<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for telum</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/telum/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/telum/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:22:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Another Windows tablet falls short of the iPad</title><link>http://www.infoworld.com/d/consumerization-of-it/once-again-windows-tablet-fall-short-of-the-ipad-221836#comment-951572075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article reeks of Apple Fan Boy desperation.  The iPad is mainly a consumption device, with a teeny bit of production capability.  The future is devices that excel at both consumption and production.  A Windows 8 tablet allows BOTH consumption and production at excellent levels.  What idiot would buy a consumption only device for $500 (iPad) when you can consume and produce (Windows 8 tablet)?  The Answer? Apple Elitist Fan Boys.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Buy Offering $100 Off Windows 8 Touchscreen PCs</title><link>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2415789,00.asp#comment-810877644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For example, the ASUS Q200E has been selling for just under $500 for the past month or so.  Now, BestBuy is advertising the ASUS Q200E with $100 OFF (small letters "retail") and it's still JUST UNDER $500.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wow BestBuy and WSJ.  Thanks for nothing.  $100 off retail, which they were already doing for the past month or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama 'Not Losing Sleep Over' Fox News - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/obama-not-losing-sleep-over-fox-news/27759#comment-20814205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well he may not be losing sleep, but every waking hour is spent crying like a little baby about Fox news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:18:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FNC Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Fired - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/the_revolving_door/fnc_liberal_pundit_marc_lamont_hill_fired_140458.asp?red=tn#comment-20345412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although I'm on the right, I always enjoyed Hill's opinions on issues.    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:31:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed. Dave Apologizes: &amp;quot;I Got My Work Cut Out For Me&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-dave-apologizes-i-got-my-work-cut-out-for-me/27984#comment-18674989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Letterman is a creepy old man, who used his power relationship to coerce attractive younger women who otherwise would have nothing to do with him, into having sex with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To me, this is the white-collar equivalent of rape.  But instead of using physical force to get younger women to sleep with him, he uses psychological force (his boss-employee power relationship) to coerce younger women who would never NEVER otherwise have sex with him, to engage in all kinds of sexual acts with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disgusting.  Now his sexual joke about Sarah Palin's 14-year old daughter all makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Get All My Dave Letterman News from Wolf Blitzer - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/i-get-all-my-dave-letterman-news-from-wolf-blitzer/27986#comment-18614198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's the issue: An ugly, creepy, old man like Letterman is able to obtain sex from attractive young women interns because he unethically uses his power relationship to influence them into sleeping with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When a boss uses his power relationship to get women to sleep with him, it is NEVER CONSENSUAL.  It's not physical force, true, but it is  psychological force.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So stop with all the consensual talk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18559953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I personally don't mind the personal attacks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like O'Reilly says (paraphrasing): "when the person you're arguing with gets mad and starts with the profanities and name callings, it's because you are winning the argument!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18558465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!  RealReal just doesn't get it.  Are liberals really this blind?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18558383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As O'Reilly says, anytime the person you're arguing with  starts cussing and clowning around, they're losing the argument.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, with that in mind, if it's "crap" then argue against it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me easily counter your argument.  While it may be true that the police had Letterman wired, it's NOT TRUE THAT THEY HAVE EXTORTION PROOF.  An exchange of money is not proof of extortion.  Even the wired conversation is not proof, if prior (unwired) conversations showed the exchange to be a valid transaction (e.g., Letterman buying the script treatment).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're the one who's lying about what's on the tape.  I, however, was clear that my posting was a plausible alternative scenario.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, you libs have drank the Liberal Letterman Kool-aid so often that you can't even imagine plausible alternative scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fair and balanced, try it some time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18537460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to worry, just having some late night fun.  You have a good night as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18537035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, sure they did.  Where's the transcript?  Show me the link where it's posted.  You can't.  Wanna know why?  Because the transcript HASN'T BEEN POSTED.  You're imagining (because you're smoking crack or drinking koolaid?) things that aren't in the transcript.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What else are you putting in your koolaid?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless, I think I just gave you a sprinkle of reality to mix in with your koolaid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18536911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.  