<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for toptick</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/toptick/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/toptick/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:16:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 07/01/2011 Trading Signals</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2011/07/07012011-trading-signals.html#comment-240271838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cobra:  I forgot to mention yesterday, looks like a Zweig Breadth Thrust.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Well, here’s what I’m worried!</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2011/03/well-heres-what-im-worried.html#comment-176120640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cobra,  Have you checked for a Zweig Breadth Thrust?  My data is sometimes different than yours, but I have 10-day MA of adv/(adv+dec) rising from 40 on 3/17 to 63 on 3/30 (9 days).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/10/2011 Market Recap: Two More Bad Signs</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2011/01/01102011-market-recap-two-more-bad.html#comment-127597515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Cobra:  The Traders Almanac numbers seemed suspicious to me -- the drop after a down Friday/down Monday didn't look much different than what one might expect after any random day.  Indeed that is the case.  Doing their test from 1995 to October 2010, I find that the average drop after a down Friday/Monday is -7.1% (close enough to TA's number), but the average drop after any day is -6.64% -- not significantly different.  Using SPX, the drop after down Friday/Monday is -5.4%, but the drop after any day is -5.53%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will not be trading on this pattern.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too Big to Succeed &amp;#8211; Stocks to Avoid (MON, JNJ, PG, MCD, XOM, JPM, GE, MSFT, EXC)</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/08/12/too-big-to-succeed-stocks-to-avoid-mon-jnj-pg-mcd-xom-jpm-ge-msft-exc/#comment-68247044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this a small cap effect?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I puzzled over how a firm become the biggest, and stay the biggest for years, with this effect operating.  One way, see XOM and JPM, is a merger.  Merger/takeovers are well known for growth destruction (if not outright value destruction).  But I don't recall major accretions at MSFT, PG, and others.  They've underperformed in recent years, but must have well outperformed for some time before that even as the largest firms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 08/09/2010 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/08/08092010-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-67452673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cobra,  $NYAD cumulative has been making new highs for the past several days.  Indicates hidden strength.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 07/26/2010 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/07/07262010-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-64619709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Zweig said that a rise in the ZBT from under 40 to over 61.5 (hmmm, sounds overoptimized) in 10 days or less portends a bull market.  Do your data show this happened this month?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These signals are rare.  This signal definitely worked in March '09, but not so well in early December '08.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thx!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 07/26/2010 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/07/07262010-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-64353039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, Cobra, what data do you have for Zweig Breadth Thrust?  TradeStation data looks like there may have been a signal on the rise from July 6 to July 20.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thx!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 07/26/2010 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/07/07262010-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-64351220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I second marchrooster:  when NYAD is this strong off a potential bottom, the trend tends to persist over the intermediate/longer terms (true before March '07 and after March '09).  NYAD was weak off bottoms from April '07 to December '08, and those rallies tended to fail quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 06/11/2010 Market Recap: 66% Winning Rate If Buy at the Friday’s Close</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/06/06112010-market-recap-66-winning-rate.html#comment-56539992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a) many services quote 3-month bill yields 10x the actual, so this was a drop from 0.16% to 0.07% (big percentage but not big absolutely)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b) bill yields were more volatile back in December (not to mention the Crash).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think EvilTrader has it:  like the rise in Libor rates, it is a safety issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 06/11/2010 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/06/06112010-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-56273011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget:  next week is Expiration Week.  (in '09 and '10, expiration Monday is up 67% of the time, but averages &lt;i&gt;down -0.24%&lt;/i&gt; because of some big reds - FWIW).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:57:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 06/09/2010 Market Recap: A Few Institutional Charts</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2010/06/06092010-market-recap-few-institutional.html#comment-55679706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cobra, a couple of ideas:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the NYMO, I would say there is a positive divergence -- there was a lower SPX close 6/07, but NYMO is much higher on that date.  Using volume-based McClellan Oscillators, the MO has been rising since flash crash day ( &lt;a href="http://etfinvestmentoutlook.com/etf.php?s=IVV&amp;amp;c=breadth_volume_d" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://etfinvestmentoutlook.com/etf.php?s=IVV&amp;amp;c=breadth_volume_d"&gt;http://etfinvestmentoutlook.com/etf.php?s=IVV&amp;amp;c...&lt;/a&gt; for example).  Also, MO on other indexes (RUT, S&amp;amp;P 1500, etc.) also are rising since flash crash, thus showing positive divergence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I offer another interpretation of the volume bottom pattern chart -- when you get a V bottom with a spike in volume (capitulation), it means that bottom will be retested, and the real bottom is when the volume &lt;i&gt;decreases&lt;/i&gt; with lower prices (March 09, February 07, July 06).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:55:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Reign and Romance of Risk</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/05/19/the-reign-and-romance-of-risk/#comment-51120948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As Gladwell wrote in the New Yorker (&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/01/18/100118fa_fact_gladwell)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/01/18/100118fa_fact_gladwell)"&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/re...