DoD has actually been using Mills technolgy in military/industrial applcation, this being the second instance of such use, where the first one was in 1986 when Haus used his modern model of the electron to formulate a classical QM explanation for the DoD, how the Free Electron Laser works. This was the base on which Mills began his derivation of his own, fuller classical theory, GUT-CQM.

Dear Andrea,

Recently, a press release from in Germany stated that due to additional major customers, production of the ECat at 100W may occur in the spring of this year 2023.

A) Is this correct?

B) Will a grid-connected ECat SKLep 100W version and a stand-alone ECat SKLep version be produced then?

C) For consistency of understanding, could we refer to the ECat with 230VAC input as the grid-connected version and

D) refer to the ECat with 12VDC input as the stand-alone version?

E) Up to what output line has an interconnection of the ECats with 12VDC output already been tested?

E1) 500W ?

E2) 1000W ?

E3) 2000W ?

E4) 5000W ?

E5) more ?

Thank you still for your courageous work and it is nice when more and more people support it and hear about it.

Sincerely from Germany

Claus

10 Dec 2022 update on Brilliant Light and Power:

Harnessing Power from the Conversion of Hydrogen to Dark Matter by
Dr. Edward Amoroso

https://brilliantlightpower...

Dr. Edward Amoroso is Founder and CEO of TAG InfoSphere

https://tag-cyber.com/about-us

Besides being world class IT/security specialists, TAG-Cyber also has physics and climate divisions that make this combination of experts ideal for ferreting out, by way of full, in depth due diligence, what the real intent of any organizations might be, here that organization being Brilliant Light and Power.

The excuse that Tag-Cyber may be, somehow, a shill of, or for, BrLP, does not work. What Tag-Cyber says about BrLP, can be taken as having been fully confirmed by its several experts. That means
everything that is claimed by Mills and his company, Brilliant Light and Power is true, as far as that is humanly possible to find out.
Wikipedia has no idea what it is spewing, on it's topic of Brilliant Light Power.

Dec 10, 2022 update from Brilliant Light and Power, Corp.:

https://brilliantlightpower...

This update is by an outside firm:

https://tag-cyber.com/about-us

In particular their "About" :

"TAG Cyber serves the global cybersecurity industry, including enterprise teams and commercial vendors. We do so through a revolutionary new approach to professional research and advisory. We employ only experienced experts, mostly former CISOs, as our analysts. We are available to customers on a 24/7 basis through an on-line portal. And we focus on addressing your specific challenges."

Why this cyber security firm has dong this due diligence of BrLP is due to them also being bullish about the environment:

https://tag-cyber.com/climate:"

"Our experienced analyst team helps climate science, zero carbon, and sustainable product companies and start-ups tell their story to buyers, investors, and citizens. Chief Sustainability Officers, ESG teams, and
environmental advocates read our TAG Climate Annual."

and

"Our TAG Climate team include luminaries such as Professor Dork Sahagian from Lehigh University. In addition to working with us, Professor Sahagian directs the Environmental Institute at Lehigh, which supports
research in various aspects of climate science. "

They advice government as well. Maybe someone in the USA government Environment Department:

https://www.state.gov/envir...

will listen to Tag Cyber, if not to Mills.

However in 2000, a government sponsored institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and other similar labs:
refused to give Mills a report on Neutron Scattering Analysis they did on his samples of Hydrino Hydrate crystals, due to not wanting to be involved in anything controversial.

The other menu items on the site of TAG Cyber gives a very compelling picture of this third party being impartial about their due diligence, be that regarding Brilliant Light and Power, Corp. or any othercompany thatthey investigate.

Their quarterly report is worth down loading and reading.:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/we...

If any one is able to analyze what constitutes a scam, it is this Tag Cyber.

Dec 03, 2022 update on Brilliant Light and Power:
https://brilliantlightpower...

