<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for vincentvw</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/vincentvw/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/vincentvw/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:06:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Seven Technologies That Will Rock 2011</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/02/seven-technologies-that-will-rock-2011/#comment-123315035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my view, Quora is just Friendfeed, wearing different clothes. The "interest graph" you're talking about has been part of that social network since its inception. The only difference (an improvement) is that it's geared towards serious conversation, though chances are that that will change or already is. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:06:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunk Costs</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/07/sunk-costs/#comment-65052885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Could you in the future write something about Real Options? I believe it's a strong factor in financial decision making but also difficult to quantify as such.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vincent&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunk Costs</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/07/sunk-costs/#comment-64252156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think that there is a cultural difference in how sunk costs are perceived? I'm thinking about the differences in the perception of taking risks (such starting a business) in Europe, where it's considered a bad thing, vs. the US, where it's not considered as bad as in Europe. I guess, either way, we shouldn't let it affect our future decisions…&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Porter's 5 forces - how they work, 3 examples, and why it's better to be a thief</title><link>http://foodandretail.blogspot.com/2007/10/porter-5-forces-how-they-work-3.html#comment-43848289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ans13, unfortunately I don't have the time to do all the work for you. I would imagine the graph above is a great template for any industry you're interested in, however. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 05:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 85,000 reasons why Apple&amp;#8217;s iPhone isn&amp;#8217;t going to be disrupted</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/25/85000-reasons-why-apples-iphone-isnt-going-to-be-disrupted/#comment-21041989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was the same point I wanted to make. Firefox has had a great impact on the browser-world, but still hasn't overtaken the most convenient option (IE on PC/Safari on Mac) and is being followed by a much lighter option (Chrome).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you (Scoble) also note that apps aren't the only factor in the iPhone's success, which clearly has the exclusivity feel, the slick interface, and entirely coolness of it going for it, not to mention it doing stuff that people want, like phoning, browsing, listening to music, GPS, etc. Apps are in there somewhere, but they certainly aren't the first reason why people buy the phone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scanning Headlines</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/08/scanning-headlines/#comment-15055509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't it more a matter of contextual relevance? What I mean is that news can be relevant to a person, because it's about a certain location (what I imagine that company FW invests in to do, is it called OutsideIN?), to be consumed at a certain time (e.g. when the markets open), or of global interest (e.g. 9/11 or global pandemic)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's human nature to browse around for no reason at all, which is what many people do, and no wonder that "(not so) smart" aggregation, basing suggestions only on the past, get confused. Group aggregation is kind of effective, I guess (e.g. techmeme), but it's also often not directly relevant to your every day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To me, the perfect aggregator collects news that is relevant to my context, and when you really get down to it, that means that Google search is about as smart an aggregator as is needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Streaming Kills Piracy</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/streaming-kills-piracy/#comment-12575560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Unfortunately, we don't have a good mobile broadband system to make streaming possible everywhere."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry, I don't buy that statement. I have perfect broadband in all the European countries that I lived, but not much in terms of legal streaming services. I think that the real barrier is that agreements have been made with traditional media channels for a type of exclusive content to be shown here, which prevent content from services like Pandora, Hulu, Netflix to be shown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Media = the most unflat industry in this modern world and it's mostly thanks to the lawyers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Anyone Use Chrome?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/does-anyone-use-chrome/#comment-12368554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like Chrome, because it's just quick and it feels safer than IE. But I like OS X even more, which is the reason why I don't use Chrome. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:31:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Exclusive Deal Between Apple and AT&amp;amp;T Anticompetitive?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/is-the-exclusive-deal-between-apple-and-att-anticompet/.html#comment-12311599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not French (nor in France) so other national options may exist, but &lt;a href="http://Orange.fr" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Orange.fr"&gt;Orange.fr&lt;/a&gt; lists a 32GB iPhone with a 12 year min. contract as €229 base-price + €58 per month for the phone contract for 12 months and €30 per month for unlimited mobile internet for 12 months. That would come to ca. €1310 for that year, with a USD equivalent of ca. $1890. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Exclusive Deal Between Apple and AT&amp;amp;T Anticompetitive?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/is-the-exclusive-deal-between-apple-and-att-anticompet/.html#comment-12303126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is true and where AT&amp;amp;T/Apple can clearly be attacked in is in their &lt;strong&gt;ongoing&lt;/strong&gt; exclusive partnership, which is now what, 2 years? That said, this can of worms was already opened up before. The whole mobile industry has actively been restricting consumer-choice for more than 15 years. If AT&amp;amp;T/Apple is to be attacked, then I sincerely hope that this sets a precedent for attacking the other carriers too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of that said, call it exclusivity or bundling, partnerships make strategic sense in a competitive marketplace. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:36:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Exclusive Deal Between Apple and AT&amp;amp;T Anticompetitive?