Get rid of Who and Big Pharma. While at it get rid of the WEF , United nations, etc...

EXPOSED: KLAUS SCHWAB’S DAUGHTER FLIPS — CONFESSES WEF’S PLAN TO MURDER BILLIONS.
MAY 12, 2025
https://faiezkirsten.substack.com/p/exposed-klaus-schwabs-daughter-flips
Nuremberg 2.0 >>> Ho, ho, ho, --- ha, ha, ha, --- hee, hee, ew, ew, --- ha, ha, gasp, --- weeee, hee, hee…..

Not WHO budget cuts? The poor things. I'm certain the CCP will jump into fully fund it. And let's not forget those wonderful philanthropists such as Gates, Soros, Bezos (and ex-wife) and all the other rich lefties who will pump their money into Tedros' party machine.

Right on target.

THE B.I.S ( Those 'Independent' Swiss - LOL) will have a 'Game Plan' as well, along with support from their Media 'Front' = ALPHABET, 'Parent' company of Google, You-Tube & now Incorporating WIZ, Israeli/American Cyber 'Security' Firm! Maybe the VatiCan't will 'Acquire' shares in the WHO, as part of it's Temple Wealth Diversity portfolio strategies, And sheared Flocks everywhere, now there's a Neo U.S original Pope residing in Rome. Clubs - Of, InClueDead (included).
Wellness & Unity - John D.

Once again, Jeffrey Tucker from BI nails it.

I read a UK conservative blog. You should read what they think of Farrar there. Whomp whomp.

Teddypox and WHO continuing with their mission: Death to us all.

I have been long convinced that Farrar is THE global lead in the whole sorry Covid fiasco.
He is I believe the health equivalent of the City of London as the epicentre of much.
He was sharp enough to leave SAGE in the UK when the sentiment started to change but in my view he has as many serious questions as Fauci to answer.
I fervently hope history will treat Farrar very robustly.

It takes 5-10 years to determine the long-term effects of a new vaccine, thereby identifying the Satanist co-option of our institutions* that knew the vaccines were deadly if a blood vessel is pricked, otherwise no non-Satanist entity would take a chance on the annihilation of humanity should the long-term effects prove deadly.
-----------------
* Who use the more numerous Marxists as pawns to implement Karl Marx's 1843 directive for the "abolition of religion", and the destruction of those civilizations "whose spiritual aroma is religion"...

Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Critique_of_Hegels_Philosophy_of_Right.pdf

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

...and...

"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."

...and...

"It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world."

Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, "The Struggle"...

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

Let's take a look at the 1954 paper virologists point to for the existence of measles, and see what the paper's authors admit In the Discussion section:

"Although we have thus already obtained
considerable indirect evidence supporting the
etiologic role of this group of agents in measles,
2 experiments essential in the establishment of
this relationship remain to be carried out.
These will consist in the production of measles
in the monkey and in man with tissue culture
materials after a number of passages in vitro
sufficient to eliminate any virus introduced
in the original inoculum. The recovery of the
virus from the experimental disease in these
hosts should then be accomplished."

https://archive.org/details/EndersPeebles1954

"Indirect evidence" is the paper's findings, and that standard of 'science' continues today,*
because virology conspires to not conduct the two "essential" experiments that would confirm the existence of measles, and rule out stressed cells excreting what today are called exosomes.

Firstly, when pressed under oath in court, medical science is compelled to admit there is no such thing as a virus. Secondly, medical science tells us there are no vaccines for cold viruses, the coronavirus, and RSV, being a cold virus.** Thirdly, if a blood vessel is pricked receiving a jab, where the needle wasn't aspirated, that means, in the case of the COVID-19 "vaccines", the nanoparticles carrying the mRNA have entered the bloodstream, and will now enter the cells of organs throughout the body,*** and being a foreign element within those cells, the immune system destroys the cells, leading to organ damage and/or subsequent death, the severity of the outcome depending on if the syringe carried a full mRNA load, or if its contents was merely saline.

This is why in 2017 the CDC and WHO alerted the medical community there was no longer a need to aspirate a needle, preventing the contents of the syringe from entering a blood vessel...

