We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

SPANGLER the Deplorable • 2 years ago

If the vax works, then a mandate isnt necessary.....

If the vax doesnt work, then a mandate isnt necessary....

.....its called science.

CyborgSeer • 2 years ago

John Nolte: you gutless wonder, too afraid to take on AT&T over their CNN propaganda channel, THESE ARE NOT REAL VACCINES dude! Real vaccines, like we all had as kids, do not require distancing, masks or boosters. AND you never had to fear getting the things the real vaccines were for! Grow up John, geez!

Deplorable D • 2 years ago

Nolte: Lifesaving vaccine? Let’s not even get into the “vaccine” debate. Just pure numbers.

My chance of dying from Covid is 0.5%, per the CDC. And that is IF I am infected with SARS-CoV-2 AND IF I develop Covid. Per Oxford University, the chance of all three events occurring is 0.04%.

Per Pfizer’s own numbers, while they claim the RRR is 95%, the more important ARR is 0.85%. That is absolute risk reduction. In looking at the numbers of raw data, the reduction in deaths is 0.078% vaxxed versus unvaxxed. (Dr Briggs does an excellent breakdown of the math: July 2021 paper in Infectious Diseases entitled “Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study” by Menni.)

EDIT: [new paper: "Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID_19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trails" in Meicina, Ronald Brown concluded the ARR for Pfizer is 0.7% and Moderna is 1.1%.]

The adverse events, which we only have short-term data right now, is about 1%. We have no medium term numbers because Pfizer unblinded their trial when the initial data showed 15 vaxxed versus 14 placebo subjects died.

EDIT [new paper: "mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Development of CMR-confirmed Myopericarditis" by Kafil concluded the incidence of myopericarditis is 1 case per 1000 inoculations. Not per person vaxxed, but per jab given.]

So, my less than 0.04% chance of dying versus a 0.078% reduction in lethality but a 1% chance of severe adverse side effects. That is the math. Take the mRNA experimental drug if you wish, but do not lecture me about “lifesaving”. I have obviously done more research than you have.

Myles_Fansant_93 • 2 years ago

He is equating this for covid to the vaccine you took for measles or whatever as a kid. Apples and vaccines.

jaj Jaj • 2 years ago

Deplorable D • 2 years ago

Former VP of the WHO’s viral disease and vaccine advisory told a London paper this weekend the vaccinated should be quarantined. They are the ones spreading the variants and are a danger to the unvaccinated. Check out the interview at TGP.

TheNameIsFriday #NoUnity • 2 years ago

Something making me go 🤔. When Covid was at its worst in 2020 with no one vaccinated…there were never any variants spreading or constant threat of new variants. Now with millions and millions vaccinated, variants are all over the place and case numbers in some places are higher now than when no one was vaccinated.

JohnMcClane • 2 years ago

Maybe these mRNA vaccines help SARS-COV-2 viruses mutate? Sounds like a logical theory to me. Why isn't anyone investigating this?

Ed from Queens • 2 years ago

The inoculated are the spreaders!

Chris McDonald • 2 years ago

Before mask mandates and vaccines I asked everyone I came into contact with " if they knew anyone with covid ". Not1 said yes. Now just 3 of my friends know someone with covid after being double jabbed

Neil Foster • 2 years ago

Before the vaccine several family members and friends got Covid. Now since the vaccine, no one has that I know.

bill sailer • 2 years ago

Bill, so 675,000 did not die in the US??????? And all the countries had people die too?????That makes even less sense.

Chaz Nonya • 2 years ago

Yes!! This guy has it right!!

Reto Kehrli • 2 years ago

Yup and we're sent by the leftists to eradicate all opposition so we can install our fascist paradise.

Disgruntledviewer • 2 years ago

I agree with Trump.....the Vaccine is a China plot to get rid of us! We are so stupid to take this killer vaccine.Nolte knows It will turn us into zombies in the years to come!!

Athos • 2 years ago

😂😂😂😂😂. Wow. Unbelievable. And gravity is a theory and the earth is flat and the moon landing was faked. And Trump committed no crimes while in office.

EMcF • 2 years ago

You're hilarious. Your future career as a stand-up comedian aside, you should learn about Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

Jen Sanchez • 2 years ago

I know we sound like conspiracy nuts, but look into Lancet's retracted hydroxychloroquine study involving patient overdosing. Look into Bill Gates polio vaccine and depopulation agenda. Look

Athos • 2 years ago

Lancet’s study OK. The Bill Gates nanobots in the vaccine…uh, no.

Jen Sanchez • 2 years ago

Nonobots? Nah, I mean he believes that climate change will destroy the worlds supplies in a few decades, so we need depopulation so people don't starve and die anyways. He innoculated 496,000 children who were paralysed directly from the vaccine.

NickTheRoo • 2 years ago

Of course he didn't. What crimes? Proof please.

Unless being a great President is a crime, which to people like you it probably is.

So yeh, you got me.

Athos • 2 years ago

30,000 lies recorded and factually proven in four years.

RIPKarlKolchak • 2 years ago

You poor beguiled fool.

The true science is out there. What you are fed by Twitter and CNN is just the data that supports their agenda.

Ken • 2 years ago

But of course he's factually correct.

NickTheRoo • 2 years ago

Yep

Tom • 2 years ago

Alternative hypothesis:

The creator of the PCR test is Kary Mullis who won a Nobel Prize for it in 1993. He said that the PCR should NOT be used to diagnose covid or anything else.

