Disqus - Latest Comments for traducteur

Re: The situation in Gaza is so desperate that some are predicting another war

traducteur — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:50:10 -0000

Gaza illustrates to perfection the Zionist ideal vision of the land of the goyim: a field of rubble inhabited by starving people. Syria too. They're rubbing their hands in satisfaction.

Re: The winner and undisputed world champion

traducteur — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:43:22 -0000

The welfare of Odyssey's shareholders is nothing to do with the case. The treasure belongs to Spain, no one else. These treasure-hunters are an unscrupulous and grasping lot.

Re: Nothing to see here, please move along

traducteur — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:04:18 -0000

And our superior stock is at risk of becoming contaminated with subhuman goyish genes:

http://palestinianpundit.bl...

Re: It is sad when lackeys turn on each other

traducteur — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:26:19 -0000

another glimmer of hope:

http://www.king5.com/news/l...

Re: It is sad when lackeys turn on each other

traducteur — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:12:31 -0000

excellent news, good for the Aussies

Re: It is sad when lackeys turn on each other

traducteur — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:20:15 -0000

a glimmer of hope, disfigured by a torrent of extreme racist excrement, but there none the less:

http://groups.google.com/gr...

Re: Israelis Jettison Peace Talks in Favor of Massive Land Theft;Brazil, Argentina Recognize Palestinian State

traducteur — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:31:38 -0000

An option you don't mention is the extermination or forcible expulsion of all goyim living in Zionist-controlled territory. There are increasingly strident calls for this from "Israeli" Jews and their Western sycophants.

Re: Will you take them in?

traducteur — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:45:55 -0000

Yes, so that they will be condemned to watch impotently from a distance while the Palestinians lovingly erase every trace of their former presence in the land.

Re: The albatross

traducteur — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:40:37 -0000

Israel is threatened by peaceful demographics as well as by terrorism and warfare. To stave off this danger, Israel will not allow for any significant Palestinian return to Israel or any viable Palestinian state

...and, he might have added, they are casually contemplating the extermination or forcible expulsion of a million and a half Israeli citizens who are guilty of the crime of not being Jewish, and all the goyim in the West Bank for good measure, as Xymph noted in a recent post.

Re: The detachment of the lie factory from reality

traducteur — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:12:10 -0000

George, we don't want to underestimate them, certainly, but a factor that may work in our favour is that they are likely to underestimate us. They seriously regard us as subhuman, intellectually and spiritually on the level of cattle, and that arrogance may cause them to overreach. Vigilance by all means, then, but not fear. Or let's say not excessive fear!

Re: The detachment of the lie factory from reality

traducteur — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:20:32 -0000

To coin a phrase, we have nothing to fear but fear itself. The Zionists like to think of themselves as much more important than they really are, and they love to fantasize about nuking the goyim. In reality, they have no means of "bringing the whole world down with them". Their disappearance (soon, in sha' Allah!) will barely be noticed. Good riddance.

Re: Eyewitnesses

traducteur — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:45:40 -0000

Seumas Milne comments in the :
Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/ju...

Re: Self-defense?

traducteur — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:05:34 -0000

An interesting piece by a very interesting man:

Israeli Murders,
NATO and Afghanistan

A fundamental question is
now being asked at NATO HQ:
Is NATO genuinely a mutual
defence organisation,
or is it just an instrument to
carry out US foreign policy?

Craig Murray
June 2, 2010

Â Â
NATO flag

I was in the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office for over 20 years
and a member of its senior management structure for six years, I served in
five countries and took part in 13 formal international negotiations, including
the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea and a whole series of maritime
boundary treaties. I headed the FCO section of a multidepartmental
organisation monitoring the arms embargo on Iraq.

I am an instinctively friendly, open but unassuming person who always
found it easy to get on with people, I think because I make fun of myself a lot.
I have in consequence a great many friends among ex-colleagues in both
British and foregin diplomatic services, security services and militaries.

