<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for snafzg</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/snafzg/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/snafzg/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:48:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Engadget Giveaway: win an HTC One S, courtesy of Bell Canada</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/02/engadget-giveaway-win-an-htc-one-s-courtesy-of-bell-canada/#comment-545838610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently you have over 1795 Canadian readers! Count me in!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engadget Giveaway: win one of four Beats Audio bundles, courtesy of Daybreak!</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/engadget-giveaway-att-daybreak/#comment-543843668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since it's open to Canada, count me in! Just got an HTC One X and I'm sure these headphones would sound great with it! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:11:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vodafone UK, retailers push back Galaxy S III in Pebble Blue by weeks, trample on dreams</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/vodafone-uk-and-retailers-push-back-galaxy-s-iii-in-pebble-blue/#comment-540504370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bwahaha, you know it! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vodafone UK, retailers push back Galaxy S III in Pebble Blue by weeks, trample on dreams</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/vodafone-uk-and-retailers-push-back-galaxy-s-iii-in-pebble-blue/#comment-540491621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So annoyed... HTC One X Rogers (Canada) only comes in a 16GB version so I was going to wait for the SGS3. Then I hear it won't come out until June 21. Then I hear it will mostly likely only be available in wimpy white meaning an even bigger delay if I want a blue one. This is ridiculous. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:20:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S III battery tested by GSMArena, lasts as long as your tablet</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/mobile-comments/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/#comment-528733927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd rather not use a case as well, but until they come out with a drop-proof casing I'm not going to risk breaking such a pricy piece of gear. I mean, you use your phone every day, ten, twenty, one-hundred times per day... there's a very good chance an accident will happen, especially when all their cases are so glossy and slippery in your pocket/hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S III battery tested by GSMArena, lasts as long as your tablet</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/mobile-comments/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/#comment-528503517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really wanted to buy the HTC One X but Canada only has the 16GB version and given the fact that the S3 has quite a bit more battery life than the One X (and the battery is replaceable), it makes my decision even easier. Barring any surprises in the NA release, it looks like I'll be picking up an S3 in June. I can't imagine the Super AMOLED screen quality is that much worse... As for body style who doesn't protect their $700 investment with a case these days?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S III: Pentile Super AMOLED used 'because it lasts longer'</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/11/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-pentile-super-amoled-explained/#comment-526322518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey man, I found a phone I think you might like. &lt;a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d8/Nokia_1112.jpg/800px-Nokia_1112.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d8/Nokia_1112.jpg/800px-Nokia_1112.jpg"&gt;http://upload.wikimedia.org...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:58:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canada: Samsung Galaxy S III launch details unveiled</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2012/05/08/canada-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-launch-details-unveiled/#comment-524549277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They said so at the London launch. You can watch it here: &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-mobile-unpacked-2012-event-watch-online/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-mobile-unpacked-2012-event-watch-online/"&gt;http://www.engadget.com/201...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:13:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S III gets benchmarked, shows plenty of promise</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/gsiii-benchmarks/#comment-518987017</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Because the global One X uses a Tegra 3 chip (crap) while the global/local One S uses a Snapdragon S4 (mint). You'll notice the AT&amp;amp;T One X beats the global One S because it they're using the same chipset and the One X is just a  bit more powerful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 09:03:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy S III preview: hands-on with the next Android superphone (video)</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/02/dndnp-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-hands-on/#comment-517894371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest complaints about the HTC One X are: lack of a removable battery, nasty battery life in the quad-core model, and a missing micro-SD slot. Looks like the S3 has at least 2/3 of those issues fixed. Depending on battery drain tests, it could have 3/3 fixed.  That said, the display is worse, it's bigger (possibly an issue for some users), and  the construction quality is a bit lacking. The jury is out on photo/video quality, but the One X will be hard to beat there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung unpacks the Galaxy tomorrow, we'll be liveblogging the London event right here!</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/02/samsung-mobile-unpacked/#comment-517767921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Less than 2 hours and not a single update to the liveblog? What gives? ENTERTAIN ME! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amalur?  38 Studios, you just failed.