<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tidwell</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/tidwell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/tidwell/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 14:26:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
    addStream | RTCMultiConnection
    Use this method to add additional streams in a LIVE session.
  </title><link>https://www.rtcmulticonnection.org/docs/addStream/#comment-4472820901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Muaz!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am attempting to add a screen share stream to an existing connection using connection.addStream(stream) and am getting the following warning followed by an error:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Warning&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"Complex" Plan B SDP detected! Chrome will switch the default sdpSemantics in M72, around January 2019 from 'plan-b' to the standardized 'unified-plan' format and this peer connection is relying on the default sdpSemantics. This SDP is not compatible with Unified Plan and will be rejected by clients expecting Unified Plan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Error:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;DOMException: Failed to execute 'setRemoteDescription' on 'RTCPeerConnection': Failed to set remote offer sdp: Media section has more than one track specified with a=ssrc lines which is not supported with Unified Plan. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;br&gt;shareScreen = () =&amp;gt;{&lt;br&gt;    window.desktopCapturer.getSources({types: ['screen']}, (error, sources) =&amp;gt; {&lt;br&gt;      console.log(sources[0])&lt;br&gt;     if (error) throw error&lt;br&gt;     navigator.webkitGetUserMedia({&lt;br&gt;         audio: false,&lt;br&gt;         video: {&lt;br&gt;           mandatory: {&lt;br&gt;               chromeMediaSource: 'desktop',&lt;br&gt;               chromeMediaSourceId: sources[0].id,&lt;br&gt;               minWidth: 2560, &lt;br&gt;               maxWidth: 2560,&lt;br&gt;               minHeight: 1440,&lt;br&gt;               maxHeight: 1600&lt;br&gt;           }&lt;br&gt;         }&lt;br&gt;     }, stream=&amp;gt;{&lt;br&gt;       this.rtc.connection.addStream(stream)&lt;br&gt;     }, e=&amp;gt;console.log)&lt;br&gt;   })&lt;br&gt;  }&lt;br&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do I need to change some constraints or remove the screen sharer's video stream in order for this to work?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I appreciate all your help. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 14:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RTCMultiConnection FAQ | Documentation | Demos!</title><link>https://www.rtcmulticonnection.org/FAQ/#comment-4286083066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Muaz!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How can I send a private message to another user? I tried using the connection.peers['remote-userid'].sendCustomMessage and connection.peers['remote-userid'].onCustomMessage but those were not defined in the peer object, even after enabling the v2 api. I appreciate any guidance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Love your work!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Ern’s Smokes Out the BBQ Faithful</title><link>http://www.dtlv.com/2012/12/18/big-ern/#comment-744209822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I always get a three piece platter: 2x Chicken + Pulled pork with cole slaw sides. It's great. Healthy, delicious cole slaw, too. Thanks Big Ern!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Minimalist Cabin Project</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/the-minimalist-cabin-project/#comment-465846124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you considered an adobe/clay brick home? I recently visited Pun Pun (&lt;a href="http://punpunthailand.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="punpunthailand.org"&gt;punpunthailand.org&lt;/a&gt;) and saw their amazing, beautiful adobe homes. Minimalist. Sustainable. DIY. It's definitely on my radar. I'm interested in knowing the reasons for your cabin preference...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://allthetimeeverything.tumblr.com/post/6372379639</title><link>http://allthetimeeverything.tumblr.com/post/6372379639#comment-463925284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mandrew, you are awesome. I shoulda, coulda, woulda. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://allthetimeeverything.tumblr.com/post/6729931274</title><link>http://allthetimeeverything.tumblr.com/post/6729931274#comment-460402448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;bump!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 02:06:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: letter.ly</title><link>http://letter.ly/kortina/BwT#comment-93367622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Howdy Kortina,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, that IS interesting. I LOVE conversing (notice i didn't say kind of love when describing something awesome)...way more than writing. I should thank you for inspiring me to write! Doesn't happen often.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"That's interesting" is a solid phrase to use in conversation and I couldn't reprimand you for using it...especially if you need to interject and transition to genuine feedback as to why you find something interesting. However, this use is irrelevant to the situation that I think you're describing. Correct me if I'm wrong. Your partner in conversation has said something that fails to inspire a genuine AND polite response. And for whatever reason (awkward silence, unconscious social cues, etc.) you feel the need to respond. What's needed here is a go-to "give my brain a few hundred milliseconds to come up with something appropriate" phrase that won't obligate you to making statements you don't believe. "That's interesting" doesn't fit the bill. Give this a shot: "Hmmm"&lt;br&gt;It doesn't misrepresent what you're thinking and it buys you some time (add more m's if needed) to think about your next move. Which still might be silence. Hell, you might even fire back a social cue to respond while saying it. In yo face, uninteresting person!