This news item is about:
the work done on the Suncell, since the last update, on Sept 21, 2022. This includes 50 more features that have been added to the device, to make it more efficient due to reducing its complexity,

the tangible business activity of 40 businesses that have lined up due to their own due diligence towards leasing the device, which activity shows the degree that the device is commercially viable for real world application which innovations, in turn add six months to the development of the device,

the increased number of employees hired to handle further engineering on the device and for proving out the theory whose predictions were used to guide the development of the Suncell,

third parties being narrowed down towards certification of the device

narrowing down the particular outside manufacturers for mass production of the Suncell,

the images gathered by the WEBB space telescope, confirming a prediction made by the Mills' theory, the Grand Unified Theory Classical Physics, in particular that the hydrino reaction used to power the Suncell, does exist in stellar processes,

that BrLP places 4th in having produced such numbers of patents world wide, all regarding the hydrino reaction,

tying up all loose ends regarding the prediction made by GUT-CP, that the electron in an atom is able to fall below the ground state, to release energy that is being actively extracted for practical use in the Suncell,

and

other implications of the theory in replacing all of Standard Quantum Mechanics.

Time is getting very close to when naysayers about Mills and his theory will not be able to say nay, no more.

ICCF 24 is an example of entitlement gone off the rails; it must work, no matter how wrong it is. It has taken on a life of its own, demanding money and involvement in experiments that are now into the 1000's with no end in sight.
I feel sorry for all you guys in LENR.

BrLP update:
FIRST LIGHT FROM SUNCELL® LIGHTBULB DESIGN
https://brilliantlightpower...

Hope the video will follow.

I still do not understand why do they stubbornly go for PV design. Using the SunCell for steam generation could be more straightforward (although perhaps less efficient). This is provided that all issues with control of the hydrino reaction are solved.

Dec 03/23 update.
https://brilliantlightpower...

The Suncell has to be in its most robust embodiment, before entering the market. It has to not only work, in its most efficient version but, also not be easily reverse engineered. That is among many other considerations, to allow it to be made by Brilliant Light Power in a way that not only satisfies Mills' goal of serving humanity with a very low cost form of power but, allows to him to make a profit that he can plow back into his other projects, anti-gravity, extremely inert plastics, photonic computing, neutrino based telecommunications.

It takes a lot of secondary work to make his theory not only work but also keep his items from falling into the hands of the competition where the only consideration is making a profit, period but, also prevent it from being misused.

That alone shows what kind of person Mills is.

Giving it away and asking for donations would work far better. Every person trying to profit, no matter how well-intentioned, has been silenced. Why do you think Tesla and Plutarch had water gas cars, and so did Myers and a dozen others? They all wanted to make money n keep how it worked secret ended badly in every case.

Open source is the only way you help humanity information needs to be free, making you credible.

Implosion steam heaters work great, they are super simpldesignsgn, and the inventor is open about not knowing how it works..think they are still in business, but they build n sell their stuff.

There will never be a deal with a manufacturer (if there is, they want the rights so that they can bury it) unless you try Japan or Taiwan. Two energy-dependent islands.

On paper, Utopia exists as much as the promise of life after death, as under the many religions,is why religion is such a nice money making scheme. Due to practical considerations, like an inventor putting food on ones table, I won't be waiting for the good will of "some" users to donate any money or food so I can feed my family. That is why the world is the way it is. Calling it "greed" instead of "concern for one's family" is playing with words to try and put down the nasty "capitalist system". When first considered without thinking it through, "sharing" by everyone seems like a good idea, but it never works for long when tried in the real world. All attempts at a utopian commune tends to break down due to ones family unit wanting more for itself than for the good of the group.

Business practices, like advertising tend to brain wash everyone into wanting more than the other guy.

Update, 21 Sep. 2022 on Brilliant Light and Power, Inc.:

"First Light from SunCell® Lightbulb Design":

https://brilliantlightpower...

Presumably the data from this latest test, will be used to tweak the design of this kind of Suncell into an even more perfected version, That updated version will then be the first commercially acceptable version in beta stage that will then be further tested under realistic commercial conditions in a several pilot plants. That will take at least a year of use in pilot plants, each plant having differing kinds of intentionally adverse conditions, in order to work out all the practical real world kinks, under which the Suncell would have to work.

I am still puzzled by the fact that Mills is so attached to the idea of using PV for power conversion. If SunCell works as he claims, and if the hurdles of controlling the hydrino reaction are solved, the easiest and the most straightforward power conversion solution would be through steam generation. If you have harnessed a new source of energy, why would you hold it back until you invent and perfect some new power conversion system? Why do not use the systems which already exist? It is the same as if you have invented and built a new supercomputer, but you hold it back, because you would want to invent a new keyboard and mouse for this computer. More rational way would be to use the existing peripherals, while the new more advanced ones are under development.