</title><link>http://www.heartlessgamer.com/2010/07/amalur-38-studios-you-just-failed.html#comment-63387608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kind of assumed it was AnotherFantastyMMO(tm) all along. Didn't they accidentally leak an image of a centaur cardboard cutout a couple years back?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:52:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Illustrated Guide To The 5 Levels Of Inception</title><link>http://www.cinemablend.com/new/An-Illustrated-Guide-To-The-5-Levels-Of-Inception-19643.html#comment-63209578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't remember: Did Saito spin Cobb's totem in the introductory scene of the movie (when he was initially dragged in by bodyguards)? He said something about "remembering seeing it before." If he did spin it, did it stop?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be very odd if it did because it's only supposed to stop in reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13297271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess this is more an argument about semantics than values. Personally, I don't think booth babes or any women should be harassed or objectified. My argument simply stems from the language in the poster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look at the poster and see two separate lines and you seem to be combining them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Commit acts of lust&lt;br&gt;2) Take photos with us or any booth babe&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lust" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lust"&gt;http://dictionary.reference...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lust is defined as a desire (internal) not an action (external). I realize where you're coming from in that some morons may try and get away with more than the contest actually directs based on the muddy presentation of it all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yeah, I guess I'm giving people more credit than they may be worth. I just don't think we'll see any lawsuits coming out of this... Maybe I'm being optimistic but I'm sure any lewd images coming out of this contest will be 100% consensual.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13297052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If done without consent, I fully agree with you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But interestingly, at which point do we call humans complete idiots incapable of being responsible for their own actions. Sad innit?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13296952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can read into the contest instructions as much as you like. When I read into it (on the poster in your above image), it merely states, "Hey commit an act of lust! Take a pic with a booth babe!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To me, lust is an internal human process, not an external one. It's the thought, not the action. When they say, "commit acts of lust," I take it as, "think lustful things about booth babes." I think many, if not most guys at these shows were going to do that regardless of a contest's instruction...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to be quite honest, I think of this entire thing as hilarious because it's clearly marketing a video game based on sin. Lust is a sin. They're basically, telling you to commit a sin. Sounds like this will cause a ruckus with the religious folks too, not just the feminists. And because you're being overly defensive today, I don't say that in a mean way. :P&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they wanted to generate controversy and hype, they got it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13296735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL when did this become about sexual harassment and when did I say they were asking for it? Please don't put words in my mouth.  I merely stated that the women dressing up half nude are objectifying themselves. I'm going to give them some credit and say that they fully realize what they are doing and that it's their choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I fail to see how this contest objectifies them any more than they have been since the existence of gaming, automobile, and dozens of other types of conferences for decades..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And again you're assuming the worst. First, you assume they won't have foreknowledge of this contest.  Maybe they'll have to sign a consent form or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, how many people do you think are going to walk up and take "lustful" pics without asking the models first? That's a quick way to get tossed out and anyone with a tenth of a brain wouldn't even attempt it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How is it a bad thing if some guy or girl walks up to them and asks, "Hey, there's a contest going on asking us to take photos with booth babes. Are you comfortable with that?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13288698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's all jump to the worst possible conclusion... Lust does not necessarily manifest itself in any physical or verbal way. And is it sexual harassment to politely ask someone who is promoting a product for a quick photo with them?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are being paid to PROMOTE. They should be more than happy to snap off a couple pics and chat with people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13287301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1) No-one is forcing them to do it... You might as well blame them for objectifying themselves.&lt;br&gt;2) The silhouette in the add actually looks pretty healthy!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally... it's not just ANY game they're promoting with this contest. I hope the irony wasn't lost on you that they are promoting Dante's Inferno... I actually can't think of a better contest for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then again, maybe you're right on track since the first act of Dante's Divine Comedy (Inferno) describes the recognition and rejection of sin. You're definitely rejecting this contest! :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EA &amp;#8211; Disgusting as Usual?</title><link>http://www.cuppycake.org/?p=852#comment-13283353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't actually find the task part of the contest too bad (take pics with chicks - meh), but the wording of the reward seems sliiiiightly inappropriate even for this manly man. :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snafzg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:34:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>