<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for terencereis</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/terencereis/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/terencereis/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:20:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Did Google rip off the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Last Week Tonight&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; theme for a new commercial?</title><link>http://www.avclub.com/article/did-google-rip-last-week-tonight-theme-new-commerc-229438#comment-2412428249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They might wanna have a word with Kid Wave, too: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK6z5tMR_P8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK6z5tMR_P8"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:20:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bacon Causes Cancer? Sort of. Not Really. Ish.</title><link>http://www.wired.com/2015/10/who-does-bacon-cause-cancer-sort-of-but-not-really/#comment-2330919628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure if stats were properly treated. It conflated population risk (frequency of colorectal cancer) with individual risk (WHO study).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Micron first to market with phase-change memory modules for portable devices (video)</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/18/dnp-micron-first-to-market-with-phase-change-memory-modules-for/#comment-653797384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the useless comments department: isn't glass "made" of sand, and isn't sand constituted mainly by silica, which is the name for silicon dioxide? So shouldn't PCM also be classified as a silicon-based storage? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Android is so hot, why has Java ME overtaken it? - 
		Apple 2.0 - 
		Fortune Tech</title><link>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/01/01/if-android-is-so-hot-why-has-java-me-overtaken-it/#comment-399679409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're either dumb or biased or lazy. Just throw browser there: &lt;a href="http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=1&amp;amp;qpcustomb=1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=1&amp;amp;qpcustomb=1"&gt;http://www.netmarketshare.c...&lt;/a&gt; - and you'll find out that Opera Mini answers for the change. They were either under-measuring Opera Mini or the data is just plain wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Reading Trends At AVC</title><link>http://avc.com/2011/05/mobile-reading-trends-at-avc/#comment-196288664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting. We  (by we, I mean Pontomobi Interactive, mobile shop in Brazil; and McCann) have just completed an extensive survey that shows big numbers from people accessing blogs/social networks more frequently on their mobiles than on PCs. And we know linkage is a big part of the whole sharing/conversation routine. Question: what was your traffic source? Are all these numbers organic or originated from other sites (which ones)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a huge claim (if one is still needed - it shouldn't) for properly adapting your content to mobile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Motorola XOOM is most certainly not a flop</title><link>http://bgr.com/2011/04/06/the-motorola-xoom-is-most-certainly-not-a-flop/#comment-179667134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Galaxy Tab sold 1m in its first month. And it's not even a proper tablet. So yes, it's a flop. Big flop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:04:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Disbands Mobile Group As Part Of Reorganization
		| mocoNews</title><link>http://moconews.net/article/419-yahoo-disbands-mobile-group-as-part-of-reorganization/#comment-38656836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a lot of spin when you just disband all your whole mobile experts while claiming "that the importance of mobile increased".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Budget Smart Phone: the HTC Smart</title><link>http://www.blog.moby1.co.uk/2010/01/htc-phones/budget-smart-phone-the-htc-smart.html#comment-29500689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A Brew OS for a GSM phone? We're talking CDMA here, no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why won&amp;#8217;t location-based networks grow?</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/10/23/why-wont-location-based-networks-grow/#comment-20951751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The reasons you listed are not exclusive to location-based networks, but common to all social networks. My view is that participation in these networks generate transaction costs that exceed the benefits promised by adding location, therefore hampering the network effect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terencereis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:49:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>