I lost very few friends when I left the FCO over torture and rendition. In fact
I seemed to gain several degrees of warmth with a great many acquaintances
still on the inside. And I have become known as a reliable outlet for
grumbles, who as an ex-insider knows how to handle a discreet and
unintercepted conversation.

What I was being told last night was very interesting indeed. NATO HQ in
Brussels is today a very unhappy place. There is a strong understanding
among the various national militaries that an attack by Israel on a NATO
member flagged ship in international waters is an event to which NATO is
obliged - legally obliged, as a matter of treaty - to react.

I must be plain - nobody wants or expects military action against Israel.
But there is an uneasy recognition that in theory that ought to be on the
table, and that NATO is obliged to do something robust to defend Turkey.

Mutual military support of each other is the entire raison d'etre of NATO.
You must also remember that to the NATO military the freedom of the high
seas guaranteed by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is a vital
alliance interest which officers have been conditioned to uphold their whole
career.

That is why Turkey was extremely shrewd in reacting immediately to the
Israeli attack by calling an emergency NATO meeting. It is why, after the
appalling US reaction to the attack with its refusal to name Israel, President
Obama has now made a point of phoning President Erdogan to condole.

But the unhappiness in NATO HQ runs much deeper than that, I spoke
separately to two friends there, from two different nations. One of them said
NATO HQ was "a very unhappy place". The other described the situation
as "Tense - much more strained than at the invasion of Iraq".

Why? There is a tendency of outsiders to regard the senior workings of
governments and international organisations as monolithic. In fact there are
plenty of highly intelligent - and competitive - people and diverse
interests involved.

There are already deep misgivings, especially amongst the military, over the
Afghan mission. There is no sign of a diminution in Afghan resistance
attacks and no evidence of a clear gameplan. The military are not stupid and
they can see that the Karzai government is deeply corrupt and the Afghan
"national" army comprised almost exclusively of tribal enemies of the
Pashtuns.

You might be surprised by just how high in Nato scepticism runs at the line
that in some way occupying Afghanistan helps protect the west, as opposed
to stoking dangerous Islamic anger worldwide.

So this is what is causing frost and stress inside NATO. The organisation
is tied up in a massive, expensive and ill-defined mission in Afghanistan that
many whisper is counter-productive in terms of the alliance aim of mutual
defence. Every European military is facing financial problems as a public
deficit financing crisis sweeps the continent. The only glue holding the
Afghan mission together is loyalty to and support for the United States.

But what kind of mutual support organisation is NATO when members
must make decades long commitments, at huge expense and some loss of life,
to support the Unted States, but cannot make even a gesture to support
Turkey when Turkey is attacked by a non-member?

Even the Eastern Europeans have not been backing the US line on the Israeli
attack. The atmosphere in NATO on the issue has been very much the US
against the rest, with the US attitude inside NATO described to me by a
senior NATO officer as "amazingly arrogant - they don't seem to think it
matters what anybody else thinks".

Therefore what is troubling the hearts and souls of non-Americans in NATO
HQ is this fundamental question. Is NATO genuinely a mutual defence
organisation, or is it just an instrument to carry out US foreign policy?
With its unthinking defence of Israel and military occupation of Afghanistan,
is US foreign policy really defending Europe, or is it making the World less
safe by causing Islamic militancy?

I leave the last word to one of the senior NATO officers - who incidentally
is not British:

"Nobody but the Americans doubts the US position on the Gaza
attack is wrong and insensitve. But everyone already quietly thought
the same about wider American policy. This incident has allowed
people to start saying that now privately to each other."

Craig Murray is a human rights activist, writer, former British Ambassador,
one time Foreign Office specialist on maritime law and an Honorary Research
Fellow at the University of Lancaster School of Law.

http://www.craigmurray.org....