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for asking questions...If you have any genuine ones, I don't think the conversation could yet be labeled uninteresting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to more of your letters,&lt;br&gt;Greg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I quit my first job out of school because I... - kortina's tumblog</title><link>http://blog.kortina.net/post/84636878#comment-7002617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The boss will be one of many influences at Bonnaroo this year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Fastest Way to Compose Gmail Messages - gCompose Bookmarklet</title><link>http://blog.kortina.net/post/72593823#comment-6537638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent work Kortina. 3 birds, 1 stone.&lt;br&gt;I've been looking for a reason to play around with Ubiquity some more. &lt;br&gt;I've wanted a faster way to shoot off a gmail.&lt;br&gt;and wanted to say wassup for myself and Ali, who I saw the other night at George Haye's birthday party.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Giving</title><link>http://gregtidwell.org/blog/giving/#comment-4158541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, if we give more, do we have shorter days and nights?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Giving</title><link>http://gregtidwell.org/blog/giving/#comment-4053157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Chris. It's never been easier to give to St. Judes. Everyone seems to be involved. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An End to the Revolving Door - Barack Obama | News from Presidential Candidates, the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the White House</title><link>http://polfeeds.com/item/An-End-to-the-Revolving-Door#comment-3729647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hooray Obama. Sounds like he's making good and tough decisions already&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin Is the Symptom, Not The Disease</title><link>http://mattmaroon.com/?p=582#comment-3560126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;deciding who to vote for this year was too easy. i hope they take your advice, especially depoliticizing science. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 24 hours with a G1 Google Phone </title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/10/24-hours-with-a.html#comment-3304729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pretty fair review. i'll have to check out the streetview when i'm out tonight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the thing i hated most about the iphone was how often safari crashed when using google reader. no problems with the g1 so far.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;also, you can't leave out how smooth the phone's material is...i find myself petting it. seriously. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Repercussions of an attempted mugging</title><link>http://gregtidwell.org/blog/repercussions-of-an-attempted-mugging/#comment-3222538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a dog that bites indiscriminately...just how much is chain mail these days?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Repercussions of an attempted mugging</title><link>http://gregtidwell.org/blog/repercussions-of-an-attempted-mugging/#comment-3036603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The City of Brotherly Love, of course. ha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Anti-Social Graph</title><link>http://mattmaroon.com/?p=356#comment-372845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook could create some algorithm to assign a probability that a person is who they say they are...and it would probably rely on more than just friendships, which I agree are game-able. I think it would be difficult to game photo tagging and instant messaging, unless you created a bunch of accounts, chatted with yourself and accepted photo tags from yourself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They may one day offer probabilities...or even have a identify verification process. Whether or not that's valuable, I don't know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:15:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook knows who you are, and that's worth more than you think</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.blogspot.com/2008/04/facebook-knows-who-you-are-and-thats.html#comment-372802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Photo tagging is reliable source of data that Facebook can use to analyze relationships and ultimately helps to verify identity. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kortina's tumblog</title><link>http://blog.kortina.net/post/32449129#comment-363572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i had to check it out, who doesn't want 'Goodies'?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:08:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kortina's tumblog</title><link>http://blog.kortina.net/post/32449129#comment-362416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i don't know&lt;br&gt;i 'feel' like 5/month,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i also 'feel' that ad clicking is most likely when i'm on a niche blog that covers my interests. and i'm rarely 'on a blog' unless i'm using the 'Next' google reader bookmarklet to browse my feeds. have you tried this? it's under Google Reader-&amp;gt;Settings-&amp;gt;Goodies&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregtidwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>