<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for viveksingh</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/viveksingh/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/viveksingh/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:17:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Calling all professional presentation designers: do a pro-bono project</title><link>http://www.slidemagic.com/blog/2009/10/calling-all-professional-presentation.html#comment-18719016</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for writing about this. Presentation skills being used to support a cause. I am sure many presenters will take a cue and look out for such projects.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">viveksingh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visualizing 1 in 8,000</title><link>http://www.slidemagic.com/blog/2009/09/visualizing-1-in-8000.html#comment-17230066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that this visual representation is better than the bar graph. 0.01% and 1.3% cannot be compared with a bar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But,&lt;br&gt;I feel '1 in 8000 &amp;amp; 1 in 76' alone without the images will do a better job than with the images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not every presenter will be able to choose the images properly (the diameter and the quality of representation).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this particular example, I feel it easier to understand 1 in 8000 and 1 in 76 than to understand the images.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">viveksingh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>