<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for wesny</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/wesny/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/wesny/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:22:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ARONSON: Master and its discontents</title><link>https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2015/09/21/aronson-master-and-its-discontents/#comment-2265315533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly for your argument, on your list of "girl, American Dream, 'hey guys,' Columbus Day, meritocracy, housewife, virtue, affirmative action, alien, 'God bless America,' 'free speech,'" there are quite a few words that probably should be more problematic than they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crew team to lease former Chi Psi house</title><link>https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2015/04/06/crew-team-to-lease-former-chi-psi-house/#comment-1955481106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Control-F "crew team" &lt;a href="http://www.yalebulldogs.com/sports/m-crewhvy/index" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.yalebulldogs.com/sports/m-crewhvy/index"&gt;http://www.yalebulldogs.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2014 Tournament of Champions Student Protest</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/nsd-update-coverage-toc-2014/#comment-1363456913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick comment that I haven't seen raised yet.  While watching the videos of the Tab announcement, I heard one of the arguments for the TD's decision was that "when a rule doesn't cover a particular action, it is up to the judge's discretion to decide."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Never mind the fact that even if this is true, that would imply that the LITERAL judge in the round (IE Matt) has discretion here not Tab staff but more importantly this just isn't true to begin with.  If an action isn't codified as illegal, it is legal.  No one would ever be convicted on the basis of "well it seems like what you did should be illegal so even though it isn't, you're still guilty."  The default "community norm" of every action is permissibility just like it is in the rest of life.  Especially given the TD's reliance on the argument that there wasn't codified action so they had to make a seat of their pants decision, it seems preposterous that one wouldn't just default to non-action in a situation specifically banning an action given no precedent for this in the real world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bennett Eckert Wins 2nd Year Nationals; Harvard-Westlake Closes out 1st Year</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/nsd-update-coverage-woodward/#comment-1307645196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As usual, not me.  Although Ari is a good looking guy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:02:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sam Natbony Announces the 2014 Penn RR Field</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/2014-penn-rr-field-announced/#comment-1293211682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to clarify, the above commenter is not me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Preetham Chippada Wins the 2014 Scarsdale Invitational</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/nsd-update-coverage-scarsdale-2014/#comment-1236228906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scarsdale bracket: &lt;a href="http://challonge.com/scarsdale2014" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://challonge.com/scarsdale2014"&gt;http://challonge.com/scarsd...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Andrew O&amp;#8217;Donohue Wins the 2014 Columbia Invitational</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/nsd-update-coverage-columbia-2014/#comment-1217464644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the bracket as posted by tab.  Achal and I will try to update it as results come out: &lt;a href="http://challonge.com/columbia2014" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://challonge.com/columbia2014"&gt;http://challonge.com/columb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:29:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Danny DeBois and Noah Thaler are 2014 Hendrick Hudson Co-Champions</title><link>http://nsdupdate.com/2014/nsd-update-coverage-hendrick-hudson-semifinals/#comment-1127440435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stuyvesant SW should be Stuyvesant SV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adam may have gone 8-0 and got his 4th bid, but he lost his rap battle in a 2-1:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMLI3n8yH9A" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMLI3n8yH9A"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:45:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950841667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is another post up above where someone listed an email saying they will honor any one pair if you placed an order.  Regardless, looks like people will at least be getting some shoes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950741658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, I have a confirmation email, where they give me a ship date as well as a confirmation that my order is being processed and says the shoes were "sold" to me.  That seems to imply an acceptance to me, but I'm not a lawyer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:03:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950737849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reps are now saying that orders are going to be canceled for sure.  Is there any chance there is room for a BBB complaint? Do they have to honor advertised prices?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950735612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would recommend to keep calling and try to get another rep.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950734948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brooks brothers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:57:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brooks Brothers, Bonobos, &amp;#038; $40 Allen Edmonds &amp;#8211; The Wednesday Handful</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/07/brooks-brothers-bonobos-40-allen-edmonds-the-wednesday-handful/#comment-950732821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2 comments on Facebook said they called and the price was honored.  1 person called and said the price wouldn't be.  