<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for williamtodd</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/williamtodd/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/williamtodd/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:31:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Different Strokes</title><link>http://williamtodd.us/blog2/?p=186#comment-73045981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As further prooof of my debauchery, I'm commenting on my own comment!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Different Strokes</title><link>http://williamtodd.us/blog2/?p=186#comment-73045924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I'm commenting on my own post. Oh the depths to which I have sunk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What We Learned About Apple Yesterday</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/01/28/what-we-learned-about-apple-yesterday/#comment-31909719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A casual glance down the comments seems to reveal that you have commented on almost everybody else's comments. Don't you have anything better to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What We Learned About Apple Yesterday</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/01/28/what-we-learned-about-apple-yesterday/#comment-31867640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By far and away the most sensible and plausible reaction to the iPad I've read so far. I pretty much agree with everything in here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:46:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Does: An Ad on Google&amp;#8217;s Homepage</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/06/google-droid-ad/#comment-22081171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an iPhone 3G and I think I'll wait for exactly what you're waiting for. The issue is the network and AT&amp;amp;T's has become totally dysfunctional. I'm no fan of Verizon but that's how bad things have become.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RUMOR: Verizon and Apple Already Testing 4G iPhone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/19/4g-iphone-verizon/#comment-20607330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would ditch AT&amp;amp;T in a heartbeat. Their network service has been horrible, beyond belief. I'm this close to even giving up my iPhone to get away from this carrier. Apple has to also take their share of the blame for the anti-competitive, anti-consumer exclusivity deal they struck with AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Vick Signs With Eagles: NFL Players Tweet Reactions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/vick-signs-with-eagles/#comment-14817731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reggie Bush is right. Everybody deserves a second chance. Even as a dog lover I still think Michael Vick deserves another shot. Like the ASPCA donation idea also.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:15:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Pirate Bay Keeps Sinking: Another Lawsuit Coming</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/31/the-pirate-bay-another-lawsuit/#comment-13739511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully someone will hoist the Jolly Roger once again. The King is Dead, Long Live The King.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:17:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/i-was-interrupted-from-peacefully.html#comment-13245973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rock on Tyler!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unemployment Rate By State: June Update</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/unemployment-rate-by-state-june-update.html#comment-12919663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michigan's survival rate dropping to zero? Your byline in operation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:32:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Modern Banking Explained Or The Importance Of Saving Money</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/07/modern-banking-explained-or-importance.html#comment-12918174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL funny. I guess the retail investor thinks the FDIC has his/her back. Whoops! It's gone!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Who Does Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp;amp; Katz Represent?</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/just-who-does-wachtell-lipton-rosen.html#comment-11939202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should write a book on your perspective on all things pre and post Lehman. It would be a pot boiler par excellence and an antidote to this Summer's hot 'new' drink: Kool-aid!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Companies To China: We Implore You to Reconsider Green Dam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/27/companies-china-letter-protest/#comment-11830500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Constructive engagement' has failed; the Chinese government continues to ratchet up censorship despite the efforts of companies like Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to maintain a dialogue with them. Sadly, only the threat of Green Dam to their primary businesses, search in Google's case, has finally got these guys to show some balls and directly confront the government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastly, I believe the Chinese Communist Party is being forced to increase censorship because of increasing internal dissension not because the people demand it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:20:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: China&amp;#8217;s Google Block: A Final Warning?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/25/chinas-google-block-final-warning/#comment-11725279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen to your last thought. This all goes to show that the policy of 'constructive engagement' as practiced by the likes of Google, Microsoft and Yahoo is a failure and should be dropped. The question you pose can be re-framed as 'Will Google have the cahunas to stop being such a whore?" (Please forgive the mixed metaphor.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:42:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Track Iran Election with Twitter and Social Media</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/14/new-media-iran/#comment-10899873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for putting all this vital information in one place. An invaluable service and potentially situation changing. Great job!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Great Firewall of China Goes Local</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/08/firewall-china-local/#comment-10697207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who is Chinaren I wonder? I have to assume you are a dissident Chinese commenting anonymously as you are. Or maybe not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:23:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Fun Than Talking About Insurance</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/more-fun-than-talking-about-insurance/#comment-9773424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm certainly willing to keep an open mind but the health insurance companies have an uphill battle to improve their public image which is at an all time low. The Industry as a whole is seen as an obstacle to true healthcare reform. Perhaps you guys can change that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:18:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lance Ball</title><link>http://blog.lanceball.com/post/106271108#comment-9208171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks positively terrifying! Somehow medieval garb and WWII flamethrowers look strange together.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judge Gonzalez Greenlights 363 Process</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/judge-gonzalez-greenlights-363-process.html#comment-9053977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's just really hard to see any winners here no matter what happens, except maybe the lawyers, though it seems they will have earned it&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:39:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Screen Kindle Coming This Week</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/04/big-screen-kindle/#comment-8983375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dateline 2025: Brain implants finally arrive too late to rescue the newspaper industry. Oh well. Rosebud, Rosebud!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building The First Virtual Hospital</title><link>http://williamtodd.us/blog/2009/04/building-the-first-virtual-hospital/#comment-8895315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Doug. If anyone is interested in further details of who or what was involved in this specific project, let me know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JP Morgan Sees $400 Billion More In Bank Losses</title><link>http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/jp-morgan-sees-400-billion-more-in-bank.html#comment-8444895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to believe this number is understated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Janus Syndrome</title><link>http://williamtodd.us/blog/archives/930#comment-7937769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jack be nimble, Jack be quick... I suspect there will be some left over for you laggards :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contxts: Get Rid of Your Business Cards and Use SMS Instead</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/17/contxts/#comment-7309524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love this, thanks! Fantastic solution to a very old problem... and I like their site design too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">williamtodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>