Disqus - Latest Comments for tes1900

Re: Oncology Practice Reviews PCIP | LifeHealthPro

tes1900 — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:12:47 -0000

Presently I am getting about the same amount of medical coverage now as I did before I had PCIP, when I paid expenses and meds out of pocket, except now, with the insurance it is costing me several times more than it cost me without the insurance.
I would like to keep this insurance for a year from my approval date, if I can afford it, but that also is in question.
Their statements are rather confusing, obviously written for their offices alone.
They don’t cover any dental at all, regardless of the problem, or the degree of sepsis.
Finding a provider is next to impossible, at least in my area. I have found that on occasion an office will be split where some will be providers and the other not; the office will say that all are providers if one is, but the PCIP office says differently.
They say in their brochure how they pay for everything over five thousand and something; well I can see why. It seems as though you would have to have about 20K in medical bills to reach that 5K.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:26:44 -0000

OK let me spell it out in very simple terms. If you add up everything, (that’s all the celeries, benefits, junkets golf courses fees, jet costs, perks…everything), then divide it through the total number of employees it goes to it then it will total around 124 per hour. $1600 of each new car per hour; not day not month not year, goes to labor alone. I don’t know how I can spell it out any plainer or put it in simpler terms.

Re: Parking gallery solar project - StimulusWatch.org

tes1900 — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:00:38 -0000

tell me...how is that vital?

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:01:16 -0000

Ok, we can bitch and complain about what the administration has done to us, but that is just it, it is done and we can but deal with it!
What we need to do is look ahead and be ready for what they plan to do to us next. Exactly the same only bigger, assuming that we are dumb and will not object!

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:59:06 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Doorbells - StimulusWatch.org

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:56:03 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Purchase new police crusiers - StimulusWatch.org

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:54:48 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Most active projects scrutinized in the press

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:52:16 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: (2) additional K-9 units for Police Station - StimulusWatch.org

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:50:48 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:49:11 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:44:35 -0000

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:25:32 -0000

You are so correct: You are no Politian and you are also no historian and your research stinks also.
First off the number of hard copies of the 1100 page document were very limited and the review time was extremely limited as I remember less than 24 hours for the complete bill. Transparently there was none - nada!
The president has control over everything the lower offices do simply by the veto!
Obama hasn’t deleted the First Amendment yet, but until he does we have a RIGHT to free speech so if we think he’s out of line we can say so.
And by the way this mess was started by Jimmie Carter, remember with the Community Reinvestment Act and their lending practices, the Mr. Bill accentuated the problem by treating to revoke their federal charter.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:57:35 -0000

I don’t see how we are Patriots; how our lives are on the line, except maybe by starving to death?
That was your mistake waiting to get your weapons and ammunition now! Are you trying to tell me you don’t know how to reload?
The sooner we start another “Operation Wetback” like Hoover, Truman and Eisenhower; the better off we will be. In fact we should have spent the monies on securing our boarder and deporting all the wetbacks instead of PORK!
And remember only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Solder.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:32:14 -0000

Impressive post, but I agree, who gives a shit what color he is, but he has made it virtually impossible for any black man to get in there for many years to come, and that’s unfortunate. I don’t care if the person is male of female; blue, green or purple; just as long as they do a good job.
All I can say is that the majority said they wanted change…now they got it! It’s just a shame that we will all have to pay for it instead of the people that voted for him.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:21:13 -0000

Sir; You make me proud to be an American
Thank you, excellent post! Really – excellent!!!

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:14:47 -0000

I am a Native American; Choctaw!
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Do you know whom you are talking about?
Obviously not or you wouldn’t say such dribble.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:09:04 -0000

Dream on!

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:28 -0000

There was a time, many years ago, when the unions ere a good ting. Through the years they have gotten perverted, crooked and just basically a leech on society. They have become a detriment to the US and each and every one of them should be broken. It is my opinion that the first and bentest way to start is to have the UAW go Chapter 11.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:51:18 -0000

total up the benifits, average it out with what everyone is making and this is what you will get, although I seem to rremember also hearing a nlulmber of 142.00 per hour - you choose!