Just wanted to give you guys the heads up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J. Crew Extra 30% off Sale Items 4/1 &amp;#8211; 4/7 Picks</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/04/j-crew-extra-30-off-sale-items-41-47-picks/#comment-848751616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad I could help.  It's so nice that if I had the money, I would buy it as a second bag for days when I don't need as much stuff.  Just wish I could justify it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J. Crew Extra 30% off Sale Items 4/1 &amp;#8211; 4/7 Picks</title><link>http://dappered.com/2013/04/j-crew-extra-30-off-sale-items-41-47-picks/#comment-848630689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want the BK brief so badly.  I saw it in store though (an employee had one of his own that he showed me) and I think it is too small for my use.  It fits a 13 inch laptop and a book pretty comfortably but that is about all.  You can't even get a medium sized binder in there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News:  Affordable Suiting</title><link>http://dappered.com/2012/07/breaking-news-affordable-suiting/#comment-596933291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just got mine in the mail and tried it on.  Great out of the box.  I got a 36R and 30x30 trousers in navy.  I could probably escape without tailoring on the jacket.  Might get it done slightly but fits almost perfectly out of the box.  And I'm a trim guy.  Button stance is really low though, just like the Ludows.  Also, minimal shoulder padding for most of the shoulder and then quite a bit more right at the outer edges of each.  Not a deal breaker but definitely something to be aware of.  Pants are luxury sized a bit.  I might have been able to size down a size if they had it in the waist.  FIt of the pants is decent out of the box.  Definitely not a totally straight leg but I'm definitely going to have them tapered quite a bit.  The fabric feels pretty damn good for the price and I love the buttons on the jacket.  They make it wearable as a blazer possibly.  For $270? It's definitely a buy.  If it ends up going any lower, you should buy it even if you have a closet full of navy suits already.  It's that good.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:13:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News:  Affordable Suiting</title><link>http://dappered.com/2012/07/breaking-news-affordable-suiting/#comment-592309491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that the slim fit? If so, are you comparing to a J. Crew slim?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News:  Affordable Suiting</title><link>http://dappered.com/2012/07/breaking-news-affordable-suiting/#comment-592289847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They would be great as separates.  The brown buttons make the jacket very versatile IMHO and the pants would work fine I think.  I'm planning to use it both as a suit and separates. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News:  Affordable Suiting</title><link>http://dappered.com/2012/07/breaking-news-affordable-suiting/#comment-592288669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will do.  If Joe puts up his review relatively soon, I'll put mine in the comments. Otherwise I'll link to it somewhere on a post hopefully next week.  If @Joe wants to include it in the post, I'd be happy to write something, since having these in a 36 is a major selling point in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News:  Affordable Suiting</title><link>http://dappered.com/2012/07/breaking-news-affordable-suiting/#comment-592142887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just ordered mine.  36R so let's see how it is.  I also noticed a lot more slim stuff from J. Crew factory in this new wave of stuff.  Lots of shirts, those oxfords for $40 look really good, I ordered one of the polos.  Factory always ran bigger than normal J.Crew so we shall see how the slims fit.  Would love a review of the oxfords.  Those could be a great buy even with the logo.  It seems pretty small and forgettable.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:51:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://lesseffort.effortlessgent.com/post/19540290731</title><link>http://lesseffort.effortlessgent.com/post/19540290731#comment-468609235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Suit Supply for the suit.  That's on the higher end but its a good deal for the money.  So that takes up somewhere between 470 and 630.  That leaves you with say 500.  Next try Uniqlo for some basics.  On that limited budget, I know it isn't high quality but I've bought their chinos and such in the past and they hold up pretty wel and are worth it when you have to rebuy (even quality pieces wear out so you end up rebuying anyway).  I would say J. Crew or Brooks Brothers for some oxfords and dress shirts in that price range.  There are smaller boutiques but they end up going for $150 a shirt at least, which is out of your range.  Quality footwear might be tricky on that budget but check out Macy's for some good deals.&lt;br&gt;The best place to find these is Soho (Spring and Broadway area is the home base) and 30-60 on 5th and Park.  &lt;br&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:08:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rugby additional 20% off Insider Sale</title><link>http://dappered.com/2011/10/rugby-additional-20-off-insider-sale/#comment-352304313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I ordered some university cut chinos that shipped today.  Never tried them before but I have a pair of the slim fit chinos and I have found that they are slightly too slim below the knee and slightly too baggy above it.  Not the best fit ever.  Slightly larger than the Levi's 511, slimmer than the 514s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thisfits.me/post/11705795192</title><link>http://thisfits.me/post/11705795192#comment-340323471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just picked up some BR vintage straight fit cords and have been loving them.  A little on the (too) slim side, but overall, slightly thinner than say the 514s which I find just loose in the thighs.  They beat Rugby or Levi's in my opinion and I own both.  My new favorite pair.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every Verizon phone just 1¢ from Amazon (iPhone not included)</title><link>http://bgr.com/2011/10/12/every-verizon-phone-just-1%c2%a2-from-amazon-iphone-not-included/#comment-333265115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any way to get these phones as an upgrade to an existing line if I sign a new 2 year deal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweyn Venderbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>