"Aspiration before injection of vaccines or toxoids (i.e., pulling back on the syringe plunger after needle insertion but before injection) is not necessary because no large blood vessels are present at the recommended injection sites, and a process that includes aspiration might be more painful for infants (22)."

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/administration.html

"...no large blood vessels"? The smallest blood vessels are measured in millionths of a meter (um), while nanoparticles that carry the mRNA are measured in billionths of a meter (nm). That's called premeditated murder, identifying the Marxist co-option of our institutions.

Let's take a look at WHO...

"Do NOT aspirate, i.e. do not pull back on the syringe after inserting in the injection site as it increases the pain:
− There are no large blood vessels at the recommended injection sites or injection into a large vessel, so no risk of major bleeding."

https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/multiple-injections/trainingmodule_painmanagement_final.pdf?sfvrsn=1b91f223_7&ua=1

------------------
* “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ -- Professor Andreas Podbielski, University of Rostock, 2015, giving expert testimony on the existence of viruses at Ravensburg Local Court.

As Dr. Lanka observes:

"Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity."

https://dokumen.pub/wissenschafftplus-magazin-the-virus-misconception-part-1-measles-as-an-example-i-01-2020nbsped.html

Now, for the real shocker: How a virus is manufactured piecemeal, not captured whole...

"1. The fact of Alignment

Virologists have never isolated a complete
genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly,
in its entire length. They always use very short
pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists
of four molecules to determine them and call
them sequences. From a multitude of millions of
such specific, very short sequences, virologists
mentally assemble a fictitious long genome
strand with the help of complex computational
and statistical methods. This process is called
alignment.

The result of this complex alignment, the
fictitious and very long genetic strand, is
presented by virologists as the core of a virus
and they claim to have thus proven the
existence of a virus. However, such a complete
strand never appears in reality and in scientific
literature as a whole, although the simplest
standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis]
have long been available to
determine the length and composition of nucleic
acids simply and directly. By the fact of the
alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid
of the appropriate length directly, the virologists
have disproved themselves.

…

3. Alignment is only done by means
of mental constructs

In order to be able to mentally/computationally
assemble the very short sequences of the
nucleic acids used into a long genome, the
virologists need a template to align the short
sequences into a very long, supposedly viral
genome strand. Without such a given, very long
sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to
construct a viral genome
theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue
that the constructed genome is from a virus
because the alignment was done with another,
given viral genome.

This argument of the virologists is briefly and
unambiguously refuted by the fact that all
templates with which new genetic material
strands were generated
theoretically/computationally were themselves
and finally generated
theoretically/computationally and do not
originate from a virus." – Dr. Stefan Lanka

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-virologists.pdf

...and...

** "What's Causing My Cold?

...

It's likely that someday you'll have a close encounter with one of these types:

Rhinovirus

Coronavirus

RSV and parainfluenza"

https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/common_cold_causes

What medical science says about vaccines for common cold viruses...

"Why Is There No Vaccine for the Common Cold?

...........

Research and Vaccine Development

Research on the development of a common cold vaccine suggests that a vaccine for the common cold is not likely in the near future.

A study that compiled past and present research on the development of a rhinovirus vaccine noted that:7

It will be difficult to develop the vaccine because rhinovirus infects quickly and mutates, or changes, quickly.

In clinical trials that tested a cold vaccine with just one strain, results showed that it was not protective.

In clinical trials that focused on a cold vaccine with 10 strains, results also found it to be ineffective.

If a cold vaccine does get developed, it will likely need to provide broad protection against many strains of rhinovirus."

https://www.verywellhealth.com/why-there-will-never-be-a-vaccine-for-the-common-cold-770451

*** Instead of entering muscle cells in the deltoid region.

Ain't gonna happen. Nicole Schwab, Klaus Schwab's daughter has spilled the beans and is working with international prosecutors for the WEF's plan to kill BILLIONS of people. It is over.

As long as people insist on believing in phony viruses and phony pandemics pharma, WHO, and their cronies will use those beliefs to maintain power over the public and foist poisons on them in the form of vaccines. Can people please wake up and smell the truth?