I would have said the same about Rossi's "invention", but I am convinced now that Rossi is a fraud and so is his "e-cat". I still hope that Mills' SunCell is a real thing, but the PV approach does not look optimal at this point. The only rational explanation is that either control of the hydrino reaction is still not fully developed, or the materials and design of the SunCell cannot withstand the reaction conditions.

We already know how to access CPE energy the easiest most efficient way we know now is through a million cavitating electrolyzers producing charge plasmoid clusters which tapping the ZPE.

Besides the fact u could run a 5-watt LED off a nuclear battery for decades, how do we know there's not one in there I'm actually being serious.

Also something very suspicious about a person who won't let their invention get taken apart, and only has one model not multiple. If you were serious about demonstrating your technology works when you make multiple models and send them off to every lab and challenge them to prove you wrong!

That's where the doubt creeps in, plus no free energy, over unity is not free, you just get a higher return on input, that's not breaking any law.. Free ecat energy does

The reason is to prevent copying his technology. He is perfecting the version(s) that are most complex(its physics already differs drastically from accepted SQM) to understand in terms of physics and then adds his own inventiveness to make it work in a way that very few, if any, will understand how it works, exactly. You can only copy it down to the last tiny item, which would make others versions to remain exact to the original, to count as a design difference for patent purposes. That is also his way of getting back at everyone, here the mostly the USA energy sector ,for putting him down. He is also cutting out the insane USA itself from benefiting from use of this device by not allowing the same insane USA to have it but will allow it to be first used elsewhere, like Canada and Mexico. If you rub a super genius the wrong way that SG has ways of retaliating that will make you wish you hadn't done that.

Update, 14 Sep. 2022 on Brilliant Light and Power, Inc.

"Neutrino Communications Indicated by Molecular Hydrino Two-Photon ½ Energy Spectrum":

https://brilliantlightpower...

This can replace the kind of phone communication that currently works using microwaves, towers placed in tens of thousands of locations all over the place for line of sight connections between those towers and its "cell" phones. Instead of cells that are defined and limited by those towers, neutrino communication is direct line sensing and sending neutrino with no need for the phones to ever see each other, anywhere on Earth and extending as far as the far side of the Moon. No sight required due to neutrinos being able to pass through a million miles of matter without being affected by that matter. What affects neutrinos to allow them to be used for communication is the electrons spin when at a lower orbital then the ground state. This will take at least 20-30 years to develop into a viable form.

This would be the next best thing that has some of the features that are similar to the "sub space" communications of Star Trek fame.

Required reading for anyone serious about a theory of everything. ie The Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics

https://www.reddit.com/r/GU...

Two updates, August 18, 2022, from Brilliant Light and Power:

Update 1:
"New extraordinary Hydrino confirmation by FTIR that resolves the experimental mysteries of so-called “metaborate monomer” data..":
https://brilliantlightpower...

Update 2:
"The engineering of the commercial prototype Suncell having a light-bulb design is near completion.
Tests are planned to start next week.":

This is an excerpt from:
https://brilliantlightpower...

This is in keeping with the expected, 2023, commercialization via leasing of the Suncell. The first places to get the benefit of this extremely low cost way of producing power, will be small, local grids of electric power installations in Canada and Mexico. The USA, due to the belligerent attitude expressed by their energy sector and their academia toward Mills work, is not going to get the benefit of the Suncell or any other items already made or to be made by any of Mills companies or collaborators. That is how sanctions work on those (certain editors on Wikipedia, gate keepers of academic physics like Robert Park) that have been holding back Mills' theory and its intended benefit towards humanity. Mills has taken a page from Europe and North America in how to treat those, such a Putin, who is continuing to cause harm to humanity.

The Sun more active than predicted.
https://www.forbes.com/site...

Update on Brilliant Light and Power.

"GUTCP Review Completed, Webb Shows Predicted Big Bang Bust":

https://brilliantlightpower...

This is first, about a five year long, thorough checkup, made by a third a party, Randy Booker, on the accuracy of the math and physics used in the thesis of GUT-CP, and secondly a corroboration, by use of the Webb space telescope, of a prediction made by that theory.

