<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tashfeen</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/tashfeen/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/tashfeen/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:46:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Some of Gabriel Garcia Marquez&amp;#8217;s Best Characters Were Dead People</title><link>http://lithub.com/some-of-gabriel-garcia-marquezs-best-characters-were-dead-people/#comment-3260427897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beautiful! Thank you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
        Saying Goodbye To Python</title><link>http://www.ianbicking.org/drafts/saying-goodbye-to-python.html#comment-1244619035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Ian, I come from a completely different world: creative fiction (although I do love to code on the side). However you post made complete sense to me, and I applaud you for walking the new path. Sometimes our medium of expression fails to live up to the way we want to express ourselves, and you have to make a hard choice. Keep making beautiful things, sir - I wish you all the best.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:00:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 4 beta: first thoughts</title><link>http://blog.tommorris.org/post/3263606661#comment-145709292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome post! Brilliant writing, this is how tech blogs should be. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:53:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men: First Class Trailer Hits YouTube [VIDEO]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/11/x-men-first-class-trailer/#comment-145414729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hell yeah!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A picture of Islamofascism: Two Sudanese policeman whipping a defenceless woman</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100068401/a-picture-of-islamofascism-two-sudanese-policeman-whipping-a-defenceless-woman/#comment-112422429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Toby, Sharia laws do have their loopholes and once again the video proves it. The Quran does NOT sanction aggression of any kind, and specifically condemns  violence against innocent people. FYI, wearing trousers is perfectly Sharia-safe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What you see in the video is just a bunch of goons displaying the extent of moral and psychological corruption in a particular society. Unfortunately, there are quite a few of those societies in the world today - mostly 'Islamic'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Off topic: your post seems to attack one feminist/critic in particular without providing enough details. You seem to be overgeneralizing about Western feminists, which is unfair.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:19:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rediscovering HTML tables</title><link>http://woork.blogspot.com/2009/09/rediscovering-html-tables.html#comment-16613420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this is why we love your posts, Antonio - you tend to think out of the box. and yes, i agree, tables are still important, unless, of course, you don't give a damn about accessibility. keep up the good work and see you around!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Patents Search Box With Two Buttons</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/02/google-search-patent/#comment-15809934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;absolutely ridiculous &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Having template problems</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/having-template-problems.html#comment-11494372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Heidi! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:52:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to display code (nicely) in Blogger posts</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-to-display-code-nicely-in-blogger.html#comment-6468590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I checked it too, strange that Chrome behaves like this. I'll put up a note in the post notifying users about this. Thanks again!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to display code (nicely) in Blogger posts</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-to-display-code-nicely-in-blogger.html#comment-6467109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't get it, those are lines 2 and 3 in the first block of code in this post. Why are you saying they're missing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to display code (nicely) in Blogger posts</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-to-display-code-nicely-in-blogger.html#comment-6449096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you mean this part? &lt;br&gt;.syntaxhighlighter .line .content .block {&lt;br&gt;background: none !important; }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It comes after the CDATA area and before &amp;lt;/head&amp;gt;. Hope this clears up things. Thanks for the feedback!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to display code (nicely) in Blogger posts</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-to-display-code-nicely-in-blogger.html#comment-6407431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't have to go through all that trouble! You only have to click on the View Source icon (the file icon next to the printer icon) on the code. That will open a pop-up with the line numbers removed :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:22:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to display code (nicely) in Blogger posts</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-to-display-code-nicely-in-blogger.html#comment-6407334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What CSS lines? It's all there...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to partition a hard drive in Windows Vista with maximum shrink</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-to-partition-hard-drive-in-windows.html#comment-3780295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately I'm no good at Linux, so I'm stuck with such experiences which lead to writing such posts... Should do some more Linux, really...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:53:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Error codes in real life</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/11/error-codes-in-real-life.html#comment-3584808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aren't you awesome as always. Thanks, and good luck to you too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangla newspaper and mag links</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/01/bangla-newspaper-and-mag-links.html#comment-1933311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangla newspaper and mag links</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/01/bangla-newspaper-and-mag-links.html#comment-1933307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rajshahi?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sophos antivirus review</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/07/sophos-antivirus-review.html#comment-1148085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a tough one. I'd say Sophos is superior to both Avast and AVG, but that's because it detects malware a lot better than both. Avast is improving day by day, plus it's free, so if you have to choose between the two (or the three), go with Avast. If you're looking for a good antivirus for your company, I'd suggest NOD32 or Kaspersky.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:07:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 7 reasons why Blogger+Adsense+Analytics sucks</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-7-reasons-why-bloggeradsenseanalyti.html#comment-1057042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because although it sucks sometimes, I also happen to adore it (you hadn't guessed? sheesh).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail inbox is really 5GB?</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/06/gmail-inbox-is-really-5gb.html#comment-1053490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha ha, see! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And the winner of the browser speed wars is... not Firefox 3.0</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/06/and-winner-of-browser-speed-wars-is-not.html#comment-1023653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;jeff, sorry, I forgot! testing the ones I did were pretty hectic and pretty much took my breath away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:33:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And the winner of the browser speed wars is... not Firefox 3.0</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/06/and-winner-of-browser-speed-wars-is-not.html#comment-795688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Flock and Firefox do display similar characteristics (both seem to perform better rendering non-graphics intensive sites). The updated Flock, which will be built on FF3.0, ought to be even more Firefox-ish than the current version. I know Apple claims their browser is the best, but unfortunately I couldn't test Safari or Konqueror because I'm running Windows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail inbox is really 5GB?</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/06/gmail-inbox-is-really-5gb.html#comment-697056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what I'm asking: the numbers are growing everytime, so why would the Gmail team say the inbox is 5GB? (PS- I use Gmail since it was in beta.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You can't access Google Notebook from within Gmail</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/01/you-cant-access-google-notebook-from.html#comment-615125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Antivirus reviews 2008 (part 3)</title><link>http://techqi.blogspot.com/2008/01/antivirus-reviews-2008-part-3.html#comment-528110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Techguy: this is amazing. You haven't (a) even considered the fact that this isn't an updated version of the information presented (see the note at the beginning of the article), and (b) that if antivirus software performance was consistent with detection and disinfection ratings I wouldn't even be writing these posts (see the first post in this series, or better, the FAQ on AV Scan).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tashfeen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>