I thought the conclusion was pretty funny myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18536891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I already made 10 points, so I'll oblige you and do eight more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Points 10-18: 10. Letterman is ugly by normal standards, 11. Letterman is creepy by his own admission, 12. Letterman had sex with the women that worked under him, 13. Letterman admitted that the women would be embarassed if other people knew, 14. Halderman is a writer, 15. Halderman sold Letterman a script treatment for $2M, 16. Letterman bought the script but panicked and decided to claim it was extortion, 17. Letterman tried to cover up his affair by framing it as a joke during his monologue and getting the audience to giggle about it, 18. Letterman is a hypocrite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: All liberals who are defending Letterman are hypocrites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Just kidding about the conclusion, but I couldn't resist because I see you libs getting so angry).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18536712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I only brought that up because it's Halderman's job to write documentaries and expose's.  So pitching a script treatment to Letterman that exposes Letterman's unethical treatment towards women is not out of character for Halderman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Everytime he makes fun of the failings of public figures, he's assuming a role of moral superiority.  To see this, ask yourself if he would make fun of John Edwards NOW, now that he's been exposed as a creepy woman stalker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18536321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*shakes head sadly*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, I haven't read any convincing counters to my arguments: (1)  that Letterman is unethical for using his boss-power relationship to sleep with women that otherwise wouldn't sleep with him; (2) that Letterman bought the rights to the script for $2M, then panicked and tried to claim it was extortion; (3) that Letterman is a creepy scumbag ("creepy" by his own admission); and (4) that Letterman, being a creepy guy probably had the younger women teabag him, making him the ultimate teabagging hypocrite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Okay, 4 may be stretching it but I wouldn't put it past a creepy guy like Ltterman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In conclusion, when you libs can only name call and can't argue back convincingly, it just makes us thinking Americans smile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*smiles knowingly*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18505400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, so you approve of old men using their power relationship to force young women into having sex with them.  Then admitting that the women would be embarrassed if the truth came out?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh.  I get where you're coming from.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You speak of "crack" a lot.  Maybe it's because you're speaking from your butt?  No?  With the liberals it's all about sex, and tea bagging and crack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No wonder Rasmussen shows the Dems tanking in the polls along with their healthcare plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18505283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tape transcript?  More likely, they have Dave letterman paying for the script treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See, you're already making assumptions and not being fair and balanced.  I just posted an alternative and more likely scenario that Letterman's extortion scenario.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I too am waiting for the facts to come out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18505234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glenn Beck got the communist Czar fired.  The advertisers are all back!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ROFLMAO!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18505198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the tea of truth is difficult for you far-left kool-aid drinkers to sip :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:33:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann on Joe Halderman: ‘This is Exactly the Guy We Knew’ - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-on-joe-halderman-this-is-exactly-the-guy-we-knew/27999#comment-18504324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love how the far left isn't even giving Halderman the benefit of the doubt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we take a fair and balanced approach to this story, we can equally find Dave Letterman at fault.  For the following reasons:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Letterman, as a comedian that makes fun of the misfortunes of other people, places himself on a higher moral ground than the people he makes fun of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Letterman admitted to having sex with his younger female employees--using his boss power relationship to get younger, nubile women into his casting couch just to satisfy his perverse craving for the younger bodies of women.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Letterman knew that the women would be embarrassed by having sex with him.  He stupidly admitted this in his monologue.  This means, he knew what they would normally not sleep with an old flabby guy like him, unless he abused his power relationship to influence them into having sex with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. (And this is ultimate manipulation trick) Letterman TRIES TO COVER UP HIS UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR, by telling it as a joke monologue and TRICKING THE AUDIENCE TO LAUGH.  His monologue was just an attempt to brainwash the audience and the viewers into thinking his unethical behavior was no big deal.  Afterall, listen to everyone laughing in the audience.  They thought he was telling a joke.  But it was just another power manipulation trick.  To the viewers they get the impression that the laughter means that everyone in America approves.  Far from it.  Imagine if he admitted this on the Factor, instead of passing it off as a joke.  The outrage would be clear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Now, here's a rational alternative to Letterman's EXTORTION story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A. Halderman is an award winning writer and producer of documentaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;B. Halderman discovered Letterman's abuse of his power relationship with his younger female employees to get them to sleep with Letterman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;C.  Halderman decides to write a story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;D. Halderman present Letterman with a Script Treatment (synopsis of the script).  This is standard practice in the industry.  Before you write the story, you provide the script treatment.  I believe Letterman acknowledge this in his monologue, saying that Halderman gave him a one page script.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;E. Letterman seeing the Script Treatment goes bananas and tells Halderman after consulting with his lawyers, "Hey don't do that documentary.  I'll give you $2M for the rights to your script."