Disqus - Latest Comments for tarunkjuyal

Re: Melissa Etheridge: Angelina Jolie Was a Cancer Coward

tarunkjuyal — Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:40 -0000

In the case of Melissa Etheridge, I'd say... "Just Shut Up". And leave it at that.

Re: WH Distances Itself From Harry Reid; Carney Says He "Speaks For Himself" | RealClearPolitics

tarunkjuyal — Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:16:45 -0000

Carney is a fool of the first order. Obama could not find anyone qualified to be press secretary, so he settled for a sophmore.
Let's finally spend some time checking Barry's bonifides. Barry hasn't even disclosed where he was born or went to school. He hasn't disclosed his stolen identities or why he has no law license.

Re: CNN Plays 'Only the Good Die Young' After Segment About Sikh Temple Shootings

tarunkjuyal — Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:12:12 -0000

CNN wonders why they lose viewers every day. They are no longer relevant.

Re: Coulter Column: Obama's Signature Move Unsealing Private Records

tarunkjuyal — Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:13:04 -0000

If people who question the veracity of Owe-bama's nativity are called "birthers," I propose that those who question Romney's tax records be called "taxers."

Re: Networks That Fawned Over Obama's World Tour Mock Romney's International 'Blunders'

tarunkjuyal — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:50:06 -0000

The media has no choice but to be negative on Romney. Obama has no record to run on, it's that simple.

Re: A Dirty Video - Raising Awareness for Ocean Pollution

tarunkjuyal — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:35:03 -0000

great video

Re: A victory in the global warming fight?

tarunkjuyal — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:24:22 -0000

Combating climate change may not be a question of who will carry the burden but could instead be a rush for the benefits, according to new economic modeling presented at “Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges & Decisions” hosted by the University of Copenhagen.

Contrary to current cost models for lowering greenhouse gas emissions and fighting climate change, a group of researchers from the University of Cambridge conclude that even very stringent reductions of can create a macroeconomic benefit, if governments go about it the right way.

“Where many current calculations get it wrong is in the assumption that more stringent measures will necessarily raise the overall cost, especially when there is substantial unemployment and underuse of capacity as there is today”, explains Terry Barker, Director of Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge and a member of the Scientific Steering Committee of the Congress.