<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for timiacono</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/timiacono/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/timiacono/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:18:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GOLD LOSING ITS LUSTER?</title><link>http://pragcap.com/gold-losing-its-luster#comment-9308004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, I don't remember seeing "Of course, when compared to most other assets, gold has been an outperformer over a 1, 3, 5 or 10 year period." when I left my comment. Either I'm getting old or you just did a big Blogger no-no.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timiacono</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOLD LOSING ITS LUSTER?</title><link>http://pragcap.com/gold-losing-its-luster#comment-9303115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gold was also a bad investment since 1980, however, since 2000, it has outperformed just about every other asset class with the notable exception of gold stocks. Pick your timeframe and you can make any argument you want, but, in the scheme of things, the four and a half months are meaningless. It's nice to see that there are still plenty of people with a profound disdain for the stuff, a clear indication of a huge upside yet to come.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timiacono</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:53:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>