There have been other, piecemeal checks made on GUT-CP, whereas this one is regards to to the whole thesis, from start to finish, that found no part of that thesis to have any errors or serious short comings which would have invalidated this monumental work by Randell Mills.

The findings about the age of certain very old galaxies, by imaging those galaxies via use of the special capabilities of the James Webb space telescope, indicate that there are galaxies, whose age is totally incompatible with the Big Bang theory.

These two points lend much credence to the predictions made by the Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics.

Related on "Big Bang never happened":
https://www.lppfusion.com/c...

What led to the prediction of the universe being eternally cyclic, is the property of space being an absolute or not having any sub-components such as waves. In other words, due to being an absolute, space cannot have anything such as wave fluctuations coming out, as if from nowhere and back to nowhere. Attributing waves to the quantum scale started with Huygens who, after observing waves at the macro scale, assumed it appropriate to attribute, what is essentially an artifact, to the scale of light. Waves at the macro scale were found, in the 1960's by engineering analyses, to always be an artifact. So according to SQM, Huygens made an extremely lucky guess and an artifact, when attributed to the QM scale, just happens to turn out to be a mechanism. That is extremely unlikely, and is why SQM actually consists of many such hodge podge assumptions or anything goes, as long as the waves are kept intact. Why are waves considered so important that they have to be kept despite analytical evidence indicating they are only an artifact?

For Experimenters:

Many types of experiments might be producing plasmoids (micro ball lightning, charged clusters, strange radiation). I suggest that if you are experimenting, please be aware about the harmful effects of plasmoid emission. Urutskoev and others tried to show their effect on plants and cells. They found a correlation and also showed by tests that most shielding materials are not effective.

Thick lead sheets might be the most effective conventional and common shielding material. But it won't shield from black state plasmoids. If you are experimenting, these black state ones are probably emitted, but you can't detect them. Plasmoids can shift states, and then cause damage in a bright state. http://ikkem.com/iccf23/PPT...
Also http://www.rexresearch.com/...

Shoulders and Bostick died from cancer. Please beware and try to avoid contact. Plasmoids might be contained in electodes, wires or other materials. They might escape or damage the materials.

Edward Lewis

This deal is really good (and shocking) news. Rebates and incentives for heat pumps, EVs, etc. will help spur their adoption even more.... eventually leaving incumbent technologies in the dust.

“We estimate at current prices, households that get heat pumps for space and water heating, an EV, and put solar on their roof stand to save $1,800 per year on energy bills,” he added. “Not only that, but these households will be getting off the roller-coaster ride of fossil-fueled inflation, with stable bills into the future.”

https://archive.ph/zJmGE#se...

With rising ambient tempertures, due to climate change, there will be more than enough heat to make those heat pumps be more efficient and maybe get more than the 3 times more heat energy out than put in.

Non-electrolysis cheap hydrogen production claim
https://www.pv-magazine.com...

Brillouin Energy Corp.
Brillouin Energy Corp Demonstrates CleanTech Licensable Solid State Fusion Boiler System atthe 24 th Annual International Conference on Cold Fusion

https://brillouinenergy.com....

Brillouin Energy Corp.

Brillouin Energy Corp Demonstrates CleanTech Licensable Solid State Fusion Boiler System at

the 24 th Annual International Conference on Cold Fusion

https://brillouinenergy.com...

The Higgs mechanism is normally associated with high energy physics, but its roots lie in superconductivity.

Higgs, Anderson and all that - Nature Physics

https://www.nature.com/arti...
Higgs, Anderson and all that

There is evidence for a Higgs mode in disordered superconductors near the superconductor–insulator transition.

As early as the early 1960s, solid-state physics was complementing theoretical particle physics in the form of the recently deceased Nobel Prize winner in physics, Philip Anderson. Anderson was an outstandingly creative pioneer of solid state physics. He was also interested in particle physics. In 1962, he published a paper demonstrating how photons (or light quanta) obtain mass in a superconductor. This inspired Peter Higgs to publish his theory of the Higgs field in 1964 and led to him and François Englert being awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2013.

“In solid-state physics, we speak of the Anderson-Higgs mechanism”, says Kaiser. Higgs spectroscopy has now brought these ideas back into solid state physics. Like the Higgs boson, the Cooper pairs, which are each formed from two electrons and carry superconductivity, belong to the quantum mechanical family of bosons. Bosons tend to assemble in a common quantum state. The Cooper pairs form a large quantum mechanical wave, a collective quantum object that can move through the superconductor as an electric current without friction.

