YouTube has removed your videos. Please repost them to Odysee & BitChute as YouTube are an utterly toxic provider.

Yes please! That would be great.

The videos (and slides) are on the Pandas site.

Download the audio here part 1 I see works

The videos are on the Panda site

And let us not forget those eminent scientists whom a quarter century ago warned that according to their computer models that due to global warming sea levels would have risen enough to flood Cape Town due to the melting ice cap.
Whoops temperatures haven't risen measurably except where the surroundings of the measuring instruments have changed, Cape Town and Holland haven't flooded so let's call it climate change because that cannot be measured.

Can you for one moment consider the harm lockdowns are doing? On children, on artists, restaurants, tourism businesses and so many others, do you not think it is a bit selfish to continue supporting it for a disease that has an over 99% recovery rate?

Maybe 5% of the population understands the implications of a 10% destruction of GDP, and the enormous burden deficit spending and resulting debt will have on future generations - the young of today, who will be around to pay the price, unlike the politicians and scientists, who have absolutely no "skin in the game".

From Australia to USA, France to South Africa, many tens of trillions of Dollars has been added to national debt levels. There has never been a cost benefit analysis of lockdowns. It has always been presented as the only option. Any dissenters are tagged as conspiracy theorists, denialists, granny killers. alt-right etc.

Don't forget Latin America

The High Priest of Environmental Causes Al Gore was out promoting his waste of cellulose In January, 2006 – when promoting his Oscar-winning (yes, Oscar-winning) documentary, An Inconvenient Truth – Gore declared that unless we took “drastic measures” to reduce greenhouse gasses, the world would reach a “point of no return” in a mere ten years. He called it a “true planetary emergency.” Well, the ten years passed today, we’re still here, and the climate activists have postponed the apocalypse. Again.

Time to change your tin foil hat. It's useful to have a few.

Good point Stewie!
The global warming nutcases actually published the melting ice cap, flooding coastal cities, drowning Holland theories in scientific journals for peer review so these totally inaccurate predictions can be looked up by intelligent people.
Plus of course every time a CO2 molecule is created by burning hydrocarbons for fuel two oxygen atoms must be consumed and whilst I have read copious articles about the increased number of CO2 particles per million in the atmosphere I have seen nothing about the inherent and compulsory reduction in the number of oxygen molecules.
What do you say?

Al Gore made a lot of money out of conspiracy theories, wouldn't you say? Also, when I last checked, he had no solar panels on his mansion.

That's definitely not polite!

Perv

I'm a Doctor. I'm paid to do that sort of thing.

That's what Pallo Jordan also said. What do you think about my new blue tin foil hat. I had no idea tin foil came in rainbow colours.

I'm a Batman gal myself . I love his car, how it emits tons of carbon, hoping that Greta creature coughs hard. Did you know that the turnips in Sweden compared the grumble Greta to JC? And I thought we lived among the heathen and stupid!

Awe, last link gave me a paywall, but its beautiful. In Greta's world, the truth is irrelevant. Its a school dropout, so what do you expect? Just make it up as you go along.
Same with Fauci, Gates, Birx, WHO, etc.

Thanks to all those who had the courage to allow Nick Hudson & Panda to communicate their assessment of this pandemic. We live in a really scary world where news and information are manipulated to support particular narratives, and those who challenge them are cancelled, de-platformed, ridiculed, and abused or worse.

Where are the conservative voices standing up to this censorship?

Destroy the economy (middle class) for a 'disease' that has over 90% recovery rate = ANC policies.
Do nothing about 58 murders per day. There's no mystery here.

His comments about the Diamond Princess are bizarre. Does he imagine that everybody was milling around swapping sputum on the boat all day? He thinks it is impossible to isolate people on a boat. Where does this idea come from? If people are in their cabins and handwashing?

He says, 'Only 12 people out of several thousand on board the ship died. So that told you very clearly that this universal susceptibility was nonsense.'

For an erudite, self-appointed critic of other people's mis-tweets (and I agree several points he makes on that) this is remarkably lax terminology. The fact that 'only 12 people' died (!) is not a mark of susceptibility. It certainly doesn't tell you anything 'very clearly'. In epidemiology, a susceptible individual (sometimes known simply as a susceptible) is a member of a population who is at risk of becoming infected by a disease. If Nick is so unbiased and analytical why can't he manage to say that over 600 people on the boat were infected? And that was when they were locked in their cabins and using clean procedures. What's this guy's agenda? Could it possibly be self-publicity? His swagger speaks volumes.

'Only 12 people'. I guess by that logic Harold Shipman was found guilty of murdering 'only 15 people'.

But the worst thing about this is he is neither an epidemiologist nor a medic. Did he ever work in ICU and see these people die or talk to their relatives?

