<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for whatknows</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/whatknows/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/whatknows/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:47:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Ethics of Authenticity </title><link>http://mini.chadswaney.com/post/55712232#comment-3639563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For whatever it is worth, reading your statement made me think about Justine Cassell's view on embodying technology. (&lt;a href="http://www.soc.northwestern.edu/justine/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.soc.northwestern.edu/justine/)"&gt;http://www.soc.northwestern...&lt;/a&gt; In some sense it seems you are suggesting the inverse - that technology should appropriately embody us. Sounds good to me. This whole phenomena of computers speaking on our behalf is kind of a new concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">whatknows</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federating with Identi.ca</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/08/federating_with_identica.shtml#comment-2219304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more. One great boon to my use of RSS (and particularly Google Reader) was Firefox's ability to simplify the subscription process. This leaves me wondering if a Firefox extension might help the process along.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once major benefit of Twitter (before the trouble, that is) was the IM integration, particularly the ability to listen for keywords. I don't see how Laconic can (easily?) replicate that in a federated architecture. I would love to ditch Twitter if possible, but presuming the IM comes back online, this was my favorite feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">whatknows</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:39:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Organizing Ourselves</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/03/organizing_ourselves.shtml#comment-196112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more. Actually, it sounds a lot like Charles Leadbeater and his book "We Think." His book, and the recent YouTube video have certainly caught some buzz in the poli-theory-blogosphere (gnovis wrote about it here: &lt;a href="http://www.gnovisjournal.org/blog/we-think-mass-innovation-vs-mass-consumption)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.gnovisjournal.org/blog/we-think-mass-innovation-vs-mass-consumption)"&gt;http://www.gnovisjournal.or...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am hesitant, however, when people assume that democracy will be the outcome of Internet. Cases like Singapore show how eGovernment can effectively increase the standard of living and citizen-government relationships, without necessarily requiring democracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">whatknows</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>