A laser pulse into the Ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) superconductor will form a optical cavity in which a Bose condensate of polaritons will form in the electron cloud that surround the positive core of the UDH. This condensate will produce a self-confining bubble of Higgs field derived from the nature of the UDH superconductor. This Higgs field in the superconductor may well be identical to the cosmological Higgs field.

The question arises: Is the Higgs field in a superconductor(SCHF) the same field as that of the cosmic Higgs field (CHF) or is the SCHF different than the (CHF).

The SCHF produces mass in photons whereas the CHF does NOT produce mass in photons. SCHF might be the anti field of CHF.

Does SCHF change the mass of the electron in any way? This requires some looking into.

But on another issue, how does 1 dimensional superconductivity act in the LENR reaction.

Near the end of the video after some explanation about superconductors, there is an explanation about what a one dimensional superconductor is. I want to show what the SCHF can do in the simplified case of a one dimensional superconductor.

https://youtu.be/avsQd2xmCkc

Some background: Dr. Brian Ahern showed that the LENR reaction occurs in nanoparticles. Nanoparticles can form one dimensional superconductors as constrained by their size. This experiment will show how nanoparticles produce the LENR reaction when a laser pulse irradiates gold nanoparticles. These nanoparticles demonstrate ballistic (one dimensional ) superconductivity.

Ballistic conduction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

In this experiment, the LENR reaction only occurs when the LENR light pulse is active. A radioactive isotope provides a probe to explore the nature of the LENR reaction. Since there is no lattice involved, n o fusion reaction is possible. No excess heat is produced. Various types of laser pulses are used in this experiment which reveals the details of the mechanisms of the LENR reaction. The basic take away from this experiment is to show that the LENR reaction is a unified electroweak based reaction.

Radioactive decay half-life acceleration cause by Electronweak force mediation.

Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112....

Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation

A.V. Simakin, G.A. Shafeev

This reference sheds light on the posit that an Unified Electroweak reaction accelerates radioactive decay through Higgs field based super-conduction carried through Bose condensation of polaritons. With this posit in mind, experimental data elucidates what the optimum duration of the pumping laser pulse time-frame should be to optimize the LENR reaction.

Abstract

"Experimental results are presented on laser-induced accelerated alpha-decay of Uranium-232 nuclei under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of its salt. It is demonstrated that the decrease of alpha-activity strongly depends on the peak intensity of the laser radiation in the liquid and is highest at several terawatt per square centimeter. The decrease of alpha-activity of the exposed solutions is accompanied by the deviation of gamma-activities of daughter nuclides of Uranium-232 from their equilibrium values. Possible mechanisms of the laser influence on the alpha-activity are discussed on the basis of the amplification of the electric field of laser wave on metallic nanoparticles."

This experiment speaks against the posit that accelerated radioactive decay is caused by any interactions with neutrinos purported by the Russian Meme. The mechanism of polariton Bose condensation causation involves the generation of polariton plasma and associated intense Electroweak fields that has been generated around a gold nanoparticle that produces a critical density of LENR active surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) cloud which acts as a LENR active superconductor in which Electroweak stabilization of radiation occurs in the vicinity of the gold nanoparticle. The SPP and Its vortex tube are pictured below along with associated theory.

https://advances.sciencemag...
Vortex and half-vortex dynamics in a nonlinear spinor quantum fluid

The referenced article shows that the polariton Bose condensate reduces the 69 year half-life of U232 to 5 microseconds when the LASER pulse is active. It addition, the acceleration of radioactive decay of the 4.5 billion year half-life of uranium is sufficiently half-life accelerated to produce significant detectable uranium decay products. The Half-life decay is not caused by increased radiation, but by a change in the nature of the unstable isotope itself.

It is reasonable to suggest that the alpha-decay proceeds during the laser pulse, while the spontaneous decrease of alpha-activity during exposure is negligible. This means that the activity drops down by a factor of 2 during 5 ms, which is the total duration of all 150 ps laser pulses during exposure. In other words, the half-life of 232U in the laser field is 5 ms instead of 69 years. About 10^10 nuclei of 232U decay during laser exposure. Another infrared laser radiation with pulse duration of 350 ps affects the alpha-activity of the solution to lesser extent despite to much higher number of laser pulses.