&lt;/a&gt;, many entrepreneurs succeed not by taking great risk, but by structuring deals where the risk is born by others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another canard of capitalism is "personal responsibility and accountability".  Yet one of the great innovations of western civilization that enabled capitalism is the &lt;i&gt;limited liability&lt;/i&gt; corporation.  I've read several article recently about what an advantage the U.S. has internationally because of our relatively liberal and non-punitive bankruptcy laws.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mutual Fund Fees</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/05/11/mutual-fund-fees/#comment-49789890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/feestudy.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/feestudy.htm"&gt;http://www.sec.gov/news/stu...&lt;/a&gt; see section III.F -- doesn't name names but describes funds with asset-based fee breakpoints, sometimes combined with performance fees.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inflation</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/04/09/inflation/#comment-44227940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eyeballing it, the change from 1913 (20+) to today (248) is substantially less than CPI (at CPI this series would have gone from 20 to 438).  BCA Research had a graph a year or two ago showing that the 'commodities bubble' was actually a return to trend -- a long term secular &lt;i&gt;deflation&lt;/i&gt; in real commodities prices.  Over time, we've become vastly more efficient at producing ags and softs, more efficient at extracting industrial metals, and more efficient at using commodities (the last a trend not so much reducing per-capita demand as increasing the real value represented by a unit of consumption).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Favorite ETF Sites</title><link>http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/2010/03/some-favorite-etf-sites.html#comment-42869915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cefconnect.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cefconnect.com/"&gt;http://www.cefconnect.com/&lt;/a&gt; is also very good for closed-end funds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing Based on the Yield Curve &amp;#8211; REITs Like it Steep</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/03/03/investing-based-on-the-yield-curve-reits-like-it-steep/#comment-37994319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be interesting to have a breakdown of equity vs. mortgage REITs.  Mortgage REITs are a carry trade, so the correlation of curve to performance makes perfect sense.  But how much do operating/equity REITs benefit from the curve?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Spent My Weekend</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/03/01/i-spent-my-weekend/#comment-37527336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey!  Maybe they have figured out how to profit from social networking, and the VCs got in cheap.  Or, and I consider this more likely, the VCs opened a magnum of Chateau Bulle 1999 before writing their checks . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Spent My Weekend</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/03/01/i-spent-my-weekend/#comment-37491595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keeps them comfortable for four years, during which time they estimate a 50% probability that _somebody_ will figure out how to monetize social networks . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Heine &amp;#038; Price Disciples</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2010/02/25/david-marcus-launching-new-mutual-funds/#comment-37256766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A. Gary Shilling apparently is still arguing for deflation (and investment in long treasuries).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunspotting (by Fayssoux)</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2010/02/sunspotting-by-fayssoux.html#comment-35489250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, 7/8/2009 to 2/17/2010 is 155 trading days, or 224 calendar days.  The solar cycles are measured in calendar days, so would be about 111 trading days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read the fine print, investors: Some mutual fund fees higher than thought</title><link>http://newrulesofinvesting.com/read-the-fine-print-investors-some-mutual-fund-fees-higher-than-thought#comment-34346001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The tax issue is manageable -- you can look up the unrealized/undistributed gains before buying a fund and decide if that works against you, or for you.  For most funds you can check the planned distributions in the fall and exit a fund if the distribution will be adverse to you.  (Granted, these actions are hardly the 'set and forget' convenience that funds sell, but I do these.)  This is really an issue of timing -- should extra taxes count as a fee if I get the money back next year when I sell the fund?  kaChing's case is overextended on this point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other fees are disclosed, except soft dollar commissions.  These bug me because there is a real fiducial problem -- "I'll spend your money to benefit me, without disclosure."  Do soft dollars really displace manager expenses that would have to be paid for explicitly?  If it is spent to cover costs of the manager, it is a fee and should be disclosed, not buried in the capital gains/losses.  Are the soft dollar prices competitively set?  Somebody elses dollars are always cheaper and easier to spend than my own ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Japan, the US, and the Lost Decades</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/12/20/japan-the-us-and-the-lost-decades/#comment-26775657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The other Faber also likes Japan -- as a contrarian play.  &lt;a href="http://www.anirudhsethireport.com/marc-fabers-picks-for-2010/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.anirudhsethireport.com/marc-fabers-picks-for-2010/"&gt;http://www.anirudhsethirepo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investment Newsletter Directory</title><link>http://www.mebanefaber.com/2009/12/10/investment-newsletter-directory/#comment-25553129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they don't publish a price list, you know it's expensive.  I haven't checked in years, but the various BCA services seemed to priced at integral multiples of 2500$US.  If you like BCA but can't afford it, check &lt;a href="http://www.boeckhinvestmentletter.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.boeckhinvestmentletter.com/"&gt;http://www.boeckhinvestment...&lt;/a&gt; .  Tony Boeckh was the head of BCA before Martin Barnes.  His site is like a BCA-lite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:38:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/09/2009 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2009/12/12092009-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-25418790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aha!  Now I get it.   Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/09/2009 After Bell Quick Summary</title><link>http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/2009/12/12092009-after-bell-quick-summary.html#comment-25335041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cobra,&lt;br&gt;On the ISEE numbers, isn't '76% chance of red close next day or next next day' indistinguishable from random?  I.e., if each day has a 50% chance of red, don't two days have a 75% of a red?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toptick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>