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;F. Letterman gives Halderman $2M to own the rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;G. Letterman changes the story and claims it's extortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;H. Letterman uses his media power to manipulate the American people into believing Halderman extorted him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alternate Conclusion: Letterman is hypocritical pond scum.  Letterman is a manipulator of young women and a manipulator of the media to brainwash the American people into giggling about his unethical behaviors.  And he's a liar for buying a script and then pretending that it's extortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't put this past Letterman.  Afterall, he admitted to manipulating young female interns and female employees into having embarrassing sex with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In conclusion, let's be fair and balanced folks.  Either party could be at fault.  But the evidence points to a manipulative coverup by Letterman in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:02:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed: CBS Execs Didn't Know About Plot Until Final Hours - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-cbs-execs-didnt-know-about-plot-until-final-hours/28007#comment-18478314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;American patriots did complain when Bill Clinton used his power relationship to get Monica Lewinsky to perform oral sex on him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed: CBS Execs Didn't Know About Plot Until Final Hours - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-cbs-execs-didnt-know-about-plot-until-final-hours/28007#comment-18478142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoa, when I think about this scenario more and more, it really brings out what a scum bag Letterman is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, he uses his power relationship with his younger female employees to sleep around with them.  These are women that would be ashamed to admit it if the truth came out (Letterman's own monologue).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, he uses the influence of his late-night show to trick the audience into laughing about the whole scenario.  Let me repeat that: he TRICKED the audience into laughing about the scenario--probably to garner sympathy from the American people.  Probably trying to put out the impression that his sleeping around is no big deal to the American public.  A variation of a trick from the Saul Alinsky playbook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Third, he takes the money he paid Halderman to write a script, and claims that it's extortion money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My friends, Letterman is worse than a politician.  By making fun of other people on a nightly basis, he's essentially taking the high moral road like a politician.  But by using his media influence to trick people into laughing about the incident, he proves what a MANIPULATOR he really is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just like he used his power relationship to manipulate young women into having sex with him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Sorry for replying to my own post, I'm just in shock about how Letterman is trying to manipulate the American people to cover up his unethical behaviors)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:50:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed: CBS Execs Didn't Know About Plot Until Final Hours - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-cbs-execs-didnt-know-about-plot-until-final-hours/28007#comment-18477089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the excuse of the Neo-Comms?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"At least we don't take the high moral ground"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah right.  As if admitting to being a loser somehow made it okay to do evil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(sample trial script)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neo-Comm:  Yes your honor, I did commit murder.  But hey, it's okay, because I'm not a hypocrite.  You see, I never claimed I followed the law.  So you should give me a pass and let me go free.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judge:  But it's a crime to commit murder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neo-Comm: Haven't you been listening.  I don't follow the law!!!  I'm not a hypocrite.  Murder is okay in my books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judge: Death penalty&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(end script)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed: CBS Execs Didn't Know About Plot Until Final Hours - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-cbs-execs-didnt-know-about-plot-until-final-hours/28007#comment-18471570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured it out.  David Letterman is a liar.  The key here is what's known as the Script Synopsis or Script Treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like all writers, Halderman (an award winning, famous writer / producer) came to David Letterman to show him his script treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As professional courtesy, and a favor to Letterman, he showed his Script Treatment to Letterman, to get Letterman's feedback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Letterman freaked out and realized that the script treatment -- if expanded into a full blown script -- would make him look "creepy" (Letterman's own words)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So Letterman VOLUNTARILY GIVES Halderman  $2M NOT TO PUBLISH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;VOLUNTARILY.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Therefore it's NOT extortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Letterman, like all politicians is trying to cover up his mistakes.  He voluntarily gave Halderman $2M not to publish.  But then like all slimy unethical people, he decided to lie and say it was extortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah right Letterman.  Give it up.  Who are we as thinking Americans to believe?  A guy that admits to sleeping with young women and who admits that they would be embarrassed about it?  Or an award winning writer and producer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember, you heard it hear first.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letterman Blackmailed, CBS News Employee Arrested. &amp;quot;I Need to Protect My Family. I Need to Protect Myself. I Hope to Protect My Job&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/letterman-blackmailed-cbs-news-employee-arrested-i-need-to-protect-my-family-i-need-to-protect-myself-i-hope-to-protect-my-job/28025#comment-18444536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah.  Not a big deal for a boss to coerce his female employees into having sex with him.  And then, when he gets caught, admitting that they'd be embarrassed if anyone knew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, only in liberal world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">telum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>