Both the power of the laser pulse and its duration are important factors in producing optimum half-life decay acceleration. The nanosecond laser pulse length is too short to optimize radioactive decay acceleration as well as the 350 ps laser source. The 150 ps laser source seems to be a better fit to match the 50 ps life span of the individual polariton which comprise the Bose condensate aggregation is the resonance value for optimization of radiation decay.

Another insight gleaned from this experiment is that the length of the laser pulse does not produce continuing radioactive decay acceleration. The LENR activity is constrained by the lifetime of the polariton condensate and is active only as long as the polariton condensate is active.

A New Signal.

https://phys.org/news/2022-...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Negative mass in General Relativity

Flying saucer caught on Flacon 9 Launch cam just now:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

..how crazy's that eh? 3rd UFO i've spotted this weekend (saw another large odd-shaped ship in the sky yesterday evening, and a hypersonic tic-tac this afternoon).

My categorised list of UAP links is still growing daily - sufficient to now establish unequivocally that most of the 'orbs' being seen are in fact these cube-shaped craft - they're one and the same entity! - and they're deployed and recollected by other 'orbs' and saucers; perhaps similarly, these 'launcher orbs' are actually saucers, only appearing as orbs for the same reasons the cubes do; they're strongly radiative, and so more visible at night? Just a hunch, check the evidence for yourselves..

https://drive.google.com/fi...

I've also discovered a fascinating 'tethering' mode wherein two box-orbs join together via a kind of umbilical cord, assuming a distinctive 'upper vs lower' configuration, maintaining a loose loop of slack in the tether - one cube then seems to lead the other, sometimes leaning into the direction of travel, while the other just kinda trails along. All documented in the list, check it out, you heard it hear first..! (seriously, no one else appears to be making these particular connections so you're unlikely to find out about them from elsewhere..)

Doesn't seem to matter where on Earth you are, just gotta keep looking up, scanning the skies; odds-on chance you'll see something within days.. there was one over my work last week (it's on the list); it's like The Abyss meets Close Encounters, yet real; seeing is believing..

Magnetohydrodynamics is the branch of physics that studies behavior of electrically conducting fluids in the presence of magnetic fields. Examples of such magneto fluids include plasmas, liquid metals, salt water, and electrolytes. https://youtu.be/W2cAn-Gl2gU

Buddy James: Magnetohydrodynamics | Thunderbolts

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Learn some practical quantum mechanics using video gaming.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

https://news.mit.edu/2022/e...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

What Happened To All The Neutrinos?

https://www.science20.com/n...
Is The Axial Higgs Mode An Explanation For Dark Matter?

In a condensed matter science solution, the Higgs mode if found also in superconductors. By addressing dark matter directly as a product of the Higgs mode in superconductors, it may be possible to create an optical cavity in a superconductor to form a false Higgs field vacuum comprised of Anderson-Higgs polaritons which demonstrate an imaginary mass thus forming a Higgs field based tachyon condensate. Since some metallic dust micro-particles produced by a galaxy will cool below the maximum superconductor temperature for these metal nanoparticles, these superconducting particles would generate micro-bubbles of false vacuum utilizing the axial Higgs mode of this superconducting metallic nano-dust.

Next, the Tully Fisher effect would naturally fall out as a consequence of this relationship between the dust production of a galaxy and the production of associated dark matter. These tachyonic microbubbles would also produce the superfluidity needed to satisfy that required by Khoury and Berezhiani for dark matter superfluidity

https://penntoday.upenn.edu...
Physicist theorizes that dark matter is a superfluid

A hypothesis by Justin Khoury of the Department of Physics and Astronomy stands to shake up how scientists consider dark matter.

Finally, the imaginary mass particle theory put forth by J. S Farnes, describing these microbubbles of anti de-Sutter space aka anti spacetime as dark matter and their production of dark energy would therefore have a possible imaginary mass based foundation.

https://www.aanda.org/artic...

A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework

Scott's presentation has a great deal to say about many aspects of the physics we are puzzling over here.

Donald E. Scott: Dark Matter Debunked | Thunderbolts https://www.youtube.com/wat...
I found this presentation fascinating. Axil Axil, Bob - I'd be interested in what you think about it. ThanksI

I have a different view of the coronal heating problem

https://youtu.be/sYIpK4YcoBI

Parkhomov showed over multiple decades that Relic Neutrinos do exist and can be focused and interact with beta isotopes like 60Co.

