<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for xolan99</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/xolan99/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/xolan99/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:22:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grooveshark circles back again, swaps app for HTML5</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/06/dnp-grooveshark-back-again-swaps-app-for-html5/#comment-641987841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You never give up, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:22:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T confesses: its network couldn't handle unchecked FaceTime over cellular</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/att-facetime-over-cellular-iphone-complaint-reaction/#comment-626171849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We all don't have iPhones and that wasn't my point. My point was addressing the first comment about iPhone to iPhone. If you have one and I have one, why not use the method that's built in that doesn't require app, sign-in, etc..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously for the mobile industry in general the way to go is Google, Skype...anything that's free and is fairly universally used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But for Blackberry users, if they need to communicate with another, why not use BBM? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T confesses: its network couldn't handle unchecked FaceTime over cellular</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/att-facetime-over-cellular-iphone-complaint-reaction/#comment-625810884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Again though my comment was focused solely on iPhone to iPhone users. If an iPhone user doesn't have Skype installed on their phone, then you can't make a Skype call to them obviously. It requires an app whereas Facetime is builtin to the OS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T confesses: its network couldn't handle unchecked FaceTime over cellular</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/att-facetime-over-cellular-iphone-complaint-reaction/#comment-625809957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You may not need to log in initially but the other person needs the app, in which case you have to install if the other person doesn't have it. If you and I wanted to talk on video, you'd have to wait for me to download Tango, which I don't have. And clearly you didn't read what I said - I said IF you are chatting with someone else with an iPhone there is no better option. Obviously if you want to talk to someone with an Android phone, you'll need to look elsewhere. But if a family has kids/parents all using an iPhone, why not? And it's Wifi only now but that's why this whole thing is available on cell with iOS6.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:23:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T confesses: its network couldn't handle unchecked FaceTime over cellular</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/att-facetime-over-cellular-iphone-complaint-reaction/#comment-625714193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are communicating with another iPhone/iPad/Mac user, there is no better option. No need to log into Skype, Google Plus, etc.. It works just like a phone call - nobody needs an app or to be signed into anything. Plus unlike the Skype app, the video is full screen as opposed to half screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HBO Go update supports Android tablets up to ICS</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/02/hbo-go-android-tablet-update/#comment-575034808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most content, at least on XBOX 360, is the same broadcast 720p HD that you'd get on regular cable&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:57:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 and 4S now available to purchase outright at Cricket for $399 and $499</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/22/apple-iphone-4-and-4s-now-available-at-cricket/#comment-565655003</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well if I am to believe the rumors, the aspect ratio would change to be taller and so the width of the actual device wouldn't increase by much. If I can use it while walking down the street, holding a coffee, holding onto the subway or bus handles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yes, I did choose Apple because of the OS. I prefer the design, the ecosystem and things like widgets don't concern me. Again, I gave Android a chance by buying an EVO when it came out and I almost kept it but I realized that practically I couldn't operate it under my busy life in NYC with one hand. Thus I moved back to iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think a 4 inch would fail if designed correctly. Remember that Apple is trying to sell the iPhone to as wide a user base as possible...thus if 80% of the population can wrap their thumb from one side to the other, it's not that 80% of the population has tiny hands - it's that 80% of the population includes kids, teens, women, etc..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 and 4S now available to purchase outright at Cricket for $399 and $499</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/22/apple-iphone-4-and-4s-now-available-at-cricket/#comment-565404363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I for one prefer a screen size where I can use the phone with one hand, as my other hand on the go is usually busy or carrying something.  I had the HTC EVO and returned it as I couldn't turn it on, txt, etc..  