Democrats like Northam always claim they are Pro-Choice?
Can I choose to smoke?
Democrat - No its not good for you!
Can I choose a large soda?
Democrat - No its not good for you
Can I choose to own a gun?
Democrat - No its not safe for kids
Can I choose an incandescent bulb?
Democrat - No its not good for the planet
Can I choose my own health insurance?
Democrat - No, because we can't ban or mandate it
Can I choose a one-sex restroom?
Democrat - No its not good for the Trannies
Can I choose to honor God?
Democrat - No that's offensive
Can I have a southern border wall?
Democrat - No that's immoral
So what can I choose?
Democrat - an Abortion

You covered that excellently.

----- Roseanne Barr was crucified by the Marxists for her comment about Valerie Jarret. - ( Brought about by discussions of Valerie Jarret covering up ILLEGAL C.I.A. & F.B.I. spying on Trump and all Americans ) , So ,Democrats themselves must then hold a Governor and LT. Gov. accountable if a mere actor is thrown under the bus.

The Meddling Kids of the web have found additional pictures of Northam in the SAME Plaid Pants and with the SAME bushy hair shape ..... The Blackface is him...... He's Finished.

Democrats are much more afraid of losing Taxpayer Funding of Planned Parenthood ... their EUGENICS program.
Say hello to the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

The classmate may know if he is the blackface. If so he should reveal it, to again show Northam is a lying.

Democrat? check... Lips moving? check.... Yep he's LYING

Northam has boxed himself into a corner in the impossible way which only a Democrat can.

I hope this argument goes on forever and TRUMP can quietly get on with building the Wall !!!

MAGA

That was my first reaction when this first broke, please Northram don't resign. Democrat hypocrisy is hard to miss but this keeps it front and center.

It is wonderful to have more proof that the Democrats are racist AND BABY KILLERS!

You can bet Trump will make sure the abortion issue is kept front and center for 2020.
No matter how much the aborting democrats and propaganda media try to distract and bury this, Real Americans will hear the babies cries.
Do y’all remember Trump in the debate with Criminal Clinton when he said she and her baby harvesting party are ok “ripping the baby out of the womb of the mother”
This moral issue will guarantee Trump 2020 and expose the democrats for the cold blooded murders they are.
VOTE LIFE>>VOTE TRUMP 2020

They showed their hand. Scary stuff.

Well said!!

I thought the same thing. This is a false flag to distract from the abortion issue.

Democrats lowered the bar from innocent until proven guilty. Now it's guilty until you're proven innocent. Northam must resign now, he must follow his party's standards. Justin Fairfax should resign too on rape charge "claims" from 2004 according to Democrat standards.

No, let him follow the Republican standard and keep his job.

Like Keith Ellison?
Cummings?
Clinton
Shelia Jackson Lee ? and others

Looking4U,a S0r0s-sucking leftist bag of turds and globalist misdirection.

He can help OJ find the murderer after he's done with the photo.

Speed up the investigation by a year and send him a mirror.

Lock him in a room with the cap and ball his great grandpappy used.

Like OJs search for the real killer.

And what's the political benefit, specifically in the states he needs?

Assuming the economic environment is the same, he should be sticking to one coherent message about the economy. It's the strongest thing in his portfolio right now.

I voted for Trump, and will again. I know he has to pay lip service to the moronic religious voters that "need" that issue or it's a deal breaker.

I ALSO know that Trump is going to focus on REAL issues, like the economy, immigration, and America itself; while ABORTION will remain legal forever.

Life doesn't begin at the point that your faith-based philosophical scam-system has deemed so.

We agree on what he should focus on.

Murder is murder. It doesn’t matter to me what party you’re associated with!

Murder is murder. But since you don't hold a funeral when a zygote fails to attach to a uterus and therefore never develops, the point of murder being murder is moot.

The point is not "moot" because what you are suggesting is a natural process that does not have the facts and criteria that are required in order to prove a person to be convicted of that offense.

If you do a little research on matters such as free will, intent, and causality, or, better yet, the elements required for murder to be prosecuted, you might discover that murder requires certain elements such as:

> Mens rea (evil mind): an evil intent;
> Actus reus (wrongful act): the act was purposeful;
> Concurrence: the intent and act must be simultaneous;
> Causation: the act and intent must work together to be the cause of the harm; and
> Harm: act and intent must be the cause of actual harm.

From your comment, I can only conclude that you must be a registered Democrat.

No but a Zygote coming out is significantly different than cutting and pulling out piece by piece a fully formed, but tiny person with arms and legs, and a beating heart in the chest, or plunging a needle into the base of a small skull or snipping the neck. One is natures way of dealing with a non viable life, the other is man's brutality and inhumanity to the unborn human, cloaked as "choice and compassion".
there is a point that a new person is viable, and rather than chop them up and suction the parts, why not let them live. this is why late term 3rd and post 3rd trimester abortions shouldn't be allowed.

true, there will be an accounting.