It is a likely component of dark matter.

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Proof for the Existence of Molecular Hydrino (dark matter):

https://brilliantlightpower...

Peer reviewed and published in:
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Available online 11 June 2022

New page please Bob on "O" days connection to ancient knowledge.

Instead of just bookmarking UAP vids i think look legit, i've begun simply compiling a text file of the links. This is handy for sharing, without bombing the comments section with in-your-face videos. Current draft as of tonight looks like this: https://drive.google.com/fi...

Note the sheer predominance of the 'box-orbs' however - every week, new sightings caught in the can. I've found however it's impossible to discuss this openly on YouTube as the comments just get shadow-banned - you can see your comments, but no one else can. More out of curiosity at whether or not Disqus will allow it, i thought i'd try discussing the matter here instead:

• ignoring all the other types of craft or 'phenomena' - just focusing on the box-orbs / cubes / whatever you wanna call 'em; there's a lot of it about, no?

I don't wanna broach the 'i' word but they're increasing in frequency and number, folks..

Added a few more since posting last night, including more box-orbs. Currently up to at least 16 sightings of these things, mostly recent - since i suspect they may glow at night, many (if not most) of the glowing orb phenomena (such as famous mass-sightings over US cities, ie. NYC, Phoenix etc) might also belong under that same header. These sightings are typified by weird static or slow-moving lights that appear in loosely-organised clusters, persist a while then wink out one by one. If these are also box-orbs, then the phenomenon's been going on a long while, if now seemingly reaching pandemic levels.. such examples are a dime a dozen on YT - i haven't even bothered collecting links for most of them, so common are they.

They don't just move slowly, mind, and are capable of blistering speed - so fast the eye would miss it, hence usually only caught serendipitously - check the recent sightings in LA caught by YouTube user Engine TwentySeven, including this one - watch?v=1_1FcVD6KmI - and you can see they're displaying controlled flight, not merely floating, but in some of his vids you also see some very fast-movers in the background behind the UAP he's shooting; 'speed' for these things seems quite arbitrary.

How to interpret their presence, behaviour and possible intentions? They're obviously up to something, but is it entirely passive and hands-off - although even then, that doesn't exactly equate to 'zero threat' if they actually are 'on recon' - or are they interfering, influencing, coercing or guiding events... in short, are they interfering in our fate in some way? This seems to be the overarching question.

In fact, lemme put a finer point on that, in the context of some more-familiar big questions:

• are we alone in the universe?

No, evidently we are not; these things are clearly 'technological' and of intelligent artifice. It is unclear if they're individually-sentient or crewed, or else a distributed / centralised intelligence, but their activities do seem broadly consistent with both degrees of coordination as well as autonomy. Post-organic, at a guess, but we're barely out of diapers compared to their abilities. They're likely much older than us.

• Fermi's paradox / "where is everyone?"

See above: we've been gaping through the wrong end of the 'scope i'm afraid. Also, check out the first link under the 'Saucers' section ( watch?v=6ppeCMiqpog ): this incredible capture really lucked out; it's clear that the craft did not want to be seen, and initially tried to take cover from the witnesses' line of sight, before scarpering fast and low.. Note also how box-orbs, when watched frame-by-frame, seem to vanish periodically before reappearing right on track a few frames later - Luis Elizondo talks in terms of apparent 'signature management' but in this case we're talking about box-orbs maybe 300 meters away - but either way, some of these things are intentionally elusive, others so faint you can barely film them from nearby in broad daylight.. Box-orbs, for their part, don't seem to care too much whether we see them or not, but as i say, we may have been seeing them for some considerable time.. they're here, though. Fermi's paradox is solved (you heard it here first eh)..

As to other big questions such as our place or purpose in the cosmos, maybe if we can communicate with these things they'll have some food for thought on the issue, but in the meantime, since they are here already:

• Is it safe?

The usual go-to answer here is that if they've been here all along and aren't obviously attacking yet, presumably they're entirely benign, if not some kind of guardian over-watcher, ready to intercept the ICBM's the minute we go loco.. but they're obviously scanning / on reconnaissance for something, some kind of intention or eventuality; they're collecting information, god knows how much and from what channels besides sight and sound.. and for what reason?

