<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for varangianguard</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/varangianguard/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/varangianguard/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:59:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I Love This Guy!!!</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/i_love_this_guy_.html#comment-230461073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean relativistic like Texas schools? I think that the word you were looking for is "revisionist"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Love This Guy!!!</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/i_love_this_guy_.html#comment-230314405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;President Obama, man up and admit that sending your kids to public school isn't any more dangerous than Governor Christie sending his.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apples and oranges, TP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;pascal, the administrators who lead most school systems are politicians too. Too many public schools are in trouble. One reason is that there are way too many people trying to grab onto the rudder at the same time who want to turn the "ship" in different directions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Love This Guy!!!</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/i_love_this_guy_.html#comment-230197897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's my take. If it were me, or any of you - fine. Point taken.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, we are talking about the Governor of New Jersey dissing New Jersey's public education. I'm thinking that he should either step up to the plate and start leading on education, or get off the bandwagon down here with the rest of us. Or, he could just "man up" and take the heat about sending his kids to private school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here, he's just using his position in a really lame attempt to self-justify poor leadership. Yeah, he's ready for the national political arena (that's sarcasm, in case I was too subtle).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:46:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: COPS &amp;#038; COIT</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/cops_coit.html#comment-228229388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps you aren't old enough? lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: COPS &amp;#038; COIT</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/cops_coit.html#comment-228145222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"drooping the ball"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your Freudian slips crack me up every time! roflmao!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a great weekend everyone!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gone Missing</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2011/06/gone_missing.html#comment-224789662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, then since I too have a DD-214, perhaps it is &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; who should be ashamed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And just for the record, the Mayor retired at O-5, not O-6 (which was kind of my point - which obviously went over your pay grade).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conspiracy or Just Good Strategy?</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/08/conspiracy_or_just_good_strategy.html#comment-72358486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your cigar allusion is off-kilter. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Party of No Becomes Party of Go</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/08/party_of_no_becomes_party_of_go.html#comment-70946008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, you can't spell egregious.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, I agree we can do without futile grandstanding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Another Day in the Abdul World</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/08/just_another_day_in_the_abdul_world.html#comment-68162478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least I'll know who to go to now...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Q &amp;#038; A for IMPD</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/08/q_a_for_impd.html#comment-67932066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IIRC, the victims were stopped at a red light, wearing helmets, and the officer did not have his siren on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cannot remember the last time I have heard a police car working the siren. Lights, yes, but not the siren. LEOs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;edit. According to the Probable Cause, the siren was operating. My bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Q &amp;#038; A for IMPD</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/08/q_a_for_impd.html#comment-67866176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wonder if there is something else at fault when you get officers stressing enough to discharge their weapons (off duty) or drinking and driving?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Might be totally unrelated incidents, but sometimes where there is smoke there is fire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Watch the rank &amp;amp; file in the upcoming weeks. If more incidents occur, then there is a problem with the department that will, like as not, lead right back to the top tiers of management.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IMPD Conspiracy Theory</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/impd_conspiracy_theory.html#comment-65270406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a lot I could criticize about the IMPD, but this is simply ludricrous. And, for Councilor Oliver to give any credence to it is inexcusable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Water World</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/water_world.html#comment-64695470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But, does Citizens really answer to the public? I would posit that it doesn't. It answers to the Trust, which isn't really the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tough Questions Demand Tough Answers</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/tough_questions_demand_tough_answers.html#comment-63172506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, good luck with that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaws of Clay</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/jaws_of_clay.html#comment-62374398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why weren't they charged. OK, I'll play. Because it was a political football. And, it was apparent that at least one policeman had crossed a line. Which, I notice the Reverend, ,et al, had no difficulty in condemning without due process, btw.