<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for zellunit</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/zellunit/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/zellunit/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:25:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-432554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point, yeah scarily, I think most could coast. I mean, some people do that in a way right? It's all a matter of degree of personal attention, which is in itself just a continuous scale. That hits deeper ethical, moral, and existential questions though :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zellunit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-429043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent point. i didn't want to make a long post even longer by jumping into this, but you are probably correct and there's no way they could have sold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;that said, i still have faith that they are ballsy and would have gone for the homerun had the choice been 100% theres :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zellunit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>