The fact that they could turn on us in an instant but haven't, yet, seems cool comfort - check out the vids i've listed under military engagements; these things don't flinch under heavy fire, but can take out our most powerful weapons in an instant.. so are we entirely defenceless?

Best defence would seem pre-emptive, peaceful communication. On some YT channels an underground culture of making direct contact has begun to emerge; you can watch videos of people signalling to these things from the ground with flash-lights, and getting flashed back in response! But also, some have taken to lasing them as well, eliciting extreme (non-Newtonian) evasive manoeuvres; these things don't like being lased! This is the only hint i've seen of a possible chink though - they're trans-medium, hypersonic, non-dissipative (no sound, let alone sonic booms), and impervious to conventional weaponry.

The word 'invasion' doesn't really seem such a leap - it's just that the usually-preceding 'a' word is immediately evocative of a Roland Emmerich-type movie apocalypse, all over, one way or another, in about 90 mins. But what if it's more of a slow-boil thing.. are they manipulating us or our environment - an active program of ends and means, rather than purely 'hands off, unless..'?

Look up. I saw something last weekend - in the atmosphere, high, at plane-height, but stationary, for minutes, and large.. white light grew from a bulbous front section, i could make out a large box-like section behind, dunno if it was glinting in the sun whilst slowly rotating or producing its own bright, warm light, but then it just disappeared while i was fumbling for my potato-cam 2G phone. Wish i'd kept eyes-on to see how it left..

But check also the video from YouTube user K'eyush The Stunt Dog ( watch?v=bouEV1fBxlk ); YT has been showing me suggestion for this channel for years and i've watched a good few of them; point is, it's a familiar, trusted source, completely unaffiliated with anything 'woo', in other words anyone could see them at any time.. if you haven't, yet, it seems increasingly likely that someone you know either has or will, before too long. Like Elizondo says, the phenomenon is only becoming increasingly more prevalent..

The point of collecting these links is that this weight of independent corroboration eliminates any alternative explanation: it's not anything other than an alien invasion - not necessarily 'attack', no one's claiming that - but they're here, they're technically superior and increasingly multitudinous. They thus have reasons, intentions and motivations. If you've watched half these links then you now have a privileged set of answers to some of these aforementioned big questions that everyone before us had to take to their graves unanswered.. now superceded by this one, hanging question of singular import: what's all this leading up to, then? 'Something' is happening, and moreso by the day.. so what are we looking at if we FFWD a bit; are we hurtling towards certain inevitable conclusions? Revelations, in either sense? Should we be concerned, and if not, why? Cuz personally, i'm getting a little perturbed. A bit uneasy about all this, what it means, and where it might be headed..

Up to 19 box-orb sightings now caught on video - there's probably more out there, perhaps going back years, but i'm not looking for these things particularly; i'm just searching YT for 'UAP' and 'UFO' once a day and then filtering by upload date, then scrolling past all the junk for whatever legit sightings have been caught or uploaded in the past 24 hrs.. it just so happens that most of them are these mysterious box-orbs..

Sorry i know i'm banging on about it, but no one else seems to be documenting or even noticing the overwhelming prevalence of this one particular UAP. From London to Scotland, Paris to NYC and LA, the world over, they're being filmed in every sky..

Just check out the first section - 'boxes / box-orbs' - in the above-posted list (updated daily) - work from bottom-up for the most recent additions. What to make of it? All i know is, it's definitely technological, and definitely not 'us'..

I though that this might be interesting to someone:

https://phys.org/news/2022-...

This may be of interest:

Next Wednesday, June 22, 2022, at 10:00AM EST the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy, will hold a hearing entitled "Investigating the Nature of Matter, Energy, Space, and Time". The witnesses will be:

Dr. Asmeret Berhe, Director of the Office of Science, Department of Energy;

Dr. Brian Greene, Director of the Center for Theoretical Physics, Columbia University;

Dr. Lia Merminga, Director, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory;

Mr. Jim Yeck, Associate Laboratory Director and Project Director for the Electron-Ion Collider, Brookhaven National Laboratory;

Mr. Michael Guastella, Executive Director, The Council on Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals.

The video of the hearing or a link to it should become available here.

https://youtu.be/c8uUZtJjz8Q