<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sscornelius</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sscornelius/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sscornelius/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google launches Hangouts, a new unified, cross-platform messaging service for iOS, Android and Chrome</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/google/2013/05/15/google-launches-a-new-unified-cross-platform-messaging-service/#comment-898328284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will there be a desktop version to replace the Google Voice desktop app?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast Reporter Susanna Collins No Longer With Network</title><link>http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/05/03/comcast-reporter-susanna-collins-no-longer-with-network/#comment-883320955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it hypocritical that the network that loves to present us with shots of attractive women in the stands, close-ups of the Ice Crew and always has a "hottie" among the "Shoot the Puck" participants (ironically hosted by Susannah) is suddenly bothered by a slip of the tongue. I think CSN is more embarrassed by the Sports Nutz videos she hosted a few years ago when a simple Google search would have revealed them when they first interviewed her.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny that Kendall Gill was only suspended for his altercation with Tim Doyle and Susannah was actually let go. A double standard perhaps?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Petition drawn up for Obama to attend slain teen`s funeral - Chicago News and Weather | FOX 32 News</title><link>http://www.myfoxchicago.com/story/20882323/petition-drawn-up-for-obama-to-attend-slain-teens-funeral#comment-789356502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck. You would have a better chance of him coming back here for a political fund-raiser. City violence is the REAL problem, not assault rifles or magazine capacity. However, it's not a hot-button topic in Washington and Feinstein, et al would rather pursue their own agenda than come up with real solutions in our cities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Impressions From An iPad 2 Owner: Should You Wait? [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/11/first-impressions-from-an-ipad-2-owner-should-you-wait-pics/#comment-164774500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Impressions From An iPad 2 Owner: Should You Wait? [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/11/first-impressions-from-an-ipad-2-owner-should-you-wait-pics/#comment-164774415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:41:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Impressions From An iPad 2 Owner: Should You Wait? [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/11/first-impressions-from-an-ipad-2-owner-should-you-wait-pics/#comment-164584555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We don't own an iPad. I'm curious if it's worth buying the iPad 2 or take advantage of the $100 price reduction and buy the old one. It's for my son and he is into gaming so we'll probably eventually opt for the iPad 2. If it was for me, I would go the cheaper route.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Unveils &amp;#8220;Project Phoenix,&amp;#8221; Its New Webmail App</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/11/14/aol-project-phoenix/#comment-97148262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will this be integrated into AIM mail too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USS Admiral Hugh Rodman</title><link>http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/uss-admiral-hugh-rodman.html#comment-37755541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's probably a relation as I have a number of distant relatives in Kentucky. My third great grandfather was born in Christian County: &lt;a href="http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/short-biography-of-henry-p-cornelius.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/short-biography-of-henry-p-cornelius.html"&gt;http://corneliuspics.blogsp...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USS Admiral Hugh Rodman</title><link>http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/uss-admiral-hugh-rodman.html#comment-37627070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, my bad!  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USS Admiral Hugh Rodman</title><link>http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/uss-admiral-hugh-rodman.html#comment-37625532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link, Richard. It's great that you have these wonderful pictures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The website says your father served on the Rodman from September 1945 to January 1946. Our records indicate that my dad returned to the U.S. in April 1946 so our fathers would not have been on the ship at the same time. Too bad. That would have been interesting!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SC&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USS Admiral Hugh Rodman</title><link>http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/09/uss-admiral-hugh-rodman.html#comment-20079325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for writing, Bev. I appreciate your comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:27:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talk to Dead Celebrities With Twitter’s First Séance</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/12/tweance/#comment-19904414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Abraham Lincoln have a Twitter account?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: POLL: Tumblr Edges Out Posterous in Reader Vote</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/02/poll-tumblr-beats-posterous/#comment-18344359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both Tumblr and Posterous are superior blogging platforms. I have both and you cannot go wrong with either one. The fact that Posterous has been around for a shorter period of time than Tumblr is a reflection of Posterous' simplicity and ease of use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cornelius Family Farm</title><link>http://corneliuspics.blogspot.com/2009/08/cornelius-family-farm.html#comment-15702272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm glad you and Amanda got to see the original farm site last summer. You can see that it is nothing like how I remember it. I just hope the land stays in the family so I can always visit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus version 3: Introducing Disqus Comments and Disqus Profile</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/08/25/disqus-v3/#comment-15448287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At the risk of sounding completely illiterate, where is the control panel?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus version 3: Introducing Disqus Comments and Disqus Profile</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/08/25/disqus-v3/#comment-15387756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To use Version 3 of DISQUS on our blogs, is there anything we need to do with the existing code?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Banned from College Stadiums</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/sec-new-media-policy/#comment-14964973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It may eventually come down to YouTube removing video clips, but you can do a search on YouTube right now for the college of your choice and see clips from past games taken by fans in the stands plus clips taken from TV. I personally see no harm in posting personal video as long as I am not profiting from its distribution ... but that's just my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Banned from College Stadiums</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/sec-new-media-policy/#comment-14962101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is really a dumb move. I can't tell you how many times I've clicked on YouTube to watch video of an exciting play  taken from the stands of a college football game. It is infinitely more exciting to watch fan-produced video (even in its crudest form) than watch over-produced TV coverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotify: The Best On Demand Music Library I've Ever Experienced</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/08/spotify-best-on-demand-music-library.html#comment-14490407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification, Jer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotify: The Best On Demand Music Library I've Ever Experienced</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/08/spotify-best-on-demand-music-library.html#comment-14489209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to seeing it released everywhere. You wrote that the free version has advertising...is that advertising ON the site or audio ads played between songs?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:19:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft: We’re Just Going to Keep Running, Running, and Running (Scared of Apple)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/24/laptop-hunter-ad-update/#comment-13280279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the "Get a Mac" ads are more memorable, but having just gone through the laptop search myself, I can say that the Microsoft ads are more realistic. I settled on a $699 HP laptop, but nobody was there to hand me money.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Inauguration UFO Video</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/16190/obama-inauguration-ufo-video/#comment-5496886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad the aliens could make it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 24-minute news cycle (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/01/19/the24minuteNewsCycle.html#comment-5367720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought about the same thing as I was watching the Tweets come in when Flight 1549 splash landed in the Hudson River. In fact, as it was happening, I went to &lt;a href="http://monitter.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://monitter.com/"&gt;http://monitter.com/&lt;/a&gt; and typed in the word "Hudson." Monitter updates everything in real time and it was amazing the number of Tweets that were coming in -- most were retweets passing along links and others came in from witnesses. It was amazing how quickly it all came together...in some cases more quickly than conventional news outlets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Do You Ever Get Frustrated By Twitter?</title><link>http://www.bluecreativestudio.com/blog/?p=217#comment-5119029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish there were a way to thread replies. Often I receive a reply to an older Tweet that I have to research to know what they were replying to. For the same reason, I seldon reply to a Tweet that's older than 24 hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can I shove this fire hose down your throat?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/6895/can-i-shove-this-fire-hose-down-your-throat/#comment-4382953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I'm understanding you correctly, you want your followers to go directly to the original link, not to FriendFeed. You can do this by going to Account &amp;gt; Feed Publishing and check the box in front of: "Link to source site instead of FriendFeed conversation (does not apply to comments)." The link contained within your Tweet will go to the original shared content; NOT to FriendFeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Cornelius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>