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:34:59 -0000

George Washington
Washington was baptized into the Church of England. In 1765, when the Church of England was still the state religion, he served on the vestry (lay council) for his local church. Throughout his life, he spoke of the value of righteousness, and of seeking and offering thanks for the "blessings of Heaven."
In a letter to George Mason in 1785, Washington wrote that he was not among those alarmed by a bill "making people pay towards the support of that [religion] which they profess," but felt that it was "impolitic" to pass such a measure, and wished it had never been proposed, believing that it would disturb public tranquility.
His adopted daughter, Nelly Custis Lewis, stated: "I have heard her [Nelly's mother, Eleanor Calvert Custis, who resided in Mount Vernon for two years] say that General Washington always received the sacrament with my grandmother [Martha Washington] before the revolution." After the revolution, Washington frequently accompanied his wife to Christian church services; however, there is no record of his ever taking communion, and he would regularly leave services before communion—with the other non-communicants (as was the custom of the day), until, after being admonished by a rector, he ceased attending at all on communion Sundays. Prior to communion, believers are admonished to take stock of their spiritual lives and not to participate in the ceremony unless he finds himself in the will of God. Historians and biographers continue to debate the degree to which he can be counted as a Christian, and the degree to which he was a deist.
Thomas Jefferson
Though his religious views diverged widely from the orthodox Christianity of his day, throughout his life Jefferson was intensely interested in theology, spirituality, and biblical study.
Ben Franklin

Franklin is credited as being foundational to the roots of American values and character, a marriage of the practical and democratic Puritan values of thrift, hard work, education, community spirit, self-governing institutions, and opposition to authoritarianism both political and religious.
I've seen a lot of scholars speculate about Ben Franklin's religious beliefs. He didn't say a lot about them, for a very good reason: he was never asked!

But at the age of 85 he responded to a letter from the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles. Stiles asked him for a portrait of himself to hang opposite the portait of Eli Yale, and asked him some questions about his religious beliefs. I found the letter in American Heritage, December 1955.

Franklin replied that none of the portraits of himself that he had were "worthy of the place and Company you propose to place it in." But, he said, "You have an excellent Artist lately arrived. If he will undertake to make one for you, I shall cheerfully pay the Expence; but he must not delay setting about it, or I may slip thro' his fingers, for I am now in my eighty-fifth year, and very infirm."

"You desire to know something of my religion," Franklin went on. "It is the first time I have been questioned upon it. But I cannot take your Curiosity amiss, and shall endeavour in a few words to gratify it."

"Here is my Creed. I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That he governs it by his Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we render him is doing good to his other Children."

"That the soul of Man is immortal, and will be treated with Justice in another Life respecting his Conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental Principles of all sound Religion, and I regard them as you do in whatever Sect I meet with them."

"As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion, as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble."

"I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that Belief has the good Consequence, as probably it has, of making his Doctrines more respected and better observed; especially as I do not perceive that the Supreme takes it amiss by distinguishing the Unbelievers in his Government of the World with any peculiar Mark of his Displeasure."

"I shall only add, respecting myself, that, having experienced the Goodness of that Being in conducting me prosperously thro' a long life, I have no doubt of its Continuance in the next, though without the the smallest Conceit of meriting such goodness."

[signed] B. Franklin

Enough said!

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:57:30 -0000

To Trying to live Free – God Bless

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:53:24 -0000

NO they aren’t; That is exactly true; Oh wait they will create a permeate place for that mouse! – Right on!!!

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:49:56 -0000

You have hit the nail on the head Ahhh - what pay check?

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:46:38 -0000

There is some news show that has a segment called the "raping of America" – they should include this on it, what a great description for the stimulus package.

Re: Stimulus Watch in O'Reilly Radar

tes1900 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:44:36 -0000

Would it not be interesting to track this money and see where it all goes?
How much to Reid and Pelosi. How much to Obama and how much too overseas accounts of the puppeteers!