<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tdruth01</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/tdruth01/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/tdruth01/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:52:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wading Into the Posner/Hot News/Linking Brouhaha</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/wading-into-the-posnerhot-newslinking-brouhaha.html#comment-12030700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said . . . I hope Bill Patry might be willing to come out of his blogging exile to provide the world with his opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T. D. Ruth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'This Book May Not Be Sold'</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/07/this-book-may-not-be-sold.html#comment-856829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hogwash.  First sale doctrine applies and I would be tickled to represent the student who gets sued for selling the book used.  This is even more outrageous than UMG arguing against the resale of promo CDs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T. D. Ruth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford Claims Trademark Violation in Artist's Images</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/06/ford-claims-trademark-violation-in-artists-images.html#comment-572186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember a story about Ford (on this blog) claiming trademark in photographs in January, though it might have been for a different group.  Ford later admitted it's mistake (&lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7999)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7999)"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/...&lt;/a&gt;.  Why is this photographer addressing this issue 6 months later?  Is he not aware that Ford realized it made a mistake?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T. D. Ruth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>