<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for texasbrian</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/texasbrian/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/texasbrian/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:42:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Liz Cheney Claims Obama Has "Abandoned" Czechoslovakia (Which Hasnt Existed Since The Early 90s)</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/09/16/liz-cheney-claims-obama-has-abandoned-czechoslo/189922#comment-652340657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell me again why anything she says is relevant...?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#039;s Plan to Stick It to Poultry Workers</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/177241#comment-536200001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because Boehner wouldn't agree to raise it. It's a Congressional ceiling. You know better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What am I owed for Continental&amp;#8217;s codeshare confusion?</title><link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/what-am-i-owed-for-codeshare-confusion/#comment-513804749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to put some blame on the passengers here. When I travel internationally, I... (a) know which airlines I am flying, (b) check in online for all airlines, (c) never leave the counter without all boarding passes. I'm guessing they were at the counter because they needed to check bags... which were checked to CDG, another thing I would have checked. Yes, CO messed up, but you cannot be a lemming as a passenger. If you are, then you must accept some of the blame. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dropbox ups free bonus space to&amp;nbsp;16GB</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/05/dropbox-ups-free-bonus-space-t.html#comment-489014036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Click here and I'll have 10 of my friends google Santorum just to move it back up in the rankings. &lt;a href="http://db.tt/t7n74Ne9" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://db.tt/t7n74Ne9"&gt;http://db.tt/t7n74Ne9&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reservation system keeps United fliers in holding pattern | Business
 | The Bulletin</title><link>http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120318/NEWS0107/203180319/1011/BIZ01&amp;nav_category=BIZ01#comment-469420775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“It’s been absolutely horrific,” said the teary unemployed woman who is going to HAWAII on REWARD MILES.&lt;br&gt;Sweetie, this is not horrific. The Holocaust was horrific.&lt;br&gt;This is an inconvenience. Get a grip.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: | News  - Home</title><link>http://click2houston.preview.ib-prod.com/pns/servlet/page/view/pns-hou/news/-/1735978/9198266/-/y3ta3sz/-/index.html#comment-454765706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That isn't even the real logo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Latest Word - Michael Roberts - Sydney Spies's yearbook swaps sexy photo for ID shot, mom to file complaint</title><link>http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2012/02/sydney_spies_yearbook_sexy_photo_formal_complaint.php#comment-434272357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's worse: This mom's glorification of her daughter's slutty "model" pics, or the fact that Westword has now published them all, for free, and given her tons of publicity she didn't deserve?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Herman Cain&amp;#039;s Latest Attempt at Damage Control is Amazing</title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/150001#comment-377715912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The right sure is fond of stock art. #astroturf&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: United Airlines Employee Calls Gay Passengers Faggots</title><link>http://unicornbooty.com/blog/2011/11/28/united-airlines-employee-calls-gay-passengers-faggots/#comment-374315612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, no offense, but United didn't do anything to their Twitter account. You simply listed the wrong link. They're "@united." not "unitedairlines."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And you're not doing anyone any favors by not checking your facts before you throw out accusations like that. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/music/still-have-faith-george-michael-at-the-o2-2924994.html</title><link>http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/music/still-have-faith-george-michael-at-the-o2-2924994.html#comment-355353107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The concert is called "Symphonica." If you went there looking for disco or Top 40 hits, you deserve to be disappointed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:42:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coalition releases list of Republicans using same-day registration | The Morning Sentinel, Waterville, ME</title><link>http://www.onlinesentinel.com/news/Coalition-releases-list-of-Republicans-using-same-day-registration.html#comment-321026428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dutson says "Right now it creates too much of a liability in a system that doesn’t have enough structure to keep it safe.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Um... how, then, did it work for the past 38 years? What's happened in the past election cycle that makes the system "structurally unsafe"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gotta love GOP excuses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Snip it or skip it? San Francisco debates circumcision</title><link>http://www.sfexaminer.com/node/707681#comment-263131448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No offense, Sonia, but regardless of the paragraph you wanted to highlight, you entered a very public debate and mentioned your child in doing so. So it's fair game for others to jump in: *you* opened the door and invited them in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You seem intelligent and rational. I'm not here to argue with you, but I wanted to point out that you seem to have become indignant and offended when people have brought up your situation. Rather than telling people to "mind their business," it might be best to refrain from posting it to a discussion thread. This entire article and thread is exactly about that "business."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just sayin'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Francisco Circumcision Ban Unconstitutional, Professor Says</title><link>http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/11/san_francisco_circumcision_ban_1.php#comment-234066628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Says the "mom" who is reading the article and posts nothing meaningful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Francisco Circumcision Ban Unconstitutional, Professor Says</title><link>http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/11/san_francisco_circumcision_ban_1.php#comment-219939153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is so simple and ridiculously rational. Thanks, Rbb4x.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Perry for President? </title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/113786#comment-206368772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The difference is that at least W pretended to have ideas. Perry? Not a one. Last day of the legislative session in Texas, and schools still haven't been funded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 16:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Perry for President? </title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/113786#comment-206272150</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I don't think the guy would survive a mainstream nationwide election. He is devoid of any intelligence or original thought. Texans here keep electing him simply because he has an R next to his name, and he has big Texan donors. They're scared of Democrats — so much that the Texas GOP-led legislature is gerrymandering the state right now for house apportionment to ensure no Democrats even have a chance. He's a fool and a coward.