<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for trans</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/trans/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/trans/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:01:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A factory reset of a Microsoft Surface Go reminded me why I love Chromebooks</title><link>https://chromeunboxed.com/chromebook-power-wash-factory-reset-microsoft-surface-go/#comment-4793054507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And yet I just managed to completely brick my first Chromebook tablet. I signed up for the trial of Enterprise Upgrade, decided not to buy it at the end of the trial, deleted the account (as told to do by Google support) and presto, Powerwash functionality was deactivated on my device and there was no way to get it back. Google support told me I'd have to return the device to the store from which I bought it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, all I ever wanted to do with it is access my file server via SMB and pull up PDF files. Over a month in I never could get it to access the server.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So much for 52 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Announces Android Support for Foldable Devices</title><link>https://www.droid-life.com/2018/11/07/google-announces-android-support-for-foldable-devices/#comment-4184361745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious for a screen that flips up for a long narrow display, making more room for input interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:21:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sicp Goodness - Why you don't need looping constructs</title><link>https://www.lvguowei.me/post/sicp-goodness-looping/#comment-3966219242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post. Actually, thought you were going to talk about combinators -- another way to avoid loops.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like the layout of your blog too. What blog engine/generator and style template is it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: interblah.net - why-is-nobody-using-refinements</title><link>http://interblah.net/why-is-nobody-using-refinements#comment-3958766245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. That's correct.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2018 11:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: interblah.net - why-is-nobody-using-refinements</title><link>http://interblah.net/why-is-nobody-using-refinements#comment-3957239634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Refinements failed for a much simpler reason -- the syntax. As the creator of Ruby Facets I was looking forward to adding support for refinements, but I soon discovered I would have to maintain a **second copy of every method** with refinement boiler plate wrapped around them. That just wasn't worth the hassle. If instead matz had made refinements a simple mechanism of loading the *same code* in two different ways, e.g. `require` vs `refine`, then I think we would have seen a lot more uptake. Both Ruby Facets and Active::Support would have been largely ready to be used via refinement out the gate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 06:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Molten Salt Reactor Claims Melt Down Under Scrutiny</title><link>http://www.powermag.com/blog/molten-salt-reactor-claims-melt-down-under-scrutiny/#comment-3202957297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is natural for people, especially young people, to be over exuberant about their perceived success. We really need to stop flailing people every time things don't meet the hype. We end up only hurting ourselves. We see this far too often -- the media is all over some breakthrough claims, then expectations aren't met, then all the money drys up and the entire branch gets labeled quackery. Cold fusion research, for example, is still recovering almost 30 years later even though the field has legitimate applications even if not net energy positive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High Profile Double Shot by Filco</title><link>http://keypuller.com/high-profile-double-shot-by-filco/#comment-2997879043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't beat the price and the keys are solid. But being limited to SA Row-2 and 3 profiles, does feel a bit less than perfect. Hopefully I'll get used to it. (I am typing on them right now.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Flexbox Less Scary &amp;#8211; Embracing The Future Of CSS</title><link>https://benweiser.com/making-flexbox-less-scary/#comment-2997169513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It still sucks. I thought Flexbox was going to finally fix layout craziness. Alas I find my self wrestling with it just as much as I did with divs. For decades we've had tables and they work pretty well, but we are constantly told not to use them for layout. Yet to this day they can't seem to make something for layout that works as well? Insane.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birkana hexadecimal number symbols</title><link>http://yawar.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-birkana-hexadecimal-number-symbols.html#comment-2953617890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's pretty cool. I might even simplify and use just base four, and then pair them to create base 16.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:49:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The future of Crystal</title><link>http://crystal-lang.org//2015/12/24/the-future-of-crystal.html#comment-2947923960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Disappointed that "this will be the last big breaking change". I'd much rather see you work hard to really perfect the language then put up a barrier so early for backward compatibility. Perfection takes patience and you know what they say about patience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fibonacci benchmark</title><link>http://crystal-lang.org//2016/07/15/fibonacci-benchmark.html#comment-2916294203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Small optimization, can't the condition be `&amp;lt;= 2`? And technically, 0 in should return 0.