Re: The IDF can time travel

traducteur — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:15:38 -0000

I don't write poems but, in any case, poems are not poems

Long ago, I was made to understand that Palestine was not Palestine;
I was also informed that Palestinians were not Palestinians;
They also explained to me that ethnic cleansing was not ethnic cleansing.
And when naive old me saw freedom fighters they patiently showed me
that they were not freedom fighters, and that resistance was not resistance.
And when, stupidly, I noticed arrogance, oppression and humiliation
they benevolently enlightened me so I can see that arrogance was not
arrogance, oppression was not oppression, and humiliation was not
humiliation.
I saw misery, racism, inhumanity and a concentration camp. But they
told me that they were experts in misery, racism, inhumanity and
concentration camps and I have to take their word for it: this was not misery, racism, inhumanity and a concentrations camp.
Over the years they've taught me so many things: invasion was not invasion, occupation was not occupation, colonialism was not colonialism and apartheid was not apartheid.
They opened my simple mind to even more complex truths that my poor
brain could not on its own compute like: 'having nuclear weapons' was
not 'having nuclear weapons', 'not having weapons of mass destruction' was 'having weapons of mass destruction'. And, democracy (in the Gaza strip) was not democracy. Having second class citizens (in Israel) was democracy.
So you'll excuse me if I am not surprised to learn today that there were more things that I thought were evident that are not: peace activists are not peace activists, piracy is not piracy, the massacre of unarmed people is not the massacre of unarmed people.
I have such a limited brain and my ignorance is unlimited. And they're
so fucking intelligent. Really.

Ghassan Hage

Re: The Rachel Corrie gambit

traducteur — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:25:09 -0000

In view of their habit of gunning down defenceless goyim, "superior mortality" must be some kind of wry Jewish joke.

Re: Kill the mad dog, now!

traducteur — Mon, 31 May 2010 09:47:33 -0000

Well said, Xymph. You speak for us all.

Re: Saturday, May 29, 2010

traducteur — Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:31 -0000

As usual, the blood of goyim doesn't matter.

Re: Friday, May 28, 2010

traducteur — Fri, 28 May 2010 11:11:57 -0000

Most of the people known as marranos were actually former Muslims, not Jews. Not for the first time, history has been distorted to highlight Jews as the only victims, or at any rate the only ones who matter.

Re: Red faces at Foggy Bottom

traducteur — Fri, 21 May 2010 12:09:23 -0000

Euro-trash dips

lol

Xymph, your blog would be worth reading for the style alone.

Re: What lite looks like

traducteur — Wed, 19 May 2010 14:57:23 -0000

You're a bit hard on Chomsky, Xymph. He's in much the same position as George Bernard Shaw, who found to his chagrin, as he was growing older, that the rising generation of activists regarded him with respect as "a veteran who had done good work in his time." Chomsky may be past it now, but reread American Power and the New Mandarins for an invigorating taste of what he once was.

Re: A bad case

traducteur — Wed, 19 May 2010 11:25:45 -0000

I'll drink to that. Sahtain!

Re: Happy Nakba Day

traducteur — Fri, 14 May 2010 12:54:49 -0000

The Zionist media are saying that Hizballah has located its rockets in urban areas "the better to conceal them". I take it the real point of the assertion is to prepare us all for the carpet-bombing of urban areas next time around. They did it last time around too, of course, but at that time they hadn't thought of this ingenious pretext and had to fall back on the lame excuse that their troops had been fired on from defenceless apartment buildings, mosques, etc.

Re: Gish Gallup

traducteur — Thu, 13 May 2010 12:40:22 -0000

You'd think they'd have learned by this time that trying to develop bioweapons that will kill only goyim is self-defeating. Must have been taken in by their own ideology about the goyim not really being human. Reality bites back, as the saying goes.

Re: The love that really dare not speak its name

traducteur — Wed, 12 May 2010 13:49:09 -0000

It happens at other institutions besides Harvard, and in other departments besides schools of law.

Re: Monday, May 10, 2010

traducteur — Tue, 11 May 2010 07:26:17 -0000

Can't really call MA a third-rate novelist, Xymph, unfortunately. I've always enjoyed and admired her works, but now I'm going to burn them all.