Now Conservative users have a course of action for this political censorship..... time for a class action suit!

Without Trump, Twitter would fail.

All the TWITS from Hollywood still Twitter, so they may stay online for them to spew hatred for anything good.

Over night?

Not quite overnight. But it would be done in 3 months or less is my guess. It would be the new MySpace. Remember MySpace?

Wow, ignorance knows no bounds.

You are living proof.

I went out to Gab and looked around. Nice!

GAB https://gab.ai/logo.png

By private companies you mean net neutrality? Liberals do whatever is convenient. Grow a pair

Just like bakers...

When has there ever been any real "net neutrality"?

Yep lead or get out of the Wayne?

God, guns, and the love of America is what our founding fathers had in their hearts. This America hating immigrant named Pranay Singh is not what our founding fathers wanted.

He is just doing what the American owners of Twitter tells him to do.

38,44,308,22,380, KOOL AID!

Communist leftwing tactics, silence and censor those who's opinions threaten the ideology and progress of the Leftwing democrat communist party.

Yes and when they are no longer useful no one will question where they disappeared to

Agreed. Class action and possible criminal activity.

Since it’s not a government entity I doubt it can be successfully sued. The best way to deal with this is for conservatives to quit using it. Hurt their advertising revenue and they’ll listen....or go out of business.

Wrong, it’s a private business. Not a hate crime, so it’s legal

If you could read, you would have read that I said twitter is legally ok. They may have a fiduciary or ethical reason, but not a legal reason. So I am right and you are a moron.

They are inconsistently applying their own code of conduct. I agree we shouldn't get the govt involved but we should point out the hypocrisy.

The bakery, genius, discriminated against gays. Gays are one of the protected classes, federal law. Customers of Twitter, last time I checked, aren’t a protected class. There’s a difference, then, between the bakery and Twitter. And there are similarities, such as they are each a private business. But I hope I have educated you as to the differences.
I am not surprised at your lack of education and kindness, seeing the confederated flag, the flag of loser racists, and your deplorable name, which is what you and the rest of your trailer park dwellers are.

Nice try, but you be wrong. There are 5 or 6 protected classes against hate, federal law. Gays are one of them. Customers of Twitter are not one of them. The bakery , then, violates federal law. Please educate yourself, moron.

you want to sue a private company that doesn't charge for the use of its communications platform? You sound like a socialist pig.

Social media, like Twitter, has become the new "town square" where free speech should rule. All speech should be protected. Twitter, FB, etc. are no longer private companies. They control or are today's town square.

It's not public space. No public funds invest in its servers and software. In fact, Twitter pays into public funds and gets nothing in return. It can and should tell whoever it wants to piss off.

Most of what you say may be or used to be true. But social media has become something different. It's like a private British company buying up the town squares in colonial times and removing all flyers critical of the crown.

That makes no sense. It's a free, opt-in service, not a public space. You tards just like to make wild claims against anyone who doesn't want to deport 30 million Mexicans. That's all you really care about. That and ending social programs for blacks. I'd respect you more if you just would say it.

Oh hell yes I want to end welfare, Medicaid. For all lazy colors. Black, White don't matter. Also deport all illegal scumbags that snuck in to this country. Question, who the hell do people who can't afford to feed them self's think that they can keep banging out kids. They stop the welfare and Medicaid. These lowlifes will slow down on the breeding. So Trevor the dog ass sniffer. Do you still live with mommy and daddy? Since it doesn't bother you our tax's pay for these illegals. I'll bet you're a jobless little sissy boy. Oh or are you a girl today. Lbgtkcszwhng what ever letter you freaks want to add. Remember BLACK LIES MATTER

Right on. So how does that impact the free use of Twitter? You have to try harder, dirt bag.

If you own a house and the land it's on you should be able to do what ever you want with it. You know that ain't true. All kinds of rules, regulations and laws. All there for the public good.

None of that legally has any bearing. The law prohibits the government from limiting speech, but businesses like Twitter are free to moderate however they see fit.

Remind me what damages you could sue for?
The answer is 'None'

Twitter needs some non-partisan competition. Unfortunately there’s no money in it. Twitter is not profitable despite being well-established, it’s propped up financially by liberal sponsors like Soros.

Germany new hate speech law amounts to same censorship. We are witnessing the end of free people.

Britain too.

Yah? Did they rip you off by giving you access to their free app? Did you read the terms and conditions before accepting them? America - home of the litigious.

You really think you can get money for this? LOL boy you people are not bright at all. Its their platform, they will tell you to go find another.

Simple. Cancel your account with Twitter and head over to GAB! Problem solved. Hit them in their pocket books. Works every time.

And a mass exodus to Gab.

Damn right I'm with you. Now seen if we can get zuckerbookerfag.

https://nlrb.gov/sites/defa...
Section 8(a)(2)—Domination or Illegal Assistance and Support of a Labor Organization.
National Labor Relations Act
Examples of violation:
• Taking an active part in organizing a union or a committee to represent employees.
• Allowing one of several unions, competing to represent employees, to solicit on company premises during working hours and denying other unions the same privilege.
• Soliciting and obtaining from employees and applicants for employment, during the hiring procedure, applications for union membership and signed authorizations for the check-off of union dues.
• Refusing to hire qualified applicants for jobs because they belong to a union. It would also be a violation if the qualified applicants were refused employment because they did not belong to a union, or because they belonged to one union rather than another.
Examples of restraint or coercion that violate Section 8(b)(1)(A) when done by a union that is the exclusive bargaining representative:
• Refusing to process a grievance in retaliation against an employee’s criticism of union officers.
• Rejecting an application for referral to a job in a unit represented by the union based on the applicant’s race or union activities
Examples of violations of Section 8(b)(2) are:
• Causing an employer to discharge employees because they circulated a petition urging a change in the union’s method of selecting shop stewards.
• Refusing referral or giving preference on the basis of race or union activities in making job referrals to unit represented by the union.