<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thepalineffect</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/thepalineffect/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/thepalineffect/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:24:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Joe The Plumber</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/joe-the-plumber/#comment-3104174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Joe the plumber deal, it's a great way of highlighting Obama's plan to change our economy into socialism.  But it's another example of how the Democrats will rabidly tear apart anybody who opposes them, no matter who they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Election &amp;#8216;08 T-Shirts | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/post-election-08-t-shirts/#comment-3073084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's the Buffoon for you, always prepared.  They look awesome, let's hope some of them aren't illegal soon after the election haha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Is Mentioned In Ohio Voter Fraud Indictment | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-is-mentioned-in-ohio-voter-fraud-indictment/#comment-3057629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ACORN again, if it doesn't come up in the debate it's time to start screaming at the set.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Chased By Crazed Ku Klux Klansman! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-chased-by-crazed-ku-klux-klansman/#comment-3057335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Liberals require you to write disclaimers after everything you say because they're too stupid to understand what you're doing on their own (disclaimer: by using the all inclusive term liberals, I do not mean 'all' liberals, only the ones who are currently alive, and most of the dead ones) (disclaimer: by "too stupid" I really mean "too stupid").&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Chased By Crazed Ku Klux Klansman! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-chased-by-crazed-ku-klux-klansman/#comment-3054913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man that guy is going to get creamed by somebody too stupid to realize what he's trying to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:00:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Well I&amp;#8217;ll Be Damned | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/well-ill-be-damned/#comment-3045627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is kind of funny, people buying up the misspellings and then showing an ad that leads to the real website.  But, if companies like Bank of America want to protest it, they should remove their advertising dollars from Google.  That way they won't be paying for people to visit their site who were trying to get there in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I actually thought Google was more ethical than this, I suppose not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Good Old Days | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/the-good-old-days/#comment-3028791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow I can tell, take Xanax man lol.  Or maybe not, we need to be upset about this and let people know it.  I think I sent something to you from the dailyantikos, quoting the kos saying: "And remember, we're no longer gunning to "win", we're gunning to decimate conservatism and deliver a clear progressive mandate for change."  Getting the kids is very important to decimating conservatism, maybe most important.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Go Ahead! Vote Obama! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/go-ahead-vote-obama/#comment-3028644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think most blacks would be okay with it, or most minorities in general, but I can see liberals being perfectly fine with it.  It may be time to begin homeschooling kids until a voucher system is instituted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Good Old Days | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/the-good-old-days/#comment-3028358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol alright, I was just wondering, not in a disrespectful way.  I hadn't read a John Wayne synopsis before with such a heavy emphasis on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Good Old Days | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/the-good-old-days/#comment-3027876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was talking with someone today about how John Wayne teamed up with Ronald Reagan to fight Communism back in their acting days, John Wayne was a real American.  Thanks for the article.  I'm just wondering though, what's with the heavy emphasis on him being a Freemason?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:51:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Who&amp;#8217;s The Hottest Female &amp;#8220;Info-Babe?&amp;#8221; | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/poll-whos-the-hottest-female-info-babe/#comment-3023847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to give it to Hasselback.  That Megyn Kelly photograph is just unflattering, she's one fine lil newsie when she's got the makeup on and she's railing at an Obama spokesman.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Set To Become Revlon Spokesmodel | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-set-to-become-revlon-spokesmodel/#comment-3022101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol well it depends on your pageviews and the rate you have them pop, it's like a buck eighty per thousand exposures.  Soooo I'd say it's not even worth considering until your blog is really big, because people really do dislike those ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Set To Become Revlon Spokesmodel | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-set-to-become-revlon-spokesmodel/#comment-3020538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hadn't thought about that, death penalty!  Well I don't think I actually want him to 'die'.  Life in prison would work for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michelle would be a good pack mule, but she'd be a TALKING pack mule.  I'd be worried about being so close to tools which would easily end my misery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't see ads, the force is strong with my Firefox ad-blocker.  Adbrite's just a lame ad broker period, you get the weirdest ads for your content, the PPC is brutally low.  But, if you want to make some good scratch, turn on the full page ad option and watch the magic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Set To Become Revlon Spokesmodel | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-set-to-become-revlon-spokesmodel/#comment-3020441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Logan Act, that would have to be the absolute worst of them all.  Unfortunately, it seems very far outside the realm of possibility to make any ground with that before he's elected, and I think it'll just fade afterwards.  I like the RICO thing, but people can take that many different ways (overzealous prosecutor, criminal anxious to get off, etc).  ACORN, if people find out about his intimate ties with them, that will sink him I'm sure.  It's something that effects us all, personally.  