<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for zhoutong</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/zhoutong/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/zhoutong/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:44:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Introducing Xav.tc &amp;#8211; TechXav&amp;#8217;s Own URL Shortener, And Why We Don&amp;#8217;t Use Bit.ly Pro</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/12/27/xavtc/#comment-27357075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Xav.tc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Xav.tc"&gt;Xav.tc&lt;/a&gt; is designed for private usage only, all posts within the TechXav Network should have their own shortened URLs. We keep it private because we want the URL to be short enough. Anyway, thanks for your support, hope you can enjoy &lt;a href="http://Xav.tc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Xav.tc"&gt;Xav.tc&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Why AskForAnswer Is Better Than Yahoo! Answers</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/10/20/5-reasons-why-askforanswer-is-better-than-yahoo-answers/#comment-20854747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you are correct, we still have lots of work to do on the design. We will launch our Alpha 3.0 version this weekend, with brand new design.&lt;br&gt;Hope you will support us if you like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:16:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Teens Have Developed One of the World&amp;#8217;s Most Social Q&amp;#038;A Platform &amp;#8211; AskForAnswer</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/10/14/introducing-askforanswer/#comment-20052199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most likely we will run by ourselves, forever. Because we put lots of effort into it, and we are glad to use our ability to do something for the Internet, selling it does not make sense for us because what we want is not just money, the most important thing is experience.&lt;br&gt;Of course we hope AskForAnswer to be a successful social web platform, but in order to operate it, funding/capital may be required. So we will be more likely being invested instead of being acquired if we can do well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evolution of Websites: How 40 Popular Websites have Changed Over the Years</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/09/05/evolution-of-websites-how-40-popular-websites-have-changed-over-the-years/#comment-16024772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, they are really huge changes over years. Just imagine how will my web platforms look like after a few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter the Web 2.0 Version of RSS Feeds?</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/08/25/is-twitter-the-web-2-0-version-of-rss-feeds/#comment-15347353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really? But I think Friendfeed is more likely to be the social version of RSS Feeds, as it can integrate the statuses from lots of social services in one account. Not wrong, some people love to use Twitter for links only, then Twitter will become a RSS Reader...&lt;br&gt;The major problem is not that people don't want to share "What are you doing?", but is that people don't want to read the others', they enjoy interesting links more than personal statements. That's all...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google need not to build an Operating System at all to Kill Microsoft?</title><link>http://techxav.com/2009/07/23/google-need-not-to-build-an-operating-system-at-all-to-kill-microsoft/#comment-13269619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yah, actually your comment is not wrong, but what I mean is just Javascript for Rich Internet Applications. As an Operating System, Windows should provide Script API for different types of programming languages, JScript should be one of them. However, when we talk about the web, then Microsoft is not so successful in Javascript as the compatibility of Internet Explorer is not so good.&lt;br&gt;Therefore, we are talking about different things...&lt;br&gt;Anyway, thanks for your support.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhou Tong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:32:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>