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CORRECTION: I think one or the other has to be true, you are getting the wrong answers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:12:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mixin Class Composition - Scala Documentation</title><link>http://docs.scala-lang.org/tutorials/tour/mixin-class-composition.html#comment-2858488306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Impressive that Scala has parametric classes (ie. the constructor argument is visible to all methods). I take it one can do that with traits too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You should Not Use the Jargons lisp-1 lisp-2</title><link>http://ergoemacs.org/emacs/lisp1_vs_lisp2.html#comment-2819855120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree. Ruby is more a Lisp-1 because parenthesis are optional.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    def a; 1; end&lt;br&gt;    a  #=&amp;gt; 1&lt;br&gt;    a = 2&lt;br&gt;    a  #=&amp;gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Venezuela Is Falling Apart</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/05/venezuela-is-falling-apart/481755/#comment-2675805774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You sure know how to make up a bunch of crap, as I said or implied none of this. Try IMF and World Bank -- the kind of powers that sit well behind, if not above, Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 14:11:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Venezuela Is Falling Apart</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/05/venezuela-is-falling-apart/481755/#comment-2675132319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, the government isn't wrong in that there is an effort by outside powers to destabilize the country. Unfortunately the way they are dealing with it only furthers the downward spiral.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 05:35:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: After a year of using NodeJS in production</title><link>http://geekforbrains.com/post/after-a-year-of-nodejs-in-production#comment-2657086495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Time to consider Elixir and Phoenix? The error situation is similar, unfortunately, but the rest should prove a huge improvement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Search for a Better Battery</title><link>https://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/innovation/the-search-for-a-better-battery#comment-2642760380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh real nice, Debbie Downer. Unfortunately, I fear some of the tech is being selectively suppressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ayatollah So | Scott Adams Blog</title><link>http://blog.dilbert.com/post/142791072111#comment-2625035612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, no worries. We won't let Iran's elections be more democratic than are own for much longer!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Forces is one of the first casualties of the new Star Wars canon</title><link>http://www.pcpowerplay.com.au/news/dark-forces-is-one-of-the-first-casualties-of-the-new-star-wars-canon,402907#comment-2616034415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those games were better then the last six movies!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Computer gaming is modern entertainment, movies not so much. Disney is making a big mistake dissing the gamers like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:27:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dial-a-Drug Machine</title><link>https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/devices/the-dialadrug-machine#comment-2601991822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awaiting the 3D atomic printer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 5 Best &amp;#038; Worst Things About Daredevil</title><link>http://www.antifanboy.com/top-5-best-and-worst-things-about-the-netflix-daredevil-show/#comment-2593187200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Karen did well when she was speaking. It's the stupid emotional cuts, like when she is so proud of Foggy during his opening statement. He barely said two words, and she's gushing with pride for him. Those cuts were over done and poorly timed. That's just bad directing and editing, that make Karen look bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 5 Best &amp;#038; Worst Things About Daredevil</title><link>http://www.antifanboy.com/top-5-best-and-worst-things-about-the-netflix-daredevil-show/#comment-2591816174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can forgive bits of weak acting -- it takes time to grow into a character. But some of the writing is terrible. (Spoilers) Who in their right mind kills his compatriots to save a girl, but later admits she was going to have to be killed anyway? (Stick literally said that) Then when Stick finally tries to kill her he sends someone he knows can't win? Then she comes to kill Stick but with just a few words from our Hero she suddenly changes here mind *again*. No one is that on the fence about killing someone. It's ridiculous. Worse, Matt can't hear Ninjas. But stick tells him, "you have to go deeper and listen to their breath" Really? He can hear Stick whisper this from 100 yards in another room, but he never noticed people breathing before? So stupid. I'll also mention that the choreography on the fights is too often weak as well. Not only are their too many obvious misses, but Daredevil gets hit way too much for a superhero. By any realistic account he would be dead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the upside, the whole Punisher subplot turned out pretty good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PolitiPlatform - Jeb Bush's Policies</title><link>https://www.politiplatform.com/bush#comment-2488855507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You forgot "Take the American people for a third ride." In the infamous words of his brother ... &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntwdH3Q54ZY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntwdH3Q54ZY"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PolitiPlatform - Ted Cruz's Policies</title><link>https://www.politiplatform.com/cruz#comment-2488853080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;His tax plan might not be so bad, but other then that... and wait a minute, wouldn't 26 (end birthright citizenship) make him ineligible to be president?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:03:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PolitiPlatform - Marco Rubio's Policies</title><link>https://www.politiplatform.com/rubio#comment-2488851019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He plans to end the new open relationship with Cuba. Also, like Trump he wants to grow the military.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>