I think people just allow themselves to be distanced from that other stuff because it doesn't have a direct impact.  Or maybe Obama will have to walk up to every voter and personally pop them upside the head before they'll decide not to vote for him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I was living in Afghanistan I might trade Michelle for a half starved al-Qaida mule.  But I doubt I'd get away with ripping anybody off that bad, I'd probably have to throw in a few goats too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Set To Become Revlon Spokesmodel | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/obama-set-to-become-revlon-spokesmodel/#comment-3019311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's fun to think about him having an affair (er....his wife is Michelle Obama, can't blame him much), but people who are able to dismiss his 'affairs' with the worst elements of society will easily dismiss this.  I like the ACORN scandal, I think that has the potential to hit him harder than anything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, this campaign is just tearing Obama up, he's had to have all sorts of 'enhancements'.  I'm looking forward to the breast implants.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:51:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3018974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, thanks to both you and Buffoon for defending our country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the results of polls are manipulated by pollsters purposely oversampling certain elements of the population to get the result they want, polls lie.  They tell the truth about the views of the people they poll, but they lie about the indicated viewpoint of the people they 'claim' to represent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry I insulted your behind.  However, I believe your behind isn't particularly intelligent when it so easily buys into the neverending propaganda stream of a group of people in the media trying to drown the sitting president to get the member of another party elected.  So, please tell your behind that I do apologize for unintentially offending it but I stand behind what I said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barack Obama is a disaster, and something destructive has happened which makes this term relevant.  He was nominated.  Now, if you want to know why his nomination earns him the term of being a 'disaster', this blog is the right place for you to be.  Look around a lil bit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You used the term "American propaganda"....what does that mean?  Is that a reference for the underlying ideology of the patriotism which people of my 'ilk' hold?  Why did you defend our country if you don't believe she's worth defending?  That's the ideology I hold.  America is worth defending.  If you don't believe that, I don't understand why you went to such lengths to defend her.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3018939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Having no precedent doesn't mean having no power, for every single judicial decision in history there was a point where there was no precedent.  No precedent just means the situation hadn't occurred yet.  Now it's occurred, and we can say, "Yes, somebody should be stopped when they won't stop demanding recounts and driving this country into the ground."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3016159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you overslept when they announced the electoral count, but that's what decided the election.  Judges just decided to stop the ridiculous recount after recount after recount, which confirmed that GW won every time.  In addition, the NYT independently confirmed that even if the recounts had been allowed to keep going, GW would have still won!  Geez move on man, that was eight years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3016138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't vote for GW twice, I wasn't involved much in 2000 but I was sure glad he won.  I voted for him 2004, and I'd vote for him again if he could run again.  And he'd win, I guarantee you.  He kept your stupid butt safe from terrorists for seven years, but all you can do is whine and complain instead of being grateful that you haven't been blown into a hundred pieces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a few McCain supporters who are getting discouraged, I'm not one of them, polls lie.  The polls ALWAYS over estimate Democratic support, and it's the same thing here.  People will realize that Obama is "a disaster" (nod to the article's title), and they'll vote against him.  America can be funny sometimes, but America will make the right decision.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3015584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh . . . are you perhaps aware of where you're at?  In all of your blustering and patting yourself on the back did you perhaps possibly think to click the front page and read a few articles?  This ain't a forum bud, there's plenty of articles here to make whatever case it is you're asking 'me' or Buffoon to make.  I don't think Buffoon has enough time to copy and paste all of the articles he's written about Obama and McCain on here, and as for me I just don't feel you're worth it to go through the trouble.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll save you the trouble of responding....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tulsa: "derrr yu got nuhtheng."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Did Not Have Sex With ACORN | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/i-did-not-have-sex-with-acorn/#comment-3015486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I did not have sexual relations with that nut, ACORN.  I do have a thing for walnuts though." - Barack Obama&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:31:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3015364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3015132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This guy will reply and reply and reply and keep repeating the same thing, "Derrr u stell gott nohthing, derrrrr yur lame, derrrrr."  He thinks the last person to respond wins.  He'll be too busy trying to outlast people on the internet to vote in the GE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:49:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3014849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you still talking?  Lol.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Is A DISASTER! | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://www.dequalss.com/wp/2008/10/barack-obama-is-a-disaster/#comment-3012812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh gosh I feel just absolutely distraught that you think I'm failing  =(  You telling anyone they're failing would be like Ed Wood telling another director he's failing.  You're not quite an authoritative source, and you're so badly buried in 'suck' you can't see clearly enough to accurately comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, I do like it when I fail by the standards of the left, since everything is backwards with them it actually means I'm succeeding.  It's a beautiful feeling  =D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepalineffect</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:42:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>