Disqus - Latest Comments for tonyleone

Re: Schmidt: Don’t Like Google Street View Photographing Your House? Then Move.

feedback tweak — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:25:41 -0000

all of googles responses above are 100% honest- something many are not comfortable with these days because they have no ability to tell right from wrong.

google in these responses is being misunderstood when in fact the part about them staying out of the stock market was proof enough there of their advanced intelligence and again honesty- too bad if people dont get it

i want google in my mind that is part of its ongoing development of the "singularity"- how else can it progress withough our contribution?

some people deserve to remain in the dark and out of our game

Re: Drift into a peaceful slumber with Panasonic's self-rocking Relax Chair Yasumi

feedback tweak — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:27:35 -0000

is that the guy from " office space " with two dozen pencils in his shirt plastic pencil holder in which the company doesnt know they fired him six months ago?

Re: The Equity Culture’s Demise Has Been Greatly Exaggerated The Reformed Broker

feedback tweak — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:45:34 -0000

Only a few things to know to succeed on ST's:

1) it's a primary massive pump for AAPL Apple computers so all you need to is swing trade it

2) Keep track of the same garbage stocks recycled there ever since march 09 most notably LVS,MGM,WYNN,PCX et al but the gambling ones seem to send the message to the astute investor the game has always been rigged but when someone comes along to expose it they get the boot.

3) And the biggest contributors are very bright talented chart technicians who are lured into the competitive trap the site feeds off of as free content that places further burden on them to produce without regard they are slave to the system

Re: S&P500 something has gotta give. Long trap?

feedback tweak — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:42:20 -0000

i think in outrageous possibilities for clues these days because that's all we seen all year as our best guess low volume PPT pumping the gas as needed has been the case fine but now that ideas has pretty much fanned itself through the media why would new volume come in to short with such an unknown threat as that force hanging overhead. The saying is market doesnt like doubt well how about direct annihilation if you try telling yourself there's two sides to this.

I'm as puzzled as anyone and I'm just a hack but if the US's brilliant strategy has managed to turn half of Europe into the socialist non productive heap a crap it really is by trashing its currency relative to ours, well then as a consequence we turn them into South America circa 1984 whose worthless dollars should be flowing back here into the only left on Earth secure are the top s&p 100 stocks as Porter Stansbury laid out previously. Destroy the world and get paid is fine by me.

Re: Volatility Spotlight: InterOil (IOC)

feedback tweak — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:06:12 -0000

This IOC was my first test run using deep ITM covered calls as you see how greedy I was with IVol so high I choose this but failed to collar it after buying in at 28 I think it hit close to your figure I seem to recall 38. So within days this thing dropped like 8 or 12 points in a day taking me below my downside protection of the ITM call

So then I naturally rolled down as you see the deep ITM strategy caused me to not panic-sure they was initial shock to wake up to such a thing but then intuition began growing too although dealing with hedge funds one cannot go on that at all. I sensed something just was far to abnormal which was confirmed later when news hit Merrill Lynch had some dealings with the contracts for I dont recall 9 mm acres or whatever.

So soon as I heard those animals were involved I knew what happened they were pushing it around before the news as if it were a t-bond topping out before a last rate cut blow off top. I didnt know Soros was behind it but who else but a whale I sensed?

So I kept rolling down with deep calls i think three times is how vicious it was. Then at some point I lifted the short call and maybe broke even if not made some change and hauled ass never looking back.

Looking back I guess the only way to have played it was buying way OTM calls. I dont recall if a collar would have worked.

I am looking at it now so maybe catch some points on a run as it retraces up and go deep with the extreme IVol readings although it-s probably finished this time

Re: Chart.ly Chart of the Day: Brocade Communications BRCD | Chart.ly Blog

feedback tweak — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:56:49 -0000

I agree with your view on this POS stock as long as I've know it last 10 years it has been nothing but a a serial disapointer so why not discount it to what we think price it deserves; And because of ST's refinement of the process of ferreting out these public menaces from what contributers like you and the other contributors of this forum to start propelling it to world class status by making it feared among the phony business world as we surgically take apart all usual suspects as such in this case before they begin to hurt the masses by focusing it on that stream after a consensus has been made the agreement is that dedicated stream only allows itself to be spammed by posters also in agreement that particiluar issue should be crippled.

How can you be so sure it isnt happening now by outside hedgies when in these structured cases we decide the innocent dont get thrown in with the guilty who heretofore have by the nature of Wall st staus quo.

