We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
The fact is, we no longer have a legitimate government operating under the rule of law. We have a criminal organization which is waging an undeclared war against us. That is not exaggeration, it is not rhetoric, it is not hyperbole; it is the simple fact of the matter. We are now in the middle of World War Vee, and unless you want to be a casualty of war, you need to wake the hell up.
Do not consent. Do not comply. Do not obey. Resist by any means necessary.STAND UP! SPEAK OUT!
And the current Martial Law stuff that is going on now in Australia??!!..
THAT IS FULL-ON INSANE!!!...The USA has to fight THAT at every turn!!....
We have guns, they don’t.
For now we still have them.
Make certain that doesn't lead to complacency
This is nothing new. Experimentation has been done on US citizens for decades without out our knowledge or consent. Do some digging you'll come up with a list of times they sprayed, dropped, injected, fed us things for the sake of science. The problem is that now they're up against the reaches of the internet. Now we can all read things from reputable sources instead of relying on word of mouth, which makes them work harder to cover tracks. They aren't doing a good job.
I agree with you 1000%
William Gibson, Canadian author and futurist, has a name for this form of "government" in his latest novel, Agency. He calls it a KLEPT.
Yes, a kleptocracy, is government BY theft...I should read that book, although I prefer non-fiction generally
Make Jan 6 look like a picnic. March on DC . 9/11/2021
Jan 6 already looks like a picnic compared to what went on in Portland (for over 100 days) and several other American cities. The "rioters" of 1/6 killed nobody, looted no stores, and torched nothing.
A transcontinental criminal organization killing Americans, destroying property rights, mandating experimental useless drugs and arming terrorists. All on the grift!
pass it on
If you don't like it we can cram it down your throat!!!
Ya'll wildin'. A democratic government which doesn't conform to your own political views is totalitarian? Public health is not just a core responsibility of any civil government, but it is also a public duty for all of us. Spreading unfounded nonsense such as this only benefits those who profit from strife and use misinformed masses as their personal purse. Having faced the real possibility of losing family to this kind of fear mongering campaigns, I can unabashedly say that the words you write and speak have consequences: For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech" (1 Peter 3:10).
You seem to confuse the duties of the government with the duties of a rancher to his cattle. We are not cattle, we are not slaves, we are not children. We are free human beings and we own ourselves. Our elected representatives are our employees, not our masters. Sadly we don't even have elected representatives. We have election thieves in charge.
We've become a banana republic. Act accordingly (consult a Central American for life tips).
funny enough, family in central america were given ivermectin and other vitamins when they got covid last year; they all got well within 2 , 3 days, and we thought they were gonna be goners. That's when i realized something was messed with the whole covid plandemic.
Many countries doing same. Bangladesh has a population of 160 Million, about half the US population of 327 Million. THey've had 10,000 deaths, while US has had 580,000 deaths. (those #s as of April 2021). The difference? Everyone in Bangladesh has Ivermectin!
Similarly, a province in India decided to push Ivermectin instead of the shots. Their Covid cases plummeted. Other provinces went the shot route & have high cases/deaths like US.
So glad that one of my doctors uses this protocol. She said they'd not lost a single patient.
The whole world's become a banana republic. The world is becoming the huge gutter in the outer space.
I think I’d rather live in a banana republic
In a barrel?
In a little cabana. My barrel doesn’t have a toilet. ;)
No snowflakes!!!
I call them as I see them.
The definition of "to govern" is "to control." How much control by a politician or bureaucrat do we need?
As much as we're collectively willing to give them. For them there is no limit. If the people won't do something big we'll all end up as lab rats in a huge concentration camp
Start with removing the oligarchs first. Then the politicians that work for the oligarchs.
Americans are supposed to have "self-government". Most have been taught this means we elect representatives to interfere in each other's lives. But self-government actually means that every American has a right to govern himself. We elect representatives to run the government, not us.
Politicians and bureaucrats reply, "How much is there?"
