<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for timothyandrew</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/timothyandrew/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/timothyandrew/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:15:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pow Over HTTPS - Timothy's Blog</title><link>http://blog.timothyandrew.net/blog/2013/07/11/pow-over-https/#comment-1190013569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Nate Beaty, not at all. Glad it helped!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timothyandrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:15:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recursive Postgres Queries</title><link>http://blog.timothyandrew.net/blog/2013/06/24/recursive-postgres-queries/#comment-941014435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I replied on HN, but I'll paste my reply here too:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Good point! I've flipped the queries around.&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; The difference is lesser, but still fairly significant (30x).&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Thanks for pointing this out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timothyandrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recursive Postgres Queries</title><link>http://blog.timothyandrew.net/blog/2013/06/24/recursive-postgres-queries/#comment-941013927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I just fetch `survey.questions`, I've got a bunch of questions in no particular order. How would I convert this to a depth-first ordering of the tree in Ruby? I couldn't think of a way (unless we changed the order_number to store more information).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timothyandrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recursive Postgres Queries</title><link>http://blog.timothyandrew.net/blog/2013/06/24/recursive-postgres-queries/#comment-940342793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We *do* have a root survey_id for all these elements.&lt;br&gt;The problem is that the order_number is local to each sub-question level, so we couldn't do an `order by order_number` up top.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timothyandrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>