<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tamihania</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/tamihania/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/tamihania/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:29:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Options Theme</title><link>http://polnor.net/minds/2008/10/options-theme/#comment-8274395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry but I cannot help you - Options Theme is discontinued by theme author, Justin Tadlock.&lt;br&gt;Explanation here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://themehybrid.com/support/topic/cant-download-the-options-structure-or-visionary-themes" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://themehybrid.com/support/topic/cant-download-the-options-structure-or-visionary-themes"&gt;http://themehybrid.com/supp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(but you can try other themes by Justin - f.i. one used on this side is the child theme of Hybrid :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamihania</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/02/fewer-followers-or-more-meaningful.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/02/fewer-followers-or-more-meaningful.html#comment-6747084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As I said on Twitter: I like article as it is. It underlines the time dimension in group relations. &lt;br&gt;One may also take into account other dimensions of relations in group and/or group in itself. The size of the group is important. One cannot simply deal effectively over a long time with the crowds (groups over 100-200 members if you are professional or -  20-30 people if you are not). &lt;br&gt;You cannot talk about connections/ relations in crowds or with them (but you can lead them if you are prepared to, you have a talent or - you have a group of co-workers helping you).&lt;br&gt;The strategy which can be effective on Twitter is arbitrary choosing people you would like to interact and, well, treat the rest as the crowd or your public...&lt;br&gt;For further reading:&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/"&gt;http://facultystaff.richmon...&lt;/a&gt;  - excellent resource on Group Dynamics&lt;br&gt;and (found there): &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/16%20Crowds%20and%20Collectives.ppt" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/16%20Crowds%20and%20Collectives.ppt"&gt;http://facultystaff.richmon...&lt;/a&gt; - Crowds and Collectives&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/3%20Individual%20and%20the%20Group.ppt" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/3%20Individual%20and%20the%20Group.ppt"&gt;http://facultystaff.richmon...&lt;/a&gt;  - Individual and the Group.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamihania</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:04:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Great Instant Messenger Aggregators Across Multiple Platforms</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/28/instant-messenger-aggregators/#comment-6741275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me help you with Linux IM clients:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.anewmorning.com/2009/01/02/10-best-instant-messengers-for-linux/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.anewmorning.com/2009/01/02/10-best-instant-messengers-for-linux/"&gt;http://www.anewmorning.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;(one of the first results of Google search...)&lt;br&gt;Anyway, thank you for trying :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamihania</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:12:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My first minipost</title><link>http://polnor.net/minds/2008/12/my-first-minipost/#comment-4487319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, I know I can always count on you, AicaniLove :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamihania</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I&amp;#8217;d like to see: FriendFeed + Google Reader tighter integration</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/10/what-id-like-to-see-friendfeed-google-reader-tighter-integration/#comment-4306859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as I remember, you have such a possibility - or something close to it, in feedly (Firefox extension, kind of magazine-like Google Reader "manifestation"). But I agree with you, tighter integration of "pure" Google Reader with FriendFeed (and perhaps other services - Disqus, Intense Debate, Twitter...?) would be fantastic feature! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamihania</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>