Not at all. A human is a human no matter their age or size of body.

Both contraception and abortion carry a similar sentence upon one's soul.

Completely agree. Some cases women have miscarriages and that is devastating to them. Others can’t have children, or any more due to medical reasons, and this leftist cult of death just saddens them.

Hi Benny, they are so wrapped up in their own choices, they aren’t willing to accept consequences. Somehow they believe that a fetus is a nothing until it pops out fully formed.
I’ve also come to the conclusion that abortion is a religion to them, and it is very, very hard to disrupt a person’s beliefs when it has become an article of faith. Look atCunning’s sticking to the zygote stage as a clump of cells, yet ignores the dismemberment of a life in the womb. My guess is if he saw a late term abortion, he’d barf at the actions. Life and freedom dies in ignorance.
Heck murders and rapists on death row have more rights than the unborn.

murders and rapists on death row have more rights than the unborn
God wants us to respect all innocent, developing humans whether 1 second from conception, or 110 years.
But anti-Christians want to kill innocents, and protect guilty murderers. That's because they are against the author of all life - the one who will judge them for their sins.

Well put.
Of course the answer is obvious - it is because Progressives hate the author of all life - Jesus Christ.

Because "choice" does not mean what you think it means.

Providing graphic details doesn't say anything about the merits of the question of Life. There are similar gross details of amputating a leg. The use of the term "tiny human" is ridiculous. In fact, the zygote can still DIVIDE and make identical twins, which shows how unscientific it is to call it A human life.

So your argument is that small people aren't human.

How big are you? The t4 program needs to know... for later.

Also, if a child at that stage splits into twins, there was always two people there.

No there weren't always two people there, there was one. I'm sure your holy book will someday "explain" how and why the division occurs. ehem. Just like it explained the age of Earth and how the force of buoyancy doesn't work when a certain man "walks" on water. But the issue of "tiny" is trivial, as you're making it out to be. Tiny means it's not viable; and viability, to a LOGICAL person, goes to how and when we consider when life begins.

Ones soul is created and given at conception, therefore life. The cell splits into two distinct bodies to account for each soul.

So your argument is that life only matters when it is convenient? Are you convenient? Doesn't seem like it to me.

Are you being difficult on purpose?

Let's say a woman goes through fertility treatment. Her egg and her husband's sperm are joined in a lab on Jan 1. The fertilized egg is frozen for later use.

Six months later, on June 1, it is implanted inside her.

On June 7th, the zygote splits into two, zygote alpha and zygote beta.

On what date did zygote beta's "soul" get created?

Does the attempt to dehumanize people through labeling work? It just seems to make you a monster, and does nothing to the children you want exterminated.

The soul and body of man are created simultaneously and one cannot fuction at all without the other.

The freezing of the two child's shared body prevents them from growing. Therefore they split later. Did you honestly just ask me why cell growth does not take place under freezing conditions?

That you use an abomination to cover for a sin that cries to Heaven for vengeance at least tells me that you are a genuine reprobate beyond help as you seem to have lost all humanity to the point of not recognizing your own shame. At least what awaits you is well deserved.

There are multiple reasons why you won't answer the question.

Either you realized how your predisposed way of thinking CANNOT make room for logic, or you're still blind to the obvious, and merely continue spewing the rhetoric.

Again, on what day in that example did B gain a soul? B, not A, not what came before the split. B itself !!!!!!!! B
Again, B.

I answered everything you said and even asked you a few things.

Seems you ignored both my answers and my questions for the same reason you ignore the humanity of your victims: they are inconvenient.

I looked up the answers and you never stated when soul B, as distinct from A, first came to be. Perhaps you need to go back to your group of like-minded victims of religious brainwashing and do the difficult task of tying religion to logic. You can't win, of course, but perhaps you can DELAY the inevitable. Logic will beat blind faith and superstition.

The Souls are unique. Their bodies were shared for a time as it is difficult to fit two distinct bodies in a single cell.

Logic is the lowest form of thought, and is minimally useful. In fact, it is totally useless for these topics; you will need at least Reason for this.

Faith is the highest form of thought and it means to found oneself in God.

Their bodies were not "shared for a time". It wasn't two bodies. It was one, before division. With division, you get the additional cell which to your limited religious reasoning, means you got "something from nothing". We all know religion rejects this. Just another reason why FAITH is the lowest form of reasoning, it basically throws in the towel and gives up; like saying "you know what, these concepts are really complicated, let's just say it was magic and that if you don't believe then you're going to a bad place for eternity". Yep. lowest form.

Yes, because it is hard to have two bodies occupying a single cell. Once the cell divides, so do their bodies. Technically since they are twins their bodies share many traits so it makes sense their bodies were totally joined at one point.

Faith is founding oneself in God.