The test is literally meaningless. It's not like a pregnancy test which is binary false/positive. The test is based on PCR cycles which can be manipulated to prove anything.

They're literally shutting the world down based on a fake test. That's why they have to make up all these variants to explain why the vaxxed still test positive. It's the same test as 2020 so where's the proof some new variant is being found.



https://anti-empire.com/the-inventor-of-the-pcr-technique-would-be-the-first-to-say-its-not-fit-for-diagnostic-purposes/

EMcF • 2 years ago

My husband is a nurse in a hospital. He treated some covid patients last fall and winter (leading him to get covid at Christmas). This summer, he has treated MANY covid patients. Fortunately, the numbers are going down. One of his patients told my husband that he is a democrat and works for the cdc and has now lost all faith in science because he said the PCR test was created with the sole purpose of over-diagnosing covid to get Trump out of office.

Chris Snyder • 1 year ago

Did your husband say how they find different variants? Is covid genetic testing also to make Trump look bad?
Did he say if Soros paid people in other countries to get sick/run up numbers to make Trump look bad?

Deplorable D • 2 years ago

Note the FDA has pulled the EUA for the test starting Dec 31 because of its inaccuracy. Why not pull it now? They stated they are allowing the inventory levels to drop and give time for doctors to find an alternative. If the test does not work, then why allow its continuous use?

Jumpin jack • 2 years ago

Google ADE.

EMcF • 2 years ago

There are MANY doctors saying exactly that, including Nobel prize awardees. It is because of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

Andrew Reinbach • 2 years ago

mRNA is not DNA. They are different molecules and do different things. The codes comprising DNA tell the body what to do. mRNA delivers those instructions to the biological function controlled by DNA. Ergo, even if RNA did mutate, it doesn't mean our DNA is changed by these vaccines.

Neil Foster • 2 years ago

Virus mutate regardless.

JohnMcClane • 2 years ago

no kidding? thank you captain obvious. you have no point.

Neil Foster • 2 years ago

The point is that your claim that the vaccines "help" the virus mutate is bogus.

JohnMcClane • 2 years ago

You have no point. Viruses are single celled organisms that need a host to replicate, they make fast copies of themselves, that are naturally not very accurate, and mutate easily. Everybody knows this, that's why they make a few different flu vaccines every year, because they don't know which one will be the one they need. The "variants" that are being reported weren't named until AFTER the mRNA vaccine use was widespread. MRNA works by tricking your cells into accepting a "spiked protein" (the inventors' description, not mine), that is supposed to latch onto covid-19 when it attempts to co-opt your cells in order to replicate and spread. What side effects might this "spiked protein" have? What unintended effects does it have? You've heard of the law of unintended consequences right? There are ALWAYS unintended consequences. Keep burying your head in the sand all you want Neil. Whatever makes you feel better.

Neil Foster • 2 years ago

I whistle Dixie and it keeps elephants away. Never failed me yet.
See? Making bogus cause and effect claims is easy. Fun too!

7of9 • 2 years ago

Because you're a half-wit?

bill sailer • 2 years ago

They probably are, and like the FDA, WHO, and CDC they will have to make up their minds for a couple of years first.

Deplorable D • 2 years ago

It has been investigated, and the conclusion is the mRNA drug is causing the mutations. Even researchers with the WHO have admitted this.

artmofo • 2 years ago

Investigated by who? Scientists at Trump University?

Chris Snyder • 1 year ago

To stop mutations, they should have pulled the plug on people who didn't get cured from covid within 10 days. This would have also reduced hosptial overcrowding.
But actually, omicron did what my friend (a vet) said it would do - the virus mutates and becomes more infectious, but less deadly - this so it survives and spreads. Ebola doesn't spread so much because it kills people too fast.. I guess it never got the memo.

Donald Cox • 2 years ago

No one is investigating that theory because it simply isn't credible.

JohnMcClane • 2 years ago

You can make that pronouncement all you like, ignoring the possibility may make you feel better, but it’s still an opinion you hold based on faith, instead of fact.

Donald Cox • 2 years ago

No, it isn't a possibility. Nor is it something I hold on faith. Check when the variants were first discovered. The fact that the variants existed before the vaccines is proof that the vaccines didn't cause the variants.

jesse • 2 years ago

Your error is thinking that it is a vaccine.

Donald Cox • 2 years ago

Your error is believing the anti-vaxxer propaganda that this isn’t a vaccine

JohnMcClane • 2 years ago

The variants were first discovered AFTER the vaccines rolled out. Don't even try that.

Donald Cox • 2 years ago

You are wrong. According to Wikipedia:
Alpha first detected in UK Sep 20
Beta first detected in S. Africa May 20
Gamma first detected in Brazil Nov 20
Delta first detected in India Oct 20.
First roll out of vaccine Pfizer in Dec 20 in the US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

BTW. Vaccines being available in the US doesn't mean the vaccines were available in 3rd World Countries.

So, since the variants preceded the vaccines, the vaccine did not cause the variants.

Jay V • 2 years ago

Yup I would think it will just mutate around the jab just like the flu! They should never have done a vax but instead focus on treatment. I’m sure there are off label drugs that are effective possibly ivermectin. But Big Pharma is so f corrupt!!