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/is-the-exclusive-deal-between-apple-and-att-anticompet/.html#comment-12255270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A brief comment on exclusivity as well. This is only relevant in the case of monopolistic behaviour. In this case, the only reason that the iPhone appears to be monopolistic is because the competition is simply crap. But no one is stopping other manufacturers from setting up their own app-stores on their own platforms, including distributing them via AT&amp;amp;T. And if you want to argue for the other carriers, then I'm sure plenty of precedents can be found where they themselves form exclusive agreements with a phone-manufacturer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You might as well accuse Dell &amp;amp; Microsoft of anti-competitive behaviour because those two come in a bundled package. Bundling is simply a strategic move which can make and break companies. I don't like it, but I don't see a legal/logical case for stopping it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:44:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Exclusive Deal Between Apple and AT&amp;amp;T Anticompetitive?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/07/is-the-exclusive-deal-between-apple-and-att-anticompet/.html#comment-12254976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If there were an unlocked option for $399, I'd buy it immediately. Unfortunately, Apple sells it unlocked (in France) for €749, which comes to about $1050.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanomedia</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/nanomedia/#comment-10926229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm going even more nano than you. I'm using &lt;a href="http://drop.io" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="drop.io"&gt;drop.io&lt;/a&gt; + Facebook connect to share a music-station only for my friends. I'm tired of the witch-hunt that is the media-industry (deleted my &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt; account as well) and want to get back to the reason why I like to find and share music.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, as a European,  I find the the US-centricity of (online) media very, very bothersome (asking people to pirate, basically).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Won't See The Palm Pre On Me</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/06/you-wont-see-the-palm-pre-on-me/#comment-10609694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I assume that in October, when the Pre arrives here in Europe, that there will be a Sim-slot in it as well. Because I've never heard of the no-sim phone over here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IKEA's growth part I - the Scandinavian years</title><link>http://foodandretail.blogspot.com/2007/11/ikea-growth-part-i-scandinavian-years.html#comment-10349089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's always nice to hear. Hope you get a good grade!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Isn't Paypal More Successful?</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/05/why-isnt-paypal-more-successful/#comment-9949954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's a cultural thing? I don't have the empirical facts on this, but I do know that generally Americans prefer to buy stuff on credit (OK, maybe not so much any more) and most (not all) European countries prefer buying via cash they have. So if Paypal takes money off the account directly, perhaps that bothers people? Again, I don't know whether there are significant continental differences as far as the use of paypal is concerned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interlude: The "10,000-hours-to-be-an-expert" rule</title><link>http://foodandretail.blogspot.com/2007/11/interlude-rule.html#comment-8981036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah man, since I wrote this essay and Gladwell's new book came out, I've kind of felt that everything he says these days seems like "Duh!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then again, I did enjoy "The Tipping Point," kind of. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some initial impressions about Zara &amp;amp; H&amp;amp;M</title><link>http://foodandretail.blogspot.com/2008/04/some-initial-impressions-about-zara-h.html#comment-8977800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure Lotta, go for it! What's the topic?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 05:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Design case-study: The Ford SYN-US</title><link>http://foodandretail.blogspot.com/2007/09/design-case-study-ford-syn-us.html#comment-8600224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a concept at the time I wrote about it. So either it was never launched, renamed to something else, or parts of it were used in other designs, I really can't tell you. Mail Ford about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/91862572#comment-7710654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can you describe the scent, as briefly as possible? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Disqus Look And Feel</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/03/new-disqus-look-and-feel/#comment-7377254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more. I find the unasked for pop-ups, no matter if it's on Disqus or that Wordpress live-view thing, super-annoying. It's not a matter of it being useful or not, but that it can easily pop-up by accident and is difficult to get rid of. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking For The Yawn</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/03/looking-for-the-yawn/#comment-6835874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, maybe I'm not thinking like an investor, but I'd find it hard to be working a company that produces yawns. All of my previous companies have been in in the "wow" space (consumer electronics, entertainment, space technology, wine, art…). Are you saying that that's the wrong move?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or is this something about B2B, which, yes, induces yawns in me, but can be pretty profitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help Boxee Build It's Pitch To Content Owners</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/02/help-boxee-build-its-pitch-to-content-owners/#comment-6779354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Frankly, I didn't agree with your last post on this, not because you're not right, but because it entirely doesn't make sense. TV, for better or for worse, is an institution, which reaches a wide audience and has long-standing contracts with content-providers. Boxee is a clear eye-sore for those kinds of companies, who have so far claimed exclusive domain on television. So any pitch you make will have to be with that in mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I say, go the Apple TV / Xbox route, and offer TV shows for money. When/if you have enough market-share, you can renegotiate. Alternatively, negotiate for a Hulu-channel, designed exclusively for Boxee, possibly a pay-for version… again, dependent on market-share.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:44:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Government Funds Business</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/03/when-government-funds-business/#comment-6779242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Being the CEO of a company who has taken government money is like having a big target on your back. Everything you do is going to be second guessed, debated and discussed like never before." Love that quote, welcome to Europe! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confessions Of A Pack Rat (aka My Document Retention Policy)</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/01/confessions-of-a-pack-rat-aka-my-document-retention-po/html#comment-5552745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's pretty simple: when you're forced to or when not doing so harms you or people you care about in some way (another way of saying forced to). It's the same principle as when you should defend yourself against physical violence. The tricky part is establishing if harm is actually being done or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vincentvw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>