You think I am crazy but you know damn well Wall Street never gives sell short calls on bullshit stocks like these just because they are big issues laying around collecting dust in many portfolios when if ST's dedicates a stream to punishing crap stocks like these before they harm the general public then you will be helping others and doing for SEC what they will never be able to do is clean up this game with the truth which because of the open nature of ST's and allegience to no corporate entity we can pay ourselves and those who follow us for free to profit by surgically removing this cancer and spread th ewealth amongst the public.

Re: What is Goldman Sachs?

feedback tweak — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:56:52 -0000

Notice the Goldman guy was a good bullshitter trying to persuade your reporter off a public right of way indicates good poker playing to quick thinking come out bluffing.

But I also noticed 'BARE' popped up on my screen but again Goldman stealth as they are had me tripped up as to whether it was hedge or not which as we know their history of using their own customers as bait for playing both sides of a trade they did in fact manage to disguise their hand from me but only this time.

I suspected it would only be a matter of time after Goldman-Sachs monitoring StockTwits would soon learn a new variation of an old trick we detect so often which is fine by me if this is the new wave of investing. I mean why not engineer your own reality so Yale professors can do a part II thesis on ' How to Fabricate Market Efficiency".

On these special findings on research of this same nature I am sure now the cat is out of the bag such that Stocktwits-in order to safeguard its patent- needs to devise a paid subscription for an exchange of this info whereby those wanting to join that particular stream must allow themselves to an INTERPOL, KGB, or Brooklyn Russian mafia run background check as proof they have no ties to Goldman or any of its other its U.S. government affiliations least I suspect the SEC has been acting as their shill all this time.

Re: VIX Update: Implied Volatility On Volatility (10/17)

feedback tweak — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:17:41 -0000

My implieds on VIX implieds read is some real bad news( black swan thingy) hit late Friday is why that thing spiked.

Re: Evil is the Buzzword in Corporate America…BUT…Maybe we are Just DUMB!

feedback tweak — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:51:57 -0000

Mallord Ducks engage in rape to procreate so if staying focused is evil why is it that moralists claim evil's a distraction? From their idea of common good maybe but I'm out for myself.

Re: Subs: A Holding Presents at Investor Conference Value Plays

feedback tweak — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:07:25 -0000

Appears a potent antidote to McDonalds who by now would seem toxic in the mind's of this current green generation of moms.

Your due diligence has created a vision that Jamba is primed to encroach of the above's real-estate and pick and all the best plums off tree it can carry home.

Also the chart has a classic look of a solid story unraveling by the institutionals moving in ( trying to anyway) early and quietly while others still claim it would appear "speculative".

Re: Stop Trading

feedback tweak — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:59:09 -0000

Well first off she should be called in for capping the client in anger and frustration at end of chat. She obviously is reading off a script and doesn't have a clue. Tell you truly I'm not far behind her so I can only think in extremes in these cases to evoke the wildest possibilities and try to sort it out from there.

Firstly does Goldman own these firms or just hacking them with algorbots or own the systems administrator? I mean TDAmeritrade's system stops me out if no shares available. Maybe I should pose that to them and find out and get back to you here.

After all these mobster machinations you've been unearthing on Goldman's cute little trading game so far, its given my insight into a parallel market- a doppleganger if you will-concealed within the one we think we see via dark pools anti matter. In fact that is my whole point-nothing real matters all the better. Here is how I think Gs wants it to stay that way.

This idea's genus in that it counters a known fact, i.e. very negative news is abundant so it has built a system to feed off of that. It is a magnificent archetype Goldman's constructed whereby its intent is to keep new money out and perhaps fuel itself off whatever it finds out there. Lets face it until last year the public had no idea what short selling meant and the money managers who used it en masse last year took them awhile to catch on so perhaps they still think they replicate it again.

The easy money these people made then by just sitting on positions Goldman's algorbots has them scared if why these can't sleep scalping for nickles and dimes while the bots lie deep inside their gut spewing out insurmountable fear that wracks their body each second with having to trade big positions in order to stay afloat.

Massive anxiety when you don't know what entity is gaming your ass.

Lastly I think the above explains why Goldman is content with operating in a market with no liquidity. In essence it is a micro cap market with day traders feeding it but for seconds so as a perfect Darwinian adaptation the bots arrive on the scene beating you out to the kill.

I first realized this in early 90's with NASDAQ when B Madoff was MM jerking around spreads and me- a novice placing market orders. No volume. It was still a hoax then. I realized this once with a fine software company that is still around but I looked up after placing order and thought "Damn I just bought 10% of its daily trading volume".

Goldman's in our face each day. Why? They must also have the greatest psychologists money can buy. Unless there is a voluntary trade moratorium boycott strike or whatever they know the system will always feed off these degenerate gamblers it's consuming because their own ego convincing them they can beat the system is their biggest con. Goldman doesn't devise that it merely adapts.

Goldman knows the con is inside their minds.