http://disqus.com/by/southernshade/enWed, 06 Jun 2012 00:42:18 -0000http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/05/politics/wisconsin-recall-vote/index.html#comment-548475477<p>Good points, my friend. But remember, Liberals do not think logically. They are ruled by emotions and demagoguery. </p>Kevin SWed, 06 Jun 2012 00:42:18 -0000http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/05/politics/wisconsin-recall-vote/index.html#comment-548472975<p>Interesting that CNN was reporting minute-by-minute about the exit polls. Now that walker won, CNN is showing a recording of the Queen of England's grand day. I am quite sure if Walker lost, the CNN pundits would be discussing it non-stop. </p>Kevin SWed, 06 Jun 2012 00:37:58 -0000http://katefoy.com/?p=280#comment-726316<p>Wow, Kate, this is exciting stuff. I like the conversation you created around commenting and Seesmic. I hadn't heard of this new technology until I somehow followed a link to this blog. It will be interesting to see what best practices around video vs. text commenting...especially in the "learning 2.0" world. Right off the bat, it seems to me that certain types of comments lend themselves to a specific approach. something like instructional technical material might be better in text. I could see the actual technical terms, for example, instead of asking "What was that word she just said?" On the other hand, there is a much greater sense of community and connection that is possible. Seeing a real, live talking face is a lot warmer than reading faceless text. That's important to a geezer like me who works from home a lot!</p>Kevin SSun, 22 Jun 2008 16:25:04 -0000