A lot. For instance, you no longer have inalienable rights which would include the right to the full and complete ownership of your body and mind and to do with it what you please just so long as you do not violate the rights of others. The so-called war on drugs end your right to control your body. For example: Alcohol, a true narcotic drug, is legal for adults to make, possess, and use, yet it is one of the most deadly of drugs, including disease, homicides, and vehicle accidents.
Cocaine (and I haven't used in 40+ years) is not a narcotic drug and the deaths caused by its use are miniscule compared to alcohol. And most, if not all, users seldom if ever violate the rights of others merely from its use, yet it is highly illegal and hundreds of thousands of people have been convicted of a felony merely from it's possession.
The government now grants use privileges instead of us have rights.
Another example. If you own a piece of land and want to build a house on it. I'm talking about a normal lot-sized piece of land. But it has a boggy part to it and the EPA declares it a protected wetland, then you cannot build on it. This has happened more than once and people have gone to jail. Again, I'm not talking about a few dozen to a couple of hundred acres. I'm talking about 1/4 of an acre to 3 or 5 acres of land.
It should be to help people
Government is never there to help the people. (Though there may be *some* politicians who want to do good) Small govt is a MUST, because once govt has power to (allegedly) "do good", they have the power to do EVIL as well.
THIS is exactly what our Founding Fathers warned of. And Dr Ron Paul (Rand Paul's dad) when he ran for President in 2008.
Politicians convince the masses they will give them things (free healthcare, welfare, anything) to convince the masses to grow govt & give govt their money.
People need to say NO and depend on themselves, their family, their communities instead.
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington. The Founding Fathers knew that "the people" must be ever vigilant to keep the government in control. Unfortunately, too many people have become lotus eaters. They have gone to sleep.
Legitimate governments' only function is to limit power, to keep power in check through separation of powers. Government should not exist to help people. That is always a cover for taking illicit power
The U.S. Constitution is a document to limit the power of the federal government. If it's not in the Constitution they federal government is not supposed to do it. The Supreme Court is supposed to decide if something the fedgov wants to do is constitutional. But of course the Supremes are part of the fedgov and will, over time, give more credence to the fedgov, taking away our inalienable rights.
That's why i am asking the question in the first place, i cannot believe CHD doesn't know about this. Big Pharma is much more protected than any organization on this planet. Let's just say this: 007 - License to ... You know the rest...
I'm wondering why no one is questioning the fact that they are saying that this new shot is interchangeable with the old shot but at the same time it is legally different or legally distinct. Why is it that the old shot is still under emergency authorization but the new shot is deemed a provable? Isn't anybody wondering what the heck is in this new shot that is slightly different than the old shot?
You don't get to interchange a legalized one for one that has no approval. That is insane.
The ingredients are the same; it's a label that makes aworld of difference. Another resource I subscribe to posted a report by on this. If you accept the vax on the current bottle labeled as an experimental vax, the company has no liability for damages. The approved vax, however, has full liability and likely won't be released until they have worked out an agreement for that same escape clause for it. Since it's the same product, they can mandate the shot but you have the right to refuse any that isn't in the new label bottle, since mandates are questionable legally under the EUA . Gives wiggle yat least.
You know, the more I read the news the more my stomach tightens up into a little ball. Can it get more insane and obvious than this? Seriously? Americans are not protected and our government could care less. We can all just roll up and die for all they care. geez. I saw this a bit when I lived overseas, the differences in the ways the consulate's offices treated their citizens. But how many smacks in the face are we Americans willing to put up with? How come we are walking like sheep going to the slaughter? Silently? My son lives in Europe and said, "Mom, you have to get out of there." I thought, more easier said than done.
And "America" still has the balls to call itself "The Leader Of The Free World." What a cruel and disgusting joke.
The joke is Joe Biden and his puppet masters, do you have the balls to do anything about it? I think so, let your voice be heard.
Trump was given money by Pfizer as well.
Yes he was but not as much as Joe Biden or the democrats, Biden, Joe $381,930 $381,930 $0 Candidate (D-PRES)
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte $195,184 $62,184 $133,000 Political Party
DNC Services Corp $132,970 $102,970 $30,000 Political Party
My thought is to leave this country as well.
Incredible. These people do what ever they want: no law , no health involved😞😞😞