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think a witness seeing one young man attempting to kick in a door justification for an arrest, and likely charges. Police were called, after all, and I wonder how often that happens in certain parts of the City? Little trust in the police, or the Prosecutor's office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know this answer sounds off-the-cuff, but I don't have time to present a fact-filled, deeply-reasoned argument just now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaws of Clay</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/jaws_of_clay.html#comment-62360652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My favorite was the whopper that the kids in question weren't criminals, because they weren't charged.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reverend, that isn't why they weren't charged, and saying stuff like that doesnt' make it so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Propaganda at its slickest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Deal&amp;#8217;s a Deal</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/a_deals_a_deal.html#comment-61918693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's Ann Lathrop, with an "o", not a "u". If you would be so kind to edit the entries to reflect that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really don't know what anyone really expected around here? The City is run not by those with vision, but by those with a blinkered view set before them by a minority of self-vested interests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Real vision exists in this town, but it is ignored, dismissed and/or belittled at almost every turn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those in charge, from either side of the political fence, are more interested in acquiring wealth and influence at the taxpayers' expense than they are in improving Indianapolis. If the two dovetail, fine, but if not, then let self-interest rule!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Deal&amp;#8217;s a Deal</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/a_deals_a_deal.html#comment-61857167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Am I wrong in thinking that the Pacers actually were awarded fewer penalties for leaving Indy early in this deal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Think Twice</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/07/think_twice.html#comment-61087397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I think that no one has changed any minds here, this is still been a very good exchange of points of view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A big thank you to Abdul for providing a place for a civil discussion, and thank yous to Think Again and Councillor Vaughn for providing some clear insight to both sides of the IWC sale issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:08:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Observations</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/06/a_few_observations.html#comment-58438108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They won't Matthew. It's like the Mayor is trying to be David Copperfield, or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Watch the flashy-thingy in my right hand, while I pick your pocket with my left".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voilà! (or is it Veolia?) I magically get re-elected to another four years of free buffets, globe trotting and hanging with the Pro-Sporter crowd, while using YOUR money to do it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ha-hahhhhhh!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:59:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amnesty for All</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/06/amnesty_for_all.html#comment-57434786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Todd Rokita Calls Military Service a Waste</title><link>http://politicsandpucks.blogspot.com/2010/06/todd-rokita-calls-military-service.html#comment-57423933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every time you get in your car, and you might die. That doesn't seem to invoke calls to how courageous (or crazy) one is. Please have a little perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doing Better with Less</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/06/doing_better_with_less.html#comment-57228600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh. Tough when the easy stuff seems so hard to grasp.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I should have been really surprised had the numbers remained flat or decreased after moving the test to Spring. After all, the kids have been in "learning/testing" mode since August, instead of being in "zone out in summer" mode.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any other conclusions are based upon baseless conjecture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And who is the "Education establishment" anyway? I don't know a teacher who didn't prefer that the test be in the Spring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:49:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IMPD Releases Findings In Police Brutality Case</title><link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2010/06/impd_releases_findings_in_police_brutality_case.html#comment-55704799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't worry about the victim. I am quite sure that the inevitable future settlement with the (self-insured) City will assuage any pain he's suffered. More tax dollars down the drain, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Todd Rokita Calls Military Service a Waste</title><link>http://politicsandpucks.blogspot.com/2010/06/todd-rokita-calls-military-service.html#comment-55354353</link><description>&lt;p&gt; What is it Patton said? Something like "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." At least Carlo d'Este attributes the comment to him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have to agree that it is NOT the "duty" of an American serviceperson to die for their country. That's just plain wrong-headed. The Armed Services don't sign recruits up with the intent to let them go out and get killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I disagree that "duty" equals conscription. The draft was started to require service, not pander to some ideal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joining the Armed Services doesn't require "courage", it requires a commitment to country, and a desire to improve both the recruit and the country at the same time. The Armed Services indeed may not be your cup of tea, but it isn't courage (or a lack thereof) keeping you out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may not choose to support Mr. Rokita in November (I doubt I will, in fact), but it is due to politics, and not some ethereal concept you really don't seem to understand very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">varangianguard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>