I don't think you have understood what the Diamond Princess was telling us at a time when we had almost no data on this virus. In a perfect environment, with 2666 passengers and 1045 crew :
-760 infections of which between 50 and 70% were asymptomatic (different figures from various different studies)
-Crew were not fully quarantined and shared meals in the canteen,
-the passengers were elderly, average age 52,
-same air was circulated throughout the ship's aircon system etc
-12 deaths recorded, all over age 70
Nick Hudson, like many others, correctly relied on this data to predict likely infection and mortality outcomes. Most importantly "The age-graduated mortality of COVID is profound".
This should have driven the response to Covid - and meant that locking down an entire population when only a particular risk group (age + comorbidity) were likely to experience severe disease, was a colossal policy failure with disastrous social and economic consequences.

But, like Nick, you're assuming this is merely about numbers. There are lots of other factors to be considered when making policy decisions, not least the capability of the health services in the face of an unchecked exponential outbreak and the political fallout of such in a democracy.

Fully agree. And lockdowns as a (short term) method to allow medical services to prepare, makes complete sense. Unfortunately the politicians are driving the response, and the overwhelming aim is to do something and ensure re-election. Sweden showed us what could be achieved. Not perfect, but the absence of political interference makes me envious.

I'm not sure how accurate it is to say that the politicians are driving the response. In the UK, at least, we have a bunch of highly qualified and unelected boffins harrying the politicians to do more lockdowns.

These boffins and brains are paid and part of the problematic narrative. The UK is running the full program in all its glory. The initial data predicted by these boffins at imperial was soooo inaccurate it almost revealed a compliance in the spin doctor sagas! Fear and emotion seem to be the narrative devices to control the minds. Seems like an elaborate rebranding of a flu type virus with a sinister economic undertone. Much love and just ask questions. 💚

Raw Archive is a sock puppet.

Who are they? What are their qualifications? Where is the reasoning for their decisions, minutes of meetings? What conflicts of interest do they have? Why have their estimates been so horribly wrong? Why have other viewpoints not been represented in these decision making bodies? Why the ongoing suffocation in MSM of any alternative views? How could an apparent democracy transform overnight into some sort of medico-political junta?

Google is really easy to use.

They are called SAGE and everything they do is published by the Gov't. Google it.

And your comment that the 'MSM' are 'suffocated' is not accurate. Just Google 'Professor Anti-Lockdown' with the name of a newspaper like 'The Guardian' or 'The Telegraph' and it'll throw up multiple articles they have published by lockdown sceptics, for example.

Here the Telegraph takes a positive look at Sweden: https://www.telegraph.co.uk...

So we can expect SAGE to engage in measured, transparent and detailed rebuttal of the various issues raised by PANDA and by so many other globally renowned experts in the relevant fields?

Or are they answerable to no one except their political masters?

A search of the Guardian reveals only a relentless bashing of organisations that question the official narrative, including countries that have failed to engage in hard lockdowns.

Sweden comes in for a lot of negative coverage - this is some of the worst journalism I have ever seen :

https://www.theguardian.com...

https://www.theguardian.com...

https://www.theguardian.com...

Google is your friend. All of this is published. https://www.gov.uk/governme....

Whilst I agree that The Guardian's coverage of Sweden is warped, the idea that 'MSM' are 'suffocated' is just complete and utter drivel:
https://www.theguardian.com...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk...
https://www.theguardian.com...
https://www.theguardian.com...

How could an apparent democracy transform overnight into some sort of medico-political junta? Exactly.

"If Nick is so unbiased and analytical why can't he manage to say that over 600 people on the boat were infected? And that was when they were locked in their cabins and using clean procedures."

The vast majority of infections occurred before passengers were locked up - thereafter infection rates fell sharply. The infection rate amongst crew was 13% - they were never under complete quarantine. The infection rate amongst passengers was 23%.

Sounds like it demonstrated the efficacy of lockdown.

Exactly. No virus can survive when all potential hosts are removed. But a vessel lockdown cannot be reproduced in the real world, certainly not for 12 months. People have to shop, work etc. So the virus is still with us, enabled by repeated lockdowns, with a real risk of a substantial new strain developing.

The point is - we locked everyone away when it was not really necessary, if our objective was to protect only those at risk.

Do you know the R rate for leprosy? It is very much less than 1. I agree there are political motives for lockdowns, but that isn't unreasonable in itself.

If Hudson cannot present an accurate analysis from a very limited environment like the Diamond Princess then what chance does he have in analysing observational data at the population level? Quite telling that none of his analysis is peer-reviewed and published in science journals. This guy is either completely out of his depth or up to something else entirely.

Mrs Bill Gates is no medical doctor either, and just look what she's achieved!

The virus is being used by Big Tech to replace the brick and mortar with virtual 5G, e.g fasten the fourth industrial revolution.

Add to this the supplementing force of socialists everywhere using it for class struggles and we have a nasty class/cultural war raging all over the planet.

Hence the reason for the cancel culture and the false narratives being peddled by the mass streaming media.