From what I understand that's why Apple chose the 3.5 inch screen size to begin with - because based on average hand sizes, 80% of adults could operate with one hand&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's FaceTime finally goes cellular, says so long to WiFi restrictions</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/apples-facetime-finally-goes-cellular-says-so-long-to-wifi-res/#comment-554685717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My experience has been shoddy at best. Pixelated and choppy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:55:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's FaceTime finally goes cellular, says so long to WiFi restrictions</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/apples-facetime-finally-goes-cellular-says-so-long-to-wifi-res/#comment-554570219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, there's no way users would want to use this on a daily basis. But the option is there should they need it I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's FaceTime finally goes cellular, says so long to WiFi restrictions</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/apples-facetime-finally-goes-cellular-says-so-long-to-wifi-res/#comment-554566252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm thinking this was enabled in anticipation of 4G LTE iPhones. Video chatting over 3G would be choppy to a point of being useless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:33:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple announces first Retina display in a MacBook, 220ppi with 2880 x 1800 resolution</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/apple-macbook-pro-retina/#comment-554539457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think this is geared for regular people though. The Airs and regular Pros are. I'm thinking this is mostly for graphic artists/designers and video editors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple announces first Retina display in a MacBook, 220ppi with 2880 x 1800 resolution</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/apple-macbook-pro-retina/#comment-554525004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To those of you saying "who cares", I think the real benefit here is for video editors. Being able to edit in full 1080p while having extra screen estate for all the controls, tools without the need of a second monitor?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engadget Giveaway: win a new iPad, courtesy of Kabam!</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/engadget-giveaway-win-a-new-ipad-courtesy-of-kabam/#comment-470424672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hoping I win...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engadget Giveaway: win a new iPad, courtesy of Kabam!</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/engadget-giveaway-win-a-new-ipad-courtesy-of-kabam/#comment-470424588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hoping I win&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:59:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nook Tablet update closes sideloading loophole, lacks holiday spirit</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/edit-nook-firmware-updater-1-4-1-closes-third-party-app-looph/#comment-390967602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ugh. After not being satisfied with the Fire, I was going to trade it in for a Nook Color or Tablet. But if even sideloading is disabled then I will keep the Fire. At least Amazon makes it possible to install outside APKs without rooting....for now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google partners with Universal, EMI, Sony Music, 23 independent labels on Google Music, scores exclusive content</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/google-partners-with-universal-emi-sony-music-23-independent/#comment-365126809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Concert items from big bands are cool but why would we shift from using iTunes or Amazon MP3? Will the prices be significantly different? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:47:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google partners with Universal, EMI, Sony Music, 23 independent labels on Google Music, scores exclusive content</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/google-partners-with-universal-emi-sony-music-23-independent/#comment-365126309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't you just download on iTunes and upload to Amazon Cloud?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:46:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The official Gmail app for iPhone, iPad is officially official (update: pulled)</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/the-official-gmail-app-for-iphone-ipad-is-officially-official/#comment-353950612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think this will deter me from continuing to use Gmail as an exchange email on the default iOS mail app. Push notifications, more fluid and contact book integration. But hey, more options are always good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WatchESPN iOS app lets some people watch live sports wherever they want</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/watchespn-ios-app-lets-some-people-watch-live-sports-wherever-th/#comment-179882682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The app though has the full cable channels of ESPN, ESPN 2 and ESPN U. Not just ESPN 3.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WatchESPN iOS app lets some people watch live sports wherever they want</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/watchespn-ios-app-lets-some-people-watch-live-sports-wherever-th/#comment-179882684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The app though has the full cable channels of ESPN, ESPN 2 and ESPN U. Not just ESPN 3.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon waives Xoom and Galaxy Tab activation fees on contracts from March 1st in a limited time offer</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/15/verizon-waives-xoom-and-galaxy-tab-activation-fees-effective-re/#comment-166282344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to see how many people who hate on the iPad on this board and praise the Xoom, actually own a Xoom...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:11:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cinema Confidential News: 02/04/2009 - Martin Campbell in talks to direct "Green Hornet"</title><link>http://www.cinecon.com/news/1968/martin-campbell-in-talks-to-direct-green-hornet/#comment-5886748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's been corrected&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cinema Confidential News: 01/22/2009 - List of the 81st Annual Academy Awards Nominations</title><link>http://www.cinecon.com/news2008.php/1931/list-of-the-81st-annual-academy-awards-nominations/#comment-5529000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sdfsdf&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xolan99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:21:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>