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journalism vs. WikiLeaks</title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/112611#comment-200299269</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I think it belongs in part of a broader piece on Gitmo intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:28:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: George Michael upset by BBC wedding day snub -  Musicrooms.net</title><link>http://www.musicrooms.net/rock-and-pop/32098-george-michael-upset-by-bbc-wedding-day-snub.html#comment-196136113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if you had actually read the entire Twitter feed and not selectively taken items out of context. He never said he was "upset," nor was there a "snub." Anything to generate a click, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 01:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Francisco Circumcision Ban Unconstitutional, Professor Says</title><link>http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/11/san_francisco_circumcision_ban_1.php#comment-175981071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're correct; there are no medical studies suggesting that circumcision reduces sexual pleasure -- because it can't be medically measured. What *can* be measured is the number of nerve endings that are deliberately removed for no valid reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I never claimed that there were medical studies about sexual pleasure, and if there's any "distortion," it's not on my part.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I'm not a part of NO-CIRC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*sigh*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Texas Considers Bill to Ban Almost All Abortions</title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/103796#comment-164503199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the kind of nonsense that makes me embarrassed to be a Texan. What is going on in this country?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gay Couple Files Complaint against Dallas Morning News</title><link>http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/030711-Gay-Couple-Files-Complaint-against-Dallas-Morning-News#comment-162772324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pepjrp:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're not immune; you just think you're better than. You're one of those who thinks you'll never get hit by a car because you drive a Lexus. Isn't there something in your bible about not being judgmental, or something about throwing stones?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gay Couple Files Complaint against Dallas Morning News</title><link>http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/030711-Gay-Couple-Files-Complaint-against-Dallas-Morning-News#comment-162586940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This has NOTHING to do with Jesus, God, Allah or the man in the moon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This has to do with a newspaper's legal rights.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:31:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gay Couple Files Complaint against Dallas Morning News</title><link>http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/030711-Gay-Couple-Files-Complaint-against-Dallas-Morning-News#comment-162467727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with Tom on this one, except for this bizarrely ironic sentence: "Hey Libtards....try not to clump all right wing nuts into the same category." Um, Tom, you just put all liberals in the same category. Don't be that guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This boils down to two things: (a) The newspaper legally has the right not to publish, and (b) it's a completely stupid business decision on their part.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I can empathize with the couple, they even admit that the lawsuit is pretty pointless, except to "shine light" on something. Clogging up the courts with lawsuits you know you won't win isn't how you do that; you do that by getting people elected who will fix the laws.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And there's a bit of ego in here, as with all wedding announcements: who cares? Your friends and family already know, and the rest of the readers don't give a toss. This is about seeing your name and photo in print. I appreciate the equality aspect, but I just see a bigger need to choose battles more wisely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Francisco Circumcision Ban Unconstitutional, Professor Says</title><link>http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/11/san_francisco_circumcision_ban_1.php#comment-158015139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Janna:&lt;br&gt;"Did you ever heard the circumcision kept men from sexual pleasure? Nope. Never. It has different purpose and it never hurt anyone. Ask doctors, you lunatics."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It reduces sexual pleasure (ask a grown man and you'll find out; there's a whole foreskin restoration industry).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the most offensive thing you wrote is that "it never hurt anyone." Seriously? Tell that to the people who have had botched circumcisions, or to the boys who have had parts of their penises taken off by accident. Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, ask doctors? OK. No professional medical association in the United States or the rest of the world recommends routine neonatal circumcision. The American Medical Association calls it "non-therapeutic." At no time in its 75 years has the American Academy of Pediatrics ever recommended infant circumcision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is it that you said about "Ask, read, compare BEFORE..."?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Francisco Circumcision Ban Unconstitutional, Professor Says</title><link>http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/11/san_francisco_circumcision_ban_1.php#comment-158013538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Angela Pittman:&lt;br&gt;"For all those who are arguing that these male babies should have a choice, why is that you argue for their rights now, when technically no claims that underage people have rights until they turn eighteen."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, I think you've missed the point here. Everyone has rights, regardless of age. A child has the right not to be kidnapped or raped, correct? Even if it's by their parents?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are confusing the age of 18 with PRIVILEGES. At 18 you can smoke, vote, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you cannot say that they are their parents' property, which is basically your argument, or else I'd like to introduce you to Children's Protective Services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line: Where the hell does a parent get off deciding to mutilate my body IRREVERSIBLY when I cannot even speak? We don't even let babies get tattoos, but you're OK with making them get a permanent disfigurement?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, Angela, because you think circumcision has preventative health benefits, I'll say it again: Why not have doctors start removing breast tissue, since breast cancer is pretty prevalent? How would you feel if your parents did that to you before you knew it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texasbrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>